Search

Objectives: Anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are often present in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and might be relevant in the pathogenesis of this condition. They are major determinant of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in triple-positive antiphospholipid (aPL) profile. Whether they are present and pathogenic in patients with isolated LA [negative anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies] is a matter of debate., Methods: We measured aPS/PT in a large number of isolated LA with the aim to ascertain whether there is a link between the way isolated LA is assessed and the presence of these antibodies. APS/PT were measured in 86 patients with isolated LA (aCL- and abeta2GPI-). LA was assessed by two test systems, the dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and the Silica Clotting Time (SCT)., Results: Sixty-six (77%) individuals with isolated LA were positive for aPS/PT (IgM 44, IgG and IgM 15, IgG in 7). Diagnosis of LA was made based on positive results in both dRVVT and SCT in 40 patients (Group 1) and based on only one positive test in the remaining 46 patients (Group 2). The rate of positive aPS/PT antibodies was significantly higher in Group 1 (OR=7.2, 95% CI 1.9-27.0, p<0.002). Moreover, the titre of IgM aPS/PT was significantly increased in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (137 U, IQR 64-179 vs. 43 U, IQR 11-120, p=0.008)., Conclusions: These data indicate an association between LA based on two positive coagulation tests and the presence of aPS/PT antibodies, especially of IgM isotype., (© 2021 Marta Tonello et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)

