Search

Background: The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping (METΔ14ex) remains controversial., Materials and Methods: 110 consecutive METΔ14ex NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (CHT) and/or immunotherapy (IO) in 10 German centers between 2016-2022 were analyzed., Results: Combined CHT-IO was given to 35/110 (32%) patients, IO alone to 43/110 (39%), and CHT to 32/110 (29%) upfront. Compared to CHT, CHT-IO showed longer progression-free survival (median PFS 6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.004), more objective responses (ORR 49% vs. 28%, p = 0.086) and numerically longer overall survival (OS 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.240). For IO monotherapy, OS (14 vs. 16 months) and duration of response (26 vs. 22 months) were comparable to those of CHT-IO. Primary progressive disease (PD) was more frequent with IO compared to CHT-IO (13/43 vs. 3/35, p = 0.018), particularly for never-smokers (p = 0.041). Higher PD-L1 TPS were not associated with better IO outcomes, but TP53 mutated tumors showed numerically improved ORR (56% vs. 32%, p = 0.088) and PFS (6 vs. 3 months, p = 0.160), as well as longer OS in multivariable analysis (HR=0.54, p = 0.034) compared to their wild-type counterparts. Any second-line treatment was administered to 35/75 (47%) patients, with longer survival for capmatinib or tepotinib compared to crizotinib (PFS 10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.013; OS 16 vs. 13 months, p = 0.270)., Conclusion: CHT-IO is superior to CHT, and IO alone also effective for METΔ14ex NSCLC, especially in the presence of TP53 mutations and independent of PD-L1 expression, but never-smokers are at higher risk of primary PD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: JK: speaker’s honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca and Pfizer, travel grants from Takeda, advisory board honoraria from Takeda, Roche and AstraZeneca. DM: advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda. DiKa: advisory boards/speaker´s honoraria from BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings from Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim. MH: advisory board, speaker’s honoraria and travel grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim. BH: advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer. MF: grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, BMS; speaker´s honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, BMS. MK: speaker’s honoraria and travel grants from Veracyte Inc. AV: speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca. MA: speaker’s honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. CG: advisory board/lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Takeda, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, AbbVie, Tesaro/GSK and Blueprints Medicines. AT: consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis; speaker’s honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis; travel grants from Sanofi, Janssen, Daiichi; BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca. MR: advisory board/lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. NF: grants from Roche, consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Berlinchemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers&Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda; support for attending meetings from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Takeda. AS: advisory board honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, ThermoFisher, Novartis, speaker’s honoraria from BMS, Illumina, AstraZeneca, Novartis, ThermoFisher, MSD, Roche, and research funding from Chugai and BMS. MT: research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Roche, Takeda; speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca, Beigene, Novartis, Eli Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Oncology, Merck, Sanofi and travel grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen Oncology, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim. PC: research funding from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda, speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Thermo Fisher, Takeda, support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, and personal fees for participating to advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Takeda and Roche, all outside the submitted work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) represents a major immune-related adverse event (irAE) in patients with lung cancer. We aimed for the clinical characterization, diagnostics, risk factors, treatment and outcome in a large cohort of patients from everyday clinical practice., Patients and Methods: For this retrospective analysis, 1,376 patients having received checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in any line of therapy from June 2015 until February 2020 from three large-volume lung cancer centers in Berlin, Germany were included and analyzed., Results: With a median follow-up of 35 months, all-grade, high-grade (CTCAE ≥ 3) and fatal CIP were observed in 83 (6.0%), 37 (2.7%) and 12 (0.9%) patients, respectively, with a median onset 4 months after initiation of CPI therapy. The most common radiologic patterns were organizing pneumonia (OP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (37% and 31%). All except 7 patients with G1-2 CIP interrupted treatment. Corticosteroids were administered to 74 patients with a median starting dose of 0.75 mg/kg. After complete restitution (n = 67), re-exposure to CPI (n = 14) led to additional irAE in 43% of the cases. Thoracic radiotherapy targeting the lung was the only independent risk factor for CIP (odds ratio 2.8, p < 0.001) and pretherapeutic diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide inversely correlated with CIP severity. Compared with patients without CIP and non-CIP irAE, CIP was associated with impaired overall survival (hazard ratios 1.23, p = 0.24 and 2.01, p = 0.005)., Conclusions: High-grade CIP accounts for almost half of all CIP cases in an allcomer lung cancer population. A continuous vigilance, rapid diagnostics and adequate treatment are key to prevent disease progression associated with impaired survival., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Frost reports consulting fees for being an advisory board member from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Berlinchemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers&Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp&Dohme, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Lilly and Takeda; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid for the “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie (DGP)” and the “Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG): Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie, Sektion Thoraxonkologie”. Mrs. Unger has nothing to disclose. Dr. Blum has nothing to disclose. Dr. Misch has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kurz has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lüders has nothing to disclose. Dr. Olive has nothing to disclose. Dr. Raspe has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hilbrandt has nothing to disclose. Dr. Koch reports consulting fees for AstraZeneca and Roche, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche and Janssen-Cilag. Dr. Böhmer reports consulting fees from Varian Medical Systems. Dr. Senger has nothing to disclose. Dr. Witzenrath reports having received research grants from the „Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft“, „Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung“, „Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie“, European Respiratory Society, Marie Curie Foundation, Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, Capnetz Foundation, International Max Planck Research School, personal fees for lectures or consulting from: Astra Zeneca, Bayer Health Care, Berlin Chemie, Biotest, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Gilead, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hexal, Insmed, Novartis, Noxxon, Pantherna, Roche, Teva, Vaxxilon; Patents planned, issued or pending: EPO 12181535.1: IL-27 for modulation of immune response in acute lung injury (Issued 2012), WO/2010/094491: Means for inhibiting the expression of Ang-2 (Issued 2010); PCT/EP2021/066543: A pharmaceutical combination comprising an anti-viral protonophore and a serine protease inhibitor (Issued 2021); PCT/EP2021/075627: New medical use of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (Issued 2021). Dr. Grohé reports having received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Siemens; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AbbVie, Ariad, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Siemens; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Ariad, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Siemens; Dr. Bauer has nothing to disclose. Dr. Modest reports consulting fees from Amgen, Merck Serono, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, MSD, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Onkowissen, Sanofi, Taiho, G1 and Transgene; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, Merck Serono, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, MSD, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Onkowissen, Sanofi, Taiho, G1 and Transgene; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen. Dr. Kollmeier has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: RET fusions are present in 1%-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, central nervous system-penetrant, selective RET inhibitor, previously demonstrated clinical activity in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC in the phase I/II ARROW study, including among treatment-naive patients. We report an updated analysis from the ARROW study., Patients and Methods: ARROW is a multi-cohort, open-label, phase I/II study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later 0-1). Patients initiated pralsetinib at the recommended phase II dose of 400 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal, or investigator's decision. The co-primary endpoints (phase II) were overall response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review and safety., Results: Between 17 March 2017 and 6 November 2020 (data cut-off), 281 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC were enrolled. The ORR was 72% [54/75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 60% to 82%] for treatment-naive patients and 59% (80/136; 95% CI 50% to 67%) for patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy (enrolment cut-off for efficacy analysis: 22 May 2020); median duration of response was not reached for treatment-naive patients and 22.3 months for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Tumour shrinkage was observed in all treatment-naive patients and in 97% of patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy; median progression-free survival was 13.0 and 16.5 months, respectively. In patients with measurable intracranial metastases, the intracranial response rate was 70% (7/10; 95% CI 35% to 93%); all had received prior systemic treatment. In treatment-naive patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who initiated pralsetinib by the data cut-off (n = 116), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (18%), hypertension (10%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (9%), and lymphopenia (9%). Overall, 7% (20/281) discontinued due to TRAEs., Conclusions: Pralsetinib treatment produced robust efficacy and was generally well tolerated in treatment-naive patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Results from the confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting are pending., Competing Interests: Disclosure FG has consulted or provided expert opinion