Search

Importance: Radiation therapy to doses of 24 to 36 Gy is currently used to treat indolent B-cell lymphoma of the ocular adnexa; however, ocular adverse effects are common., Objective: To determine if a response-adapted radiation therapy strategy will result in excellent disease outcomes while reducing orbital morbidity., Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-institution, phase 2 prospective nonrandomized controlled trial of a response-adapted strategy involved 50 evaluable patients with stage I to IV indolent B-cell lymphoma of the ocular adnexa enrolled between July 2015 and January 2021. This treatment approach was also retrospectively evaluated with a separate 55-patient cohort treated between March 2013 and October 2021. All data were analyzed between November 2021 and December 2023., Interventions: Patients were treated with ultralow-dose radiation therapy to 4 Gy in 2 fractions and assessed for response at 3-month intervals. Patients with persistent orbital lymphoma were offered an additional 20 Gy in 10 fractions to complete the response-adapted treatment., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was 2-year local orbital control within the irradiated field after response-adapted therapy. Secondary end points included overall survival and complete response rate., Results: The 50 prospective patients were a median (range) of 63 (29-88) years old, and 31 (62%) were female. Among the 50 patients, 32 (64%) had mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, 12 (24%) had follicular lymphoma, and 6 (12%) had unclassifiable low-grade B-cell lymphoma. Thirty-one patients (62%) had stage I disease, and 36 (72%) were newly diagnosed. At a median follow-up of 37.4 (95% CI, 33.7-52.5) months, the 2-year local control rate was 89.4% (95% CI, 81.0%-98.7%), and the 2-year overall survival rate was 98.0% (95% CI, 94.1%-100%); 45 patients (90.0%; 95% CI, 78.2%-96.7%) experienced a complete response to response-adapted radiation, including 44 patients with a complete response to ultralow-dose radiation and 1 patient with a complete response after an additional 20 Gy. No local recurrences were observed among patients with a complete response to response-adapted therapy. No grade 3 or higher toxic effects were observed. In a planned subset analysis of 22 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated stage I mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, the 2-year local control rate was 90.7% (95% CI, 79.2%-100%), and the 2-year freedom from distant relapse rate was 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%)., Conclusion and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, response-adapted ultralow-dose therapy for indolent orbital B-cell lymphoma resulted in reduced radiation exposure, negligible toxic effects, and excellent disease outcomes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494700.

Complications occurring after lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) may delay chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion. The effect of these delays on clinical outcomes is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of 240 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and identified 40 patients (16.7%) who had delay in axi-cel infusion. Of these, 85% had delay due to infection. At time of LDC initiation, patients with delayed infusion had lower absolute neutrophil count (P=0.006), lower platelets (P=0.004), lower hemoglobin (P<0.001) and higher C-reactive protein (P=0.001) than those with on-time infusion. Patients with delayed infusion had lower day 30 overall response rates (59.0% vs. 79.4%; P=0.008) and shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) (3.5 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.002) and overall survival (7.8 vs. 26.4 months; P=0.046) than those with on-time infusion. The association with PFS was maintained on multivariate analysis. There was also an association between extent of delay and survival, with shorter median PFS in patients who had delays of 2-5 days (1.8 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.001) and >5 days (4.6 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.036), but not 1 day (5.7 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.238). Following propensity score matching, patients with delayed infusion continued to have shorter median PFS (3.5 vs. 6.0 months; P=0.015). Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines on day of infusion were significantly higher in patients with delayed infusion. Together, these findings suggest that delays in CAR T-cell administration after initiation of LDC are associated with inferior outcomes. Further studies are needed to guide strategies to improve efficacy in such patients.

