Search

Objective: To investigate the clinical implications of sleep quality, anxiety and depression in patients with advanced lung cancer (LC) and their family caregivers (FCs)., Methods: A total of 98 patients with advanced LC and their FCs (n=98) were recruited from the Oncology Department in Nanfang Hospital. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), consisting of seven components that evaluate subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, duration of sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, sleep medication usage and daytime dysfunction, was used to assess sleep quality. Using the tool of Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), we tested the patients' status of anxiety and depression, respectively., Results: The prevalences of poor sleep quality, anxiety and depression in patients were 56.1%, 48.9% and 56.1%, respectively, while those in FCs were 16.3%, 32.6% and 25.5%, respectively. Patients had higher PSQI, SAS and SDS scores than did FCs (p<0.05). Significant correlations were found between the patients' and FCs' scores of PSQI/SAS/SDS (p<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that sleep disturbances in patients (HR 0.413, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.80, p=0.01) and the global PSQI score of FCs (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.71, p=0.00) were independent risk factors for patients' first-line progression-free survival (PFS). Moreover, patients' sleep latency (HR 2.329, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.96, p=0.00) and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (HR 1.953, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.38, p=0.01) were significant prognostic factors for their overall survival (OS)., Conclusions: We demonstrated that presence of sleep disturbances in patients with advanced LC and the global PSQI Score of their FCs may be risk predictors for patients' poor first-line PFS. Patients' sleep latency was a potential risk factor for their OS., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of tumor mutational burden (TMB) combined with smoking status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (anti PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent next-generation sequencing test (either 295-gene panel NGS or 1021-gene panel NGS) from September 2017 to November 2020. The relationship between TMB and smoking status was investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) of the NSCLC patients who received combination immunotherapy grouped by TMB value and smoking status., Results: We enrolled 323 cases and 388 cases of NSCLC patients in the 295-gene panel cohort and 1021-gene panel cohort, respectively. Positive correlation between TMB and smoking status was found in lung adenocarcinoma, but not in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Participants with both high TMB and smoking status who received immune checkpoint therapy combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy had longer PFS than other participants (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: The combination of TMB with smoking status might be a potential predictor for the efficacy of combination immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To compare and evaluate the prognostic value of various pretreatment combinations of inflammatory factors in patients with lung cancer (LC). Materials & methods: This study enrolled 1005 patients with LC and categorized into a discovery cohort and a validation cohort. Results: A combination of Lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein levels (LCR) demonstrated the highest correlation with poor first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05), but not disease-free survival (p > 0.05) compared with other parameters in LC patients. Decreased preoperative LCR was an independent prognostic factor for first-line PFS and OS (p < 0.05), but not disease-free survival (p > 0.05) in patients. Conclusion: Pretreatment LCR is a promising biomarker for first-line PFS and OS in patients with LC.

Objectives: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is one of the leading therapeutic targets in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical importance that the percentage of ALK-positive tumor cells has on NSCLC remains unclear. Methods: A total of 344 ALK-positive patients were enrolled in this study. The percentage of ALK-positive tumor cells was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The discrimination and calibration analyses of the nomogram were estimated with Harrell's C-index. Results: Higher percentages (≥50%) of ALK-positive tumor cells were significantly correlated with male gender, poor differentiation, and normal levels of carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) and blood platelets ( p  < 0.05). A shorter first-line progression-free survival (PFS) was correlated with a lower percentage (15-49%) of ALK-positive tumor cells, chemotherapy, a poor performance state, non-adenocarcinoma, as well as abnormal CA153 and Cyfra21-1 levels; and an abnormal thrombin time ( p  < 0.05). A low percentage of ALK-positive tumor cells, crizotinib treatment, CA153 levels, and neutrophil count were independent risk factors for poor PFS in the multivariate analysis ( p  < 0.05). The nomogram showed a C-index of 0.76 for first-line PFS. Conclusion: A nomogram including the percentage of ALK-positive tumor cells may act as a crucial indicator for first-line PFS in ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

To investigate the prevalence of EML4-ALK  variants in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials & methods: Database of Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library were searched systematically to April 2018. Results: A total of 39 articles including 1903 NSCLC patients with ALK positive were recruited. The overall pooled prevalence for EML4-ALK variant 1 to 3 was 81.84% (95% CI: 76.68-86.99%), ranging from 86.64% tested by RT-PCR to 70.85% tested by other methods (p = 0.00). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled prevalences of variant 1, 2 and 3 were 40.38% (95% CI: 34.83-45.93%), 6.59% (95% CI: 4.27-8.91%) and 26.54% (95% CI: 20.89-32.2%), respectively. Conclusion: This present study provides the exact prevalence of EML4-ALK rearrangement in different variants for NSCLC patients with ALK positive.