Background: The concurrent presence of lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (triple positive profile) identifies patients at high risk of thromboembolic events. These patients are also positive for anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies (tetra-positive profile)., Objective: Understand which antibody among anti-β2-glycoprotein I and anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin is responsible for lupus anticoagulant activity., Patients/methods: Affinity purified anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies from plasma of 14 tetra-positive patients spiked into normal pooled plasma were tested., Results and Conclusions: Anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies did not prolong the diluted Russell viper venom time and silica clotting time (median ratio 0.98, interquartile ratio [IQR] 0.9-1.06; and 1.0, IQR 0.91-1.03, respectively). Anticoagulant activity remained in the flow-through that was deprived of anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (median ratio 1.88, IQR 1.58-2.77; and 1.75, IQR 1.17-2.9, respectively). This material was loaded on size-exclusion chromatography Sephacryl S-300 column and showed that anticoagulant activity and anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies coeluted in the same fractions. Besides, the flow through was poured into a prothrombin affinity column. Protein yield in three patients ranged from 54 to 91 μg/mL and showed strong positivity in phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin ELISA. The affinity purified material prolonged the coagulation time of normal pooled plasma: the diluted Russell viper venom ratio in the three patients was 2.09, 1.21, and 1.35; that of silica clotting time was 2.05, 1.5, and 2.13. In conclusion, under the assay conditions used, anticoagulant activity in tetra-positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients may largely be attributable to anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Variability remains a challenge in lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing., Objective: To validate LA test performance between Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) Core laboratories and examine agreement in LA status between Core and local/hospital laboratories contributing patients to this prospective registry., Methods: Five Core laboratories used the same reagents, analyzer type, protocols, and characterized samples for LA validation. Non-anticoagulated registry samples were retested at the corresponding regional Core laboratories and anticoagulated samples at a single Core laboratory. Categorical agreement and discrepancies in LA status between Core and local/hospital laboratories were analyzed., Results: Clotting times for the reference/characterized plasmas used for normalized ratios were similar between Core laboratories (CV <4%); precision and agreement for LA positive/negative plasma were similar (all CV ≤5%) in the four laboratories that completed both parts of the validation exercise; 418 registry samples underwent LA testing. Agreement for LA positive/negative status between Core and local/hospital laboratories was observed in 87% (115/132) non-anticoagulated and 77% (183/237) anticoagulated samples. However, 28.7% (120/418) of samples showed discordance between the Core and local/hospital laboratories or equivocal LA results. Some of the results of the local/hospital laboratories might have been unreliable in 24.7% (41/166) and 23% (58/252) of the total non-anticoagulated and anticoagulated samples, respectively. Equivocal results by the Core laboratory might have also contributed to discordance., Conclusions: Laboratories can achieve good agreement in LA performance by use of the same reagents, analyzer type, and protocols. The standardized Core laboratory results underpin accurate interpretation of APS ACTION clinical data., (© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Whether antibodies directed to β2-Glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) are responsible for LA activity is not well defined. However, in the absence of such antibodies the molecule responsible for LA phenomenon is unknown., Objective: The aim of this study was the biochemical identification of the target antigen epitope of aPL responsible of LA activity in the absence of aβ2GPI antibodies together with the biological and clinical characteristics of these patients in comparison with classical triple positive patients., Patients/methods: A comparison of patients with LA without (LA+/aβ2GPI-) and those with (LA+/aβ2GPI+) associated aβ2GPI antibodies was performed. Size exclusion chromatography and analytical chromatography were used to identify the molecule with LA activity in patients LA+/aβ2GPI-., Results and Conclusions: Analytical size-exclusion chromatography revealed a peak of 996Kd with LA activity perfectly overlapping that of IgM anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. Similarly, all the 25 LA+/aβ2GPI- patients were positive for aPS/PT antibodies. LA+/aβ2GPI- compared to 33 LA+/aβ2GPI+ patients turned out to be significantly older, with a lower rate of previous thromboembolic events and a weaker LA activity. Search for aPS/PT and aβ2GPI antibodies in patients with LA is useful to identify two subgroups of LA at different risk of thromboembolic events., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The effect of additional treatments combined with conventional therapy on pregnancy outcomes was examined in high-risk primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients to identify the most effective treatment strategy. The study's inclusion criteria were (1) positivity to lupus anticoagulant alone or associated with anticardiolipin and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies; (2) a history of severe maternal-foetal complications (Group I) or a history of one or more pregnancies refractory to conventional therapy leading to unexplained foetal deaths not associated with severe maternal-foetal complications (Group II). Two different additional treatments were considered: oral-low-dose steroids (10-20 mg prednisone daily) and/or 200 to 400 mg daily doses of hydroxychloroquine and parenteral-intravenous immunoglobulins at 2 g/kg per month and/or plasma exchange. The study's primary outcomes were live birth rates and pregnancy complications. A total of 194 pregnant PAPS patients attending 20 tertiary centres were retrospectively enrolled. Hydroxychloroquine was found to be linked to a significantly higher live birth rate with respect to the other oral treatments in the Group II patients. The high (400 mg) versus low (200 mg) doses of hydroxychloroquine ( p  = 0.036) and its administration before versus during pregnancy ( p  = 0.021) were associated with a significantly higher live birth rate. Hydroxychloroquine therapy appeared particularly efficacious in the PAPS patients without previous thrombosis. Parenteral treatments were associated with a significantly higher live birth rate with respect to the oral ones ( p  = 0.037), particularly in the Group I patients. In conclusion, some additional treatments were found to be safe and efficacious in high-risk PAPS pregnant women., Competing Interests: None., (Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.)

Background: Patients with the lupus anticoagulant (LA) are at an increased risk of thrombotic events, which in turn increase the risk of death. Understanding the determinants of thrombotic risk in patients with LA may pave the way towards targeted thromboprophylaxis. In the Vienna Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombosis Study (LATS), we systematically evaluate risk factors for thrombotic events in patients with LA., Methods: We followed 150 patients (mean age: 41.3 years, female gender: n = 122 (81.3%), history of thrombosis or pregnancy complications: n = 111 (74.0%)), who tested repeatedly positive for LA until development of thrombosis, death, or censoring. The primary endpoint was a composite of arterial or venous thrombotic events (TEs)., Results: During a median follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 12 days-13.6 years) and 1076 person-years, 32 TEs occurred (arterial: n = 16, venous: n = 16; cumulative 10-year TE incidence: 24.3%). A prolonged lupus-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT-LA) (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.07--5.02), diabetes (adjusted SHR = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.42-13.57), and active smoking (adjusted SHR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.14-5.02) emerged as independent risk factors of both arterial and venous thrombotic risk. A risk model that includes a prolonged lupus-sensitive aPTT, smoking, and diabetes enabled stratification of LA patients into subgroups with a low, intermediate, and high risk of thrombosis (5-year TE risk of 9.7% (n = 77), 30.9% (n = 51), and 56.8% (n = 22)., Conclusions: Long-term thrombotic risk in patients with LA is clustered within subjects harboring typical cardiovascular risk factors in addition to a prolonged lupus-sensitive aPTT, whereas patients with none of these risk factors represent a large subgroup with a low risk of thrombosis.

Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is an in vitro phenomenon determining a phospholipid-dependent elongation of clotting times. The presence of LAC associated with anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies is strongly associated with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) targeting thrombin and factor Xa are currently widely use to prevent and treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. Some concern has, however, been expressed about the possibility of false laboratory results during LAC assessment in patients taking these drugs. Several in vitro studies, spiking DOACs into normal plasma as well as ex vivo at peak levels in treated patients, led in false-positive LAC. The dilute Russell Viper Venom time is the assay that is most influenced by rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran and less by apixaban. Both screening and confirmatory tests have resulted equally prolonged for activated partial thromboplastin time and have not led to false-positive results, but this may depend on the type of reagent used for the test. Taipan/Ecarin snake venoms ratios, has been recommend by some investigators as they do not seem to be affected by rivaroxaban or edoxaban, but these tests are neither standardized nor generally available in clinical practice. In conclusion, for the time being it does not seem advisable to carry out LAC testing during anti-factor Xa and anti-factor IIa treatment because of the risk of false-positive results. Whenever needed in deciding the suspension of DOACs or in case of recurrent thrombosis, LAC determination should be carried out at trough better if DOAC concentration is known., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Diluted Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) has become the most popular test to detect Lupus Anticoagulant (LA). dRVVT is more sensitive than other global tests employed to detect LA and is not affected by inhibitors of factor VIII or IX. The test is most successfully implemented if you observe three steps in its execution: screening, mixing, and confirmatory studies. Interference due to the presence of heparin in tested plasma must be excluded by means of thrombin time (TT). The prior use of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) or Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) must also be evaluated by means of International Normalized Ratio, or specific tests, respectively.

The term "lupus anticoagulant" (LA) refers to a heterogeneous group of immunoglobulins behaving as acquired in vitro inhibitors of coagulation. These antibodies, namely anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies, induce the in vitro elongation of clotting time interfering with phospholipid-dependent coagulation cofactors. Positive LA is associated with thrombosis and pregnancy complications, providing one of the three laboratory criteria for the classification of the anti-phospholipid syndrome. LA is the strongest predictor of clinical events, especially when associated with other anti-phospholipid antibodies. Much more controversial is the risk conveyed by isolated and weak LA. LA detection is technically laborious, envisaging screening, mixing and confirming tests. Hopefully critical issues in LA detection, such as the interference of anticoagulants, will be overcome, in the next future.

