Search

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by one year of consolidation durvalumab is the current standard-of-care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of good functional status. However, cCRT and consolidation durvalumab may be challenging to administer for selected patient populations underrepresented or even excluded in clinical trials: older and/or frail patients; those with cardiovascular or respiratory comorbidities in which treatment-related adverse events may be higher, and patients with pre-existing autoimmune disorders for whom immunotherapy use is controversial. In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence, challenges, ongoing clinical trials and potential future treatment scenarios in relevant subgroups of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who are underrepresented in clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Chemoimmunotherapy is currently the preferred first-line treatment option for the majority of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer without driver genetic alterations. Most of these patients, however, will experience disease progression within the first year after treatment initiation and both patients and their physicians will be confronted with the dilemma of the optimal second-line treatment. Identification of molecular targets, such as KRASG12C , BRAFV600X , METexon14 , and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 mutations, and RET rearrangements offer therapeutic opportunities in pretreated patients with corresponding alterations. For those tumors that do not harbor oncogenic drivers, second-line treatment with docetaxel remains the current standard of care despite modest efficacy. Strategies to challenge docetaxel include the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with tyrosine inhibitors of multiple kinases or with DNA damage response inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and locoregional treatments for oligoprogressive disease. Next-generation immunotherapy strategies, such as T-cell engagers, immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and T-cell receptor cell therapy are being currently investigated in the quest to reverse resistance to ICIs. Importantly, the advent of these new agents heralds a novel spectrum of toxicities that require both the physician's and the patient's education. Herein, we review current and future strategies aiming to outperform docetaxel after chemoimmunotherapy failure, and we provide practical information on how to best communicate to our patients the unique toxicity aspects associated with immunotherapy.

Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations., Methods: This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations., Results: This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date., Recommendations: Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become standard-of-care for the treatment of NSCLC; however, their use brings with it the risk of a unique set of inflammatory side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The recognition, diagnosis, and management of irAEs have become essential to clinical practice, with the potential for high-grade toxicities affecting treatment decision-making. This manuscript provides a state-of-the-art review of irAEs as they pertain to patients with NSCLC, by summarizing the common and severe toxicities of the standard immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens and clinical treatment settings relevant to this disease and future directions., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of monalizumab (anti-NKG2A/CD94) and durvalumab (anti-programmed death ligand-1) may promote antitumor immunity by targeting innate and adaptive immunity. This phase 1/2 study of monalizumab and durvalumab evaluated safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamics in patients with advanced solid tumors., Main Body: Immunotherapy-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with advanced disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and 1-3 prior lines of systemic therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting were enrolled. In part 1 (dose escalation), patients received durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) with increasing doses of monalizumab Q2W/Q4W (n=15). Dose expansion in part 1 included patients with cervical cancer (n=15; durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q2W) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer (CRC) (n=15; durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q4W). In part 2 (dose expansion), patients with MSS-CRC (n=40), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=20), MSS-endometrial cancer (n=40), or ovarian cancer (n=40) received durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q2W. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Exploratory analyses included assessment of T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell activation and proliferation in peripheral blood and the tumor microenvironment (TME). The study enrolled 185 patients (part 1, 45; part 2, 140). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. In part 2, the most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (12.1%), asthenia (9.3%), diarrhea (9.3%), pruritus (7.9%), and pyrexia (7.1%). In the expansion cohorts, response rates were 0% (cervical), 7.7% (MSS-CRC), 10% (NSCLC), 5.4% (ovarian), and 0% (MSS-endometrial). Sustained NK cell activation, CD8 + T-cell proliferation, increased serum levels of CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10) and CXCL11, and increased tumor infiltration of CD8 + and granzyme B + cells were observed., Conclusions: Although efficacy was modest, monalizumab plus durvalumab was well tolerated and encouraging immune activation was observed in the peripheral blood and TME., Trial Registration Number: NCT02671435., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SP: scientific advisory income from: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Certis, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Illumina, Merck, Pfizer, Rakuten, and Tempus; SP’s university receives research funding from: Amgen, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Fate Therapeutics, Iovance, Merck, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and SQZ Biotechnologies.TA-G has received research funding, honoraria, and non-financial or other support from IPSEN, Adacap, Pfizer, Sanofi, EISAI, Lilly, Bayer, Janssen, BMS, Astellas, Novartis, Roche, and Merck. SB: institutional grants: AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. Honoraria for Advisory boards: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Sereno, Mersana Therapeutics, OncXerna, Seagen, and Shattuck Labs; Honoraria for lectures: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mersana Therapeutics, Pfizer, and Roche. DW, JN, NES, DCP, L-YC, PK, MDH: employment by and stock ownership/options in AstraZeneca. MLA: former employment by and stock ownership/options in AstraZeneca. MD: employment by and stock ownership/options in AstraZeneca. JRD: institutional funds received from: AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Astellas, Gilead, Merck, Deciphera, Hutchison, BMS, Adlai Norte, Takeda, OnKure Therapeutics; Consulting: Gilead, OnKure Therapeutics; Equity Interest: OnKure Therapeutics. BAC: institutional research support: Astra Zeneca, Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, Astellas, Bayer, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Pfizer, Repare Therapeutics. Scientific advisory boards: Foundation Medicine, Tempus, Seattle Genetics, G1 therapeutics., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Although immunotherapy is the mainstay of therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), robust biomarkers of clinical response are lacking. The heterogeneity of clinical responses together with the limited value of radiographic response assessments to timely and accurately predict therapeutic effect-especially in the setting of stable disease-calls for the development of molecularly informed real-time minimally invasive approaches. In addition to capturing tumor regression, liquid biopsies may be informative in capturing immune-related adverse events (irAE)., Experimental Design: We investigated longitudinal changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with metastatic NSCLC who received immunotherapy-based regimens. Using ctDNA targeted error-correction sequencing together with matched sequencing of white blood cells and tumor tissue, we tracked serial changes in cell-free tumor load (cfTL) and determined molecular response. Peripheral T-cell repertoire dynamics were serially assessed and evaluated together with plasma protein expression profiles., Results: Molecular response, defined as complete clearance of cfTL, was significantly associated with progression-free (log-rank P = 0.0003) and overall survival (log-rank P = 0.01) and was particularly informative in capturing differential survival outcomes among patients with radiographically stable disease. For patients who developed irAEs, on-treatment peripheral blood T-cell repertoire reshaping, assessed by significant T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotypic expansions and regressions, was identified on average 5 months prior to clinical diagnosis of an irAE., Conclusions: Molecular responses assist with the interpretation of heterogeneous clinical responses, especially for patients with stable disease. Our complementary assessment of the peripheral tumor and immune compartments provides an approach for monitoring of clinical benefits and irAEs during immunotherapy., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard treatment for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the burden of infectious complications during ICI therapy is poorly described., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs between 2007 and 2020 at a tertiary academic center. The incidence, characteristics, and healthcare utilization outcomes of infections during ICI therapy and within 3 months of ICI discontinuation are presented using descriptive statistics. Cox proportional hazard models are used to examine infection-free survival by demographic and treatment factors. Associations between patient or treatment characteristics and hospitalization or ICU admission are analyzed by logistic regression, presented as odds ratios (OR)., Results: Of 298 patients, infections occurred in 54.4% (n = 162). Of these patients, 59.3% (n = 96) required hospitalization and 15.4% (n = 25) required ICU admission. The most common infection was bacterial pneumonia. Fungal infections occurred in 12 patients (7.4%). