Search

Objectives: As the practice of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy gains widespread acceptance, the complexity of procedures attempted increases and the stage of tumour that may be safely approached remains controversial. We examined the impact of nodal involvement with respect to perioperative outcomes after VATS lobectomy., Methods: All patients listed for VATS lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer at our institution from 2012 to 2016 were analysed. Bronchoplastic or chest wall resections and tumours over 7 cm were considered a contraindication to a thoracoscopic approach., Results: Of the 489 patients identified, 97 (19.8%) patients had pathological nodal involvement. The overall conversion rate was 6.1%, reoperation rate was 5.3% and readmission rate was 5.9%. Median hospital stay was 5 days, 30-day mortality was 0.6% and 90-day mortality was 1.6%. No significant difference was identified between the nodal-negative or -positive groups in terms of preoperative demographics, hospital stay, postoperative complications, conversion rate, reoperation rate or readmission rate. Univariate logistic regression identified gender, Thoracoscore, dyspnoea score, performance status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous stroke, preoperative lung function and non-adenocarcinoma as predictors of postoperative complications. A multivariate model including nodal status identified Thoracoscore (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.18; P < 0.001) and preoperative transfer factor (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.96-0.98; P < 0.001) as the only predictors of complications., Conclusions: In non-small-cell lung cancer patients with pathological hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement, VATS lobectomy can be safely performed, as there does not appear to be an adverse effect on the incidence of perioperative complications, length of stay or readmissions., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

We describe a novel video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) anterior approach to lymph node station 7 after VATS left lower lobectomy., (© The Author 2016. Published by MMCTS on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Telepathology uses digitised image transfer to allow off‐site reporting of histopathology slides. This technology could facilitate the centralisation of pathology services, which may improve their quality and cost‐effectiveness. The benefits may be most apparent in frozen section reporting, in which turnaround times (TATs) are vital. We moved from on‐site to off‐site telepathology reporting of thoracic surgery frozen section specimens in 2016. The aim of this study was to compare TATs before and after this service change. Methods and results: All thoracic frozen section specimens analysed 4 months prior and 4 months following the service change were included. Demographics, operation, sample type, time taken from theatre, time received by laboratory, time reported by laboratory, TAT, frozen section diagnosis, final histopathological diagnosis and final TNM staging were recorded. The results were analysed with spss statistical software version 24. In total, there were 65 samples from 59 patients; 34 before the change and 31 after the change. Specimens included 51 lung, six lymph node, three bronchial, three chest wall and two pleural biopsies. Before the change, the median TAT was 25 min [interquartile range (IQR) 20–33 min]. No diagnoses were deferred. No diagnoses were changed on subsequent paraffin analysis. After the change, with the use of digital pathology, the median TAT was 27.5 min (IQR 21.75–38.5 min). This difference was not significant (P = 0.581). Diagnosis was deferred in one case (3.23%). There was one (3.23%) mid‐case technical failure resulting in the sample having to be transported by courier, resulting in a TAT of 106 min. No diagnoses were changed on subsequent paraffin analysis. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in reporting times between digital technology and an on‐site service, although one sample was affected by a technical failure requiring physical transportation of the specimen for analysis. Our study was underpowered to detect differences in accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]