Search

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); however, vision gains and anatomical improvements are not sustained over longer periods of treatment, suggesting other relevant targets may be needed to optimize treatments. Additionally, frequent intravitreal injections can prove a burden for patients and caregivers. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has been explored as an additional therapeutic target, due to the involvement of Ang-2 in DME and nAMD pathogenesis. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that targeting both VEGF and Ang-2 may improve clinical outcomes in DME and nAMD compared with targeting VEGF alone by enhancing vascular stability, resulting in reduced macular leakage, prevention of neovascularization, and diminished inflammation. Faricimab, a novel bispecific antibody that targets VEGF-A and Ang-2, has been evaluated in clinical trials for DME (YOSEMITE/RHINE) and nAMD (TENAYA/LUCERNE). These trials evaluated faricimab against the anti-VEGFA/B and anti-placental growth factor fusion protein aflibercept, both administered by intravitreal injection. In addition to faricimab efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics, durability was evaluated during the trials using a treat-and-extend regimen. At 1 year, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains versus aflibercept across YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. In YOSEMITE/RHINE, faricimab improved anatomic parameters versus aflibercept. Reduction of central subfield thickness (CST), and absence of both DME and intraretinal fluid were greater in faricimab- versus aflibercept-treated eyes. In TENAYA/LUCERNE, CST reductions were greater for faricimab than aflibercept at the end of the head-to-head phase (0-12 weeks), and were comparable with aflibercept at year 1, but with less frequent dosing. CST and vision gains were maintained during year 2 of both YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. These findings suggest that dual Ang-2/VEGF-A pathway inhibition may result in greater disease control versus anti-VEGF alone, potentially addressing the unmet needs and reducing treatment burden, and improving real-world outcomes and compliance in retinal vascular diseases. Long-term extension studies (RHONE-X, AVONELLE-X) are ongoing. Current evidence suggests that dual inhibition with faricimab heralds the beginning of multitargeted treatment strategies inhibiting multiple, independent components of retinal pathology, with faricimab providing opportunities to reduce treatment burden and improve outcomes compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval: This review article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Conflict of interest: Hansjürgen Agostini is a consultant (institutional) for Apellis, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, and Zeiss. Francis Abreu is an employee of Genentech, Inc. Caroline R. Baumal is a consultant for Alcon and employee of Apellis. Dolly S. Chang is an employee of Genentech, Inc. Karl G. Csaky is a consultant for AbbVie, Adverum, Annexon, Cognition Therapeutics, Endogena, EyeBio, Genentech, Inc., Gyroscope, Heidelberg Engineering, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Ocular Therapeutix, ReNeuron, Retrotope, and Ribomic; provides contracted research for Alexion, Annexon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Inc., Gyroscope, Iveric Bio, and NGM Bio; and is a speaker for Genentech, Inc. Anna M. Demetriades was an employee of Genentech, Inc. during development of this manuscript. Laurent Kodjikian is a consultant for AbbVie, Alimera, Bayer, Horus, Novartis, Roche, and Thea. Jennifer I. Lim is a consultant for Aura, Cognition, Eyenuk, Luxa, Opthea, Quark, Roche/Genentech, Inc., Santen, Unity, and Viridian; has received financial support from Aldeyra, Chengdu, Janssen, NGM Bio, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Inc., and Stealth; and is a grant recipient from Iveric Bio and Novartis. Philippe Margaron is an employee of F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd. Jordi M. Monés has received research funds from Apellis, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Iveric Bio, Janssen, Kodiak Sciences, Novartis, Reneuron, and Roche; is a consultant for Annexon, Apellis, Cellcure, Iveric Bio, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Maculogix, Novartis, PerceiveBio, Reneuron, and Roche; and has equity in EyeBio, Iveric Bio, Notal Vision, and Perceive. Tunde Peto is an advisor for Alimera, Astellas, Bayer, Heidelberg, Novartis, Optomed, OPTOS, Oxurion, and Roche. Federico Ricci is an advisor for AbbVie, Allergan, Apellis, Astellas, Bayer, Biogen, MSD, Novartis, Regeneron, and Roche. Matthias Rüth is an employee of F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd. Rishi P. Singh is a consultant for Alcon, AsclepiX, Bausch and Lomb, Genentech, Inc., Gyroscope, Novartis, and Regeneron, and has received research sponsorship from NGM Bio. Ivaylo Stoilov is an employee of Genentech, Inc. Balakumar Swaminathan was an employee of Genentech Inc. during development of this manuscript. Jeffrey R. Willis is an employee of Genentech, Inc. Peter D. Westenskow is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T suggests that the response to treatment among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) may vary depending on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We evaluated the efficacy of faricimab 6 mg versus aflibercept 2 mg over 2 years in patients with DME and baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse enrolled in faricimab phase III trials., Design: YOSEMITE and RHINE were identically designed, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled, noninferiority trials., Participants: Adults ≥18 years of age with center-involving macular edema secondary to type 1 or 2 diabetes., Methods: Patients were randomized to faricimab every 8 weeks (Q8W), faricimab personalized treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen, or aflibercept Q8W. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat population with baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse., Main Outcome Measures: Changes in ETDRS BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to years 1 and 2 were compared between treatment arms using mixed-model repeated measures analyses., Results: In YOSEMITE and RHINE, respectively, 220 and 217 patients in the faricimab Q8W arm, 220 and 219 patients in the faricimab T&E arm, and 219 and 214 patients in the aflibercept Q8W arm showed baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse. In both trials, mean change in ETDRS BCVA was comparable between treatments across trials at years 1 and 2. In YOSEMITE, adjusted mean change from baseline in CST (μm) at year 1 was greater with faricimab Q8W (-232.8; P < 0.0001) and faricimab T&E (-217.4; P = 0.0004) ) versus aflibercept Q8W (-190.4). In RHINE, this was faricimab Q8W (-214.2; P = 0.0006) and faricimab T&E (-206.6; P = 0.0116) versus aflibercept Q8W (-186.6). In both trials, change from baseline in CST at year 2 was greater with faricimab Q8W versus aflibercept. The median time to first CST of <325 μm and first absence of intraretinal fluid was shorter in the faricimab arms versus the aflibercept arm, with fewer injections on average., Conclusions: In patients with DME and baseline ETDRS BCVA of 20/50 or worse, faricimab treatment resulted in comparable visual acuity, greater reduction in retinal thickness, and fewer injections compared with aflibercept., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup., Study Design: YOSEMITE/RHINE (NCT03622580/NCT03622593) subgroup analysis: global, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-comparator-controlled, phase 3 faricimab trials., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to intravitreal faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) and per treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing, or aflibercept 2.0 mg Q8W. Outcomes were assessed through year 2 for the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup (N = 60) and the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE global cohort (N = 1891)., Results: In the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup, 21, 19, and 20 patients were randomized to faricimab Q8W, faricimab T&E, and aflibercept Q8W, respectively (632, 632, and 627 patients in the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort). Vision gains and anatomic improvements with faricimab at year 1 were maintained over 2 years and were generally consistent between groups. Mean best-corrected visual acuity changes from baseline at year 2 (weeks 92-100 average) for the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup were +12.5, +9.0, and +5.0 letters in the faricimab Q8W, faricimab T&E and aflibercept Q8W arms, respectively (+10.8, +10.4, and +10.3 letters in the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort). At week 96, 61.1% of the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup and 78.1% of the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort were on ≥ Q12W dosing. Faricimab was well-tolerated with a safety profile comparable with aflibercept., Conclusion: Faricimab up to Q16W offered durable vision gains and anatomic improvements up to 2 years in patients with DME in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup. Outcomes were generally consistent with the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the 24-week efficacy and safety of the dual angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor faricimab versus aflibercept in patients with vein occlusion., Design: Phase 3, global, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled trials: BALATON/COMINO (ClincalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04740905/NCT04740931; sites: 149/192)., Participants: Patients with treatment-naïve foveal center-involved macular edema resulting from branch (BALATON) or central or hemiretinal (COMINO) RVO., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks., Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point: change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. Efficacy analyses included patients in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received ≥ 1 doses of study drug., Results: Enrollment: BALATON, n = 553; COMINO, n = 729. The BCVA gains from the baseline to week 24 with faricimab were noninferior versus aflibercept in BALATON (adjusted mean change, +16.9 letters [95.03% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-18.1 letters] vs. +17.5 letters [95.03% CI, 16.3-18.6 letters]) and COMINO (+16.9 letters [95.03% CI, 15.4-18.3 letters] vs. +17.3 letters [95.03% CI, 15.9-18.8 letters]). Adjusted mean central subfield thickness reductions from the baseline were comparable for faricimab and aflibercept at week 24 in BALATON (-311.4 μm [95.03% CI, -316.4 to -306.4 μm] and -304.4 μm [95.03% CI, -309.3 to -299.4 μm]) and COMINO (-461.6 μm [95.03% CI, -471.4 to -451.9 μm] and -448.8 μm [95.03% CI, -458.6 to -439.0 μm]). A greater proportion of patients in the faricimab versus aflibercept arm achieved absence of fluorescein angiography-based macular leakage at week 24 in BALATON (33.6% vs. 21.0%; nominal P = 0.0023) and COMINO (44.4% vs. 30.0%; nominal P = 0.0002). Faricimab was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile comparable with aflibercept. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between patients receiving faricimab (16.3% [n = 45] and 23.0% [n = 84] in BALATON and COMINO, respectively) and aflibercept (20.4% [n = 56] and 27.7% [n = 100], respectively)., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of faricimab, a dual Ang-2/VEGF-A inhibitor, in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of a switch to faricimab in individuals affected by DME and previously treated with aflibercept., Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, DME patients previously treated with at least 3 injections of aflibercept then switched to faricimab were enrolled. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were recorded at baseline, at the time of the switch and at 6 months follow-up. At transition to faricimab, patients were categorized as "good visual responders" (≥ 5 letters from baseline) or "poor visual responders" (< 5 letters), and as "good anatomical responders" (any reduction in edema compared to baseline) or "poor anatomical responders" (no reduction or worsening of edema). Changes in BCVA and CST were recorded at 6 months after the switch to faricimab., Results: 100 eyes of 100 patients (61 female, 61%) were switched to faricimab after a mean of 6.8 ± 3.3 aflibercept injections. At the 6 months follow-up, only "poor visual responders" (N = 62) demonstrated a meaningful increase in BCVA (Δswitch-6M =  + 5 letters; P = 0.007), coupled with a reduction in CST (Δswitch-6M = - 67.9 µm; P = 0.004); participants with "poor anatomical response" upon transitioning exhibited a significant functional gain (Δswitch-6M =  + 4.5 letters; p = 0.05) but limited CST enhancements (Δswitch-6M = - 95.1 µm; p = 0.05)., Conclusions: Faricimab shows a positive impact on anatomical and functional metrics in DME cases refractory to aflibercept., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of dual angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A pathway inhibition with intravitreal faricimab according to a personalized treat-and-extend (T&E)-based regimen with up to every-16-week dosing in the YOSEMITE and RHINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03622580 and NCT03622593, respectively) phase 3 trials of diabetic macular edema (DME)., Design: Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority phase 3 trials., Participants: Adults with visual acuity loss (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 25-73 letters) due to center-involving DME., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6.0 mg T&E (previously referred to as personalized treatment interval), or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks. The T&E up to every-16-week dosing regimen was based on central subfield thickness (CST) and BCVA change., Main Outcome Measures: Included changes from baseline in BCVA and CST, number of injections, durability, absence of fluid, and safety through week 100., Results: In YOSEMITE and RHINE (n = 940 and 951, respectively), noninferior year 1 visual acuity gains were maintained through year 2; mean BCVA change from baseline at 2 years (weeks 92, 96, and 100 average) with faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE and RHINE, +10.7 letters and +10.9 letters, respectively) or T&E (+10.7 letters and +10.1 letters, respectively) were comparable with aflibercept every 8 weeks (+11.4 letters and +9.4 letters, respectively). The median number of study drug injections was lower with faricimab T&E (YOSEMITE and RHINE, 10 and 11 injections, respectively) versus faricimab every 8 weeks (15 injections) and aflibercept every 8 weeks (14 injections) across both trials during the entire study. In the faricimab T&E arms, durability was improved further during year 2, with > 60% of patients receiving every-16-week dosing and approximately 80% receiving every-12-week or longer dosing at week 96. Almost 80% of patients who achieved every-16-week dosing at week 52 maintained every-16-week dosing without an interval reduction through week 96. Mean CST reductions were greater (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92/96/100 average: faricimab every 8 weeks -216.0/-202.6 µm, faricimab T&E -204.5/-197.1 µm, aflibercept every 8 weeks -196.3/-185.6 µm), and more patients achieved absence of DME (CST < 325 μm; YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92-100: faricimab every 8 weeks 87%-92%/88%-93%, faricimab T&E 78%-86%/85%-88%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 77%-81%/80%-84%) and absence of intraretinal fluid (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92-100: faricimab every 8 weeks 59%-63%/56%-62%, faricimab T&E 43%-48%/45%-52%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 33%-38%/39%-45%) with faricimab every 8 weeks or T&E versus aflibercept every 8 weeks through year 2. Overall, faricimab was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of aflibercept., Conclusions: Clinically meaningful visual