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy is highly effective in relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (rrLBCL) but is associated with toxicities that delay recovery. While the biological mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have been investigated, the pathophysiology is poorly understood for prolonged cytopenia, defined as grade ≥3 cytopenia lasting beyond 30 days after CAR T infusion. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing of bone marrow samples from healthy donors and rrLBCL patients with or without prolonged cytopenia and identified significantly increased frequencies of clonally expanded CX3CR1 hi cytotoxic T cells, expressing high interferon (IFN)-γ and cytokine signaling gene sets, associated with prolonged cytopenia. In line with this, we found that hematopoietic stem cells from these patients expressed IFN-γ response signatures. IFN-γ deregulates hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation and can be targeted with thrombopoietin agonists or IFN-γ-neutralizing antibodies, highlighting a potential mechanism-based approach for the treatment of CAR T-associated prolonged cytopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.R.G. reports research funding from Sanofi, Kite/Gilead, Abbvie, and Allogene; consulting for Abbvie; honoraria/consulting fees from Tessa Therapeutics, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, and Abbvie; and stock ownership of KDAc Therapeutics. S.S.N. received research support from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Cellectis, Poseida, Allogene, Unum Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Adicet Bio; served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Merck, Novartis, Sellas Life Sciences, Athenex, Allogene, Incyte, Adicet Bio, BMS, Legend Biotech, Bluebird Bio, Fosun Kite, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, Morphosys, Janssen, Chimagen, ImmunoACT, and Orna Therapeutics; has received royalty income from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; has stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy, Inc; and has intellectual property related to cell therapy. P.S. received research support from Sobi, AstraZeneca/Acerta, ALX Oncology, and ADC Therapeutics; and served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Roche/Genentech, Incyte/Morphosys, ADC Therapeutics, TG Therapeutics, Hutchinson/MediPharma, and AstraZeneca/Acerta. R.N. reports speakership for Incyte. J.R.W. reports consulting for Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, Kymera, Merck, MonteRosa, SeaGen, and Abbvie; and research funding from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, and Kymera. S.A. reports research funding from Seattle Genetics, Merck, Xencor, Chimagen, and Tessa Therapeutics; advisory board membership or consulting for Tessa Therapeutic’s, Chimagen, ADC Therapeutics, and KITE/Gilead; and data safety monitoring board membership for Myeloid Therapeutics. L.J.N. reports honoraria for participation on advisory boards from ADC Therapeutics, Atara, BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Epizyme, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Morphosys, Novartis, and Takeda; research support from BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Epizyme, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, IGM Biosciences, Novartis, and Takeda; and serves on a DSMB for DeNovo, Genentech, MEI, and Takeda. C.R.F. reports consulting for Abbvie, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead, Karyopharm, N-Power Medicine, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, SeaGen, and Spectrum; research funding from 4D, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Allogene, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Cellectis EMD, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Guardant, Iovance, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kite, Morphosys, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Xencor, Ziopharm, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute, V Foundation, and Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research; and stock ownership in Foresight Diagnostics, N-Power Medicine. F.V. reports research funding from Allogene and Geron corporation; and honoraria from i3Health, Elsevier, America Registry of Pathology, Society of Hematology Oncology, and CRISP Therapeutics. K.T. reports consulting for Symbio Pharaceuticals and honoraria from Mission Bio. R.E.S. reports research funding from SeaGen, BMS, GSK, and Rafael Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiome may modulate the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. In a B cell lymphoma patient cohort from five centers in Germany and the United States (Germany, n = 66; United States, n = 106; total, n = 172), we demonstrate that wide-spectrum antibiotics treatment ('high-risk antibiotics') prior to CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is associated with adverse outcomes, but this effect is likely to be confounded by an increased pretreatment tumor burden and systemic inflammation in patients pretreated with high-risk antibiotics. To resolve this confounding effect and gain insights into antibiotics-masked microbiome signals impacting CAR-T efficacy, we focused on the high-risk antibiotics non-exposed patient population. Indeed, in these patients, significant correlations were noted between pre-CAR-T infusion Bifidobacterium longum and microbiome-encoded peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and CAR-T treatment-associated 6-month survival or lymphoma progression. Furthermore, predictive pre-CAR-T treatment microbiome-based machine learning algorithms trained on the high-risk antibiotics non-exposed German cohort and validated by the respective US cohort robustly segregated long-term responders from non-responders. Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Eubacterium and Akkermansia were most important in determining CAR-T responsiveness, with Akkermansia also being associated with pre-infusion peripheral T cell levels in these patients. Collectively, we identify conserved microbiome features across clinical and geographical variations, which may enable cross-cohort microbiome-based predictions of outcomes in CAR-T cell immunotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma has an extremely poor prognosis and efforts to develop novel therapies for these patients have failed for almost four decades until the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Within the last one year, two anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy products, axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel, were approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy based on multicenter single-arm phase two clinical trials. Here, we will discuss the different components of the CAR construct and their mechanisms of action, the role of conditioning chemotherapy, the efficacy and toxicity observed with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapies in aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and emerging strategies to further improve the safety and efficacy of these highly promising approaches., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)