Search

While recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have suggested superior overall survival (OS) outcomes with segmentectomy over lobectomy, questions remain regarding the comparability of these surgical procedures for treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthetize existing evidence and to compare the survival outcomes observed for stage IA NSCLC following segmentectomy or lobectomy. 40 studies (38 observational, 2 RCTs) encompassing 103,926 patients were analyzed. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrences, harvested lymph nodes, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Risk of bias was assessed using established tools, and evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE. Non-RCTs showed an OS HR of 1.10 (95 % CI: 0.94-1.30, p = 0.24) with low certainty, contrasting with RCTs' HR of 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.66-1.02, p = 0.7) with moderate certainty. Local recurrences exhibited OR 1.40 (95 % CI: 0.94-2.08, p = 0.09) in non-RCTs with low certainty, and RR 1.61 (95 % CI: 1.12-2.31, p = 0.01) in RCTs with low certainty. Non-RCTs showed DFS HR 1.13 (95 % CI: 0.95-1.34, p = 0.18) with low certainty, while RCTs yielded HR 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.85-1.18, p = 0.97) with moderate certainty. Lobectomy resulted in more harvested lymph nodes. Postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly. While definitive evidence for OS, DFS, and postoperative outcomes differences was inconclusive, a potential increase in local recurrences following lobectomy was noted. Further well-designed studies are warranted to enhance evidence and inform clinical practice in stage I lung cancer surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the second most common cancer in both men and women. In addition to smoking, other risk factors, such as environmental tobacco smoke, air pollution, biomass combustion, radon gas, occupational exposure, lung disease, family history of cancer, geographic variability, and genetic factors, play an essential role in developing LC. Current screening guidelines and eligibility criteria have limited efficacy in identifying LC cases (50 %), as most screening programs primarily target subjects with a smoking history as the leading risk factor. Implementing LC screening programs in people who have never smoked (PNS) can significantly impact cancer-specific survival and early disease detection. However, the available evidence regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of such programs is limited. Therefore, further research on LC screening in PNS is warranted to determine the necessary techniques for accurately identifying individuals who should be included in screening programs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: OA reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Lilly that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb Co that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Merck Sharp & Dohme that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with FICMAC that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Celldex that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Lilly that includes: funding grants. MA-H reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. MA-H reports a relationship with Bristol that includes: funding grants. MA-H reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Merck sharp & Dohme that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with MegaLabs that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with GSK that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Bayer that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Studies have investigated the early use of liquid biopsy (LBx) during the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with clinical evidence of advanced lung cancer, but real-world adoption and impact has not been characterized. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of LBx before diagnosis (Dx; LBx-Dx) enables timely comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and shortens time until treatment initiation for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)., Materials and Methods: This study used the Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine electronic health record-derived deidentified clinicogenomic database of patients with aNSCLC from approximately 280 US cancer clinics., Results: Of 1,076 patients with LBx CGP ordered within 30 days prediagnosis/postdiagnosis, we focused on 56 (5.2%) patients who ordered LBx before diagnosis date (median 8 days between order and diagnosis, range, 1-28). Compared with 1,020 patients who ordered LBx after diagnosis (Dx-LBx), LBx-Dx patients had similar stage and ctDNA tumor fraction (TF). LBx-Dx patients received CGP results a median of 1 day after Dx versus 25 days for Dx-LBx patients. Forty-three percent of LBx-Dx were positive for an National Comprehensive Cancer Network driver, and 32% had ctDNA TF >1% but were driver negative (presumed true negatives). In 748 patients with previously untreated aNSCLC, median time from Dx to therapy was shorter in the LBx-Dx versus Dx-LBx group (21 v 35 days; P < .001)., Conclusion: Early LBx in anticipation of pathologic diagnosis of aNSCLC was uncommon in this real-world cohort, yet this emerging paradigm was associated with an abbreviated time to CGP results and faster therapy initiation. Forthcoming prospective studies will clarify the utility of LBx in parallel with biopsy for diagnostic confirmation for patients presenting with suspected advanced lung cancer.

Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Russo has received advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, and BMS and writing engagement honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, and Novartis. Dr Rolfo has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche and MSD, advisory board honoraria from Inivata, Archer, Boston Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Pfizer, Mirati, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Genzyme-Regeneron, Blueprint, CEA. Bayer, General Dynamics, MedStar, Diverse HealthHub, MH Live Events, Janssen, Amgen, Lungevity, Imagene, ThermoFisher, Abbvie, MD Serono and Novartis, and institutional research funding for his work as Coordinating Principal Investigator from Pfizer and MD Serono and has performed nonrenumerated work on behalf of his institution for GuardantHealth. He has nonrenumerated leadership roles at the International Society of Liquid Biopsy (ISLB), the International Association for Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), the European School of Oncology (ESO), and Oncology Latin American Association (OLA).

Objectives: Predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with controversial results. Recently, gene-network analysis emerged as a new tool to address tumor biology and behavior, representing a potential tool to evaluate response to therapies., Methods: Clinical data and genetic profiles of 644 advanced NSCLCs were retrieved from cBioPortal and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA); 243 ICI-treated NSCLCs were used to identify an immunotherapy response signatures via mutated gene network analysis and K-means unsupervised clustering. Signatures predictive values were tested in an external dataset of 242 cases and assessed versus a control group of 159 NSCLCs treated with standard chemotherapy., Results: At least two mutations in the coding sequence of genes belonging to the chromatin remodelling pathway (A signature), and/or at least two mutations of genes involved in cell-to-cell signalling pathways (B signature), showed positive prediction in ICI-treated advanced NSCLC. Signatures performed best when combined for patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy, and for those receiving combined ICIs., Conclusions: Alterations in genes related to chromatin remodelling complexes and cell-to-cell crosstalk may force dysfunctional immune evasion, explaining susceptibility to immunotherapy. Therefore, exploring mutated gene networks could be valuable for determining essential biological interactions, contributing to treatment personalization., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Highly sensitive technologies are available for the molecular characterization of solid tumors, including digital PCR (dPCR). Liquid biopsy, based on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is often used to assess EGFR or RAS alterations in lung and colorectal cancers. Our study aimed to compare the results of two different dPCR platforms for the detection of mutations in cfDNA., Methods: Plasma samples from lung and colorectal cancer patients collected as per routine procedures have been tested. cfDNA Was extracted from plasma, and samples were screened on the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, BioRad) and solid dPCR QIAcuity (Qiagen)., Results: A total of 42 samples were analyzed, obtained from 20 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying an EGFR or a KRAS mutation on tissue at diagnosis, and from 22 samples of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, 10 of which presenting a KRAS mutation. EGFR mutation detection was 58.8% for ddPCR and 100% for dPCR (κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71), compared to tissue results. The detection rate for RAS mutations was 72.7% for ddPCR and 86.4% for dPCR (κ = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68), compared to tissue results., Conclusions: This study showed moderate agreement between dPCR and ddPCR. Sampling effect or threshold settings may potentially explain the differences in the cfDNA data between the two different platforms., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MDR consultant/speaker: Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Bio-Rad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, Lilly, MSD and Ipsen. C.C. reports personal fees from Roche, Amgen, Bayer, and Sevier; research founding from Merck Serono; and consulting/advisory role with Roche, Bayer, Amgen. SF received support for travel expenses from Novartis, Teva, Roche, BMS, Lilly and Ipsen. RD consultant/speaker: Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, and EUSA Pharma. All other authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) enacts major roles in the maintenance of epithelial tissues. However, when EGFR signaling is altered, it becomes the grand orchestrator of epithelial transformation, and hence one of the most world-wide studied tyrosine kinase receptors involved