for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Siemens, and Takeda; has received fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Siemens, and Takeda; and has received funding for scientific research from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Siemens, and Takeda. GC has consulted and/or had advisory roles for AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Foundation Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Samsung, and Seattle Genetics; served on speakers’ bureaus for Daiichi Sankyo, Foundation Medicine, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Samsung; received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Pfizer, Roche/Genentech; received honoraria from Ellipses Pharma and research funding from Merck; and is supported by the OPTIMA [grant number 101034347]. MT has received honoraria for scientific meetings (self) from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; advisory-board honoraria (self) from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; travelling support (self) from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and has received research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, BMS, Roche, and Takeda. VS reports research funding/grant support for clinical trials from AbbVie, Agensys, Alfa-sigma, Altum, Amgen, Bayer, Berg Health, Biotherapeutics, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Boston Biomedical, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, D3, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Exelixis, Fujifilm, GSK, Idera Pharma, Incyte, Inhibrx, Loxo Oncology, MedImmune, MultiVir, Nanocarrier, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCI-CTEP, Novartis, Northwest Biotherapeutics, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Vegenics; travel support from ASCO, ESMO, Helsinn, Incyte, Novartis, and PharmaMar; consultancy/advisory board participation for Helsinn, Incyte, Loxo Oncology/Eli Lilly, MedImmune, Novartis, R-Pharma US, QED Pharma; and other relationship with Medscape. CSB has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Daiichi Sankyo, Turning Point Therapeutics, Guardant, Regeneron, Silverback, and Takeda; and has received research funding to their institution from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech Inc., Janssen, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, and Turning Point Therapeutics. DSWT has consulted and/or had advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, Merrimack, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Roche; and research funding to their institution from AstraZeneca, Bayer, GSK, and Novartis. DHL has received personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Chong Keun Dang, CJ Healthcare, Genexine, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Menarini, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Roche, Samyang Biopharm, ST Cube, and Takeda; and non-financial support from Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Takeda. DM has consulted and/or had advisory roles at scientific meetings for AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda (institution, no personal honoraria). EG has consulted and/or had advisory roles for Alkermes, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma, Janssen, NeoMed, Roche, Seattle Genetics, TFS, Thermo Fisher Scientific; served on speakers’ bureaus for MSD, Roche, and Thermo Fisher Scientific; received travel and accommodation expenses from BMS, Glycotope GmbH, Menarini, and MSD; research funding to their institution from Novartis, Roche, and Thermo Fisher Scientific; and is supported by a grant from the ‘la Caixa’ Foundation [grant number LCF/PR/CE07/50610001]. DWK has received travel and accommodation expenses from Amgen and Daiichi Sankyo; and research funding to their institution from Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Hanmi, Janssen, Merus, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, TP Therapeutics, Xcovery, and Yuhan. AJvdW reports research funding/grant support for clinical trials from AstraZeneca [grant number ESR-16-12212], Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda [grant number 2019N0853/2020N0366]; and consultancy/advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. JFG has an immediate family member who is an employee of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals; has consulted and/or had advisory roles for Agios, Amgen, Array BioPharma, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Jounce Therapeutics, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mirati, Silverback Therapeutics, GlydeBio, Moderna Therapeutics, Oncorus, Regeneron, Takeda, and Theravance; has stock and ownership in Ironwood Pharmaceuticals; has received honoraria from ARIAD, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; and research funding from Adaptimmune, ALX Oncology, ARIAD, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, Genentech, Jounce Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, and Tesaro. LPA has a leadership role in ALTUM Sequencing and Genomica; served on speakers’ bureaus for AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech; received travel, accommodation, and expenses from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, Celgene, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, and Takeda; research funding to their institution from AstraZeneca, BMS, Kura Oncology, MSD, and PharmaMar; other relationships with Roche; and an immediate family member has other relationships with Amgen, Ipsen, Merck Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, and Roche. SVL served as a consultant or advisory board member to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Elevation Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Guardant Health, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Turning Point Therapeutics; received research funding (to institution) from Alkermes, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, Elevation