Search

OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive anatomic segmentectomy for the resection of pulmonary nodules has significantly increased in the last few years. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on the safety and feasibility of robotic segmentectomy compared to video-assisted thoracic surgery. This study aimed to compare the real-world early outcomes of robotic and video-thoracoscopic surgery in anatomic segmentectomy. METHODS Single-centre cohort study including all consecutive patients undergoing segmentectomy by either robotic or video-thoracoscopic from June 2018 to November 2023. Propensity score case matching analysis generated 2 matched groups undergoing robotic or video-thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Short-term outcomes were analysed and compared between groups. RESULTS 204 patients (75 robotic and 129 video-thoracoscopic patients) were included. After matching, 146 patients (73 cases in each group) were compared. One 30-day death was observed in the robotic group (P  = 1). Two conversions to thoracotomy occurred in the robotic, and none in the video-thoracoscopic group (P  = 0.5). Surgical time was longer in the robotic group (P  = 0.091). There were no significant differences between robotic and video-thoracoscopic groups in postoperative complications (13.7% vs 15.1%, P  = 1), cardiopulmonary complications (6.8% vs 6.8%, P  = 1), major complications (4.1% vs 4.1%, P  = 1), prolonged air leak (4.1% vs 5.5%, P  = 1), arrhythmia (1.4% vs 0%, P  = 1) and reoperation (2.7% vs 2.7%, P  = 1). Median length of stay was 3 days (interquartile range 2–3 days) in the robotic group vs 3 days (interquartile range 2.5–4 days) in the video-thoracoscopic group (P  = 0.212). CONCLUSIONS Robotic segmentectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to video-thoracoscopy, as no significant differences in early postoperative outcomes were found between the 2 techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The relationship between operating time and postoperative morbidity has not been fully characterized in lung resection surgery. We aimed to determine the variables associated with prolonged operative times and their influence on postoperative complications after video-thoracoscopic lobectomy. METHODS Patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer from December 2016 to March 2018, within the prospective registry of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group were identified. Operating time was stratified by quartiles and complication rates analysed using chi-squared test. Primary outcomes included 30-day overall, pulmonary and cardiovascular complications and wound infection. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables independently associated with operating time and their influence on the occurrence of postoperative complications. RESULTS Data of 1518 cases were examined. The median operating time was 174 min (interquartile range: 130–210 min). Overall morbidity rates significantly increased with surgical duration (20.5% vs 34.4% in the 1st and 4th quartiles, respectively, P  < 0.05) and so did pulmonary complications (14.6% vs 26.4% in the 1st and 4th quartiles, respectively, P  < 0.05). Differences were not found regarding cardiovascular and wound complications. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, operating time remained as an independent risk factor for overall (odds ratios, 2.05) and pulmonary complications (odds ratios, 2.01). Male sex, predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, number of lymphatic stations harvested, pleural adhesions, fissures completeness, lobectomy site, surgeon seniority, individual video-thoracoscopic surgeon experience and fissureless technique were identified as predictive factors for long operative time. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged operating time is associated with increased odds of postoperative complications. Modifiable factors contributing to prolonged operating time may serve as a target for quality improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Robotic surgery, although it shares some technical features with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), offers some advantages, such as ergonomic design and a 3-dimensional view. Thus, the learning curve for robotic lung resection could be expected to be shorter than that of VATS for surgeons who are proficient in VATS. The goal of this study was to analyse the robotic learning curve of a VATS experienced surgeon and to compare it to his own VATS learning curve for anatomical lung resections. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study based on the prospectively recorded data of the first 150 anatomical lung resections performed with VATS (75 cases) and with the robotic (75 cases) approach by the same surgeon in our centre. Learning curves were analysed using the cumulative sum method to assess the trends for total operating time and surgical failure (intraoperative complications, conversion, technical postoperative complications and reintervention) across case sequences. Subsequently, using adequate statistical tests, we compared the postoperative outcomes in both groups. RESULTS The median operating time was similar for both approaches (P  = 0.401). Surgical failure rate was higher for the robotic cases (21.3% vs 12%; P  = 0.125). Based on cumulative sum analyses, operating time decreased starting with case 34 in the VATS group and with case 32 in the robotic cohort. Surgical failure tended to decline starting with case 28 in the VATS group and with case 32 in the robotic group. Perioperative results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS When we compared robotic and VATS learning curves for anatomical lung resection, we did not find any differences. Postoperative outcomes were also similar with both approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the study, to measure changes inexercise DLCO% during the first 3 days after anatomical lung resection. In healthy individuals, increasing pulmonary blood flow during exercise also increases the % of the diffusing capacity of thelungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), but its evolution after lung resection is unknown.