acuity gains from baseline, anatomic improvements, and extended durability with intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks were maintained through year 2. Faricimab given as a personalized T&E-based dosing regimen supports the role of dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A inhibition to promote vascular stability and to provide durable efficacy for patients with DME., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives : Faricimab is a vascular endothelial growth factor A and angiopoietin-2 bispecific antibody. It is a novel therapeutic approach distinct from previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of switching from aflibercept to faricimab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to aflibercept, with a specific focus on the resolution of macular edema. Materials and Methods : The medical records of 29 eyes of 21 patients with DME that were refractory to intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVAs) and who had completed the clinical follow-up of at least four intravitreal injections of faricimab (IVFs) were reviewed. The central retinal thickness (CRT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the mean period (weeks) until the next injection were measured after the second-to-last IVA, first-to-last IVA, last IVA, and first to fourth IVFs following the transition to IVF. Results : The mean time from the first IVF to the assessment of effectiveness was significantly shorter than the time to the last IVA; however, no significant difference was found in the time from the second, third, and fourth IVFs to the assessment. The mean CRTs after the first and second IVFs were not significantly different from the CRT after the last IVA, but the mean CRT after the third and fourth IVFs was significantly thinner than that after the last IVA ( p = 0.0025 and p = 0.0076, respectively). The mean BCVAs after the third and fourth IVFs significantly improved compared with that after the last IVA ( p = 0.0050 and p = 0.0052, respectively). Conclusions : When switching the treatment to IVF for eyes with IVA-resistant DME, better treatment outcomes are achieved if IVF is performed three or more times.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a degenerative disease of the macular area in diabetes mellitus and can lead to vision loss, disability, and significantly reduced quality of life. Faricimab is the only bispecific antibody for DME therapy that targets two pathogenic pathways (Ang-2 and VEGF-A)., Purpose: This study comparatively evaluates the clinical and economic feasibility of faricimab and other angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with DME., Material and Methods: This article analyzed literature on the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, and faricimab 6 mg. A model of medical care was developed for patients with DME receiving anti-angiogenic therapy. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed using cost minimization and budget impact analysis (BIA) methods. Modeling time horizon was 2 years. The research was performed from the perspective of the healthcare system of the Russian Federation., Results: The efficacy and safety of faricimab in a personalized regimen (up to one IVI in 16 weeks) are comparable to those of aflibercept and ranibizumab, administered in various regimens. The use of faricimab is associated with the lowest number of IVIs. Over 2 years, the maximum costs of drug therapy were associated with the use of ranibizumab (about 914 thousand rubles), while the minimum costs were associated with the use of faricimab (614 thousand rubles). The reduction in inpatient care costs with faricimab therapy was 36% compared to aflibercept (216 and 201 thousand rubles in inpatient and day hospitals, respectively) and 82% compared to ranibizumab (486 and 451 thousand rubles in inpatient and day hospitals, respectively). BIA demonstrated that the use of faricimab will reduce the economic burden on the healthcare system by 11.3 billion rubles (9.8%) over 2 years., Conclusion: The use of faricimab is a cost-effective approach to treatment of adult patients with DME in Russia.

Introduction: A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab, used in a Treat & Extend (T&E) regime with intervals up to every 16 weeks (Q16W), relative to other therapies currently in use for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). Of particular interest were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies applied in flexible dosing regimens such as Pro re nata (PRN) and T&E, which are the mainstay in clinical practice., Methods: An SLR identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 2021 was conducted, followed by a Bayesian NMA comparing faricimab T&E treatment to aflibercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, dexamethasone and laser therapy. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central subfield thickness (CST), injection frequency, ocular adverse events (AE) and all-cause discontinuation, all of which were evaluated at 12 months. Subgroup analyses including patients' naïve to anti-VEGF were conducted where feasible., Results: Twenty-six studies identified in the SLR were included in the NMA. Most importantly for decision making in clinical practise, faricimab T&E was associated with a statistically greater (95% credible intervals exclude zero) and clinically meaningful decrease in retinal thickness compared to all other flexible dosing regimens (greater retinal drying by 55-125 microns). Anatomical outcomes determine treatment efficacy and retreatment of patients. The NMA also showed a statistically greater increase in mean change in BCVA for faricimab T&E vs. flexible regimens using ranibizumab and bevacizumab (increase of 4.4-4.8 letters) as well as a numerical improvement vs. aflibercept PRN (two letters, 95% credible intervals including zero). Accordingly, the injection frequency was numerically lower versus other treatments using flexible dosing regimens (decrease by 0.92-1.43 injections). The analyses also indicated that the safety profile of faricimab T&E was comparable to those of ranibizumab and aflibercept, which have well-established safety profiles, with similar results for the number of all-cause discontinuations., Conclusion: Faricimab provides a new treatment option in DME with dual-pathway inhibition of VEGF and angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first indirect comparison of faricimab T&E in DME. The analyses indicate that faricimab T&E is associated with superior retinal drying along with numerically fewer injections compared to all other treatments given in flexible dosing regimens. It also showed superior visual acuity outcomes compared to ranibizumab and bevacizumab., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Degenerative eye conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion are major contributors to significant vision loss in developed nations. The primary therapeutic approach for managing complications linked to these diseases involves the intravitreal delivery of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments. Faricimab is a novel, humanised, bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds all VEGF-A isoforms and Angiopoietin-2, which has been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for the treatment of neovascular AMD and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Intravitreal faricimab holds the promise of reducing the treatment burden for patients with these conditions by achieving comparable or superior therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. The scope of faricimab's application includes addressing complex macular conditions such as DMO. This review intends to elucidate the distinctive pharmacological characteristics of faricimab and provide an overview of the key clinical trials and real-world studies that assess its effectiveness and safety in treating degenerative macular diseases., Competing Interests: Winfried M Amoaku has provided consultancy services to Alcon, Alimera, Allergan (AbbVie), Bayer, Novartis and Roche. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Panos et al.)

Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Recent decades have seen rapid progress in the management of diabetic eye disease, evolving from pituitary ablation to photocoagulation and intravitreal pharmacotherapy. The advent of effective intravitreal drugs inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) marked a new era in DR therapy. Sustained innovation has since produced several promising biologics targeting angiogenesis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration., Areas Covered: This review surveys traditional, contemporary, and emerging therapeutics for DR, with an emphasis on anti-VEGF therapies, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, angiopoietin-Tie2 pathway inhibitors, integrin pathway inhibitors, gene therapy 'biofactory' approaches, and novel systemic therapies. Some of these investigational therapies are being delivered intravitreally via sustained release technologies for extended durability. Other investigational agents are being delivered non-invasively via topical and systemic routes. These strategies hold promise for early and long-lasting treatment of DR., Expert Opinion: The evolving therapeutic landscape of DR is rapidly expanding our toolkit for the effective and durable treatment of blinding eye disease. However, further research is required to validate the efficacy of novel therapeutics and characterize real world outcomes.

Background and Objectives : Faricimab is the first intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and angiopoietin-2 bispecific monoclonal antibody. Here, we evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of faricimab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that was refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Materials and Methods : We performed a retrospective, observational, consecutive-case study of patients who had DME that was refractory to treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept and were treated with faricimab between July 2022 and January 2023 under a pro re nata regimen. All the participants were followed for ≥4 months after the initiation of faricimab. The primary outcome was a recurrence interval of ≥12 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Results : We analyzed 18 eyes of 18 patients. The mean recurrence interval of previous anti-VEGF injection was 5.8 ± 2.5 weeks, which was significantly extended to 10.8 ± 4.9 weeks ( p = 0.0005) by the switch to faricimab. Eight patients (44.4%) achieved a recurrence interval of ≥12 weeks. A history of subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide ( p = 0.0034) and the presence of disorganization of the retinal inner layers ( p = 0.0326) were found to be significantly associated with a recurrence interval of <12 weeks. The mean BCVAs were 0.23 ± 0.28 logMAR and 0.19 ± 0.23 logMAR, and the mean CMTs were 473.8 ± 222.0 µm and 381.3 ± 219.4 µm at baseline and 4 months, respectively, but these changes were not statistically significant. None of the patients experienced serious adverse events. Conclusions : Faricimab may extend the treatment interval for patients with DME that is refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept. DME previously treated with the subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide or associated with disorganization of the retinal inner layers may be less likely to be associated with a longer recurrence interval after switching to faricimab.

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in Japanese patients with diabetic macular edema (DME)., Study Design: Subgroup analysis of 2 global, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-comparator-controlled, phase 3 trials (YOSEMITE, NCT03622580; RHINE, NCT03622593)., Methods: Patients with DME were randomized 1:1:1 to intravitreal faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), faricimab 6.0 mg per personalized treatment interval (PTI), or aflibercept 2.0 mg Q8W through week 100. Primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at 1 year, averaged over weeks 48, 52, and 56. This is the first time 1-year outcomes between Japanese patients (only enrolled into YOSEMITE) and the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort (N = 1891) have been compared., Results: The YOSEMITE Japan subgroup included 60 patients randomized to faricimab Q8W (n = 21), faricimab PTI (n = 19), or aflibercept Q8W (n = 20). Consistent with global results, the adjusted mean (95.04% confidence interval) BCVA change at 1 year in the Japan subgroup was comparable with faricimab Q8W (+11.1 [7.6-14.6] letters), faricimab PTI (+8.1 [4.4-11.7] letters), and aflibercept Q8W (+6.9 [3.3-10.5] letters). At week 52, 13 (72%) patients in the faricimab PTI arm achieved ≥ Q12W dosing, including 7 (39%) patients receiving Q16W dosing. Anatomic improvements with faricimab were generally consistent between the Japan subgroup and pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort. Faricimab was well tolerated; no new or unexpected safety signals were identified., Conclusion: Consistent with global results, faricimab up to Q16W offered durable vision gains and improved anatomic and disease-specific outcomes among Japanese patients with DME., (© 2023. Japanese Ophthalmological Society.)

Background and Objectives : Faricimab is a novel bispecific antibody with Fab regions inhibiting both vascular endothelial growth factor-A and angiopoietin-2. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain short-term outcomes of intravitreal injection of faricimab (IVF) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in daily clinical practice. Materials and Methods : A retrospective review was carried out on consecutive patients with DME who had been treated with IVF and were followed up for at least 1 month. Outcome measures included changes in logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of IVF administrations, and safety. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the treatment-naïve and switch groups. Results : A total of 21 consecutive DME eyes from 19 patients were identified. The mean number of IVFs was 1.6 ± 0.8 during the mean follow-up time of 5.5 months. The overall mean logMAR BCVA following IVF was 0.236, 0.204, 0.190, and 0.224 at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, without a significant change from baseline to 1 month ( p = 0.176) or for 6 months ( p = 0.923). The overall mean CRT (μm) following IVF was 400.6, 346.6, 342.1, and 327.5 at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CRT significantly decreased from baseline to 1 month ( p = 0.001) but did not reach a significant level over 6 months following IVF ( p = 0.070). No significant difference in BCVA or CRT was observed between the treatment-naïve and switch groups. No serious safety concerns were noted. Conclusions : IVF for the treatment of DME may preserve visual acuity and improve macular thickness without serious safety concerns in the short term in a real-world clinical setting.

Development of new molecules for anti-angiogenic therapy pursues the following objectives: to increase the interval between injections, which can reduce the treatment burden; to improve the effectiveness of treatment by affecting various links of pathogenesis; to ensure a good safety profile. Faricimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G antibody that targets two key angiogenesis sites: vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). In the STAIRWAY clinical trial, faricimab was shown to produce similar results to monthly ranibizumab at longer intervals and fewer intravitreal injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, specifically in terms of visual preservation and reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT). In the BOULEVARD trial, which lasted 36 weeks, the severity of diabetic retinopathy according to DRSS improved in previously untreated patients with diabetic macular edema by two stages and more in 12.2% of the 0.3 mg ranibizumab group, in 27.7% of patients in the 1.5 mg faricimab group, and in 38.6% of patients in the group treated with 6.0 mg faricimab. In the TENAYA, as well as LUCERNE, YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, the increase in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline in the faricimab group was comparable to that in the aflibercept group. Real clinical practice showed an increase in BCVA from 59.5 to 60.6 letters ( p =0.035) due to a decrease in CRT from 334.3 to 303.3 µm ( p =0.001). The first published studies are now appearing, and their results correspond to the clinical trials, which indicates a stable effect of the drug and the prospects for use in a large cohort of patients.

The advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has revolutionized the treatment of retinal neovascular diseases including neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), a leading cause of irreversible blindness. Multiple agents and methods for drug delivery are emerging to increase the duration of treatment effect and treatment interval, reducing the overall treatment burden on patients and clinicians. The newest agent on the market is faricimab. This medication targets two distinct pathways in retinal angiogenesis, VEGF-A and Ang-2, to create a more durable effect. Phase 3 trials for this drug compared treatment intervals up to 16 weeks against aflibercept dosed at 8-week intervals for both nAMD and diabetic macular edema (DME). While the drug shows similar functional and anatomic outcomes with a low adverse effect profile and trial data demonstrating increased treatment duration, its exact place in the VEGF marketplace is yet to be determined. In this article, we discuss the mechanism of action, pivotal clinical trials leading to approval, and the anticipated role for faricimab in the treatment of retinal neovascular disease., Competing Interests: Dr Archana A Nair participated on an advisory board for Eyepoint, outside the submitted work. Dr Avni P Finn is a member of the advisory board for Genentech, Allergan, Eyepoint, and Alimera, outside the submitted work. Dr Paul Sternberg Jr reports personal fees from and a consultant for Novartis; personal fees from Outlook Therapeutics and DRCR network, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2022 Nair et al.)

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) agents are the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with vision loss. They are commonly administered using several treatment protocols, including fixed, pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens. Because of the lack of evidence defining an ideal treatment paradigm, we systematically compared T&E with fixed or PRN regimens. Visual acuity improvement was similar when comparing T&E to fixed or PRN dosing at 12 and 24 months. Regarding anatomic outcomes, no significant difference was found between T&E and fixed regimens for central retinal thickness or central subfoveal thickness at 12 and 24 months. Similarly, no significant difference was found for central retinal thickness at 12 months for T&E versus PRN regimen. Regarding total number of injections, no significant difference existed between T&E versus fixed regimens at 12 months. PRN regimens delivered fewer injections compared to T&E regimens at 12 months. The results of this analysis support that visual acuity and anatomic outcomes at 12 and 24 months are similar between T&E with either fixed or PRN regimens. More head-to-head trials comparing T&E versus fixed and PRN dosing are needed to provide visual and functional outcome data beyond year 2. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021249362., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are common retinal vascular diseases responsible for most blindness in the working-age and older population in developed countries. Currently, anti-VEGF agents that block VEGF family ligands, including ranibizumab, bevacizumab (off-label use), brolucizumab, and aflibercept, are the first-line treatment for nAMD and DME. However, due to the complex pathophysiological background of nAMD and DME, non-response, resistance during anti-VEGF therapy, and relapses of the disease are still observed. Moreover, frequent injections are a psychological and economic burden for patients, leading to inadequate adhesion to therapy and a higher risk of complications. Therefore, therapeutic methods are strongly needed to develop and improve, allowing for more satisfactory disease management and lower treatment burden. Currently, the Ang/Tie-2 pathway is a promising therapeutic target for retinal vascular diseases. Faricimab is the first bispecific monoclonal antibody for intravitreal use that can neutralize VEGF and Ang-2. Due to the prolonged activity, faricimab allows extending the interval between successive injections up to three or four months in nAMD and DME patients, which can be a significant benefit for patients and an alternative to implanted drug delivery systems.

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes of patients with "treatment‐resistant" neovascular age‐related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema who were switched to intravitreal faricimab injections (IFIs) using a "real‐world" treat‐and‐extend (TAE) protocol. Methods: Seventy‐one eyes from 62 patients receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor injections were evaluated before and after switching to IFI. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Primary endpoints were treatment interval extension and presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid on spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) after switching to IFI. Secondary endpoints included best‐corrected visual acuity, average OCT central subfield thickness, and presence of a pigment epithelium detachment and pigment epithelium detachment height. Results: The average treatment interval after switching to IFI significantly increased from 37.6 ± 10.8 days to 45.2 ± 16.6 days (p = 0.0016). At the last follow‐up, 35% of eyes were able to achieve a fluid‐free status post‐IFI. A chi‐square test of independence validated this finding by showing a significant difference in the OCT findings trending towards less or no fluid on follow‐up (X2 [3, N = 71] = 13.0705; p = 0.0003). The average central subfield thickness decreased from 327.2 ± 89.1 μm to 294.8 ± 86.5 μm (p = 0.0294). Best‐corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, pigment epithelium detachment presence, and height had no significant difference after switching to IFI. Conclusions: In "treatment‐resistant" patients receiving anti‐VEGF therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema, switching to IFI in a "real‐world" TAE protocol led to statistically significant improvements in treatment interval and retinal fluid on spectral domain OCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in many retinal diseases. The comparative efficacy and safety of newer bispecific anti-VEGF/angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) agents in the treatment paradigm versus widely used monospecific anti-VEGF agents remains unclear. Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials published from 2015 to Jul 2024. With assessment by three independent reviewers, original English peer-reviewed full-text articles evaluating faricimab versus monospecific anti-VEGF agent(s) in FDA-indicated retinal disease with data on at least one set of efficacy and/or safety outcomes for each treatment arm and a minimum 3-month follow-up period were included. Data were appraised using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools, PRISMA, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. All outcomes were collected at the last follow-up. Random effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals were conducted to calculate weighted mean differences and risk ratios. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters), change in central subfield thickness (CSFT, μm), and presence of retinal fluid were primary endpoints; ocular adverse events were secondary endpoints. Results: Across 13 studies, in the context of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO), 2,226 eyes received anti-VEGF monotherapy and 3,022 received faricimab. Final and change in BCVA were similar between treatment groups. Faricimab was associated with a significantly higher reduction in CSFT in DME and RVO eyes but not in nAMD eyes. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in BCVA between faricimab and anti-VEGF monotherapy in nAMD, DME, and RVO. While faricimab offered superior improvement in CSFT at the final follow-up for DME and RVO eyes, this effect was not seen in nAMD eyes. Future studies are needed to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of faricimab for retinal vascular disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzes the dynamics of short-term treatment response to the first intravitreal faricimab injection in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). This retrospective, single-center, clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich. Patients with treatment-naïve and pretreated DME were included. Patient chart data and imaging were analyzed. Safety and efficacy (corrected visual acuity (CVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and signs of intraocular inflammation (IOI)) of the first faricimab intravitreal therapy (IVT) were evaluated weekly until 4 weeks after injection. Forty-three eyes (81% pretreated) of 31 patients were included. Four weeks after the first faricimab IVT, CVA remained stable and median CST (µm) decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 325.0 (293.5–399.0) at baseline to 304.0 (286.5–358.0). CVA at week 4 was only associated with baseline CVA (p < 0.001). CST was the only predictive variable (p = 0.002) between baseline and week 4 CST. Weekly safety assessments did not show any sign of clinically significant IOI. This study suggests faricimab is an effective treatment for (pretreated) DME, showing structural benefit 1 month following the first injection without short-term safety signals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Faricimab, a novel pharmaceutical agent targeting both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A pathways, has gained approval for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema. While clinical trials have demonstrated its favorable safety profile, this research presents two cases of hypertensive uveitis following intravitreal Faricimab injections. Methods: Medical history, clinical findings and multimodal images were retrospectively collected. Results: The patients experienced elevated intraocular pressure, mutton-fat keratic precipitates, anterior and posterior segment inflammation shortly after faricimab administration. Conclusions: These cases prompt further investigation into the potential risk of uveitis associated with faricimab and underscore the importance of continued monitoring and research to elucidate its real-world safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intravitreal faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting both angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), was recently introduced for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema and cystoid macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of intravitreal faricimab in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Methods: Single-centre, prospective cohort study of 21 eyes from 19 treatment-naïve nAMD patients who were treated with intravitreal faricimab from October 2022 to April 2024. Patients underwent a loading dose (LD) of 4 monthly faricimab injections followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural parameters from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of eyes achieving a dry macula, maximal fluid-free interval and intended interval at last follow-up. Results: The study included 21 eyes of 19 patients (mean age 83.1 years). After LD, 93.3% of eyes achieved a dry macular SD-OCT scan within a median time of 8 weeks. At the first extension, 53% of eyes remained dry, while 47% showed fluid recurrence. Long-term analysis (n = 14) revealed significant reductions in macular volume (MV), central subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height over a median follow-up of 64.9 weeks, with sustained visual and anatomical improvements. Median BCVA, CST, and MV at the final follow-up were significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.01). The intended interval between injections was ≥ 12 weeks in 42.86% of eyes. No cases of intraocular inflammation were observed, although 10% experienced retinal pigment epithelial tears. Conclusions: Intravitreal faricimab demonstrated favourable efficacy, safety, and durability outcomes in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve nAMD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a prevalent exudative maculopathy, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first-line choice for treatment. Faricimab, a novel anti-VEGF and anti-angiopoietin-2 bispecific agent, has recently been approved for the treatment of DME. In this study, we systematically reviewed the real-world evidence of the efficacy of faricimab for the treatment of DME. Methods: We searched 11 databases for eligible studies. Study selection and data extraction were made independently by two authors in duplicate. Eligible studies were reviewed qualitatively. Results: We identified 10 eligible studies that summarized data from a total of 6054 eyes with a mean follow-up of between 55 days and 12 months. Five studies reported outcomes in a population of both treatment-naïve and previously treated eyes, and five studies reported outcomes exclusively in relation to eyes that were previously treated. Faricimab improved the best-corrected visual acuity and macular thickness. The extension of the treatment interval was possible in 61–81% of treatment-naïve eyes and 36–78% of previously treated eyes. Conclusions: Faricimab for DME yields clinical outcomes similar to those known from previous anti-VEGF treatments but with extended treatment intervals, thus lowering the burden of therapy for patients. Long-term real-world studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF who showed insufficient responses to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Data collected included baseline patient demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV). We analyzed functional and structural measures before and after IVF, compared baseline demographics and treatment factors between Faricimab-responders and reduced-responders and assessed influencing factors of the follow-up BCVA and CRT. Results: This study included 25 eyes from 16 patients. After switching to IVF, the mean BCVA showed no significant improvement, changing from 59.4 ± 13.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 61.4 ± 12.8 ETDRS letters at follow-up (p = 0.26). CRT significantly reduced from 414.4 ± 126.3 µm to 353.3 ± 131.1 µm (p < 0.011), and the 3 mm CRV significantly decreased from 2.8 ± 0.5 mm3 to 2.6 ± 0.6 mm3 (p < 0.012). Seven patients met the responder criteria, exhibiting an improvement of at least 5 ETDRS letters and a simultaneous CRT reduction of at least 30 µm. Further analysis showed that higher BCVA at baseline (p < 0.001) was associated with better BCVA following IVF, while higher baseline CRT (p < 0.003), a higher number of prior anti-VEGF agents (p < 0.034) and prior corticosteroid injections (p < 0.019) were associated with greater CRT at follow-up. Conclusions: Following the initial IVF injection series, we observed a clear improvement of anatomical measures. No functional improvement was observed, although visual acuity remained stable. Higher baseline BCVA was associated with better post-IVF BCVA, while higher baseline CRT, a greater number of prior anti-VEGF agents and prior corticosteroid injections were linked to higher CRT post-IVF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aims of this work were to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of a loading dose of intravitreal faricimab in eyes with active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) and to analyze the treatment outcome in relation to specific biomarkers. Methods: Patients with active n-AMD or DME, treated with four monthly intravitreal injections of faricimab, were enrolled in this retrospective, uncontrolled study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), presence of retinal fluid (RF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), and adverse events were assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Predefined biomarkers were evaluated at baseline (BL) and at last visit. Results: Sixteen eyes of 15 patients with n-AMD (n-AMD group) and 15 eyes of 12 patients with DME (DME group) were included. Mean (± standard deviation) logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BL BCVA changed from 0.68 (± 0.43) to 0.53 (± 0.36; P = 0.13) and