Oncology, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Merus, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, RAPT Therapeutics, Turning Point Therapeutics; and is supported by the National Cancer Institute [grant number UM1CA186691]. GPK received research grants from Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Merck, AbbVie, Takeda, Daiichi, and Cullinan. DWB served on an advisory board for Blueprint Medicines Corporation. ASM received research funding from DoD, Mark Foundation, NIH, Novartis, and Verily; honoraria to institution for participation in advisory boards: AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Genentech, Inc., Janssen; travel support from: Roche; is a non-remunerated member of the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Board of Directors; and is supported by the Mark Foundation for Cancer Research ASPIRE Award, the National Cancer Institute [grant number R21 CA251923], and Department of Defense Concept Award [grant number W81XWH-22-1-0021]. JJL served as a compensated consultant or advisory board member for Genentech, C4 Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Nuvalent, Bayer, Elevation Oncology, Novartis, Mirati Therapeutics, and Turning Point Therapeutics; received honorarium and travel support from Pfizer; received institutional research funding from Hengrui Therapeutics, Turning Point Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Relay Therapeutics, Bayer, Elevation Oncology, Roche, Linnaeus Therapeutics, Nuvalent, and Novartis; and received CME funding from OncLive, MedStar Health, and Northwell Health. VSm is an employee and/or equity holder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. AR is an employee and/or equity holder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd and equity holder of Merck/MSD. SK is a former employee and/or equity holder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. AZ, MLG and ALB are employees and/or equity holders of Blueprint Medicines Corporation. JM has provided expertise for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Hengrui, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Takeda; and received research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Pierre Fabre, and Roche. YH has declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing The anonymized derived data from this study that underlie the results reported in this article will be made available, beginning 12 months and ending 5 years after this article’s publication, to any investigators who sign a data access agreement and provide a methodologically sound proposal to medinfo@blueprintmedicines.com. The trial protocol will also be made available, as will a data fields dictionary., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Precision oncology and immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Emerging studies show that targeted therapies are also beneficial for patients with driver alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in early-stage NSCLC (stages I-IIIA). Furthermore, patients with elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression appear to respond favorably to adjuvant immunotherapy. To determine the frequency of genomic alterations and PD-L1 status in early-stage NSCLC, we retrospectively analyzed data from 2066 unselected, single-center patients with NSCLC diagnosed using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Nine-hundred and sixty-two patients (46.9%) presented with early-stage NSCLC. Of these, 37.0% had genomic alterations for which targeted therapies have already been approved for advanced NSCLC. The frequencies of driver mutations in the early stages were equivalent to those in advanced stages, i.e., the rates of EGFR mutations in adenocarcinomas were 12.7% (72/567) and 12.0% (78/650) in early and advanced NSCLC, respectively ( p = 0778). In addition, 46.3% of early-stage NSCLC cases were PD-L1-positive, with a tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%. With comparable frequencies of driver mutations in early and advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 overexpression in nearly half of patients with early-stage NSCLC, a broad spectrum of biomarkers for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies is available, and several are currently being investigated in clinical trials.

Background: EGFR exon20 insertions (ex20ins) are targeted by novel compounds in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data about outcome under conventional therapies and the influence of molecular features are scarce., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 118 patients with evaluation of radiologic response based on RECIST v1.1. TP53 status was available for 88 cases., Results: Platinum doublets and chemoimmunotherapy showed similar response rates (20-25%), disease control rates (80%) and median progression-free survival (mPFS, ≈7 months), which were longer compared to monochemotherapy (9%, 59%, 4.1 months), EGFR inhibitors (0%, 46%, 3.0) and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (0%, 30%, 2.1; p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was not dependent on the choice of first-line treatment, but related to more lines of systemic therapy (p < 0.05). TP53 mutations and brain metastases were associated with shorter PFS under platinum doublets and EGFR inhibitors (HR 3.3-6.1, p < 0.01), and shorter OS for patients receiving both treatments (p < 0.05). More tumour CD8 + and less Th1 cells were associated with longer OS independent of brain and TP53 status (p < 0.01). No difference in outcome was noted according to the ex20ins site and use of pemetrexed (vs. other cytotoxics) or bevacizumab. Long-lasting responses (>1 year) occasionally occurred under EGFR inhibitors for both 'near-' and 'far-loop' variants., Conclusions: Platinum doublets and chemoimmunotherapy have the highest activity with ORR of 20-25% and mPFS of approximately 7 