Objective: Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer around the world, and it represents the main cause of death in the USA. Surgical treatment is the optimal therapeutic strategy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. The principal factor for long-term survival after complete resection is the anatomic extension of the neoplasm. However, other factors also have adverse effects on operative mortality, and influence long-term outcome. In this paper we propose an algorithmic solution for the estimation of 5-years survival rate in lung cancer patients undertaking pulmonary resection. Materials and methods: We address the issue of survival analysis through decision-making techniques based on fuzzy and soft set theories. We develop an expert system based on clinical and functional data of lung cancer resections in patients with cancer that can be used to predict the survival of patients. Results: The evaluation of surgical risk in patients undertaking pulmonary resection is a primary target for thoracic surgeons. Lung cancer survival is influenced by many factors. The computational performance of our algorithm is critically analyzed by an experimental study. The correct survival classification is achieved with an accuracy of 79.0%. Our novel soft-set based criterion is an effective and precise diagnosis application for the determination of the survival rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) registry was created 10 years ago and represents an international database collecting thoracic surgery procedures from European contributors. The purpose of the present report was to offer an overview of baseline and surgical characteristics and outcomes of patients submitted to lung resections for malignant lung disease as derived from the ESTS registry. METHODS: We retrieved data about all lung resections from 2007 to 2016 performed for primary and metastatic (secondary) lung cancer. We evaluated the baseline characteristics and the surgical management of this population. Within the subgroup of patients affected by primary lung cancer, we described the preoperative mediastinal staging management and the final pathological stage of disease. Finally, we analysed the morbidity and mortality rates for the cohort of patients submitted to anatomic lung resections for primary or secondary lung cancer. Outcomes were also evaluated in relation to several risk factors: type of resection, age, comorbidity, predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s and surgical approach. RESULTS: We selected 62 774 patients submitted to lung resections (male 66.5%, median age 64 years). For the entire population, median predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 73.3% (interquartile range: 59, 87.6), 33.8% of patients had cardiac comorbidities and 17.3% had other comorbidities. Among the patients with primary lung cancer (51 931 patients), 50.8% had Stage I disease and 23.2% Stage II disease; preoperative invasive mediastinal staging was performed in 70.3% of patients with computed tomography scan nodal enlargement and positron emission tomography scan nodal uptake. After anatomical lung resection (51 756 patients), overall morbidity was 18.5% and mortality (30 days or in-hospital) was 2.6%. Extent of resection, age >_75 years, presence of cardiac comorbidity, predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s <70% and open approach instead of video-assisted thoracic surgery were associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present report represent reliable European benchmarks for comparing the activities and outcomes of single institutions and surgeons at an international level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Stair climbing is considered the first step for functional evaluation of patients requiring anatomical lung resection who have low-predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) values. Nevertheless, stair climbing is not performed in many centres because of structural issues or patient safety concerns. We hypothesized that comparable exercise can be obtained on an ergometric bicycle in a safer environment where any adverse event can be treated. We tried to correlate the amount of exercise performed by stair climbing and by using an ergometric bicycle in a series of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluated prospectively. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with NSCLC who were scheduled for lung resection were prospectively enrolled to complete two low-technology exercise tests: The first one was stair climbing, and the second was a ramp test on an ergometric bicycle. For most patients (85%), both tests were performed on the same day, separated with at least 2 h of rest. The amount of exercise on the stair-climbing test (in watts: Watt 1) was calculated per patient weight, height reached on stairs and time spent. The bicycle test was performed on a Lode Corival ergometer with automatic calculation of the total work load (Watt 2). No estimation of VO2max was attempted. The bicycle test was conducted in an ad-hoc room fully equipped with oxygen, cardiac and blood pressure and PO2 monitoring and resuscitation equipment. The Bland–Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between both tests. A linear regression model was constructed in which the power developed on the stairs was the dependent variable and the watts generated on the bicycle and patient age were the covariates. RESULTS: All patients (median age: 65.5 years; range: 41–84), completed both tests without any adverse events. The number of watts was greater on the stairs tests (mean 227 vs 64 on the ergometric bicycle). The Bland–Altman plot showed agreement between tests in most cases (Pitman-Morgan test: 0.96). Work load was more dependent on age in the stairs tests (Pearson coefficient -0.72 on stairs; -0.52 on ergometric bicycle). The logistic model was highly predictive when the workload on the bicycle was corrected by the patient’s age (R2 =0.80; Wald test <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This simple test on an ergometric bicycle shows a high correlation with the widely accepted stair-climbing test when workload results are corrected using the patient’s age. It could replace the stair-climbing test and has the advantage of being conducted in an environment that is safer for the patient. Nevertheless, its reliability for risk prediction needs to be adequately evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