in neoplasia, in several tissues. In the last decades, EGFR-targeted therapies shaped the new era of precision-oncology. Despite major advances, the dream of converting solid tumors into a chronic disease is still unfulfilled, and long-term remission eludes us. Studies investigating the function of this protein in solid malignancies have revealed numerous ways how tumor cells dysregulate EGFR function. Starting from preclinical models (cell lines, organoids, murine models) and validating in clinical specimens, EGFR-related oncogenic pathways, mechanisms of resistance, and novel avenues to inhibit tumor growth and metastatic spread enriching the therapeutic portfolios, were identified. Focusing on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where EGFR mutations are major players in the adenocarcinoma subtype, we will go over the most relevant discoveries that led us to understand EGFR and beyond, and highlight how they revolutionized cancer treatment by expanding the therapeutic arsenal at our disposal., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest statement The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor, and despite its sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients usually have a short survival. There are no clinically relevant predictive factors of responses to therapies, and therapeutic options are still limited., Materials and Methods: Clinical data and somatic mutations of genes included in the MSK-IMPACT panel were retrieved from cBioPortal for 108 SCLCs and analyzed to identify mutated gene networks. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 54 SCLCs, whose information was also available from cBioPortal., Results: Different networks were observed in tumors of short and long survivors. Degree (K) and betweenness (B) are key features that characterize a gene in its network of related mutations. By comparing their B/K ratio, 2 signatures of mutated genes were identified, describing short (IL-7R, NTRK2, HNF-1A) and long survivors (NBN, PTPN-11, IRS-1, INPP-4A, PIK-3CG, HGF, LATS-2, SMARCA-4, FLT-3, EIF-4A2, SPEN, PAX-5, SH2-D1A, ARID-1A, HOXB-13, ERCC-4, FANCA, FH, FGFR-2, MST-1R, SMAD-4, DDR-2, IGF-1R, PIK-3CB). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the short signature had a worse median overall survival of 8 versus 28 months (P < .001). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the long signature had a better median overall survival of 39 versus 20 months (P = .004). The value of the short signature was further confirmed in an independent cohort of SCLCs., Conclusion: The networks of mutated genes could help subclassify SCLCs based on their somatic mutations and aid in identifying a subset of tumors with poor prognosis., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In GI cancers, anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) rearrangements are extremely less frequent than in non-small-cell lung cancer but may be important to offer personalized strategies of treatment in selected patients. Data about the activity and efficacy of ALK inhibitors (ALKi) in GI cancers are scarce., Materials and Methods: We assembled a clinical and molecular international data set of pretreated patients with metastatic or nonresectable cancers of GI primary tumor origin with documented ALK rearrangement treated with at least one line of ALKi. Measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1 was required for response analysis., Results: Primary tumor sites were distributed as follows: 5 (38%) pancreas, 3 (23%) right colon, and 1 (8%) for each one of gastric, duodenal, rectal, left colon, and biliary tract sites. Seven patients (54%) were treated with alectinib, 5 (38%) with crizotinib, and 1 (8%) with entrectinib. After disease progression, five patients (38%) received a subsequent ALKi treatment line, and at the time of data cutoff date, treatment was still ongoing in two patients. Five of 12 evaluable patients (41%) achieved a partial response to first-line ALKi, five patients (41%) had stable disease, and 2 (17%) had progressive disease. No complete responses were registered. At a median follow-up of 39.6 months (interquartile range: 19.8-59.5), the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.68 to no response) and the median overall survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.46 to no response)., Conclusion: Treatment with ALKi provides remarkable responses and clinical benefit in pretreated patients with ALK fusion-positive GI malignancies. Despite the rarity, ALK rearrangements represent an important therapeutic target in individual pretreated patients with GI solid tumors. Further work providing prospective clinical validation of this target is needed., Competing Interests: Marzia Del ReConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Roche Molecular DiagnosticsSpeakers' Bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Roche, MSD Oncology Paolo MancaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have a patent for a method for