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.15, 95% CI, 1.01-4.58), corticosteroid treatment within 1 month prior to infection onset (OR 3.04, 95% CI, 1.47-6.30), and concomitant irAE and infection (OR 5.48, 95% CI, 2.15-14.00) had higher odds of hospitalization. Corticosteroid use was associated with higher odds of ICU admission (OR 3.09, 95% CI, 1.29-7.38)., Conclusion: In this large single-institution study we identify that more than half of patients with ICI-treated NSCLC develop infectious complications. We identify that patients with COPD, recent corticosteroid use, and concomitant irAE and infection have higher odds of hospitalization, and that unusual infections (eg, fungal) can occur. This highlights clinical awareness of infections as important complications during ICI therapy in patients with NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) delivers high rates of local control in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, systemic immune effects are poorly understood. Here, we evaluate the early pathologic and immunologic effects of SABR. Blood/core-needle tumor biopsies were collected from six patients with stage I NSCLC before and 5-7 days after SABR (48 Gy/4 or 50 Gy/5 fractions). Serial blood was collected up to 1-year post-SABR. We used immunohistochemistry to evaluate pathological changes, immune-cell populations (CD8, FoxP3), and PD-L1/PD-1 expression within the tumor. We evaluated T-cell receptor (TCR) profile changes in the tumor using TCR sequencing. We used the MANAFEST (Mutation-Associated Neoantigen Functional Expansion of Specific T-cells) assay to detect peripheral neoantigen-specific T-cell responses and dynamics. At a median follow-up of 40 months, 83% of patients (n=5) were alive without tumor progression. Early post-SABR biopsies showed viable tumor and similar distribution of immune-cell populations as compared with baseline samples. Core-needle samples proved insufficient to detect population-level TCR-repertoire changes. Functionally, neoantigen-specific T-cells were detected in the blood prior to SABR. A subset of these patients had a transient increase in the frequency of neoantigen-specific T-cells between 1 week and 3-6 months after SABR. SABR alone could induce a delayed, transient neoantigen-specific T-cell immunologic response in patients with stage I NSCLC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KRV has received consulting from AstraZeneca; CH has received consulting fees from Johnson & Johnson and D1 Medical Technology; PTT has received consulting fees from RefleXion Medical Inc, Natsar Pharm, Bayer Healthcare, Regeneron & J&J, has a patent (9114158) licensed to Natsar Pharmaceuticals; JRB receives research funding from AstraZeneca and BMS. CT receives research grants from Siemens Medical Solutions and Carestream Health; JRB has advisory board or consulting agreements with Amgen, AstraZeneca (AZ), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi, Regeneron, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson and Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DMSB) relationships with Janssen; PMF receives research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Novartis, Regeneron, Kyowa, BioNTech. PMF has advisory board or consulting agreements with AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Genentech, Sanofi, Surface, Janssen, G1, Merck and DSMB relationships with Polaris, Flame. JN receives consulting fees from AZ, Roche, Amgen, BMS, Mirati, Merck, Arcus Biosciences, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Elevation Oncology, Bayer, NGM Pharmaceutical, Regeneron, Pfizer, Takeda, Kaleido Biosciences. JN has DSMB relationships with AZ, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo; VA receives research funding to Johns Hopkins University from AstraZeneca, Personal Genome Diagnostics and Delfi Diagnostics and has received research funding to Johns Hopkins University from Bristol-Myers Squibb in the past 5 years. VA is an inventor on patent applications (63/276,525, 17/779,936, 16/312,152, 16/341,862, 17/047,006 and 17/598,690) submitted by Johns Hopkins University related to cancer genomic analyses, ctDNA therapeutic response monitoring and immunogenomic features of response to immunotherapy that have been licensed to one or more entities. Under the terms of these license agreements, the University and inventors are entitled to fees and royalty distributions; KNS has filed for patent protection on the MANAFEST technology (serial No. 16/341,862), has received travel support/honoraria from Illumina, Inc., receives research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Anara, and AstraZeneca, and owns founder’s equity in ManaT Bio, Inc. The terms of these arrangements are being managed by Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcomes for patients with resectable disease are historically poor compared with other solid organ malignancies. In recent years, there have been significant advances in multidisciplinary care, which have resulted in improved outcomes. Innovations in surgical oncology include the use of limited resection and minimally invasive techniques. Recent data in radiation oncology have suggested refinements in pre- and postoperative radiation therapy, resulting in optimization of techniques in the curative setting. Finally, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in the advanced setting has paved the way for inclusion in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, resulting in recent regulatory approvals for four regimens (CheckMate-816, IMpower010, PEARLS, ADAURA). In this review, we will provide an overview of the seminal studies informing advancements in optimal surgical resection, radiation treatment, and systemic therapy for resectable NSCLC. We will summarize the key data on survival outcomes, biomarker analyses, and future directions for perioperative studies.

Introduction: Consolidation durvalumab (the "PACIFIC regimen") is standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who have not progressed after chemoradiotherapy, on the basis of data from the phase 3 placebo-controlled PACIFIC study (NCT02125461). Nevertheless, the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with stage III EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC is not well characterized. Here, we report a post hoc exploratory efficacy and safety analysis from a subgroup of patients with EGFRm NSCLC from the PACIFIC., Methods: Patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC and no progression after more than or equal to two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were randomized (2:1) to receive durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks [wk], for up to 1 y) or placebo; stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Enrollment was not restricted by oncogenic driver gene mutation status or programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Patients with NSCLC with an EGFR mutation, determined by local testing only, were included in this subgroup analysis. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; assessed by blinded independent central review) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate and safety. Statistical analyses for the subgroup of patients with EGFRm NSCLC were post hoc and considered exploratory., Results: Of 713 patients randomized, 35 had locally confirmed EGFRm NSCLC (durvalumab, n = 24; placebo, n = 11). At data cutoff (January 11, 2021), median duration of follow-up for survival was 42.7 months (range: 3.7-74.3 mo) for all randomized patients in the subgroup. Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3-20.7) with durvalumab versus 10.9 months (95% CI: 1.9-not evaluable [NE]) with placebo; hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.39-2.13). Median OS was 46.8 months (95% CI: 29.9-NE) with durvalumab versus 43.0 months (95% CI: 14.9-NE) with placebo; hazard ratio = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.39-2.63). The safety profile of durvalumab was generally consistent with the overall population and known profile for durvalumab., Conclusions: PFS and OS outcomes with durvalumab were similar to placebo for patients with EGFRm tumors, with wide CIs. These data should be interpreted with caution owing to small patient numbers and lack of a prospective study that evaluates clinical outcomes by tumor biomarker status. Further research to determine the optimal treatment for unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC is warranted., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See Appendix 1 (online only) for disclaimers and other important information. Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline .

