Search

Background: The value of neoadjuvant treatment in combination with resection as multimodality therapy (MMT) for stage IIB non-small cell lung cancer remains controversial., Methods: This was a national cohort study of patients with clinical stage IIB non-small cell lung cancer (2006 to 2015) that used the National Cancer Database. Cohorts were defined on the basis of the MMT sequence and were categorized as follows: surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiation (ACRT), neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery (NA), surgery-alone, and definitive chemotherapy or chemoradiation (nonsurgical). The primary comparison was between the NA and AC cohorts. Propensity matching methods were used to match cohorts who had AC vs NA. Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze the difference in risk of death between the NA and AC groups., Results: There were 10,841 patients with stage IIB lung cancer: 2476 in the AC, 854 with ACRT, 1195 with NA, 2019 with surgery alone, and 4297 with nonsurgical treatment. Of the 6544 patients who underwent surgery, 37.8% had AC, 13.1% had ACRT, 18.3% had NA, and 30.9% had surgery alone. Relative to those patients treated with AC, nonsurgical treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.69 to 3.17) or surgery-alone (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.38) was associated with a significantly higher risk of death. After propensity matching, there was no difference in the risk of death between the NA and AC cohorts (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.31)., Conclusions: MMT, including surgical resection, is associated with improved OS, regardless of treatment sequence, with no difference in survival on the basis of an NA or AC approach. The potential benefits of NA over AC to ensure that patients complete MMT warrant further prospective investigation., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for identifying patients who will benefit from multimodality therapy. This study evaluated clinical-pathologic correlation and its effects on receipt of guideline-concordant therapy in a national cohort., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with surgically resected NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2014 was conducted. Primary tumor and nodal staging information was analyzed in patients who underwent upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy to calculate correlation between clinical and pathologic stages and estimate downstaging rate. Staging accuracy and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between receipt of guideline-concordant therapy and overall risk of death., Results: Among 82,999 patients, correlation between clinical and pathologic stages was strong (r = 0.69). Correlation of primary tumor staging was high (71.2%-84.5%). The positive predictive value of nodal staging was 78.2%. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with downstaging in tumor stage (T1, 1.5%; T2, 22.6%; T3, 28%; T4, 42%) and 17.3% of positive nodes. Patients with stage I disease had high rates of guideline-concordant treatment (IA, 97.4%; and IB, 97.9%). Patients with stage IIA to IIIA disease had lower rates of guideline concordance. Receipt of guideline-concordant care was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.87)., Conclusions: Clinical staging modalities are reasonably accurate. However, less than one half of patients with stage IIA to IIIA NSCLC receive guideline-concordant therapy, and this deficiency is associated with inferior survival. Identifying factors contributing to these differences is crucial to improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of insurance on outcomes in the modern era of evidence-based guidelines is unclear. We sought to examine differences in receipt of therapy and outcomes for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer patients by insurance coverage., Method: Clinical T1-3 N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer cases were identified in the 2004 to 2014 National Cancer Database and compared across 4 groups: private, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. A multivariable, linear regression model was used to examine the effects of insurance status on time to curative surgical therapy, adjusting for patient and facility characteristics. Receipt of different therapies was examined with multivariable logistic regression. Survival analysis was conducted with Cox regression., Results: A total of 240,361 patients presented with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (60,532 private, 164,377 Medicare, 11,001 Medicaid, and 4,451 uninsured). After adjustment, Medicaid and uninsured patients received surgical therapy later than privately insured patients (9.5 days and 7.0 days, respectively, P < .001), were more likely to be delayed > 8 weeks (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.55-1.73 and odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.58), and were significantly less likely to receive surgery (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.56 and odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.55). Uninsured patients were more likely to receive no treatment (odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.92-2.41), followed by Medicaid patients (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.53-1.80). The 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in the Medicaid and uninsured populations., Conclusion: Even in the modern era, uninsured and Medicaid early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients have decreased odds of receiving a potentially curative operation and experience inferior outcomes. Given substantial expenditures on the Medicaid program, strategies for increasing utilization of curative surgery in Medicaid patients with lung cancer are needed., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)