the identification of gene panels optimal for TMB estimation (Inst) Andrew HendifarConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Ipsen, Perthera, Celgene, AbbVie, EisaiResearch Funding: Ipsen, NGM Biopharmaceuticals (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: HalozymeOther Relationship: FibroGen Alexander DrilonHonoraria: Pfizer, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, IASLCConsulting or Advisory Role: Ignyta, Loxo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech/Roche, BeiGene, Hengrui Therapeutics, Exelixis, Bayer, Tyra Biosciences, Takeda/Millennium, BerGenBio, MORE Health, Lilly, AbbVie, 14ner Oncology/Elevation Oncology, Monopteros Therapeutics, Novartis, EMD Serono/Merck, Repare Therapeutics, Melendi, Archer, Nuvalent Inc, Janssen, Amgen, Merus, Axis Pharma, Medscape, Liberum, Med Learning, PeerView, EPG Health, JNCCN/Harborside, Ology, Clinical Care Options, touchIME, Entos, Treeline, Prelude Therapeutics, Applied Pharmaceutical Science IncSpeakers' Bureau: Helsinn Therapeutics, Beigene, Remedica Ltd, TP Therapeutics, Verastem, Ignyta/Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Liberum, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, Lungevity, NIH, PER, OncLive/MJH Life Sciences, Clinical Care Options/NCCN, Lung Cancer Canada, AIOT, Chugai Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Sirio Libanes Hospital, Answers in CME, Faculty RTP, RV MoreResearch Funding: Foundation MedicinePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Wolters Kluwer (Royalties for Pocket Oncology)Other Relationship: Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Puma Biotechnology, Merus, Boehringer Ingelheim Guilherme HaradaSpeakers' Bureau: MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Anne Hansen ReeHonoraria: MSD Oncology, BMSiResearch Funding: BMSi (Inst) Samuel KlempnerStock and Other Ownership Interests: TP Therapeutics, Nuvalent IncHonoraria: NateraConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, Sanofi/Aventis, MersanaResearch Funding: Leap Therapeutics (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Silverback Therapeutics (Inst)Other Relationship: NCCN Gunhild Mari MælandsmoPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent application submitted for a nine-protein/gene panel predicting response to anti VEGF therapies in combination with chemotherapy (Inst) Hege G. RussnesHonoraria: AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), InCyte (Inst), Merck (Inst), Roche (Inst)Research Funding: Foundation Medicine (Inst) James M. ClearyHonoraria: Blueprint Medicines, Syros PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Merck, Tesaro, AstraZeneca, Esperas Pharma, AbbVie (Inst), Merus (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), BMS (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb Andrea Sartore-BianchiConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, Servier, Novartis Maria Di BartolomeoHonoraria: Lilly, MSD Oncology, Servier, BMSiConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, MSD OncologyResearch Funding: LillyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Sanofi Filippo PietrantonioHonoraria: Servier, Bayer, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Sanofi, MSD Oncology, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Servier, MSD Oncology, MerckResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Astrazeneca (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Molecular heterogeneity characterizes tumours' evolution and adaptation and, because of its dynamics and continuous changes under external pressure, it is one of the major causes of drug resistance, contributing to therapy failure. Several studies reported evidence of molecular events occuring in individual tumours, including monoclonal or polyclonal resistance, and primary or secondary resistance mechanisms. While primary resistance is a phenomenon already present at the diagnosis of a tumor, the acquired one is strongly related to the selective pressure of treatments administered. Therefore, the pharmacological characteristics of a drug, including its potency, binding affinity and structure, largely influence the mechanism of resistance that will arise at the progression of the disease. As an example, the lung cancer experience clearly demonstrated that the highest is the potency of a drug on its target, the more are the possibilities that the mechanism of resistance will arise independently of the target itself. The present review is focused on tumour heterogeneity and its relation to resistance to targeted-therapy, based on treatment selective pressure across different tumour types, including lung, colorectal, prostate, breast cancer and melanoma. The mechanisms of resistance based on the drug potency and the selective pressure of treatments are discussed, leading to new drug developments or new therapeutic combinations., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This meta-analysis aims to combine and analyze randomized clinical trials comparing computed tomography lung screening (CTLS) versus either no screening (NS) or chest x-ray (CXR) in subjects with cigarette smoking history, to provide a precise and reliable estimation of the benefits and harms associated with CTLS., Materials and Methods: Data from all published randomized trials comparing CTLS versus either NS or CXR in a highly tobacco-exposed population were collected, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Subgroup analyses by comparator (NS or CXR) were performed. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach., Results: Nine eligible trials (88,497 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed that CTLS is associated with: a significant reduction of lung cancer-related mortality (overall RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; NS RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92); a significant increase of early-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 2.84; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.58; NS RR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.27 to 4.89; CXR RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23); a significant decrease of late-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83; NS RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.80); a significant increase of resectability rate (NS RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.76 to 3.74); a nonsignificant reduction of all-cause mortality (overall RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.05); and a significant increase of overdiagnosis rate (NS, 38%; 95% CI, 14 to 63). The analysis of lung cancer-related mortality by sex revealed nonsignificant differences between men and women ( P = .21; I-squared = 33.6%)., Conclusion: Despite there still being uncertainty about overdiagnosis estimate, this meta-analysis suggested that the CTLS benefits outweigh harms, in subjects with cigarette smoking history, ultimately supporting the systematic implementation of lung cancer screening worldwide., Competing Interests: Francesco PassigliaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Oncology, Roche Marzia Del ReConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Roche Molecular DiagnosticsSpeakers' Bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma Francesco FacchinettiOther Relationship: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb Roberto FerraraConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme Tindara FranchinaHonoraria: Novartis, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme Anna R. LariciSpeakers' Bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim Umberto MalapelleConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lilly, Diaceutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Amgen, Merck, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lilly, Diaceutics, GlaxoSmithKline Jessica MenisConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/PfizerSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Roche/GenentechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim Antonio PassaroConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Boehringer IngelheimTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb Sara PilottoHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD Oncology, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, AstraZeneca Sara RamellaHonoraria: AstraZeneca, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche, Ipsen Rocco TrisoliniHonoraria: Pentax Medical Devices Silvia NovelloConsulting or Advisory Role: SanofiSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, Takeda, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Amgen, BeigeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction : The treatment scenario of lung cancer is rapidly evolving through time. In parallel, growing evidence is accumulating on different mechanisms of treatment resistance. Inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity define the spatial and temporal tumor clonal evolution, that is at the basis of tumor progression and resistance to anticancer treatments. Areas covered : This review summarizes the available evidence on molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer, from diagnosis to the occurrence of treatment resistance. The application of novel molecular diagnostic methods to detect molecular heterogeneity, and the implications of understanding heterogeneity for drug development strategies are discussed, with focus on clinical relevance and impact on patients' survival. Expert opinion : The current knowledge of molecular heterogeneity allows to identify different molecular subgroups of patients within the same conventional tumor type. Deeper understanding of heterogeneity determinants and the possibility to comprehensively investigate tumor molecular patterns will lead to the development of personalized treatment approaches, with the final goal to overcome resistance and prolong survival in lung cancer patients.