from 0.51 (± 0.34) to 0.32 (± 0.24; P: 0.048) at week 16 in n-AMD and DME group, respectively. A statistically significant mean CST reduction was reported in both groups at last visit (n-AMD: − 166.5 μm; P = 0.0009/DME: − 110.8 μm; P = 0.0086). Seventy-five and 33% of eyes with n-AMD and DME respectively achieved complete RF resolution at last visit. Subfoveal inner and outer retinal damage correlated with a lower final BCVA in n-AMD group. The presence of large (> 100 μm) juxtafoveal microaneurysms (MAs) was significantly correlated with a higher chance of residual fluid in eyes with DME. Conclusions: Both n-AMD and DME groups achieved satisfactory anatomical results after a loading-dose of intravitreal faricimab. BCVA improvement might be hampered by pre-existing retinal damage in eyes with n-AMD. Large, juxtafoveal MAs might represent a hallmark of a slower anatomical response to the treatment in eyes with DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a summary of the original article ‟Cost‑Effectiveness of Faricimab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO): A UK Analysis". DMO, a serious eye condition that can lead to vision loss in people with diabetes, is a significant health concern and a lack of knowledge exists about the cost-effectiveness (the balance of a treatment's cost and its effectiveness) of new treatments. This research assessed the cost-effectiveness of a new medication named faricimab, using a mathematical model that simulated the progression of DMO and its treatment over 25 years. The model compared faricimab against relevant therapeutic alternatives for DMO in the UK, including ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab. The research discovered that faricimab could offer improved vision results and be cost saving or cost-effective. It also suggested that faricimab could lessen the strain on healthcare services due to its less frequent dosing schedule. Overall, such findings suggest that faricimab is a promising new treatment option for DMO that could benefit patients and the healthcare system. This could have implications for future treatment guidelines and the management of DMO in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess preliminary real-world outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal faricimab. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, observational consecutive-case real-world study of patients with nAMD or DME initiated on intravitreal faricimab between November 2022 and April 2023. Treatment-naïve patients and patients previously treated with alternate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents were initiated on an intended treatment plan of four monthly faricimab injections as a loading regime. Efficacy was assessed across four treatment groups. Primary outcomes assessed for both cohorts were changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Secondary outcomes were alterations in OCT-defined structural features. Results: From 127 patients, 146 eyes received at least one dose of faricimab. Mean BCVA, measured in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, from baseline to fifth visit increased from: 59.0± 12.8 to 62.2± 14.3 in treatment-naïve nAMD; 61.1± 17.6 to 63.5± 14.8 in previously-treated nAMD; 61.1± 13.0 to 72.8± 11.5 in treatment-naïve DME; and 60.8± 14.6 to 63.3± 15.6 in previously-treated DME. Mean CST reduced in all four treatment groups between initiation to final loading dose, from: 442.8± 172.0μm to 305.2± 117.0μm (p< 0.0001) in treatment-naïve nAMD; 355.2± 115.1μm to 297.9± 92.54μm (p< 0.0001) in previously-treated nAMD; 465.8± 109.1μm to 343.1± 100.3μm (p< 0.0001) in treatment-naïve DME; and 492.5± 133.1μm to 388.5± 131.4μm (p< 0.0001) in previously-treated DME. Conclusion: Real-world outcomes showed some improvement in BCVA and CST for nAMD and DME following faricimab administration, including in patients previously treated with other anti-VEGF agents. Further work involving larger cohorts over longer periods is required to determine whether improvement is maintained, and if intervals can be extended to match those observed in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study entailed a weekly analysis of real-world data (RWD) on the safety and efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: A retrospective, single-centre clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland, approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich, Switzerland. Patients with nAMD were included. Data from patient charts and imaging were analysed. The safety and efficacy of the first faricimab injection were evaluated weekly until 4 weeks after injection. Results: Sixty-three eyes with a complete 4-week follow-up were enrolled. Six eyes were treatment-naïve; fifty-seven eyes were switched to faricimab from another treatment. Neither group showed signs of retinal vasculitis during the 4 weeks after injection. Central subfield thickness (CST) and volume (CSV) showed a statistically significant decrease compared to the baseline in the switched group (CST: p = 0.00383; CSV: p = 0.00702) after 4 weeks. The corrected visual acuity returned to the baseline level in both groups. The macular neovascularization area decreased in both groups, but this was not statistically significant. A complete resolution of sub- and intraretinal fluid after 4 weeks was found in 40% (switched) and 75% (naïve) of the treated patients. Conclusions: The weekly follow-ups reflect the structure–function relationship beginning with a fast functional improvement within two weeks after injection followed by a return to near-baseline levels after week 3. The first faricimab injection in our cohort showed a high safety profile and a statistically significant reduction in macular oedema in switched nAMD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of vitreoretinal disorders (e.g., neovascular age-related macular degeneration [nAMD] and diabetic macular edema [DME]) have assumed the standard therapy of lifelong anti-VEGF injections with drugs like aflibercept, brolucizumab, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. However, the burden imposed on patients is a major deterrent for continual therapy and recovery. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody, blocking both VEGF-A and Ang-2 molecules, produces a comparable functional and anatomical results, with less injections, significantly reducing patient burden. Visual acuity, safety, adverse effects, and anatomical outcomes are discussed in the pivotal clinical trials (YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE), and early data from real-world studies (TRUCKEE, TAHOE, FARWIDE-DME, FARETINA and others). In YOSEMITE and RHINE, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, better anatomical outcomes compared to aflibercept every 8 weeks. Faricimab in the personalized treatment interval (PTI), after week 96, achieved 12-week interval in 78.1% of the patients and 16-week interval in 62.3%. TENAYA and LUCERNE reported comparable best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and better anatomic outcomes during head-to-head phase, parallel to aflibercept, at its 8-week treatment schedule. Faricimab in the PTI regimen, after week 96 achieved 12-week interval in 77.8% of the patients and 16-week interval in 63.1%. Safety of faricimab has been comparable to aflibercept in these pivotal trials. Real-world data supports the data from the pivotal studies regarding the efficacy and safety profile of faricimab in heterogenous real world patient population. Moreover, in previously treated patients, it also demonstrated a faster fluid resolution, good safety profile. Considering faricimab has demonstrated anatomic and durability benefit in the treatment of nAMD and DME, additional data from ongoing extension clinical trials, AVONELLE-X and RHONE-X will help understand longer term outcomes for patients treated with faricimab as well as patients switching from aflibercept to faricimab after finishing the pivotal trials. Longer term data from the real-world studies will also continue to contribute to our understanding of long-term efficacy, safety and durability in the real world patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This review aims to assess the efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab—a dual vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2 inhibitor—in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macula oedema (DMO). It summarises the findings of current studies on faricimab and discusses whether this new drug may fill a gap in current treatment options. Methods: We performed a search of the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE databases for publications on faricimab between 29 November 2022 and 10 May 2023, and a search of ClinicalTrials.gov for the protocols on clinical trials for this review. We included clinical trials, case–control studies and observational studies. Results: In phase 3 trials of nAMD, the efficacy of faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept (+ 5.8–6.6 vs. + 5.1–6.