Introduction: Anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). The clinical features, survival, and burden of toxicities of patients with aNSCLC alive >1 year from ICI initiation are poorly understood., Materials and Methods: We defined ICI survivors as patients alive >1 year after ICI start and retrospectively reviewed demographics, treatment, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Long-term irAEs were defined as ongoing irAEs lasting >1 year; burden of toxicity measures were based on percentage of days a patient experienced toxicity. Using linear and logistic regression, we evaluated association between demographics and disease characteristics with burden of toxicity., Results: We identified 114 ICI survivors from 317 patients with aNSCLC. Half (52%) experienced an irAE of any grade, and 23.7% developed long-term irAEs. More ICI survivors with irAES in the first year had never smoked (P = .018) or received ICIs as frontline therapy (P = .015). The burden of toxicity in the first year significantly correlated with the burden of toxicity afterward (ρ = 0.72; P < .001). No patients with progressive disease had a high burden of toxicity, and they experienced 30.6% fewer days with toxicity than those with stable disease. Increased duration of therapy was associated with higher odds of experiencing toxicity. Half of ICI survivors with irAEs were still receiving treatment for unresolved irAEs at time of death or last follow-up., Conclusion: Significant proportions of ICI survivors have unresolved long-term toxicities. These data support a growing need to understand long-term toxicity to optimize management of those treated with ICIs., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Human gut microbial species found to associate with clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are often tested in mice using fecal microbiota transfer (FMT), wherein tumor responses in recipient mice may recapitulate human responses to ICI treatment. However, many FMT studies have reported only limited methodological description, details of murine cohorts, and statistical methods. To investigate the reproducibility and robustness of gut microbial species that impact ICI responses, we performed human to germ-free mouse FMT using fecal samples from patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had a pathological response or nonresponse after neoadjuvant ICI treatment. R-FMT mice yielded greater anti-tumor responses in combination with anti-PD-L1 treatment compared to NR-FMT, although the magnitude varied depending on mouse cell line, sex, and individual experiment. Detailed investigation of post-FMT mouse microbiota using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, with models to classify and correct for biological variables, revealed a shared presence of the most highly abundant taxa between the human inocula and mice, though low abundance human taxa colonized mice more variably after FMT. Multiple Clostridium species also correlated with tumor outcome in individual anti-PD-L1-treated R-FMT mice. RNAseq analysis revealed differential expression of T and NK cell-related pathways in responding tumors, irrespective of FMT source, with enrichment of these cell types confirmed by immunohistochemistry. This study identifies several human gut microbial species that may play a role in clinical responses to ICIs and suggests attention to biological variables is needed to improve reproducibility and limit variability across experimental murine cohorts., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Systemic treatment options for patients with lung cancer have expanded in recent years, with a number of immunotherapeutic strategies now in our treatment armamentarium. Toxicity of and resistance to treatment hold a major stake in lung cancer morbidity and mortality. Herein, we summarise the background, current evidence and potential mechanisms underlying the role of the commensal gut microbiota in immunotherapy outcomes such as response and toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Small diagnostic tissue samples can be inadequate in testing an expanding list of validated oncogenic driver alterations and fail to reflect intratumour heterogeneity (ITGH) in lung cancer. Liquid biopsies are non-invasive and may better reflect ITGH. Most liquid biopsies are performed in the context of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma but Exhaled Breath Condensate (EBC) shows promise as a lung-specific liquid biopsy., Methods: In this prospective, proof-of-concept study we carried out targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) on diagnostic tissue samples from 125 patients with lung cancer and compared results to plasma and EBC for 5 oncogenic driver mutations (EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, ERBB2, BRAF) using an ultrasensitive PCR technique (UltraSEEK™ Lung Panel on the MassARRAY® System, Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA)., Results: There was a significantly higher failure rate due to unamplifiable DNA in tissue NGS (57/125, 45.6%) compared to plasma (27/125, 21.6%, p < 0.001 and EBC (26/125,20.8%, p ≤ 0.001. Consequently, both plasma and EBC identified higher number of mutations compared to tissue NGS. Specifically, there were significantly higher numbers of mutations detected in EGFR, KRAS and PIK3CA in plasma (p = 9.82 × 10 -3 , p = 3.14 × 10 -5 , p = 1.95 × 10 -3 ) and EBC (p = 2.18 × 10 -3 , p = 2.28 × 10 -4 ,p = 0.016) compared to tissue NGS. There was considerable divergence in mutation profiles between plasma and EBC with 34/76 (44%) mutations detected in plasma and 37/74 (41.89%) in EBC unique to their respective liquid biopsy., Conclusions: The results suggest that EBC is effective in identifying clinically relevant alterations in patients with lung cancer using UltraSEEK™ and has a potential role as an adjunct to plasma testing., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival and are increasingly used for non-small cell lung cancer. However, use may be limited by immune-related adverse events such as checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). Literature estimates for CIP incidence are inconsistent. Real-world adherence to guidelines, clinical course, and healthcare utilization in the treatment of CIP has not been described in large cohorts., Methods: A combined claims and electronic health record database (TriNetX) was used to identify 13,113 patients with lung cancer treated with programmed cell death receptor/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, and a propensity score-matched control cohort treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapies. The attributable risk of CIP was calculated in the first 12 months after therapy by comparing the incidence of diagnosis codes for pneumonitis/pneumonia between cohorts. Cases of CIP, identified by the most specific code for drug-induced respiratory conditions, were further analyzed for medication usage, rates of diagnostic bronchoscopy, ICI discontinuation rates, and usage of hospital services compared with patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors who did not develop CIP., Results: The attributable risk of pneumonitis to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was 2.49% (95% CI, 1.50% to 3.47%). Median time to onset in the CIP subcohort was 3.9 months (IQR, 2.1-7.3 months). Steroid and antibiotic use increased dramatically after a pneumonitis diagnosis, and 70.2% of patients permanently discontinued ICI therapy. Compared with controls, patients with CIP had more than a threefold increased risk of needing critical care (relative risk 3.59, 95% CI, 2.31 to 5.57) and an increased risk of mortality (HR 2.34, 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.71)., Conclusions: In a large claims-based analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increase the risk of pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer by 2.49%. Cases of CIP are associated with high healthcare utilization, discontinuation of ICIs, and mortality., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: The phase III PACIFIC trial compared durvalumab with placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Consolidation durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87; P = .00251) and progression-free survival (PFS [blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1]; stratified HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; P < .0001), with manageable safety. We report updated, exploratory analyses of survival, approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned., Methods: Patients with WHO performance status 0 or 1 (any tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 status) were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; administered once every 2 weeks for 12 months) or placebo, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Time-to-event end point analyses were performed using stratified log-rank tests. Medians and landmark survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Seven hundred and nine of 713 randomly assigned patients received durvalumab (473 of 476) or placebo (236 of 237). As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up, 34.2 months [all patients]; 61.6 months [censored patients]), updated OS (stratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; median, 47.5 v 29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; median, 16.9 v 5.6 months) remained consistent with the primary analyses. Estimated 5-year rates (95% CI) for durvalumab and placebo were 42.9% (38.2 to 47.4) versus 33.4% (27.3 to 39.6) for OS and 33.1% (28.0 to 38.2) versus 19.0% (13.6 to 25.2) for PFS., Conclusion: These updated analyses demonstrate robust and sustained OS and durable PFS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and 33.1% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive and free of disease progression, establishing a new benchmark for standard of care in this setting., Competing Interests: David R. SpigelLeadership: ASCO (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Evelo Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Molecular Templates (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Curio Science (Inst), Intellisphere (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), Sanofi/Aventis (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Novocure (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Evidera (Inst)Research Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center—Simmons Cancer Center (Inst), Merck (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Neon Therapeutics (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Nektar (Inst), Celldex (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), GRAIL (Inst), Transgene (Inst), Aeglea Biotherapeutics (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), BIND Therapeutics (Inst), Eisai (Inst), ImClone Systems (Inst), Immunogen (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Molecular Partners (Inst), Agios (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Cyteir (Inst), Apollomics (Inst), Novocure (Inst), Elevation Oncology (Inst), Calithera Biosciences (Inst), Arcus Biosciences (Inst), Arrys Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), BioNTech (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Denovo Biopharma (Inst), Hutchison MediPharma (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Kronos Bio (Inst), Loxo Oncology (Inst), Macrogenics (Inst), Molecular Templates (Inst), Oncologie (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), PTC