Search

Aims: Clinical outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME) have been widely described, but data on diabetic retinopathy perceptions by diabetes patients are limited. The aim of this survey was to explore the lived experience, knowledge, fears and expectations about disease, and treatment in patients with diabetes and macular edema treated with intravitreal injections (IVTI) and to characterize patient profiles., Methods: Cross-sectional survey including a preliminary qualitative phase (20 patients with DME, treated or treatment-naive, 5 female and 15 male, age 36-74 years) followed by a quantitative survey (116 patients treated with IVTI for DME). Data ASKIA Analyze (version 5.3.3.5) was used for descriptive statistics, and R software (version 3.4.1) for multiple correspondence analysis., Results: The qualitative phase identified the wording used by patients and information helpful to propose modalities of response in the quantitative phase. In the quantitative survey (116 patients, mean age 66.6 years), most patients were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Overall, 71.9% reported that the disease negatively affected their daily activities and 33.1% considered that regular visits to the ophthalmologist were disrupting their life. Treatment expectations differed significantly between patients in terms of disease experience (visit and injection schedules), fears and feelings, and relationship with physicians, allowing three patient profiles to be identified: "Worried" patients (n = 45) felt isolated and were worried about the need for repeated treatment and possible side effects. They were mainly active men aged < 60 with type I diabetes (T1D) and DME diagnosed for > 2 years; "Curious" patients (n = 21) experienced insufficient support and requested more information on their disease and existing treatments. They were mainly single women aged 60-69 years; "Passive" patients (n = 50) felt sufficiently informed by their ophthalmologist and were not concerned by DME. They were older (mean age: 70 years) and mainly type 2 diabetic men., Conclusions: Patients with diabetes and macular edema treated with IVTI form a heterogeneous group regarding fears and expectations. Different patient profiles were identified and need to be confirmed in larger studies. A better understanding of psychological profiles may optimize compliance of diabetic patients.

Monozygotic twins with glutathione synthetase deficiency, progressive retinal dystrophy and cystoid macular edema were followed for foveal changes on optical coherence tomography under different treatment modalities. The purpose of the study is to show the effect of topical dorzolamide in conjunction with systemic acetazolamide in terms of decreasing macular edema in this specific disease. The results showed that systemic acetazolamide alone or in combination with topical dorzolamide decreased CME in both patients for a certain period of time. The result can be temporary sustained after treatment discontinuation. In conclusion, topical dorzolamide, in conjunction with systemic acetazolamide, could reduce cystoid macular edema in GSSD., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To assess the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implants for treating post-surgical macular oedema, including Irvine-Gass syndrome refractory to first-line treatments., Methods: Descriptive, observational, retrospective, consecutive, uncontrolled, multicentre, national case series. 50 patients were included in the study between March 2011 and June 2013 with a minimum 6 months follow-up. At baseline, each patient received a dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg (Ozurdex). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield macular thickness (CSMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured at baseline and then monthly. The main outcome measure was the mean change in BCVA (in ETDRS letters (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study): L) RESULTS: Baseline mean±SD BCVA was 55.7±15.4 L. At month 2, BCVA was 71.8±10.5 L and 61.2% of patients had an increase of more than 15 letters. Baseline mean CSMT was 544±117.2 μm and this decreased to 302 μm at month 2. Anatomic and functional recurrences were both first detected from month 3 and continued throughout follow-up, with values consistently above baseline. The peak in IOP was reached in month 1 with mean IOP of 15.3±4.6 mm Hg. Of the 39/50 patients followed up for 12 months, 49% received a second injection. The anatomic and functional response and safety patterns were similar to that obtained with the first intravitreal injection, demonstrating Ozurdex's reproducibility. However, more than half of the patients followed-up for at least 1 year presented neither functional nor anatomical recurrence., Conclusions: Ozurdex would appear to be an interesting alternative therapy for treating post-surgical macular oedema, including Irvine-Gass syndrome refractory to first-line treatments., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Purpose: This study aimed to demonstrate that vitrectomy may prevent the occurrence of diabetic macular oedema (DMO)., Methods: Three patients with diabetes type 1 underwent vitrectomy in one eye to treat complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy., Results: During follow-up, all patients suffered unilateral macular oedema in the non-vitrectomized eye as a result of general metabolic changes. In two of these patients, the DMO resolved with management of the underlying medical condition., Conclusions: These case reports suggest the vitreous may play a role in the occurrence of DMO associated with general risk factors. Further studies are needed to increase understanding of the mechanisms involved in the development and progression of DMO.

Macular edema was first described more than a century ago, and its medical treatment has made great progress thanks to recent pharmacological advances. Administration is topical, local (peri- or intraocular), or systemic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and corticosteroids are the mainstay therapy when inflammation is involved, as well as acetazolamide in many cases. More recently, molecules such as protein kinase-C- beta inhibitors and anti-VEGF agents are already or will soon be available, to add to our therapeutic armamentarium. Perhaps combination therapy will become popular, as is the case with age-related macular degeneration.

Purpose: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide for refractory diffuse diabetic macular edema., Methods: Seventeen patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema unresponsive to laser photocoagulation. In all patients, one eye was injected, and the other served as a control. The intervention consisted in intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The main outcome measure was central macular thickness (CMT) at 4, 12 and 24 weeks, measured by Optical Coherence Tomography. Secondary outcomes were Early Treatment Diabetic Rentinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores, intraocular pressure and cataract PROGRESSION., Results: Before injection, mean +/- SD CMT was 566.4 +/- 182.4 mum in injected eyes. Four, 12, and 24 weeks after injection, it was 228.4 +/- 47.5 mum, 210.9 +/- 87.2 mum and 358.5 +/- 160.5 mum respectively. CMT was significantly lower in injected eyes vs. control eyes except 24 weeks after injection because of a recurrence of macular edema in 9/17 injected eyes. Mean +/- SD gain in ETDRS score was significantly better in injected eyes vs. control eyes 4, 12 and 24 weeks after TA injection. In 9 of the 17 injected eyes, intraocular pressure exceeded 24 mmHg and was controlled by topical medication., Conclusion: In the short-term, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone effectively reduces macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema and improves visual acuity in most cases. The long-term effect of this treatment and predictive factors of visual recovery remain to be elucidated.