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters). At study end, 80% of faricimab-treated patients were on ≥ 12-week dosing intervals, and 44.9–45.7% of faricimab-treated patients were on 16-week dosing intervals. Total adverse events, as well as serious ocular adverse events, were comparable between groups. In phase 3 trials of DMO, efficacy of faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept (+ 10.7–11.8 vs. + 10.3–10.9 ETDRS letters). At study end, > 70% of patients in the personalised treatment interval faricimab group were on ≥ 12-week dosing intervals, and 51–53% were on 16-week dosing intervals. Total adverse events were comparable between groups, although the rate of serious ocular adverse events was higher in the faricimab groups than in the aflibercept groups (1.9–3.1% vs. 0.6–1.9%, respectively). In real-world studies of treatment-resistant nAMD or DMO, faricimab demonstrated superior efficacy compared to aflibercept. In a real-world study of mostly previously treated nAMD, faricimab demonstrated some efficacy. Conclusion: Faricimab demonstrated non-inferior to superior efficacy, strong durability and acceptable safety in treatment-naïve nAMD and mostly treatment-naïve DMO, as well as superior efficacy in treatment-resistant nAMD and DMO. However, further research is needed on faricimab in real-world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Faricimab, a recently approved bispecific antibody targeting both anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME), showed non-inferiority when compared with aflibercept in its phase III trials. Subsequent real-world investigations reveal that faricimab is predominantly administered in previously treated eyes, leading to sustained improvements in best-corrected visual acuity after treatment commences for DME and nAMD. Notably, a majority of patients with nAMD can extend their treatment intervals to every 4 months. In real-world practice, retina specialists have found faricimab to be an important therapeutic option due to its efficacy and convenience of extended treatment intervals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Dual inhibition of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A with faricimab (Vabysmo) offers excellent visual acuity gains with strong durability in patients with diabetic macular edema (ME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The phase III BALATON/COMINO (NCT04740905/NCT04740931) trials will investigate the efficacy, safety, and durability of faricimab in patients with ME due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Two identically designed global, randomized, double-masked, active comparator–controlled studies. Participants: Anti-VEGF treatment-naive patients with branch, central, or hemiretinal RVO. Methods: Patients were randomized to 6 monthly injections of faricimab 6.0 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg. From weeks 24 to 72, all patients received faricimab 6.0 mg administered in up to 16-week intervals using an automated treatment algorithm to generate a treat-and-extend–based personalized treatment interval dosing regimen. Personalized treatment interval adjustments were based on changes in central subfield thickness (CST) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was noninferiority of faricimab versus aflibercept in mean change from baseline in BCVA (week 24; noninferiority margin: 4 letters). Secondary end points (weeks 0–24) were mean change from baseline in BCVA, CST, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 composite score; proportion of patients gaining or avoiding loss of ≥ 15/≥ 10/≥ 5/> 0 letters. Secondary end points (weeks 24–72) were treatment durability (week 68); continuation of weeks 0 to 24 end points. Ocular/nonocular adverse events will be assessed. Results: In total, 1282 patients across 22 countries were enrolled (BALATON, 553 patients, 149 centers; COMINO, 729 patients, 193 centers). Conclusions: Using a novel automated interval algorithm, BALATON/COMINO will evaluate the efficacy and safety of faricimab for ME secondary to RVO and provide key insights into how to personalize treatment. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Purpose: To assess the 12 month outcomes of intravitreal faricimab (IVF) in treatment-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) recalcitrant to intravitreal aflibercept (IVA).Methods: This study was undertaken as a retrospective interventional case series of DME subjects receiving care at a single private practice facility. Subjects at baseline had undergone ≥ 8 IVA injections over the previous 12 months, ≥ 4 IVA injections over the previous 6 months, had an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured central macular thickness (CMT) of ≥ 320 microns, and had observable edema on OCT. The baseline visit for this study's purpose was considered the examination in which the subject was changed from IVA to IVF. Subjects were managed with a treat-and-extend (TAE) protocol and followed over 12 months from baseline.Results: A total of 51 eyes of 51 subjects were analyzed. There were 39.2% (20/51) of patients who reached a treatment interval of ≥ 8 weeks and had a fluid-free macula on OCT at 12 months. The CMT on OCT of the patient population reduced from 400.2 (385.3– 415.3) microns at baseline to 340.6 (324.3– 356.9) microns at 12 months (p< 0.01). There were 21.6% (11/51) of patients who improved ≥ 3 lines of Snellen visual acuity at 12 months. The visual acuity of the overall study population improved from 0.60 (0.54– 0.66) logMAR (Snellen 20/80) at baseline to 0.47 (0.41– 0.53) logMAR (Snellen 20/59) at 12 months (p< 0.01).Conclusion: A longer treatment interval and improved functional and anatomical outcomes at 12 months may be attained in a clinically significant minority of aflibercept-resistant DME patients after changing to IVF when a TAE protocol is employed. Specialists may consider IVF whenever resistance to IVA is experienced in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nowadays; intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs are considered the first-line therapeutic strategy for treating macular exudative diseases; including wet age-related macular degeneration (w-AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Despite the important clinical achievements obtained by anti-VEGF drugs in the management of w-AMD and DME; some limits still remain; including high treatment burden; the presence of unsatisfactory results in a certain percentage of patients and long-term visual acuity decline due to complications such as macular atrophy and fibrosis. Targeting the angiopoietin/Tie (Ang/Tie) pathway beyond the VEGF pathway may be a possible therapeutic strategy; which may has the potential to solve some of the previous mentioned challenges. Faricimab is a new; bispecific antibody targeting both VEGF-A and the Ang-Tie/pathway. It was approved by FDA and; more recently; by EMA for treating w-AMD and DME. Results from phase III trials TENAYA and LUCERNE (w-AMD) and RHINE and YOSEMITE (DME) have shown the potential of faricimab to maintain clinical efficacy with more prolonged treatment regimens compared to aflibercept (12 or 16 weeks) with a a good safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]