Search

Background: Current non-invasive methods of assessing disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are of limited sensitivity and specificity. Testing includes acute phase markers, autoantibodies and complement levels. Although measurements of dsDNA antibodies and complement C3/C4 levels are routine, they remain of limited value. Improved blood and urine markers may help in early detection of flare, distinction between flare and chronic damage, and monitoring response to therapy., Methods: A total of 87 patients with SLE were tested for the following cytokines in serum and urine: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1), interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), monocyte inhibitory protein 1α (MIP-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Patients attending the Lupus Unit at St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK were divided into active lupus nephritis (LN), inactive LN and non-renal SLE groups based on their renal pathology and SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). Cytokine testing was performed using the FIDIS multiplex bead assay., Results: The mean level of serum sTNF-R1 was higher in the active LN group compared with both inactive LN and non-renal SLE groups ( p < 0.001). For urine measurements there were significant differences between active LN and non-renal SLE for VEGF ( p = 0.016), after statistical correction for multiple testing. Both urinary and serum sTNF-R1 and IP-10 levels correlated with SLEDAI scores ( p < 0.001), while serum VEGF correlated weakly with SLEDAI ( p = 0.025). The optimum combination for differentiating active from inactive LN patients was serum VEGF, sTNF-R1, MCP-1 and glomerular filtration rate plus urinary sTNF-R1 and protein-creatinine ratio., Conclusion: These results indicate that for active LN, sTNF-R1 could be a useful serum cytokine marker, with potential for VEGF in the urine. This study has confirmed the ability of the multiplex bead technique to detect cytokines in a good analytical range, including very low and high levels, in both serum and urine. Combining serum and urine markers provided additional sensitivity in distinguishing active from inactive LN.

Cytokines play an important role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. This is currently a very active area of research. Of particular interest is the use of cytokines as biomarkers of disease activity in SLE and lupus nephritis. Can cytokine measurements assist in early detection of renal flare in known lupus nephritis? Can such measurements be used to distinguish between flare and chronic damage? Or help to confirm renal remission? Could they be used to help assess the required duration of immunosuppression and reduce the need for invasive renal biopsy? This review discusses limitations of current laboratory methods in monitoring SLE, how measurements of cytokines may contribute in relation to following disease activity and summarizes what is known about cytokines as biomarkers in SLE and lupus nephritis.

Introduction: Lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) presents a difficult clinical problem as no particular treatment has been proven to be effective. Studies have shown good results with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in proliferative lupus nephropathy (LN) (WHO class III and IV disease)., Objectives: To study whether MMF treatment was effective in membranous predominant LN in patients resistant to or intolerant of other immunosuppressive agents., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively studied 10 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who had biopsy-proven predominant LMN (six Vc patients and four Va or Vb patients). Previous treatments included cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, ciclosporin and corticosteroids. The following parameters were recorded at baseline and follow-up: blood pressure, ECLAM, proteinuria, serum albumin and creatinine, routine haematology and immunology., Results: The study included eight women and two men, mean age 38.4 +/- 7.1 yr (range 30-49 yr). The racial distribution was as follows: five Caucasian, and five Black patients. The mean treatment time with MMF was 18.8 +/- 15.4 months (range 3-52 months). Twenty-four-hour urinary protein excretion was reduced from median 2.26 g (range 0-7.92 g) to median 0.66 g (range 0.08-3.85 g) at follow-up (P = 0.0039). Serum albumin increased significantly after treatment from median 29.5 g/l (range 14.0-42.0 g/l) to 33.5 g/l (range 23.0-40.0 g/l) at follow-up (P = 0.04). There were no significant changes in serum creatinine (P = 0.55)., Conclusion: MMF is a potentially useful immunosuppressive agent in reducing the proteinuria associated with membranous predominant LN.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) initially found widespread use in the immunoprophylaxis of rejection in organ transplantation. It has subsequently been used in lupus glomerulonephritis, where early studies have shown it to be effective in induction and maintenance therapy. The randomized studies have mostly studied small groups of patients and their conclusions do need to be confirmed in larger studies. MMF has also been used in small numbers of patients in a variety of nonlupus glomerulopathies, which have different underlying immunopathology as well as clinical course, including IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, hepatitis-C-associated glomerulonephritis and even Goodpasture's syndrome. In this article, we discuss its use in such nonlupus glomerular diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]