OBJECTIVES Bilobectomy is considered to be a risky procedure due to space mismatch between the pleural space and the remnant lung. The objective of this study was to evaluate if postoperative complications related or not to size mismatch are more frequent after bilobectomy compared with right lobectomy cases. METHODS Retrospective case-control study on a series of matched non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cases were patients who underwent right bilobectomy (upper and middle or lower and middle) and controls, patients who underwent right upper or lower lobectomy. Cases and controls were matched by propensity scoring according to site, age, ppoFEV1, type of postoperative management (intensive physiotherapy or not), cardiac comorbidity and pT status. We selected two primary outcomes for comparison: occurrence of any cardiorespiratory complication and occurrence of any complication related to space discrepancies. For the latter, all complicated case records were reviewed and two blinded observers agreed on the probability of each complication to be related to space discrepancies. Agreement was measured by the κ statistic. The overall odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome were calculated on 2 × 2 tables for the whole population and for cases with upper or lower resections. RESULTS The study included 689 patients: 572 right lobectomy (419 upper and 153 lower) and 117 bilobectomy cases (30 upper and middle and 87 lower and middle). The overall mortality rate of the series was 2.03% (14/689), and cardiorespiratory complications were recorded in 14.4% (99/689) and space-related complications in 19.59% (135/689) cases. Both observers agreed on space-related complications in 86% of the 135 cases (κ: 0.72). After matching, 234 cases entered the study (117 with right lobectomy, including 83 lower and 34 upper, and 117 with bilobectomy, including 87 lower and 30 upper). The prevalence of cardiorespiratory complications was higher after lower and middle lobectomy compared with lower lobectomy (P = 0.0002; OR: 7.96, 95% CI: 2.19–43.16). No differences were found in death rates or in space-related complications between groups of lobectomy and bilobectomy cases. CONCLUSIONS This study failed to demonstrate a higher space-related complication rate in bilobectomy cases but cardiorespiratory complications were statistically higher after lower and middle lobectomy compared with lower lobectomy in matched cases. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The role of chest physiotherapy in limiting postoperative pulmonary complications and in the recovery of pulmonary function and exercise capacity after lung surgery is still unclear because of the lack of conclusive, well-designed clinical trials. In this article the available literature on these topics is reviewed, and the effects of respiratory physiotherapy, instituted preoperatively or administered after surgery to patients undergoing lung resection, are commented on. The authors conclude that chest physiotherapy improves preoperative exercise capacity; this is a parameter highly predictive of postoperative pulmonary complications. Also physiotherapy administered during the immediate period after lung resection probably decreases frequency of pulmonary complications. Finally, further investigation is required for a better understanding of the effects of long-term chest physiotherapy after hospital discharge in lung resection patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background and objective: Exercise tests are considered the most reliable ones for the preoperative workup of lung resection candidates but frequently are indicated only in cases with low predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO). The aim of this investigation is to evaluate if a simple, standardised incremental bicycle exercise test routinely performed in patients considered operable is predictive of postoperative cardio-respiratory complication and if its performance is comparable to a logistic regression model including frequently cited clinical predictive variables. Methods: A series of 103 lung resection candidates were included in a prospective observational study. All patients underwent a standardised, incremental exercise test on a bicycle up to exhaustion. The analysed outcome was the occurrence of postoperative cardio-respiratory complications prospectively recorded and codified. The correlation of distance reached at the end of the test and the outcome was estimated by non-parametric tests. A logistic regression model including age, BMI, predicted postoperative (ppoFEV1%) and predicted postoperative DLCO (ppoDLCO) was adjusted and the individual probability of complication calculated and set as a new variable. Finally, two receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared: one with distance at the exercise test and the other with logistic regression probability of complication. Results: Mortality of the series was nil. Outcome prevalence was 14%. Distance reached at the end of the exercise test was lower in cases with a positive outcome (3498.6m vs 4543.5m, p =0.001). On logistic regression analysis, age of the patient (p =0.016) and ppoDLCO (p =0.000) were predictive for the outcome. On ROC analysis, C-indices were 0.77 (distance) and 0.78 (logistic model, p =0.95). Conclusion: Reached distance in a simple standardised exercise test is related to postoperative morbidity after lung resection; and the accuracy of prediction using this variable alone is comparable to a logistic regression model including age and ppoDLCO. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: Since there are no data in the literature regarding variability in the management of postoperative pleural drainages, we have designed a prospective randomized study aimed at measuring inter-observer variability in deciding when to withdraw chest tubes after lung resection and to evaluate if the use of an electronic device to measure postoperative air leak decreases clinical practice variations. Methods: Sixty-one patients undergoing pulmonary resection were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: digital group (electronic measure of pleural air leak using Millicore AB DigiVent™ chest drainage system) or traditional group (standard water seal pleural chamber). Chest tube withdrawal criteria were established in advance. During morning rounds, two thoracic surgeons with comparable clinical experience and blinded to the decision of their counterpart, evaluated chest tube withdrawal criteria and noted whether the tube should be withdrawn or not. Inter-observer variability kappa index and global, positive, and negative agreement rates were calculated on 2×2 tables. Each observation episode was considered in the calculation. Results: Fifty-four observations were recorded in the traditional group. Kappa coefficient was 0.37 (overall agreement rate: 0.58; positive agreement rate: 0.72; and negative agreement rate: 0.64). In the digital group, 67 observations were recorded. Kappa coefficient was 0.88 (overall agreement rate: 0.94; positive agreement rate 0.94; and negative agreement rate 0.94). Conclusions: We have demonstrated a high rate of disagreement related to the indication to remove chest tubes after lung resection and the improvement of the agreement rate with the use of an electronic device to measure postoperative air leak and pleural pressures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: Outcome endpoints are still the most widely used indicators of performance. However, they need to be risk-adjusted in order to be reliable instruments of audit. Recently, the European Society Objective Score (ESOS) was developed from the online European Thoracic Surgery Database as an audit tool. In this study, we applied for the first time the ESOS.01 to assess the performance of three European thoracic surgery units during three successive years of activity. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis performed on prospective databases. We analysed 695 patients submitted to pneumonectomy (117) or lobectomy (578) for lung neoplasm at three European dedicated thoracic surgery units (unit A 264 patients, unit B 262, unit C 169) from January 2004 through December 2006. Qualified thoracic surgeons performed all the operations. No patients in this series were in the original ESOS development set. ESOS.01 was used to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in all patients. Observed and predicted mortality rates were then compared within each unit by the z-test. Results: Cumulative observed mortality rates in units A, B and C were 2.3% (six cases), 2.7% (seven cases) and 4.1% (seven cases), respectively. We were not able to find statistically significant differences between observed and ESOS-predicted mortality rates. The comparison of risk-adjusted mortality rates between units did not show significant differences (unit A 3.9%, unit B 3.3%, unit C 5.6%). Conclusions: The use of ESOS.01 revealed that the performances of all units were in line with the predicted ones during each period under analysis and did not differ between each other. The results of our study warrant future efforts to refine the ESOS model and to develop other risk-adjusted outcome indicators with the aim to establish European benchmarks of performance. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Objective: Prolonged air leak (PAL) after pulmonary surgery is a frequent occurrence and is reported to cause increased length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs although the costs directly attributable to PAL have never been published. The present study aims to compare the prevalence of pulmonary complications (atelectasis, pneumonia and pleural empyema) in patients with or without PAL and to quantify economic costs directly incurred by PAL in a series of pulmonary lobectomies. Methods: A series of 238 patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy (January 2001–December 2003) have been reviewed. PAL was defined as air leakage which prevented hospital discharge for 5 postoperative days or over. Hospital costs (excluding operating room) for pulmonary lobectomies have been obtained and calculated as mean daily costs. Age, body mass index, diagnosis, Charlson co-morbidity index, ppoFEV1 and major post-operative cardio-pulmonary morbidity have been used to construct a Cox-regression model for hospital stay, considering deaths as censored cases. Individual risk function has been used as a new variable and expected LOS calculated for each case. This data has been used to estimate total excess hospital stay and costs incurred by cases with PAL. Results: Prevalence of PAL was 23 cases (9, 7%). Mean daily hospital cost for lobectomy was 632.49€. For the whole series, mean hospital stay was 5 days (10 days for patients with PAL). PAL cases had more postoperative pulmonary morbidity (risk-ratio: 2.78). Variables showing independent influence on stay were: diagnosis of non-malignant disease (P=0.001); FEV1ppo (P=0.032) and cardio-respiratory morbidity (P&#60;0.001). Calculated total excess stay for PAL patients was 62 days. A total expense of 39,437.39€ (38,724.96€ hospital and 712.43€ pharmacy charges) were estimated to result from postoperative air-leak. Conclusions: PAL patients are prone to developing major postoperative morbidity. PAL calculated costs are over 13000€ per year. This data is useful for designing technical cost-effective strategies to avoid post-lobectomy PAL. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To evaluate the rate, causes and variables related to emergency hospital readmission after scheduled major lung resection. Setting: An university general hospital in a managed care health system. Methods: Databases of 727 patients undergoing scheduled major lung resection between 1994 and 2003 have been reviewed, excluding hospital mortality from the analysis. The studied outcome was the occurrence of emergency hospital readmission by any surgery-related cause, at any centre, during the first 30 days after discharge. Independent studied variables were: age of the patient, body mass index, predicted postoperative FEV1% (ppoFEV1%), type of surgery (lobectomy or pneumonectomy), postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). Descriptive statistics have been performed and forward step-wise logistic regression has been used to select predictive variables. Results: Rate of emergency readmission was 6.9% (50 cases); 3 patients (6%) died. Pleural empyema without bronchial fistula (18 cases) was the most frequent cause of readmission. On logistic-regression analysis, pneumonectomy (odds ratio 3.84; 95%CI: 1.98–7.45) and major postoperative morbidity (odds ratio 2.42; 95%CI: 1.26–4.66) showed independent correlation to the outcome. Conclusions: Readmission rate after lung resection is around 7% and it is not influenced by LOS; patients experiencing major postoperative morbidity and pneumonectomy cases have the highest probability to be readmitted within 30 days after lung resection. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To propose an ensemble model of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict cardio-respiratory morbidity after pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Prospective clinical study was based on 489 NSCLC operated cases. An artificial neural network ensemble was developed using a training set of 348 patients undergoing lung resection between 1994 and 1999. Predictive variables used were: sex of the patient, age, body mass index, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, induction chemotherapy, extent of resection, chest wall resection, perioperative blood transfusion, tumour staging, forced expiratory volume in 1s percent (FEV(1)%), and predicted postoperative FEV(1)% (ppoFEV(1)%). The analysed outcome was the occurrence of postoperative cardio-respiratory complications prospectively recorded and codified. The artificial neural network ensemble consists of 100 backpropagation networks combined via a simple averaging method. The probabilities of complication calculated by ensemble model were obtained to the actual occurrence of complications in 141 cases operated on between January 2000 and December 2001 and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for this method was constructed.Results: The prevalence of cardio-respiratory morbidity was 0.25 in the training and 0.30 in the validation series. The accuracy for morbidity prediction (area under the ROC curve) was 0.98 by the ensemble model.Conclusion: In this series an artificial neural network ensemble offered a high performance to predict postoperative cardio-respiratory morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A review of the article "Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis" by J Zhou, which appeared in the periodical "the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery" is presented.

Abstract: Background and purpose: Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with poor pulmonary function or other comorbidities are treated with radiotherapy. The objective of this investigation is to compare the 3-year survival of two early-stage NSCLC populations treated in two different hospitals, either by surgical resection (lobectomy) or by individualized high-dose accelerated radiotherapy, after matching patients by propensity scoring analysis. Methods: A retrospective comparative study has been performed on two series of consecutive patients with cytohistological diagnosis of NSCLC, clinically staged IA by means of PET-scan (radiotherapy group) and pathologically staged IA (surgery group). Results: A total of 157 cases were initially selected for the analysis (110 operated and 47 treated by radiotherapy). Patients in the radiotherapy group were older, with higher comorbidity and lower FEV1% with 3-years probability of survival for operated patients higher than that found for patients treated by radiotherapy. After matching by propensity scoring (using age and FEV1%), differences disappear and 3-years probability of survival had no statistical differences. Conclusions: Although this is a non-randomized retrospective analysis, we have not found 3-years survival differences after matching cases between surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, data presented here support the continuous investigation for non-surgical alternatives in this disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]