Therapeutics (Inst), PureTech (Inst), Razor Genomics (Inst), Repare Therapeutics (Inst), Rgenix (Inst), Tizona Therapeutics Inc (Inst), Verastem (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Genentech, Novartis Corinne Faivre-FinnTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Jhanelle E. GrayHonoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Axiom Healthcare Strategies, InivataConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen Scientific AffairsResearch Funding: Array BioPharma (Inst), Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Inivata, Merck, EMD Serono, Novartis David VicenteHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer IngelheimTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca David PlanchardHonoraria: Prime Oncology, PeerVoiceConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Celgene, MedImmune, BeiGene, Samsung, AbbVie, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo/Astra ZenecaResearch Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Sanofi/Aventis (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Janssen (Inst) Johan F. VansteenkisteHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology (Inst), Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Daiichi-Sankyo (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Roche (Inst), Daiichi-Sankyo (Inst)Research Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst) Marina C. GarassinoHonoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Roche, Bristol Myers SquibbConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Tiziana Life Sciences, Sanofi, Celgene, Daiiki Sankyo, Inivata, Incyte, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Janssen, RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Celgene, Incyte, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Otsuka, LillyResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Merck (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Amgen (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca Rina HuiHonoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Oncosec, MerckConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Oncosec, MerckResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Roche (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), OncoSec (Inst), Novartis (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis Xavier QuantinHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb France, AstraZeneca, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology Andreas RimnerHonoraria: More HealthConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck, Boehringer IngelheimResearch Funding: Varian Medical Systems (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck (Inst) Yi-Long WuHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb/China, Hengrui PharmaceuticalConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, TakedaResearch Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Roche (Inst), Pfizer (Inst) Mustafa ÖzgüroğluHonoraria: Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Janssen Oncology (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Ki H. LeeConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly Terufumi KatoEmployment: Lilly (I)Honoraria: Chugai Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck SeronoConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Pfizer, Merck SeronoResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Merck Serono Maike de WitConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ipsen, AbbVie, Jazz PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, SanofiResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Genzyme (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Noona Healthcare (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Nucana (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer Takayasu KurataHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme OncologyResearch Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Martin ReckConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi/RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Sanofi/Aventis Byoung C. ChoLeadership: Gencurix, Interpark BioStock and Other Ownership Interests: Theravance, Gencurix, Bridgebio, Kanaph Therapeutics, Cyrus therapeutics, Interpark BioConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yuhan, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ono Pharmaceutical, Lilly, Medpacto, Blueprint Medicines, Kanaph Therapeutics, Bridgebio, Cyrus Therapeutics, Guardant Health, Joseah BiopharmaResearch Funding: Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Mogam Biotechnology Research Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AbbVie, Medpacto, GI Innovation, Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Interpark BioPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Champions OncologyOther Relationship: DAAN Biotherapeutics Suresh SenanHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, BeiGene, PfizerResearch Funding: ViewRay (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Varian Medical Systems (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Jarushka NaidooHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Roche/Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, Kaleido BiosciencesResearch Funding: Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune Helen MannEmployment: AstraZenecaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca Michael NewtonEmployment: AstraZenecaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca Piruntha ThiyagarajahEmployment: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Reckitt Benckiser (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca/MedImmune Scott J. AntoniaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Memgen, Achilles Therapeutics, Amgen, Celsius Therapeutics, EMD Serono, G1 Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, RAPT Therapeutics, Samyang, Venn Therapeutics, Tarus TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Oncolytic VirusTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: RAPT Therapeutics, Celsius Therapeutics, Amgen, Achilles TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction: Immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs), including all-cause immune-mediated pneumonitis, were reported in approximately 25% of patients in the placebo-controlled, phase III PACIFIC trial of durvalumab monotherapy (for up to 12 months) in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy; only 3.4% of patients experienced grade 3/4 imAEs. With broad application of the PACIFIC regimen (consolidation durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy), now standard-of-care in this setting, there is a need to better characterize the occurrence of imAEs with this regimen., Methods: We performed descriptive, post-hoc, exploratory analyses to characterize the occurrence of imAEs (pneumonitis and non-pneumonitis) in PACIFIC in terms of: incidence, severity, and timing; clinical management and outcomes; and associations between the occurrence of imAEs and (1) all-cause AEs and (2) baseline patient, disease, and treatment characteristics., Results: Any-grade immune-mediated pneumonitis (9.4%) and non-pneumonitis imAEs (10.7%) occurred infrequently and were more common with durvalumab versus placebo. Grade 3/4 immune-mediated pneumonitis (1.9%) and non-pneumonitis imAEs (1.7%) were uncommon with durvalumab, as were fatal imAEs (0.8%; all pneumonitis). The most common non-pneumonitis imAEs with durvalumab were thyroid disorders, dermatitis/rash, and diarrhea/colitis. Dermatitis/rash had the shortest time to onset (from durvalumab initiation), followed by pneumonitis; dermatitis/rash had the longest time to resolution, followed by thyroid disorders. Most patients with immune-mediated pneumonitis (78.4%) and non-pneumonitis imAEs (56.3%) had these events occur ≤ 3 months after initiating durvalumab. ImAEs were well managed with administration of systemic corticosteroids, administration of endocrine replacement therapy, and interruption/discontinuation of durvalumab. Time elapsed from completion of prior radiotherapy to trial randomization (<14 vs. ≥ 14 days) did not impact either incidence or severity of imAEs. Durvalumab had a manageable safety profile broadly irrespective of whether patients experienced imAEs., Conclusion: The risk of imAEs should not deter use of the PACIFIC regimen in eligible patients, as these events are generally well managed through appropriate clinical intervention., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In the last decade, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the backbone of therapy in advanced, non-oncogene driven, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). More recently, they have been approved by the FDA in the adjuvant NSCLC setting based on positive disease-free survival results. In the neoadjuvant setting, emerging results signal that a therapeutic paradigm shift may be imminent. Yet, it is difficult to ascertain the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy, as the desired result is an improvement in overall survival, which can take many years to mature. In this review, we explore the role and impact of neoadjuvant therapy, data on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the rationale and potential predictive biomarkers, as well as current and ongoing trials in the setting of neoadjuvant ICIs., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer may develop pneumonitis after thoracic radiotherapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We hypothesized that distinct morphologic features are associated with different pneumonitis etiologies., Materials and Methods: We systematically compared computed tomography (CT) features of RT- versus ICI-pneumonitis. Clinical and imaging features were tested for association with pneumonitis severity. Lastly, we constructed an exploratory radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model to discern pneumonitis etiology., Results: Between 2009 and 2019, 82 patients developed pneumonitis: 29 after thoracic RT, 23 after ICI, and 30 after RT + ICI. Fifty patients had grade 2 pneumonitis, 22 grade 3, and 7 grade 4. ICI-pneumonitis was more likely bilateral (65% vs. 28%; p = .01) and involved more lobes (66% vs. 45% involving at least three lobes) and was less likely to have sharp border (17% vs. 59%; p = .004) compared with RT-pneumonitis. Pneumonitis morphology after RT + ICI was heterogeneous, with 47% bilateral, 37% involving at least three lobes, and 40% sharp borders. Among all patients, risk factors for severe pneumonitis included poor performance status, smoking history, worse lung function, and bilateral and multifocal involvement on CT. An ML model based on seven radiomic features alone could distinguish ICI- from RT-pneumonitis with an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.76 and identified the predominant etiology after RT + ICI concordant with multidisciplinary consensus., Conclusion: RT- and ICI-pneumonitis exhibit distinct spatial features on CT. Bilateral and multifocal lung involvement is associated with severe pneumonitis. Integrating these morphologic features in the clinical management of patients who develop pneumonitis after RT and ICIs may improve treatment decision-making., Implications for Practice: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer often receive thoracic radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both of which can cause pneumonitis. This study identified similarities and differences in pneumonitis morphology on computed tomography (CT) scans among pneumonitis due to radiotherapy (RT) alone, ICI alone, and the combination of both. Patients who have bilateral CT changes involving at least three lobes are more likely to have ICI-pneumonitis, whereas those with unilateral CT changes with sharp borders are more likely to have radiation pneumonitis. After RT and/or ICI, severe pneumonitis is associated with bilateral and multifocal CT changes. These results can help guide clinicians in triaging patients who develop pneumonitis after radiation and during ICI treatment., (© 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