months, regardless of the cytotoxic partner, while PD-(L)1 inhibitors show limited efficacy. TP53 mutations, brain metastases and a lower tumour CD8/Th1-cell ratio are independently associated with shorter survival., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement PC: research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, and advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. JR: lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. FCS: research funding from Roche; non-financial support from Lilly; personal fees from Takeda, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. BH: advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer. JK: research funding from AstraZeneca and Celgene. MJ: speaker's honoraria from Roche, Boehringer, and travel grants from Daiichi Sankyo. DK: advisory boards/speakers honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. FE: speaker's honoraria from Roche. FB: research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS and Roche, and travel grants from BMS and MSD. RS: research funding from BMS, and speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca and Roche. AT: research funding from BMS. MW: research funding from Roche; Personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Kite, Novartis, Merck, BMS, Heidelberg Pharma; Non-financial support from AstraZeneca, BMS, Glenmark; outside the submitted work. SL: advisory board, speaker's honoraria and travel support from BerGenBio, Novartis, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, as well as research funding from Roche, BMS, BerGenBio. WB: consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. Travel grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Roche. CS: advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda. Speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Lilly, Roche, MSD, Takeda. DM: advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda (no personal honoraria) NF: advisory board/lecture fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Takeda. JK: advisory board member without receiving any personal fees for Roche Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Lilly and Takeda. MR: advisory board/lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. FG: grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, as well as personal fees from AbbVie, Tesaro/GSK, Blueprint Medicines, Amgen. CG: advisory board/lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Takeda, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, AbbVie, Tesaro/GSK and Blueprints Medicines. AS: advisory board honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, ThermoFisher, Novartis, speaker's honoraria from BMS, Illumina, AstraZeneca, Novartis, ThermoFisher, MSD, Roche, and research funding from Chugai and BMS. MT: advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, speaker's honoraria from Eli Lilly, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, and travel grants from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Boehringer. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The majority of research within lung cancer is focused on prevention, diagnosis and treatment rather than examining infrastructure or processes of lung cancer centres. Benchmarking is a systematic method for documenting and comparing processes, functions or performance of organisations against the best in the world. ADVANCE-1 is a European Respiratory Society funded pilot study with the main aim of creating a benchmarking tool that can easily document and reflect the structure and process within a lung cancer centre and its associated registry. By doing this we can then compare centres and generate best practice learning points from each centre in order to learn from each other. The ADVANCE-1 study group was constituted by two ERS fellowship-holders and senior lung cancer specialists from the two participating lung cancer services in Glasgow, Scotland, and Berlin, Germany. The study design and benchmarking tools were reviewed externally. Once the benchmarking tools were created, prospective testing was undertaken in the two participating centres in order to allow comparison to ascertain best practice in a so called 'collaborative benchmarking approach'. We were then able to create personalised learning points for each centre. The next phase of the project will be to expand the benchmarking across several European centres in the ADANCE-2 project., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Current predictive biomarkers for PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1)/PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1)-directed immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mostly focus on features of tumour cells. However, the tumour microenvironment and immune context are expected to play major roles in governing therapy response. Against this background, we set out to apply context-sensitive feature selection and machine learning approaches on expression profiles of immune-related genes in diagnostic biopsies of patients with stage IV NSCLC., Methods: RNA expression levels were determined using the NanoString nCounter platform in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour biopsies obtained during the diagnostic workup of stage IV NSCLC from two thoracic oncology centres. A 770-gene panel covering immune-related genes and control genes was used. We applied supervised machine learning methods for feature selection and generation of predictive models., Results: Feature selection and model creation were based on a training cohort of 55 patients with recurrent NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 antibody therapy. Resulting models identified patients with superior outcomes to immunotherapy, as validated in two subsequently recruited, separate patient cohorts (n = 67, hazard ratio = 0.46, p = 0.035). The predictive information obtained from these models was orthogonal to PD-L1 expression as per