Among the so called antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies Lupus Anticoagulant (LAC) is considered the strongest risk factor for thromboembolic events. In individuals without a previous thromboembolic event (carriers), LAC is a risk factor when associated with the presence of anticardiolipin (aCL) and aβ2-Glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies. On the other hand, data on carriers of isolated LAC positivity are sparse and inconclusive. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the incidence of thrombosis in a cohort of carriers of isolated LAC positivity. One-hundred seventy-nine carriers of LAC confirmed twelve weeks apart and in a reference laboratory were studied. During a total follow up of 552 person-years, there were seven thromboembolic events (1.3% person-y). All the seven patients had at least one adjunctive major risk factor for thrombosis. The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 3.1% (95% CI 0.6-5.6) after 2years, and 5.9% (95% CI 1.2-10.6) after 5 and 10years. On a multivariate regression analysis considering age, sex, autoimmune disease, risk factors for arterial and venous thrombosis, use of aspirin, only age was found to be an independent predictor of thromboembolic events (HR=1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2, p=0.02). These data might be relevant in clinical practice and underline the importance of differentiating LAC carriers in terms of isolated positivity or positivity associated with the presence of antibodies to aCL and β2-glycoprotein I., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A unique coagulation inhibitor prolonging whole-blood clotting time was described more than 50 years ago in two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The immunoglobulin nature of the inhibitor and its interaction with antiphospholipid antibodies was later demonstrated and the term "lupus anticoagulant (LA)" was coined to describe this laboratory finding. It soon became apparent that LA was a misnomer as it is often found in plasma from patients with clinical conditions other than SLE and is associated with thromboembolic events that may occur in otherwise healthy individuals. Individuals with LA have circulating autoantibodies that inhibits blood coagulation. These are mostly of IgG or IgM class and mainly directed against a phospholipid (PL)-binding plasma protein, β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI). The presence of β2GPI-dependent LA represents a well-recognized risk factor for venous and arterial thromboembolism, as well as pregnancy loss and morbidity. β2GPI-dependent LA in the presence of documented previous thromboembolism, or history of pregnancy loss/morbidity, identifies definite anti-PL syndrome. Laboratory diagnosis of LA is thus of particular importance, as it may assign patients with a common event (thrombosis) to a group with a high risk for recurrence, which is a prerequisite for long-term oral antithrombotic treatment., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: The revised classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome state that antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] and/or anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or anti-β2 -glycoprotein I [aβ2 GPI] antibodies) should be detected on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Consequently, classification of patient risk and adequacy of treatment may be deferred by 3 months., Objectives: In order to early classify patient risk, we evaluated whether aPL positivity confirmation is related to aPL antibody profiles., Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients referred to our center who were initially positive in one or more tests exploring the presence of aPL were tested after 3 months. During a 4-year period, 225 patients were initially positive in one or more tests, and 161 were available for confirmation after 3 months. Patients were classified as triple-positive (n = 54: LAC(+) , aCL(+) , aβ2 GPI(+) , same isotype), double-positive (n = 50: LAC(-) , aCL(+) , aβ2 GPI(+) , same isotype) and single-positive (n = 53: LAC or aCL or aβ2 GPI antibodies as the sole positive test)., Results: Among subjects with triple positivity at initial testing, 98% (53 of 54) had their aPL profile confirmed after 12 weeks. The double-positive and single-positive groups had data confirmed in 42 of 50 (84%) and 23 of 57 (40%) subjects, respectively., Conclusions: Our results show that high-risk subjects with triple-positive aPL profiles are identified early, at the time of the initial screening tests., (© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Triple positivity (positive Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti β2-glycoptrotein I antibodies) identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (anti Domain I of β2-glycoptroteinI) that is present in patients with definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is supported by the fact that aβ2GPI antibodies obtained by affinity purification in these patients possess LA activity. Moreover, patients and carriers of this profile carry a much higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss than APS patients with positivity for only one of the tests. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as among carriers of aPL. Clinical studies and interventional trials should first take these high risk subjects into consideration., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Results for lupus anticoagulant (LA) are expressed as ratio of patient-to-normal clotting times (LA-ratio) according to the equation LA-ratio = (Patient(Clotting time)/Normal(Clotting time)). However, numerical results vary according to the method used for testing, thus making difficult the between-method and between-laboratory comparison of results. The hypothesis that the standardization model currently employed for the international normalized ratio for patients on warfarin is valid also for LA standardization has been taken into consideration. The model calls for the determination of a LA-sensitivity index (LASI) for each commercial method for LA detection against a common standard method. The LASI is then used to convert the LA-ratio into a scale called standardized LA-ratio (SLA-ratio) according to the equation SLA-ratio = (LA-ratio)(LASI). The model proved effective in minimizing the between-method variability of results for LA detection. If implemented it could be a valuable tool to improve the comparability of results obtained in different laboratories, to quantify the LA potency and thus pave the way to the organization of collaborative clinical trials aimed at assessing whether the potency of LA is a risk factor for clinical events.