PD-1 blockade unleashes CD8 T cells 1 , including those specific for mutation-associated neoantigens (MANA), but factors in the tumour microenvironment can inhibit these T cell responses. Single-cell transcriptomics have revealed global T cell dysfunction programs in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). However, the majority of TIL do not recognize tumour antigens 2 , and little is known about transcriptional programs of MANA-specific TIL. Here, we identify MANA-specific T cell clones using the MANA functional expansion of specific T cells assay 3 in neoadjuvant anti-PD-1-treated non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). We use their T cell receptors as a 'barcode' to track and analyse their transcriptional programs in the tumour microenvironment using coupled single-cell RNA sequencing and T cell receptor sequencing. We find both MANA- and virus-specific clones in TIL, regardless of response, and MANA-, influenza- and Epstein-Barr virus-specific TIL each have unique transcriptional programs. Despite exposure to cognate antigen, MANA-specific TIL express an incompletely activated cytolytic program. MANA-specific CD8 T cells have hallmark transcriptional programs of tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells, but low levels of interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7R) and are functionally less responsive to interleukin-7 (IL-7) compared with influenza-specific TRM cells. Compared with those from responding tumours, MANA-specific clones from non-responding tumours express T cell receptors with markedly lower ligand-dependent signalling, are largely confined to HOBIT high TRM subsets, and coordinately upregulate checkpoints, killer inhibitory receptors and inhibitors of T cell activation. These findings provide important insights for overcoming resistance to PD-1 blockade., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: In 2018, durvalumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as consolidation immunotherapy for patients with stage III NSCLC after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, whether durvalumab benefits patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC remains unknown., Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC who completed concurrent CRT. Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who completed CRT with or without durvalumab., Results: Among 37 patients, 13 initiated durvalumab a median of 20 days after CRT completion. Two patients completed 12 months of treatment, with five patients discontinuing durvalumab owing to progression and five owing to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Of 24 patients who completed CRT without durvalumab, 16 completed CRT alone and eight completed CRT with induction or consolidation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Median PFS was 10.3 months in patients who received CRT and durvalumab versus 6.9 months with CRT alone (log-rank p = 0.993). CRT and EGFR TKI was associated with a significantly longer median PFS (26.1 mo) compared with CRT and durvalumab or CRT alone (log-rank p = 0.023). Six patients treated with durvalumab initiated EGFR TKIs after recurrence, with one developing grade 4 pneumonitis on osimertinib., Conclusions: In this study, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC did not benefit with consolidation durvalumab and experienced a high frequency of irAEs. Patients who initiate osimertinib after durvalumab may be susceptible to incident irAEs. Consolidation durvalumab should be approached with caution in this setting and concurrent CRT with induction or consolidation EGFR TKIs further investigated as definitive treatment., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In the Phase 3, placebo-controlled PACIFIC trial of patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC without disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidative durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.87; p = 0.00251; data cutoff, March 22, 2018) and progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.42-65; p < 0.0001; February 13, 2017) with manageable safety. Here, we report updated analyses of OS and PFS, approximately 4 years after the last patient was randomized., Methods: Patients with WHO performance status of 0 or 1 (and any tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status) were randomized (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, administered every 2 weeks (≤12 months), stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. OS and PFS were analyzed using a stratified log-rank test in the intent-to-treat population. Medians and 4-year OS and PFS rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Overall, 709 of 713 randomized patients received durvalumab (n/N=473/476) or placebo (n/N=236/237). As of March 20, 2020 (median follow-up = 34.2 months; range: 0.2-64.9), updated OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44-0.67) remained consistent with the primary analyses. The median OS for durvalumab was reached (47.5 mo; placebo, 29.1 months). Estimated 4-year OS rates were 49.6% versus 36.3% for durvalumab versus placebo, and 4-year PFS rates were 35.3% versus 19.5% respectively., Conclusion: These updated exploratory analyses demonstrate durable PFS and sustained OS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 49.6% of patients randomized to durvalumab remain alive at 4 years (placebo, 36.3%), and 35.3% remain alive and progression-free (placebo, 19.5%)., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-pneumonitis that does not improve or resolve with corticosteroids and requires additional immunosuppression is termed steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis. Herein, we report the clinical features, management and outcomes for patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), infliximab, or the combination of IVIG and infliximab for steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis., Methods: Patients with steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis were identified between January 2011 and January 2020 at a tertiary academic center. ICI-pneumonitis was defined as clinical or radiographic lung inflammation without an alternative diagnosis, confirmed by a multidisciplinary team. Steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis was defined as lack of clinical improvement after high-dose corticosteroids for 48 hours, necessitating additional immunosuppression. Serial clinical, radiologic (CT imaging), and functional features (level-of-care, oxygen requirement) were collected preadditional and postadditional immunosuppression., Results: Of 65 patients with ICI-pneumonitis, 18.5% (12/65) had steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis. Mean age at diagnosis of ICI-pneumonitis was 66.8 years (range: 35-85), 50% patients were male, and the majority had lung carcinoma (75%). Steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis occurred after a mean of 5 ICI doses from PD-(L)1 start (range: 3-12 doses). The most common radiologic pattern was diffuse alveolar damage (DAD: 50%, 6/12). After corticosteroid failure, patients were treated with: IVIG (n=7), infliximab (n=2), or combination IVIG and infliximab (n=3); 11/12 (91.7%) required ICU-level care and 8/12 (75%) died of steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis or infectious complications (IVIG alone=3/7, 42.9%; infliximab alone=2/2, 100%; IVIG + infliximab=3/3, 100%). All five patients treated with infliximab (5/5; 100%) died from steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis or infectious complications. Mechanical ventilation was required in 53% of patients treated with infliximab alone, 80% of those treated with IVIG + infliximab, and 25.5% of those treated with IVIG alone., Conclusions: Steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis constituted 18.5% of referrals for multidisciplinary irAE care. Steroid-refractory ICI-pnuemonitis occurred early in patients' treatment courses, and most commonly exhibited a DAD radiographic pattern. Patients treated with IVIG alone demonstrated an improvement in both level-of-care and oxygenation requirements and had fewer fatalities (43%) from steroid-refractory ICI-pneumonitis when compared to treatment with infliximab (100% mortality)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: The spectrum of individual immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been reported widely, and their development is associated with improved patient survival across tumor types. The spectrum and impact on survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop multisystem irAEs from ICIs, has not been described., Objective: To characterize multisystem irAEs, their association with survival, and risk factors for multisystem irAE development., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study carried out in 5 academic institutions worldwide included 623 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs alone or in combination with another anticancer agent between January 2007 and January 2019., Exposures: Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy or combinations., Main Outcomes and Measures: Multisystem irAEs were characterized by combinations of individual irAEs or organ system involved, separated by ICI-monotherapy or combinations. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in PFS and OS between irAE groups were assessed by multivariable models. Risk for multisystem irAE was estimated as odds ratios by multivariable logistic regression., Results: The 623 patients included in the study were mostly men (60%, n = 375) and White (77%, n = 480). The median (range) age was 66 (58-73) years, and 148 patients (24%) developed a single irAE, whereas 58 (9.3%) developed multisystem irAEs. The most common multisystem irAE patterns in patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were pneumonitis thyroiditis (n = 7, 14%), hepatitis thyroiditis (n = 5, 10%), dermatitis pneumonitis (n = 5, 10%), and dermatitis thyroiditis (n = 4, 8%). Favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS = 0/1 vs 2; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94; P = .04) and longer ICI duration (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001) were independent risk factors for development of multisystem irAEs. Patients with 1 irAE and multisystem irAEs demonstrated incrementally improved OS (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12; P = .26; and aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = . 005, respectively) and PFS (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = .001; and aHR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.55; P < .001, respectively) vs patients with no irAEs, in multivariable models adjusting for ICI duration., Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter cohort study, development of multisystem irAEs was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs.