immunohistochemistry: Selecting by PD-L1 positivity at immunohistochemistry plus model prediction identified patients with highly favourable outcomes. Independence of PD-L1 positivity and model predictions were confirmed in multivariate analysis. Visualisation of the models revealed the predictive superiority of the entire 7-gene context over any single gene., Conclusion: Using context-sensitive assays and bioinformatics capturing the tumour immune context allows precise prediction of response to PD-1/PD-L1-directed immunotherapy in NSCLC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement M.W. reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche and Takeda and research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Takeda. F.M. reports research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. Henning Reis reports a consulting and advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb; travel support from Philips, Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb; research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and share ownership from Bayer. M.G. reports travel support from MSD Sharp & Dohme. J.K. reports a consulting and advisory role without personal honoraria for Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD and Takeda. T.H. reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, MSD Sharp & Dohme and Roche and a consulting and advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb and Chugai. M.M. reports honoraria from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. W.E.E.E. reports honoraria from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Astellas, Bayer, Teva, Merck Serono, Daiichi Sankyo and Hexal; a consulting or advisory role for Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas, Bayer, Teva and Daiichi Sankyo and research funding from Eli Lilly (institutional). C.A. reports research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. K.D. reports a consultancy/advisory role for Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. M.S. reports consultancy for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Lilly and Novartis; honoraria for CME presentations from Alexion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly and Novartis; research funding to the institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis and other support from Universität Duisburg-Essen (patents). All the remaining authors declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of Thyroid Transcription Factor (TTF)-1 expression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and its value for the diagnosis of SCLC, the response to first line treatment as well as the prognostic impact on overall survival (OS)., Methods: We analyzed a total of 294 patients (m, n = 184; f, n = 110) with SCLC (stage IIIA, n = 32; IIIB, n = 87; IV, n = 175) diagnosed in our institution between January 2005 and December 2008. Patient's characteristics comprising age, gender, histology and first line treatment were included into the analyses. For the follow-up of patients the governmental death registrar was used. The TTF-1 immunostaining was prospectively performed. CT scans of all patients were reviewed and response to treatment was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.0 (RECIST) criteria., Results: A total of 221 of the 294 patients were eligible for analysis. Patients with TTF-1-positive SCLC had a median OS of 374 (95% CI 306-442) days. The OS of patients with TTF1-negative SCLC was 290 (95% CI 191-389) days, which was not significantly shorter (p = 0.254). Also stratification for tumor stage did not reveal significant difference in OS. Analyzing the disease control rate (DCR) in patients with metastatic disease (stage IV), we observed a significantly (p = 0.006) improved response to treatment in the group of patients with TTF-1-expression (DCR 86% vs. 56%). Regarding the overall response rates (ORR) in the entire population, there was no difference observed between both subgroups. (TTF-1-pos. 75.3% vs. TTF-1-neg. 71.4%; p = 0.642)., Conclusions: The diagnostic information of TTF-1 in SCLC seems to be limited. TTF-1 had no prognostic value concerning OS, but may serve as a predictor for response to first line chemotherapy., Virtual Slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5811254651472285.

Background: PET/CT investigation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has a high sensitivity (89 - 100 %) and good specificity (79 - 95 %) for the diagnosis of NSCLC. Currently, it is mainly used in preoperative staging. This leads in approximately 15 % of these cases to the diagnosis of metastatic disease that was neither clinically suspected nor seen in previously performed conventional imaging. We hypothesised that including these cases in the palliative stage IV group would have an influence on overall survival., Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with stage IV NSCLC who underwent FDG-PET/CT staging with patients in whom conventional imaging procedures were performed., Methods: We analysed the OS of all stage IV NSCLC patients diagnosed in our clinic in 2009 (n = 254), 96/254 (38 %) patients were staged with PET/CT and 158/254 (62 %) with conventional imaging (CT group). Survival data were compared by Kaplan-Meier statistics., Results: Patients in the PET/CT group were younger (65 ± 11) than in the CT group (68 ± 10 years; p = 0.008). The median OS of all patients was 246 (range: 217 - 275) days; 338 (range: 247 - 429) days in the PET/CT group and 207 (range: 161 - 253) days in the CT group (p = 0.001), stating a difference of 131 days (4.4 months) in median OS., Conclusion: The use of FDG-PET/CT staging mainly in the preoperative setting leads to stage migration of patients with a better prognosis into the worst stage (IV) and thus longer survival within this subgroup. This survival benefit is unrelated to treatment and needs to be addressed in future studies., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)