Search

Purpose: We determined the incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy and describe the correlation with prostate specific antigen, histological grade and stage. We examined whether tumor cells are localized in the sentinel nodes only or also in other nonsentinel lymph nodes., Materials and Methods: A total of 1,055 men with prostate cancer underwent radio guided pelvic lymph node dissection and radical retropubic prostatectomy. In men with prostate specific antigen 20 ng/ml or less and biopsy Gleason score 7 or less only sentinel nodes were removed. In men with prostate specific antigen more than 20 ng/ml or Gleason score greater than 7 extended pelvic lymph node dissection was also performed., Results: Positive lymph nodes were found in 207 men (19.6%). In 63.3% of the men these lymph nodes were detected outside of the region of standard lymphadenectomy. The percent of patients with positive nodes was greater than predicted by currently used nomograms. The higher the preoperative prostate specific antigen, pathological stage and grade, the greater the percent of men with positive sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes (p<0.001)., Conclusions: When deciding on pelvic lymph node dissection, sentinel or extended lymphadenectomy should be performed since more than half of patients have positive nodes outside of the region of standard lymphadenectomy. In cases of positive sentinel nodes extended lymph node dissection should be performed since tumor cells are also detectable in nonsentinel lymph nodes.

Objective: To investigate how many men with low-risk prostate cancer had positive lymph nodes detected by radio-guided surgery and whether they had a higher biochemical relapse rate after radical prostatectomy, because in such patients most urologists dispense with operative lymph node staging, as nomograms indicate only a low percentage of lymph node metastases., Patients and Methods: The study included 474 men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or = 10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of < or = 6 and positive biopsies in one (group 1, 315 men) or both lobes (group 2, 159 men); follow-up data were available in 357 men. Men with adjuvant radiation or hormone therapy before the occurrence of biochemical relapse were excluded., Results: Positive lymph nodes were detected in 17 men in group 1, and in 18 in group 2. In more than half of the patients (19/35) these nodes were found outside the region of standard lymphadenectomy. Men with node-positive disease had a higher biochemical relapse rate (P < 0.001). When the tumour was organ-confined and well differentiated in node-positive disease (Gleason score < or = 6) the biochemical relapse rate was lower than in men with higher tumour stage and grade., Conclusions: When dissecting pelvic lymph nodes, extended or sentinel lymphadenectomy should be preferred. Removing the diseased nodes could improve the PSA progression-free survival, especially in well differentiated organ-confined disease.

Gamma probe-guided lymphadenectomy of prostate cancer that is presumed to be localized furnishes evidence that lymphogenous spread of the disease is present considerably more often and earlier than previously assumed, even when the clinical stage is considered localized. Multiinstitutional trials have confirmed that in principle sentinel lymphadenectomy on its own is able to detect lymph node positive patients with minimal complications and a sufficient degree of certainty. Sentinel lymphadenectomy for penile cancer is an undemanding surgical procedure and in contrast to inguinal lymphadenectomy can be considered minimally invasive. Decisions on indication and necessity for an additional inguinal lymphadenectomy depending on tumor stage and local findings in the inguinal lymph nodes are handled quite differently in various centers and should be further standardized. The most recent studies on sentinel lymphadenectomy for urinary bladder and testicular cancer demonstrate that on principle the procedure is likely feasible also for these tumor entities. Whether it is possible to replace standard treatment methods with these procedures or at least have them serve an ancillary function remains to be determined in further investigations. Basically, the premise holds true that for all urological tumor entities before standard diagnostic techniques are abandoned, the value of exclusively performing sentinel lymphadenectomy must be adequately validated. It does not suffice to rely on the results from other working groups. It is in fact essential that the accuracy of the method - the feasibility of which can be influenced by numerous factors - be assessed by comparison with a standard lymphadenectomy performed in one's own center.

Introduction: Having in mind the promising results of lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe application for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in malignant melanoma, breast and penis cancer, we tried to identify the SLN in prostate cancer by applying a comparable technique., Materials and Method: 350 patients with prostate cancer were examined after providing informed consent. The day before pelvic lymphadenectomy technetium-99m nanocolloid was transrectally injected into the prostate under ultrasound guidance. A single central application was done per prostate lobe in most cases. Activity attained 90- 400 MBq, and the total injected volume was about 2-3 ml. Hereafter, lymphoscintigraphy was carried out. Those lymph nodes having been identified as SLN by means of gamma probe detection and lymphoscintigraphy were removed intraoperatively. Later, most of the cases had different types of pelvic lymphadenectomy. SLN received serial sections and immunohistochemistry, non-SLN step sections., Results: 335 patients showed at least 1 SLN in lymphoscintigraphy. 24.7% had lymph node metastases. In 2 patients, metastases in non-SLN were found without at least one SLN being affected (false-negative patient)., Conclusion: Our experience suggests that the SLN identification is not only feasible in breast cancer and malignant melanoma, but also in prostate cancer with a comparable technique., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Because of the curative approach, the detection of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis is of significant clinical relevance. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification by means of lymphangiography has been proven to be insufficiently safe. However, the high morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy and the considerable individual variability regarding the location of lymph node metastases justify the necessity of a technique that enables the identification of SLNs. Since 1998, SLNs have been intraoperatively identified and selectively dissected, after peritumoral injection of technetium-99m nanocolloid and using lymphoscintigraphy, in three patients (one with malignant melanoma and two with SCC). At least one SLN could be detected in each patient. The maximum surgical time was 30 min. There were no severe complications. Lymph node metastases did not occur in any patient. Upon a mean follow-up of 10 months, all patients are currently free of tumor. Owing to the long-term results of sentinel lymphadenectomy in malignant melanoma of other locations and our preliminary results with respect to penile carcinoma. we consider the current method appropriate as the only primary operation for lymph node staging in early stages and, in combination with modified inguinal lymphadenectomy, in locally advanced stages.

Copyright of Der Urologe A is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)