Approximately one third of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with stage III or locally advanced NSCLC. These patients have historically been managed with chemoradiotherapy. However, outcomes for these patients remain poor, with a 5-year survival rate between 15% and 32%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with NSCLC. One such agent, durvalumab, a selective high-affinity human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks programmed cell death ligand 1 binding to programmed cell death protein 1 and cluster of differentiation 80, was recently approved in the consolidation setting after completion of definitive platinum-based chemoradiotherapy and has become the current standard of care for patients with stage III locally advanced NSCLC. Immune checkpoint blockade is associated with increased risk of immunotherapy-related adverse events, which can be managed most effectively when detected early, ideally in the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Pneumonitis represents the potentially most severe and life-threatening of all reported immunotherapy-related adverse events, but it is further complicated in the context of recent prior therapies also known to cause pulmonary toxicity, such as radiotherapy. However, there are major gaps in our ability to identify immunotherapy-related pneumonitis and distinguish it from radiation pneumonitis. This review aims to define the key steps in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of immunotherapy-related pneumonitis., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We conducted the first trial of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), finding nivolumab monotherapy to be safe and feasible with an encouraging rate of pathologic response. Building on these results, and promising data for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in advanced NSCLC, we expanded our study to include an arm investigating neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab., Methods: Patients with resectable stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastases seventh edition), histologically confirmed, treatment-naïve NSCLC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously 6 weeks prior to planned resection. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was given again approximately 4 and 2 weeks preoperatively. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility with a planned enrollment of 15 patients. Pathologic response was a key secondary endpoint., Results: While the treatment regimen was feasible per protocol, due to toxicity, the study arm was terminated early by investigator consensus after 9 of 15 patients were enrolled. All patients received every scheduled dose of therapy and were fit for planned surgery; however, 6 of 9 (67%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 3 (33%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. Three of 9 patients (33%) had biopsy-confirmed tumor progression precluding definitive surgery. Of the 6 patients who underwent resection, 3 are alive and disease-free, 2 experienced recurrence and are actively receiving systemic treatment, and one died postoperatively due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two patients who underwent resection had tumor pathologic complete responses (pCRs) and continue to remain disease-free over 24 months since surgery. Pathologic response correlated with pre-treatment tumor PD-L1 expression, but not tumor mutation burden. Tumor KRAS/STK11 co-mutations were identified in 5 of 9 patients (59%), of whom two with disease progression precluding surgery had tumor KRAS/STK11/KEAP1 co-mutations., Conclusions: Though treatment was feasible, due to toxicity the study arm was terminated early by investigator consensus. In light of this, and while the long-term disease-free status of patients who achieved pCR is encouraging, further investigation of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable NSCLC requires the identification of predictive biomarkers that enrich for response., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JER has received grants from Conquer Cancer: The ASCO Foundation. VA has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, The LUNGevity Foundation, The V Foundation, Swim Across America, The Allegheny Health Network – Johns Hopkins Research Fund and the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Cigarette Restitution Fund Program, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Personal Genomic Diagnostics. KS has received personal fees from Illumina. JRW is the founder and owner of Resphera Biosciences LLC. SB has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb. DJ has been on the advisory boards of Diffusion Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and AstraZeneca. TM has received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Surface Oncology, Kyn Therapeutics, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Adaptive BioTechnologies, Leap Therapeutics, and Aprea; has received personal fees from Leap Therapeutics, Immunos Therapeutics, and Pfizer; is co-founder and holds equity in Imvaq Therapeutics; and has filed patents for work related to PD-1 and CTLA-4. JT has received grants from Akoya Biosciences and Bristol-Myers Squibb, has received non-financial support from Akoya Biosciences, and has been on the advisory boards of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Compugen, and Regeneron. VEV has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, The Commonwealth Foundation, and Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy; has been on the advisory boards of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Merck, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and is the founder, serves on board of directors and owns stock in Delfi Diagnostics and Personal Genome Diagnostics. GR has received personal fees from Medicago and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. PI has received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Biomarker Strategies, LLC; has received personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Veran Medical Technologies Inc., and Roche Diagnostics; and has been on the advisory boards of AstraZeneca and Guardant Health. DMP and ST have received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Compugen; have received personal fees from Aduro Biotech, Five Prime Therapeutics, Tizona Therapeutics, DNAtrix, RAPT, WindMIL, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Ervaxx, Amgen, MedImmune, Merck, Compugen, Dynavax, Immunomic Therapeutics, Janssen Oncology, Immunocore, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, and NexImmune; and own equity in Aduro Biotech, Potenza Therapeutics, Five Prime Therapeutics, Tizona Therapeutics, DNAtrix, RAPT, WindMIL, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Ervaxx, and Trieza Therapeutics. JN has received grants from AstraZeneca and Merck; has been on the advisory boards of AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Genentech/Roche; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck. BL has received grants from Eli Lilly, Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Turning Point Therapeutics, and Amgen; and has received personal fees from Eli Lilly, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, and Takeda. MH has received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb; has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Nektar, Syndax, Mirati, Shattuck Labs, Immunai, Blueprint Medicines, Achilles, Arcus, and Eli Lilly; owns equity in Shattuck Labs, Immunai, and Arcus; and has filed patents related to the use of tumor mutation burden to predict response to immunotherapy. JRB has received grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Merck, RAPT Therapeutics, Inc., and Revolution Medicines; has received personal fees from Genentech/Roche; has been on the advisory boards of Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Sanofi; and has been on the Data and Safety Monitory boards of GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. JEC has received grants from the National Institutes of Health; and has also received grants and personal fees from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, and AstraZeneca. PMF has received grants from the LUNGevity Foundation, Stand Up To Cancer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa, Novartis, and Corvus; and has been on the advisory boards of Abbvie, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of many tumors. Robust data demonstrating improved overall survival and progression-free survival in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies have established immune checkpoint inhibitors as standard of care in stages III and IV non-small cell lung cancer. Nivolumab is effective in previously treated patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Pembrolizumab and atezolizumab are approved as monotherapy and in combination with other therapies. Ongoing trials investigate the potential role of immunotherapy in earlier disease settings. Identifying predictive biomarkers of response will further amplify the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer., Competing Interests: Disclosure M.L. Hsu: Nothing to disclose. J. Naidoo: Research funding: Merck (United States), AstraZeneca (United States); Consulting: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech; Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade is a promising treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet immunologic mechanisms contributing to tumor regression and biomarkers of response are unknown. Using paired tumor/blood samples from a phase II clinical trial (NCT02259621), we explored whether the peripheral T-cell clonotypic dynamics can serve as a biomarker for response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade., Experimental Design: T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing was performed on serial peripheral blood, tumor, and normal lung samples from resectable NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade. We explored the temporal dynamics of the T-cell repertoire in the peripheral and tumoral compartments in response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade by using the TCR as a molecular barcode., Results: Higher intratumoral TCR clonality was associated with reduced percent residual tumor at the time of surgery, and the TCR repertoire of tumors with major pathologic response (MPR; <10% residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy) had a higher clonality and greater sharing of tumor-infiltrating clonotypes with the peripheral blood relative to tumors without MPR. Additionally, the posttreatment tumor bed of patients with MPR was enriched with T-cell clones that had peripherally expanded between weeks 2 and 4 after anti-PD-1 initiation and the intratumoral space occupied by these clonotypes was inversely correlated with percent residual tumor., Conclusions: Our study suggests that exchange of T-cell clones between tumor and blood represents a key correlate of pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and shows that the periphery may be a previously underappreciated originating compartment for effective antitumor immunity. See related commentary by Henick, p. 1205 ., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Genetic and environmental interactions predispose certain groups to lung cancer, including families. Families or caregiving units experience the disease interdependently. We have previously evaluated the concerns and preferences of patients in addressing the lung cancer experience and cancer risks in their families. This qualitative study evaluates the concerns and preferences of family members and caregivers of patients with lung cancer in the lung cancer experience and familial cancer risks., Methods: We held focus groups to discuss the format and timing of addressing these preferences and concerns. Qualitative data generated was analyzed using a grounded theory approach., Results: Five focus groups totaling 19 participants were conducted. Seven themes were identified: (1) journey to lung cancer diagnosis has core dimensions for patient and family, (2) importance of communication between patients, families, and providers, (3) challenges for caregivers and family, (4) mixed perceptions of lung cancer causation among relatives, (5) discussion of cancer risk with relatives has complex dynamics, (6) impact of diagnosis on family health behaviors and screening, (7) role of genetic counseling., Conclusions: Family members of patients with lung cancer are interested in discussing risk factors, prevention, and diagnoses and also would like access to other supportive services do learn about and cope with some of the stresses and barriers they experience in the family lung cancer journey. The diagnosis represents a potential teachable moment with the opportunity to reduce the risk of LC development or improve early detection in LC patient's family members.

Despite progress in immunotherapy, identifying patients that respond has remained a challenge. Through analysis of whole-exome and targeted sequence data from 5,449 tumors, we found a significant correlation between tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor purity, suggesting that low tumor purity tumors are likely to have inaccurate TMB estimates. We developed a new method to estimate a corrected TMB (cTMB) that was adjusted for tumor purity and more accurately predicted outcome to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). To identify improved predictive markers together with cTMB, we performed whole-exome sequencing for 104 lung tumors treated with ICB. Through comprehensive analyses of sequence and structural alterations, we discovered a significant enrichment in activating mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) genes in nonresponding tumors in three immunotherapy treated cohorts. An integrated multivariable model incorporating cTMB, RTK mutations, smoking-related mutational signature and human leukocyte antigen status provided an improved predictor of response to immunotherapy that was independently validated.

Rationale: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer care but are associated with unique adverse events, including potentially life-threatening pneumonitis. The diagnosis of ICI-pneumonitis is increasing; however, the biological mechanisms, clinical and radiologic features, and the diagnosis and management have not been well defined. Objectives: To summarize evidence, identify knowledge and research gaps, and prioritize topics and propose methods for future research on ICI-pneumonitis. Methods: A multidisciplinary group of international clinical researchers reviewed available data on ICI-pneumonitis to develop and refine research questions pertaining to ICI-pneumonitis. Results: This statement identifies gaps in knowledge and develops potential research questions to further expand knowledge regarding risk, biologic mechanisms, clinical and radiologic presentation, and management of ICI-pneumonitis. Conclusions: Gaps in knowledge of the basic biological mechanisms of ICI-pneumonitis, coupled with a precipitous increase in the use of ICIs alone or combined with other therapies, highlight the importance in triaging research priorities for ICI-pneumonitis.