Background: Results for lupus anticoagulant (LA) are currently expressed as ratio of patient-to-normal clotting times (LA-ratio). Yet, numerical results do vary according to the method used for testing, thus making difficult the between-method comparison of results. We hypothesized that the standardization model currently used for the INR for patients on oral-anticoagulants (OAT) would be of value also for LA standardization., Patients and Methods: To test this hypothesis we determined a sensitivity index valid for LA (called LASI) for six LA-detection methods against a common-standard using two sets of calibration-plasmas: (i)normal-plasmas spiked with IgG derived from patients strongly-positive for LA or (ii)plasmas from LA-positive patients. The LASI was then used to convert the LA-ratio into the standardized-LA-ratio (SLA-ratio) according to the equation: SLA-ratio = (LA-ratio)(LASI)., Results: We demonstrate that (i)the model is feasible because calibration plots of log-transformed clotting times obtained for the LA-detection methods-vs.-the common-standard gave acceptable LASI values; (ii)the model is effective because between-method variability expressed as coefficient of variation, which was 42.8% with results expressed as LA-ratio, decreased to 7.8% with results expressed as SLA-ratio; (iii)the LASI value calculated with the LA-positive plasmas is more effective in minimizing between-method variability than the LASI value calculated with IgG-spiked plasmas., Conclusions: A model of LA calibration similar to the INR for patients on OAT is feasible by using plasmas from LA-positive patients instead of patients on OAT. Potential application of the model are:(i)to compare the relative responsiveness of different LA-detection methods,(ii)to minimize differences between their results and (iii)to quantify LA potency., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies have been found in Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) positive patients. Their prevalence and relative contribution to thromboembolic risk in LA-positive patients is not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine their presence and association with thromboembolic events in a large series of patients with confirmed LA., Methods: Plasma from LA-positive patients was collected at Thrombosis Centers and sent to a reference central laboratory for confirmation. Positive plasma was tested using home-made ELISA for the presence of aPT and anti-beta(2)GPI antibodies., Results: LA was confirmed in 231 patients. Sixty-one of 231 (26%, 95%CI 22-33) LA positive subjects were positive for IgG aPT and 62 (27%, 95% CI 21-33) were positive for IgM aPT antibodies. Clinical features of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) were not associated with the presence of IgG aPT [43 APS in 61 (70%) positive and 109 APS in 170 (64%) negative IgG aPT subjects, p=ns] or IgM aPT. Rate of positivity of IgG and IgM a beta(2)GPI was significantly higher than that of IgG and IgM aPT. Clinical events accounting for APS occurred in 97 of 130 (75%) IgG a beta(2)GPI positive and in 55 of 101 (54%) IgG a beta(2)GPI negative patients (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.3, p=0.002). No significant association with clinical events in patients positive for both IgG aPT and IgG a beta(2)GPI as compared to those positive for one or another test was found. When patients negative for both IgG aPT and IgG a beta(2)GPI (LA positive only) were compared with remaining patients, a significantly lower association with clinical events was found (OR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.7, p=0.004)., Conclusions: As compared to IgG a beta(2)GPI, the prevalence of IgG aPT in patients with LA is significantly lower and not associated with the clinical features of APS., ((c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

One of the conclusions of the subcommittee meeting on Lupus Anticoagulant/Phospholipid dependent antibodies, held in Geneva on 2007, was the need to update the guidelines on Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) detection. Particular emphasis was given to several aspects discussed in this official communication. A new paragraph is dedicated to the patient selection, and aims to minimize inappropriate requests for LA testing. Modalities for blood collection and processing are fully delineated and the choice of tests is limited to dRVVT and a sensitive aPTT. Calculation of cut-off values for each diagnostic step are clearly stated. A final paragraph reports the interpretation of the results in general and in particular situations.

