Search

Background: Previous studies have largely neglected the role of sulfur metabolism in LUAD, and no study has combine iron, copper, and sulfur-metabolism associated genes together to create prognostic signatures., Methods: This study encompasses 1564 LUAD patients, 1249 NSCLC patients, and over 10,000 patients with various cancer types from diverse cohorts. We employed the R package ConsensusClusterPlus to separate patients into different ICSM (Iron, Copper, and Sulfur-Metabolism) subtypes. Various machine-learning methods were utilized to develop the ICSMI. Enrichment analyses were conducted using ClusterProfiler and GSVA, while IOBR quantified immune cell infiltration. GISTIC2.0 and maftools were utilized for CNV and SNV data analysis. The Oncopredict package predicted drug information based on GDSC1. TIDE algorithm and cohorts GSE91061 and IMvigor210 evaluated patient response to immunotherapy. Single-cell data was processed using the Seurat package, AUCell package calculated cells geneset activity scores, and the Scissor algorithm identified ICSMI-associated cells. In vitro experiments was conducted to explore the role of ICSMRGs in LUAD., Results: Unsupervised clustering identified two distinct ICSM subtypes of LUAD, each with unique clinical characteristics. The ICSMI, comprising 10 genes, was constructed using integrated machine-learning methods. Its prognostic power was validated in 10 independent datasets, revealing that LUAD patients with higher ICSMI levels had poorer prognoses. Furthermore, ICSMI demonstrated superior predictive abilities compared to 102 previously published signatures. A nomogram incorporating ICSMI and clinical features exhibited high predictive performance. ICSMI positively correlated with patients gene mutations, and integrated analysis of bulk and single-cell transcriptome data revealed its association with TME modulators. Cells representing the high-ICSMI phenotype exhibited more malignant features. LUAD patients with high ICSMI levels exhibited sensitivity to chemotherapy and targeted therapy but displayed resistance to immunotherapy. In a comprehensive analysis across various cancers, ICSMI retained significant prognostic value and emerged as a risk factor for the majority of cancer patients., Conclusions: ICSMI provides critical prognostic insights for LUAD patients, offering valuable insights into the tumor microenvironment and predicting treatment responsiveness., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Innate immune effectors, dendritic cells (DCs), influence cancer prognosis and immunotherapy significantly. As such, dendritic cells are important in killing tumors and influencing tumor microenvironment, whereas their roles in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are largely unknown., Methods: In this study, 1658 LUAD patients from different cohorts were included. In addition, 724 cancer patients who received immunotherapy were also included. To identify DC marker genes in LUAD, we used single-cell RNAsequencing data for analysis and determined 83 genes as DC marker genes. Following that, integrative machine learning procedure was developed to construct a signature for DC marker genes., Results: Using TCGA bulk-RNA sequencing data as the training set, we developed a signature consisting of seven genes and classified patients by their risk status. Another six independent cohorts demonstrated the signature' s prognostic power, and multivariate analysis demonstrated it was an independent prognostic factor. LUAD patients in the high-risk group displayed more advanced features, discriminatory immune-cell infiltrations and immunosuppressive states. Cell-cell communication analysis indicates that tumor cells with lower risk scores communicate more actively with the tumor microenvironment. Eight independent immunotherapy cohorts revealed that patients with low-risk had better immunotherapy responses. Drug sensitivity analysis indicated that targeted therapy agents exhibited greater sensitivity to low-risk patients, while chemotherapy agents displayed greater sensitivity to high-risk patients. In vitro experiments confirmed that CTSH is a novel protective factor for LUAD., Conclusions: An unique signature based on DC marker genes that is highly predictive of LUAD patients' prognosis and response to immunotherapy. CTSH is a new biomarker for LUAD., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) represents a significant global health burden, necessitating advanced prognostic tools for improved patient management. RNA modifications (m6A, m1A, m5C, m7G), and disulfidptosis, a novel cell death mechanism, have emerged as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer. Methods: We systematically compiled disulfidptosis-correlated genes and RNA modification-related genes from existing literature. A novel disulfidptosis-correlated m6A/m1A/m5C/m7G riskscore was computed using integrated machine-learning algorithms. Transcriptomic data from TCGA and GEO databases were downloaded analyzed. Single-cell RNA-sequencing data from the TISCH database was processed using the Seurat package. Genes' protein–protein interaction network was constructed using the String database. Functional phenotype analysis was performed using GSVA, ClusterProfiler, and IOBR packages. Consensus clustering divided patients into two distinct groups. Drug sensitivity predictions were obtained from the GDSC1 database and predicted using the Oncopredict package. Results: The disulfidptosis-correlated m6A/m1A/m5C/m7G risk score effectively stratified LUAD patients into prognostically distinct groups, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy compared to conventional clinical parameters. Patients in different risk groups exhibited significant molecular and clinical differences. Subsequent analyses identified two molecular subtypes associated with RNA modification and disulfidptosis, revealing differences in immune infiltration and prognosis. Functional enrichment analyses highlighted pathways involving RNA modification and disulfidptosis, underscoring their roles in LUAD pathogenesis. Single-cell analysis revealed distinct features between high- and low-risk status cells. Conclusion: This study introduces a novel disulfidptosis-correlated m6A/m1A/m5C/m7G risk score as a robust prognostic tool for LUAD, integrating insights from RNA modifications and cell death mechanisms. The risk score enhances prognostic stratification and identifies potential targets for personalized therapeutic strategies in LUAD. This comprehensive approach emphasizes the critical roles of RNA modifications and disulfidptosis in LUAD biology, paving the way for future research and clinical applications aimed at improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have largely neglected the role of ADCC in LUAD, and no study has systematically compiled ADCC-associated genes to create prognostic signatures. Methods: In this study, 1564 LUAD patients, 2057 NSCLC patients, and more than 5000 patients with various cancer types from diverse cohorts were included. R package ConsensusClusterPlus was utilized to classify patients into different subtypes. A number of machine-learning algorithms were used to construct the ADCCRS. GSVA and ClusterProfiler were used for enrichment analyses, and IOBR was used to quantify immune cell infiltration level. GISTIC2.0 and maftools were used to analyze the CNV and SNV data. The Oncopredict package was used to predict drug information based on the GDSC1. Three immunotherapy cohorts were used to evaluate patient response to immunotherapy. The Seurat package was used to process single-cell data, the AUCell package was used to calculate cells' geneset activity scores, and the Scissor algorithm was used to identify ADCCRS-associated cells. Results: Through unsupervised clustering, two distinct subtypes of LUAD were identified, each exhibiting distinct clinical characteristics. The ADCCRS, consisted of 16 genes, was constructed by integrated machine-learning methods. The prognostic power of ADCCRS was validated in 28 independent datasets. Further, ADCCRS shows better predictive abilities than 102 previously published signatures in predicting LUAD patients' survival. A nomogram incorporating ADCCRS and clinical features was constructed, demonstrating high predictive performance. ADCCRS positively correlates with patients' gene mutation, and integrated analysis of bulk and single-cell transcriptome data revealed the association of ADCCRS with TME modulators. Cells representing high-ADCCRS phenotype exhibited more malignant features. LUAD patients with high ADCCRS levels exhibited sensitivity to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, while displaying resistance to immunotherapy. In pan-cancer analysis, ADCCRS still exhibited significant prognostic value and was found to be a risk factor for most cancer patients. Conclusions: ADCCRS offers a critical prognostic insight for patients with LUAD, shedding light on the tumor microenvironment and forecasting treatment responsiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]