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between radiotherapy (RT), in particular chest RT, and development of immune-related (IR) pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)., Patients and Methods: Between June 2011 and July 2017, NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 at a tertiary-care academic cancer center were identified. Patient, treatment, prior RT (intent, technique, timing, courses), and IR pneumonitis details were collected. Treating investigators diagnosed IR pneumonitis clinically. Diagnostic IR pneumonitis scans were overlaid with available chest RT plans to describe IR pneumonitis in relation to prior chest RT. We evaluated associations between patient, treatment, RT details, and development of IR pneumonitis by Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests., Results: Of the 188 NSCLC patients we identified, median follow-up was 6.78 (range, 0.30-79.3) months and median age 66 (range, 39-91) years; 54% (n = 102) were male; and 42% (n = 79) had stage I-III NSCLC at initial diagnosis. Patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy (n = 127, 68%) or PD-1/PD-L1-based combinations (n = 61, 32%). In the entire cohort, 70% (132/188) received any RT, 53% (100/188) chest RT, and 37% (70/188) curative-intent chest RT. Any grade IR pneumonitis occurred in 19% (36/188; 95% confidence interval, 13.8-25.6). Of those who developed IR pneumonitis and received chest RT (n = 19), patients were more likely to have received curative-intent versus palliative-intent chest RT (17/19, 89%, vs. 2/19, 11%; P = .051). Predominant IR pneumonitis appearances were ground-glass opacities outside high-dose chest RT regions., Conclusion: No RT parameter was significantly associated with IR pneumonitis. On subset analysis of patients who developed IR pneumonitis and who had received prior chest RT, IR pneumonitis was more common in patients who received curative-intent chest RT. Attention should be paid to NSCLC patients receiving curative-intent RT followed by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite the initial successes of immunotherapy, there is an urgent clinical need for molecular assays that identify patients more likely to respond. Here, we report that ultrasensitive measures of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and T-cell expansion can be used to assess responses to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic lung cancer patients ( N = 24). Patients with clinical response to therapy had a complete reduction in ctDNA levels after initiation of therapy, whereas nonresponders had no significant changes or an increase in ctDNA levels. Patients with initial response followed by acquired resistance to therapy had an initial drop followed by recrudescence in ctDNA levels. Patients without a molecular response had shorter progression-free and overall survival compared with molecular responders [5.2 vs. 14.5 and 8.4 vs. 18.7 months; HR 5.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.57-18.35; P = 0.007 and HR 6.91; 95% CI, 1.37-34.97; P = 0.02, respectively], which was detected on average 8.7 weeks earlier and was more predictive of clinical benefit than CT imaging. Expansion of T cells, measured through increases of T-cell receptor productive frequencies, mirrored ctDNA reduction in response to therapy. We validated this approach in an independent cohort of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer ( N = 14), where the therapeutic effect was measured by pathologic assessment of residual tumor after anti-PD1 therapy. Consistent with our initial findings, early ctDNA dynamics predicted pathologic response to immune checkpoint blockade. These analyses provide an approach for rapid determination of therapeutic outcomes for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and have important implications for the development of personalized immune targeted strategies. Significance: Rapid and sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA dynamic changes and T-cell expansion can be used to guide immune targeted therapy for patients with lung cancer. See related commentary by Zou and Meyerson, p. 1038 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

With increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced NSCLC, there is increasing recognition of immune-related adverse events associated with ICI use. We recently reported increased incidence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in ICI-treated NSCLC patients. Since development of immune-related adverse events in other organ systems has been associated with either no change or even improvement in tumor response/cancer outcomes, we sought to better understand the impact of CIP development on overall survival in ICI-treated NSCLC patients. Using baseline and follow-up data collected on a cohort of 205 ICI-treated NSCLC patients, we used a multi-state modeling approach to understand the effect of developing CIP on the risk of death. We observed time-dependent changes in risk of developing and recovery from CIP, with an increased risk of both developing and recovering from CIP in the first year after initiating ICI. We found that developing CIP independently increased the risk of transitioning to death in both adjusted and unadjusted models. In the multivariate model, we found that the increase in mortality associated with CIP was only seen in patients with adenocarcinoma tumor histology. Collectively, these findings suggest that in NSCLC, development of CIP worsens survival in patients receiving immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several predictive biomarkers are currently approved or are under investigation for the selection of patients for checkpoint blockade. Tumor PD-L1 expression is used for stratification of non-small cell lung (NSCLC) patients, with tumor mutational burden (TMB) also being explored with promising results, and mismatch-repair deficiency is approved for tumor site-agnostic disease. While tumors with high PD-L1 expression, high TMB, or mismatch repair deficiency respond well to checkpoint blockade, tumors with lower PD-L1 expression, lower mutational burdens, or mismatch repair proficiency respond much less frequently., Case Presentation: We studied two patients with unexpected responses to checkpoint blockade monotherapy: a patient with PD-L1-negative and low mutational burden NSCLC and one with mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (CRC), both of whom lack the biomarkers associated with response to checkpoint blockade, yet achieved durable clinical benefit. Both maintained T-cell responses in peripheral blood to oncogenic driver mutations - BRAF-N581I in the NSCLC and AKT1-E17K in the CRC - years after treatment initiation. Mutation-specific T cells were also found in the primary tumor and underwent dynamic perturbations in the periphery upon treatment., Conclusions: These findings suggest that T cell responses to oncogenic driver mutations may be more prevalent than previously appreciated and could be harnessed in immunotherapeutic treatment, particularly for patients who lack the traditional biomarkers associated with response. Comprehensive studies are warranted to further delineate additional predictive biomarkers and populations of patients who may benefit from checkpoint blockade.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are newer, immunotherapy-based drugs that have been shown to improve survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unlike traditional chemotherapeutic agents, ICIs work by boosting the body's natural tumor killing response. However, this unique mechanism of action has also led to the recognition of class-specific side effects. Labeled immune-related adverse events, these toxicities can affect multiple organ systems including the lungs. Immune-mediated lung injury because of ICI use, termed checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), occurs in about 3% to 5% of patients receiving ICIs; however, the real-world incidence of this entity may be higher, especially now that ICIs are being used in nonclinical trial settings. In this review, we briefly introduce the biology of ICIs and the indications for ICI use in NSCLC and then discuss the epidemiology and clinical and radiologic manifestations of CIP. Next, we discuss management strategies for CIP, including the current consensus on management of steroid-refractory CIP. Given the nascent nature of this field, we highlight areas of uncertainty and emerging research questions in the burgeoning field of checkpoint inhibitor pulmonary toxicity., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Opinion Statement: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of advanced NSCLC. With the intention of generating an anti-tumor immune response, ICIs can also lead to inflammatory side effects involving a wide variety of organs in the body, termed immune-related adverse events. Although no prospective clinical trial exists to guide recommendations for optimal and more specific immunosuppressive treatments rather than corticosteroids, further studies may lead to a more mechanistic-based approach towards these toxicities in the future. In relation to current practice, we recommend adherence to the recent published guidelines which emphasize the importance of early recognition and administration of temporary immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids in most cases, depending on the organ system involved, and the severity of toxicity. Recognition of these toxicities is increasingly important as the use of these agents expand within different indications for patients with lung cancers, and to other tumor types.