Objective: To determine whether the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) in a large cohort of positive patients was confirmed at a reference laboratory., Methods: Over a 1-year period, each participating center collected samples from LAC-positive patients. Plasma was filtered and kept deep-frozen until it was sent on dry ice to the reference laboratory by express courier. Centers returned detailed laboratory information and clinical data from each patient. The reference laboratory screened plasma samples by diluted Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and kaolin clotting time (KCT). When these were prolonged, 1:1 mixing studies were carried out, and confirmatory tests were performed as appropriate. Positive samples were further tested by thrombin time (TT). The presence of heparin was checked by measuring antifactor Xa activity when TT was prolonged. Negative samples were tested by activated partial thromboplastin time using hexagonal phospholipids., Results: Plasma samples from 302 patients from 29 anticoagulation clinics were analyzed. LAC was excluded in 71 samples (24%), because dRVVT and KCT screening test results were normal (34) or reversed to normal by mixing studies (35). The remaining two samples were considered negative because they contained heparin. LAC-negative patients showed different characteristics from those in whom diagnosis was confirmed. They were significantly older (49.7 vs. 45.0 years, P < 0.03), were more often first diagnosed (66% vs. 41%, P < 0.001), and were more frequently judged as mild in LAC potency (60% vs. 25%, P < 0.0001). Moreover, anticardiolipin and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I antibody values were more often normal in LAC-negative (82%) than in LAC-positive (42%) samples (P < 0.0001). LAC-positive samples identified by both dRVVT and KCT (146/231, 63%) showed a LAC potency that was significantly stronger than that in samples in which LAC diagnosis was made by a single test., Conclusions: A false-positive LAC diagnosis is not uncommon across specialized centers. Patients' characteristics and a complete antiphospholipid antibody profile may help to identify these individuals.

The silica clotting time (SCT) is a phospholipid-dependent coagulation assay used for the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LA) antibodies. The sensitivity and specificity of a new commercial SCT for identifying LA in patients who meet the clinical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and its association with thrombotic events were evaluated here. Forty-five patients who met the clinical criteria for APS according to the Sapporo International Consensus Statement were examined. Sixty-nine patients who did not meet the clinical criteria for APS, and 20 blood donors were used as controls. Plasma samples from the patients and controls were tested for LA using a new commercial SCT with low and high synthetic phospholipid concentrations. The results were compared with those obtained by diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). SCT's sensitivity for identifying LA in patients who met the clinical criteria of APS was higher compared to APTT and dRVVT (53.3% vs. 31.1% and 31.1%), and the specificities of these assays were 96.6%, 100%, and 98.9%, respectively. When dRVVT was combined with SCT, and dRVVT was combined with APTT their sensitivities were 57.7% and 48.8%, and their specificities were 96.6% and 98.9%, respectively. A stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that the combination of dRVVT with SCT was associated with total thrombotic events (odds ratio (OR)=11.5, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.25-106.3, P=0.031) as well as with venous thrombosis (OR=4.09, 95% CI=1.16-14.43, P=0.028). According to our results, SCT is the most sensitive assay for identifying LA in patients who meet the clinical criteria for APS. Moreover, the highest sensitivity was reached with a combination of SCT and dRVVT. The method's association with total thrombotic events and venous thrombosis was in fact significant., ((c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are immunoglobulins which inhibit phospholipid (PL)-dependent coagulation tests. LA are not specific, as they may reflect the presence of antibodies to human prothrombin, human beta(2)-Glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI), an association of previous antibodies or other antibodies. Antibodies to human beta(2)GPI act as in vitro anticoagulants by enhancing the binding of beta(2)GPI to PL, and this binding may be influenced by calcium ion concentration. A reduction in final calcium concentration, from 10 mm to 5 mm, increased coagulation times in both dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and dilute Prothrombin Time (dPT) when plasmas of patients with antibeta(2)GPI antibodies were used. Ten LA patients showed increased dRVVT and dPT ratios from means of 1.5 to 1.7 (P < 0.001) and 2.4 to 4.3 (P = 0.002), respectively. Instead, all LA-positive antibeta(2)GPI antibody-negative patients showed decreased coagulation times from mean ratios of 1.5 to 1.3 (P = 0.004) in dRVVT and from 2.0 to 1.5 (P = 0.01) in dPT. These results are confirmed by running dRVVT of normal plasma spiked with affinity purified IgG antibeta(2)GPI antibodies. Therefore, when a PL-dependent coagulation test is run twice, at different final calcium concentrations, antibeta(2)GPI LA can be identified.

