Search

Non-HLA antibodies against heterogeneous targets on endothelial cells have been associated with allograft injuries. The endothelial cell crossmatch (ECXM) is used in the detection of non-HLA antibodies but remains non-discriminatory for specific antibody identification. The primary objective of this study was to delineate the specific non-HLA antibody signatures associated with ECXM positivity and to determine the correlation of ECXM status and non-HLA antibody signatures on allograft health. Serum specimens from 25 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and 13 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were collected as part of clinical evaluation, and testing for angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) and donor-specific MHC class I chain-related gene A (MICA) antibodies and ECXM was performed. Remnant sera were tested for non-HLA antibodies using the LABScreen™ Autoantibody (LSAUT) Group 1, 2, and 3 kits (One Lambda, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA). In both cohorts, the concordance of AT1R and MICA together or individually with ECXM+ status was poor (<0.7), suggesting the presence of other unaccounted antibodies. Autoantibody profiling revealed three distinct clusters targeting fibrotic products, cytoskeletal proteins, and cell signaling molecules. A comparative analysis of ECXM+ and ECXM- specimens identified nine and five differentially expressed antibodies in the LTR and RTR cohorts, respectively. Employing machine learning techniques (variable importance, feature selection, ROC-AUC), we derived a five-antibody panel (TNFα, collagen V, CXCL11, GDNF, GAPDH) and a two-antibody panel (TNFα, CXCL9) that effectively discriminated between ECXM+ and ECXM- status in the LTR and RTR cohorts, respectively. Distinct antibody signatures were identified in LTR and RTR cohorts that correlated with ECXM+ status and were associated with allograft dysfunction.

Rationale: There is significant variation in approach to pre-lung transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), with some centers declining to cross any DSA. We implemented a protocol for transplantation for candidates with pretransplant DSA so long as a prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative, regardless of number, specificity, class, or mean fluorescence intensity. Objectives: To compare post-transplant outcomes including overall survival, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival, antibody-mediated rejection, and acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients where pretransplant DSA was and was not present. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. For recipients with pretransplant DSA, if the prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative, the donor offer was accepted and plasmapheresis was performed within 24 hours of transplantation and continued until retrospective crossmatch results returned. Immunosuppression and post-transplant management were not otherwise modified. Results: Of the 203 included recipients, 18 (8.9%) had pretransplant DSA. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity was 4,000 (interquartile range, 2,975-5,625; total range, 2,100-17,000). The median number of DSA present per patient was one (interquartile range, 1-2). The presence of pretransplant DSA was not associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-3.4) or decreased chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-2.1). Recipients with pretransplant DSA were more likely to require prolonged mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 7.0; 95% CI, 2.3-21.6) and to have antibody-mediated rejection requiring treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.0-55.8). Conclusions: A protocol of accepting donor offers for lung transplant candidates with preformed, complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch-negative DSA is associated with increased need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and antibody-mediated rejection without affecting short-term overall or chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival.

Background: Development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after lung transplantation is associated with antibody mediated rejection, acute cellular rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; however, the significance of circulating antibodies before transplant remains unclear., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including recipients of primary lung transplants between 2008 and 2012. We assessed the impact of circulating HLA and noncytotoxic DSA detected before transplant on development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) or CLAD-related death., Results: 30% of subjects had circulating class I antibodies alone, 4% Class II, and 14.4% class I and class II at mean fluorescent intensity greater than 1000. Nine percent of the subjects had DSA class I, 9% class II, and 2.4% both DSA classes 1 and 2. Neither the presence of circulating antibodies (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.54) nor the presence of DSA (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-3.18) before transplant at mean fluorescent intensity greater than 1000 was associated with the development of CLAD or CLAD-related death., Conclusions: Although in previous studies we have shown an increased incidence of antibody-mediated rejection in patients with pretransplant DSA, neither the presence of HLA antibodies nor DSA translated to an increased risk of allograft dysfunction or death if prospective crossmatch testing was negative. Prospective studies are needed to define the impact of pretransplant sensitization on lung transplant recipients.

Background: Patients with short telomere syndromes and pulmonary fibrosis have increased complications after lung transplant. However, the more general impact of donor and recipient telomere length in lung transplant has not been well characterized., Methods: This was an observational cohort study of patients who received lung transplant at a single center between January 1st 2012 and January 31st 2015. Relative donor lymphocyte telomere length was measured and classified into long (third tertile) and short (other tertiles). Relative recipient lung telomere length was measured and classified into short (first tertile) and long (other tertiles). Outcome data included survival, need for modification of immunosuppression, liver or kidney injury, cytomegalovirus reactivation, and acute rejection., Results: Recipient lung tissue telomere lengths were measured for 54 of the 79 patients (68.3%) who underwent transplant during the study period. Donor lymphocyte telomeres were measured for 45 (83.3%) of these recipients. Neither long donor telomere length (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-2.85, p = 0.50) nor short recipient telomere length (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.50-2.05, p = 0.96) were associated with adjusted survival following lung transplant. Recipients with short telomeres were less likely to have acute cellular rejection (23.5% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.02) but were not more likely to have other organ dysfunction., Conclusions: In this small cohort, neither long donor lymphocyte telomeres nor short recipient lung tissue telomeres were associated with adjusted survival after lung transplantation. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Rationale: The prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in lung transplant candidates and their impact on waitlist and transplant outcomes is not known., Objectives: We examined the prevalence of pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies at varying thresholds and evaluated their impact on outcomes before and after lung transplantation., Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study including all patients listed for lung transplantation between January 2008 and August 2012. Per protocol, transplant candidates were assessed by solid phase LABscreen mixed Class I and II and LABscreen Single Antigen assays., Measurements and Main Results: Among 224 patients, 34% had anti-HLA antibodies at mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) greater than or equal to 3,000 (group III), and 24% had antibodies at MFI 1,000 to 3,000 (group II). Ninety percent of the patients with pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies had class I antibodies, whereas only seven patients developed class II alone. Patients in group III were less likely to receive transplants than patients without any anti-HLA antibodies (group I) (45.5 vs. 67.7%, P = 0.005). Wait time to transplant was longer in group III than group I, although this difference did not meet statistical significance, and waitlist mortality was similar. Among transplant recipients, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was more frequent in group III than in group II (20% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) or group I (6.3%, P = 0.05)., Conclusions: The presence of anti-HLA antibodies at the high MFI threshold (>3,000) was associated with lower transplant rate and higher rates of AMR. Screening for anti-HLA antibodies using the 3,000 MFI threshold may be important in managing transplant candidates and recipients.