Purpose: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo trimodality therapy (chemoradiation followed by surgical resection), it is unknown whether limiting preoperative radiation dose to the uninvolved lung reduces postsurgical morbidity. This study evaluated whether radiation fall-off dose parameters to the contralateral lung that is unaffected by NSCLC are associated with postoperative complications in NSCLC patients treated with trimodality therapy., Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients who underwent trimodality therapy between March 2008 and October 2016, with available restored digital radiation plans. Fischer's exact test was used to assess associations between patient and treatment characteristics and the development of treatment-related toxicity. Spearman rank correlation was used to measure the strength of association between dosimetric parameters., Results: Forty-six patients were identified who received trimodality therapy with intensity modulated radiation (median, 59.4 Gy; range, 45-70) and concurrent platinum doublet chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection. The median age was 64.9 years (range, 45.6-81.6). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years (range, 0.3-8.4). Twenty-four (52.2%) patients developed any-grade pulmonary toxicity and 14 (30.4%) patients developed grade 2+ pulmonary toxicity. There was an increased incidence of any-grade pulmonary toxicity in patients with contralateral lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20) ≥7% compared with <7% (90%, n = 9 vs 41.7%, n = 15; P = .01). Similarly, contralateral lung V10 ≥20% was associated with an increased rate of any-grade pulmonary toxicity compared with V10 <20% (80%, n = 12 vs 38.7%, n = 12; P = .01). Pneumonectomy/bilobectomy was associated with grade 2+ pulmonary toxicity (P = .04)., Conclusions: Patients who received a higher radiation fall-off dose volume parameter (V20 ≥7% and V10 ≥20%) to the contralateral uninvolved lung had a higher incidence of any-grade postoperative pulmonary toxicity. Limiting radiation fall-off dose to the uninvolved lung may be an important modifiable radiation parameter in limiting postoperative toxicity in trimodality patients., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Antibodies that block programmed death 1 (PD-1) protein improve survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but have not been tested in resectable NSCLC, a condition in which little progress has been made during the past decade., Methods: In this pilot study, we administered two preoperative doses of PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in adults with untreated, surgically resectable early (stage I, II, or IIIA) NSCLC. Nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks, with surgery planned approximately 4 weeks after the first dose. The primary end points of the study were safety and feasibility. We also evaluated the tumor pathological response, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden, and mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell responses., Results: Neoadjuvant nivolumab had an acceptable side-effect profile and was not associated with delays in surgery. Of the 21 tumors that were removed, 20 were completely resected. A major pathological response occurred in 9 of 20 resected tumors (45%). Responses occurred in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. There was a significant correlation between the pathological response and the pretreatment tumor mutational burden. The number of T-cell clones that were found in both the tumor and peripheral blood increased systemically after PD-1 blockade in eight of nine patients who were evaluated. Mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell clones from a primary tumor with a complete response on pathological assessment rapidly expanded in peripheral blood at 2 to 4 weeks after treatment; some of these clones were not detected before the administration of nivolumab., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant nivolumab was associated with few side effects, did not delay surgery, and induced a major pathological response in 45% of resected tumors. The tumor mutational burden was predictive of the pathological response to PD-1 blockade. Treatment induced expansion of mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell clones in peripheral blood. (Funded by Cancer Research Institute-Stand Up 2 Cancer and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02259621 .).

Tumor DNA sequencing can identify rare driver genomic alterations that suggest targets for cancer therapy, even when these drivers cannot be suspected on clinical grounds. In some cases, genomic alterations identified in the tumor can lead to a change in diagnosis with implications for prognosis and therapy. This report describes a case in which evaluation of tumor sequencing results by a molecular tumor board (MTB) led to rediagnosis of a non-small cell lung cancer as highly aggressive NUT midline carcinoma, with implications for targeted therapy using an investigational bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitor. We discuss the molecular biology and diagnosis of this rare tumor, and suggest how improved annotation of tumor sequencing reports and multidisciplinary expertise of MTBs can facilitate timely diagnosis of rare tumors and application of potential targeted therapies., (Copyright © 2018 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)

Purpose: To characterize the effect of concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery-stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS-SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors on patient outcomes and safety in patients with brain metastases (BMs)., Methods and Materials: We retrospectively identified metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma patients who had BMs treated with SRS-SRT from 2010 to 2016 without prior whole-brain radiation therapy. We included SRS-SRT patients who were treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (ipilimumab) and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 receptor (nivolumab, pembrolizumab). Patients who were given immune checkpoint inhibitors on active or unreported clinical trials were excluded, and concurrent immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) was defined as ICI given within 2 weeks of SRS-SRT. Patients were managed with SRS-SRT, SRS-SRT with nonconcurrent ICI, or SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of acute neurologic toxicity, immune-related adverse events, and new BMs., Results: A total of 260 patients were treated with SRS-SRT to 623 BMs. Of these patients, 181 were treated with SRS-SRT alone, whereas 79 received SRS-SRT and ICI, 35% of whom were treated with concurrent SRS-SRT and ICI. Concurrent ICI was not associated with increased rates of immune-related adverse events or acute neurologic toxicity and predicted for a decreased likelihood of the development of ≥3 new BMs after SRS-SRT (P=.045; odds ratio, 0.337). Median OS for patients treated with SRS-SRT, SRS-SRT with nonconcurrent ICI, and SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI was 12.9 months, 14.5 months, and 24.7 months, respectively. SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI was associated with improved OS compared with SRS-SRT alone (P=.002; hazard ratio [HR], 2.69) and compared with nonconcurrent SRS-SRT and ICI (P=.006; HR, 2.40) on multivariate analysis. The OS benefit of concurrent SRS-SRT and ICI was significant in comparison with patients treated with SRS-SRT before ICI (P=.002; HR, 3.82) or after ICI (P=.021; HR, 2.64)., Conclusions: Delivering SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI may be associated with a decreased incidence of new BMs and favorable survival outcomes without increased rates of adverse events., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pneumonitis is defined as a focal or diffuse inflammation of the lung parenchyma, and is a known, potentially fatal toxicity of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein we discuss two patients who developed pneumonitis secondary to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and illustrate a stepwise approach to the diagnostic evaluation and management of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related pneumonitis. In the majority of patients who develop this toxicity, pneumonitis appears to clinically resolve with corticosteroid therapy alone; however, a subset of patients require additional immunosuppressive medications. Patients who clinically improve with steroid treatment must be monitored closely in the outpatient setting. If pneumonitis management results in complete clinical and radiologic resolution, patients may be able to restart their immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. It is currently unclear which population of patients is more susceptible to developing higher-grade or steroid-refractory pneumonitis.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which harnesses the body's immune system to recognize and kill cancer cells, has transformed the management landscape for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Building on the success of this approach, clinical and translational researchers are attempting to augment the benefit of anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy through the addition of other therapies, such as conventional cancer treatments. This article reviews the potential use of immunotherapeutic strategies combined with radiation therapy in patients with NSCLC, focusing on ICB. It describes the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors, summarizes published studies that demonstrate the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced NSCLC, and provides the preclinical and clinical rationale supporting the potential immunologic synergy of radiation and ICB.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown significant therapeutic responses against tumors containing increased mutation-associated neoantigen load. We have examined the evolving landscape of tumor neoantigens during the emergence of acquired resistance in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after initial response to immune checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Analyses of matched pretreatment and resistant tumors identified genomic changes resulting in loss of 7 to 18 putative mutation-associated neoantigens in resistant clones. Peptides generated from the eliminated neoantigens elicited clonal T-cell expansion in autologous T-cell cultures, suggesting that they generated functional immune responses. Neoantigen loss occurred through elimination of tumor subclones or through deletion of chromosomal regions containing truncal alterations, and was associated with changes in T-cell receptor clonality. These analyses provide insight into the dynamics of mutational landscapes during immune checkpoint blockade and have implications for the development of immune therapies that target tumor neoantigens. Significance: Acquired resistance to immune checkpoint therapy is being recognized more commonly. This work demonstrates for the first time that acquired resistance to immune checkpoint blockade can arise in association with the evolving landscape of mutations, some of which encode tumor neoantigens recognizable by T cells. These observations imply that widening the breadth of neoantigen reactivity may mitigate the development of acquired resistance. Cancer Discov; 7(3); 264-76. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Yang, p. 250 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 235 ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objectives: The role of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (AATKI) for patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the overall utility of adding AATKI to chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: We included 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AATKI plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy involving 7997 patients with advanced NSCLC. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS, and pooled odds ratios (OR) for objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or greater toxicity. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed according to line of chemotherapy, chemotherapeutic regimen and histology., Results: The addition of AATKI to chemotherapy significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79, 0.87; P<0.00001) and ORR [OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.45, 1.84; P<0.00001], but not overall survival (OS) (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91, 1.01; P=0.14). OS benefit was seen in the subset of patients with adenocarcinomas (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79, 0.95; P=0.002), especially in the second line setting (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.76, 0.96; P=0.008). However, both grade ≥3 toxicity (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.59, 2.73; P<0.00001) and treatment-related deaths (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.58, 3.56; P<0.0001) were significantly higher with the addition of AATKI., Conclusion: The addition of AATKI to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC significantly increased PFS and ORR but not OS, and did so at the expense of increased toxicity and treatment-related deaths. Preclinical and translational research in predictive biomarkers are essential for the clinical development of this class of drugs., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)