Background: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) screens are frequently ordered in the workup of thrombophilic patients or women with fetal loss. The sensitivity and specificity of LA detection vary depending on the choice of tests, cutoff values, and results interpretation. This variation is detrimental to patient management because persistent LA positivity in patients with a history of thrombosis is a requisite for long-term anticoagulation therapy. Numerous surveys have been performed to assess the state of the art for LA diagnosis. The control plasmas used in these surveys were from LA-positive or -negative patients or were normal plasmas with monoclonal antibodies against human beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)-GPI) added., Methods: A large number of laboratories were asked to test a common set of lyophilized plasmas for LA, including three normal plasmas, to which increasing amounts of affinity-purified IgG from a patient positive for anti-beta(2)-GPI had been added, and three LA-negative plasmas: one normal, one with a coagulation deficiency, and one with heparin., Results: Overall, 69, 68, and 59 of 70 participants were able to detect LA in plasmas with high, intermediate, and low potency (sensitivity, 99%, 97%, and 84%). Conversely, 69, 50, and 53 of 70 were able to rule out LA in the normal, heparinized, and deficient plasma (specificity, 99%, 71%, and 76%)., Conclusions: Sensitivity for LA detection is satisfactory, whereas specificity could be improved. Surveys for LA detection should be carried out on a regular basis because they may help improve performance. Plasmas containing graded amounts of affinity-purified human anti-beta(2)-GPI may be used as a convenient source of well-characterized naturally occurring LA material.

Anti-beta2-Glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) autoantibodies are the prominent laboratory feature of Hughes syndrome. By prolonging some coagulation tests in the presence of exogenous phospholipids (PL), they behave as classical Lupus Anticoagulants (LA). We investigated the effect of 3 affinity-purified anti-beta2GPI IgG preparations from patients with Hughes syndrome on fibrin polymerization and fibrinolysis of normal plasma, measured by comparing the optical densities of assay mixtures in the presence of the autoantibodies or normal IgG. The presence of anti-beta2GPI IgG in diluted Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) assays, carried out using a PL dilution of 1:8 or 1:64, resulted in a delay in the onset of polymerization by 30-40 and 60-70s, respectively. Fibrin polymerization was complete after 250s for both anti-beta2GPI IgG and normal IgG. The inhibitory effect of the anti-beta2GPI antibodies was not observed in the presence of excess PL, as expected for LA. Anti-beta2GPI IgG increased the plateau level of polymerization when dRVVT was performed in the presence of 1.5 nM recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, but did not impair the fibrinolytic process, which was almost complete after 250 min. The autoantibodies did not delay the onset of fibrin polymerization in tests carried out using recombinant tissue factor. On the contrary, the autoantibodies enhanced polymerization in prothrombin time assays, and accelerated it in tissue thromboplastin inhibition tests, with no effect on fibrinolysis. These data provide evidence that anti-beta2GPI LA may act as either anticoagulants or procoagulants in different in vitro coagulation tests.

Prothrombin time (PT) is routinely used to monitor oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). The fact that PT is a phospholipid (PL)-dependent coagulation test raises the possibility that lupus anticoagulant (LA) might interfere with this test, thus complicating the control of anticoagulant treatment. The effect of 6 affinity-purified preparations of anti- (a)beta2-glycoprotein I (GPI) antibodies with LA activity on the PT was tested. Instead of prolonging PT as expected, the abeta2-GPI antibodies reduced the PT of both normal plasma and anticoagulated plasma by a mean of 2.4 seconds and 5.6 seconds, respectively. This effect was also observed using other 5 commercially available preparations of thromboplastin. The abeta2-GPI-mediated reduction in PT was dose-dependent and was lost upon removal of beta2-GPI. The failure of abeta2-GPI antibodies to express LA activity in PT was found to depend on the fact that calcium ions were added together with PL at the beginning of the assay. In fact, modification of the standard diluted Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) test by adding calcium ions together with PL resulted in a loss of abeta2-GPI anticoagulant activity. The procoagulant effect was not as evident in an assay that used stimulated monocytes as a source of thromboplastin. These results show that abeta2-GPI antibodies exhibit an 'in vitro' procoagulant effect in PT and an anticoagulant effect in dRVVT only when the interaction with their antigen and PL occurs in the absence of calcium ions.

Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GPI) antibodies behave as classical Lupus Anticoagulants (LA), as they inhibit phospholipid-dependent coagulation reactions and their activity disappears in the presence of excess exogenous phospholipids (PLs). We have recently shown that a certain amount of PLs in the dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) test system is required to express LA activity of anti beta2-GPI antibodies. We have now extended this observation to two other tests, i.e., Kaolin Clotting Time (KCT) in which PLs are not added, and Tissue Thromboplastin Inhibition test (TTI) in which PLs are extremely diluted. In fact, affinity-purified antibody preparations from 5 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome did not express or only weakly expressed anticoagulant activity in both tests; the mean ratios of coagulation times obtained with purified antibodies and that of control buffer were 1.11 and 1.0 for KCT and TTI, respectively. On the contrary, the mean ratios in dRVVT were 1.31 and 1.49 at a PLs dilution of 1:8 and 1:64, respectively. Therefore, the presence of LA activity due to autoantibodies to beta2-GPI is characterized by a positive dRVVT and negative or only weakly positive KCT and TTI.

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a general term to define immunoglobulins interfering with phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests. It is now clear that the phospholipid-dependence of some LA is related to the presence of the phospholipid-binding plasma protein beta 2-glycoprotein I (beta 2-GPI) and that autoantibodies to beta 2-GPI might represent a specific category of LA. To verify this hypothesis we have purified IgG autoantibodies to beta 2-GPI from plasma of 6 patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, by means of agarose-immobilized human beta 2-GPI. All 6 preparations tested positive in anti-beta 2-GPI IgG antibody ELISA and showed a marked LA activity by prolonging dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) from a minimum of 5.3 s in patient # 1 to a maximum of 41.1 s in patient # 3. These IgG preparations behaved as typical LA, with this activity tending to disappear in the presence of increasing phospholipid (PL) concentrations. Moreover, the LA activity of the IgG preparations was not detectable in the absence of PL, in which case the ratio between dRVVT obtained in the presence and absence of IgG autoantibodies to beta 2-GPI was close to 1. This pattern was confirmed by using plasma from patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome testing positive for anti-beta 2-GPI IgG antibodies. These findings suggest that dRVVT performed both in the presence and absence of PL might constitute a sensitive screening test to detect specific antibodies with LA activity.

We describe a novel method for the purification of aPL, in which pure CL is immobilized on octyl-sepharose beads by hydrophobic interaction. No lipid contamination was present in eluates, and the system could be reutilized three times without loosing extracting capacity. Four patients with antiphospholipid syndrome were studied. A marked decrease in aCL and LA activities was found in all patient plasmas after the passage through a CL-octyl-sepharose column. Both activities were recovered in eluates which contained beta 2-GP-I and IgGs. beta 2-GP-I was also present in normal plasma eluates, which showed no aCL and slight LA activity. This method represents an improvement in the purification of aPL, and could be useful in explaining the mechanism of action of antibodies that are obtained using pure phospholipid as extracting matrix.