Lung cancer has become a paradigm for precision medicine in oncology, and liquid biopsy (LB) together with radiomics may have a great potential in this scenario. They are both minimally invasive, easy to perform, and can be repeated during patient's follow-up. Also, increasing evidence suggest that LB and radiomics may provide an efficient way to screen and diagnose tumors at an early stage, including the monitoring of any change in the tumor molecular profile. This could allow treatment optimization, improvement of patients' quality of life, and healthcare-related costs reduction. Latest reports on lung cancer patients suggest a combination of these two strategies, along with cutting-edge data analysis, to decode valuable information regarding tumor type, aggressiveness, progression, and response to treatment. The approach seems more compatible with clinical practice than the current standard, and provides new diagnostic companions being able to suggest the best treatment strategy compared to conventional methods. To implement radiomics and liquid biopsy directly into clinical practice, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system could help to link patients' clinical data together with tumor molecular profiles and imaging characteristics. AI could also solve problems and limitations related to LB and radiomics methodologies. Further work is needed, including new health policies and the access to large amounts of high-quality and well-organized data, allowing a complementary and synergistic combination of LB and imaging, to provide an attractive choice e in the personalized treatment of lung cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is still unclear how to combine biomarkers to identify patients who will truly benefit from anti-PD-1 agents in NSCLC. This study investigates exosomal mRNA expression of PD-L1 and IFN-γ, PD-L1 polymorphisms, tumor mutational load (TML) in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and radiomic features as possible predictive markers of response to nivolumab and pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC patients., Methods: Patients were enrolled and blood (12 ml) was collected at baseline before receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. Exosome-derived mRNA and cfDNA were extracted to analyse PD-L1 and IFN-γ expression and tumor mutational load (TML) by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), respectively. The PD-L1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) c.-14-368 T > C and c.*395G > C, were analysed on genomic DNA by Real-Time PCR. A radiomic analysis was performed on the QUIBIM Precision ® V3.0 platform., Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. High baseline IFN-γ was independently associated with shorter median PFS (5.6 months vs. not reached p = 0.0057), and levels of PD-L1 showed an increase at 3 months vs. baseline in patients who progressed (p = 0.01). PD-L1 baseline levels showed significant direct and inverse relationships with radiomic features. Radiomic features also inversely correlated with PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue. In subjects receiving nivolumab, median PFS was shorter in carriers of c.*395GG vs. c.*395GC/CC genotype (2.3 months vs. not reached, p = 0.041). Lastly, responders had higher non-synonymous mutations and more links between co-occurring genetic somatic mutations and ARID1A alterations as well., Conclusions: A combined multiparametric approach may provide a better understanding of the molecular determinants of response to immunotherapy.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths. Tumor heterogeneity, which hampers development of targeted therapies, was herein deconvoluted via single cell RNA sequencing in aggressive human adenocarcinomas (carrying Kras-mutations) and comparable murine model. We identified a tumor-specific, mutant-KRAS-associated subpopulation which is conserved in both human and murine lung cancer. We previously reported a key role for the oncogene BMI-1 in adenocarcinomas. We therefore investigated the effects of in vivo PTC596 treatment, which affects BMI-1 activity, in our murine model. Post-treatment, MRI analysis showed decreased tumor size, while single cell transcriptomics concomitantly detected near complete ablation of the mutant-KRAS-associated subpopulation, signifying the presence of a pharmacologically targetable, tumor-associated subpopulation. Our findings therefore hold promise for the development of a targeted therapy for KRAS-mutant adenocarcinomas.

The advances in understanding the inherited biological mechanisms of non-small cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations led to a significant improvement in the outcomes of patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Despite these clinically impressive results, clinical results are not always uniform, suggesting the need for deepening the molecular heterogeneity of this molecularly defined subgroup of patients beyond the clinical and biological surface.The availability of tissue and blood-based tumour genotyping allows us to improve the understanding of molecular and genetic intratumor heterogeneity, driving the measurement of clonal evaluation in patients with lung cancer carrying EGFR mutations. Genetic diversification, clonal expansion and selection are highly variable patterns of genetic diversity, resulting in different biological entities, also a prerequisite for Darwinian selection and therapeutic failure.Such emerging pieces of evidence on the genetic diversity, including adaptive and immunomodulated aspects, provide further evidence for the role of the tumour microenvironment (TME) in drug-resistance and immune-mediated mechanisms. Matching in daily clinical practice, the detailed genomic profile of lung cancer disease and tracking the clonal evolution could be the way to individualise the further target treatments in EGFR-positive disease. Characterising the tumour and immune microenvironment during the time of the cancer evaluation could be the way forward for the qualitative leap needed from bench to bedside. Such a daring approach, aiming at personalising treatment selection in order to exploit the TME properties and weaken tumour adaptivity, should be integrated into clinical trial design to optimise patient outcome., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AP has received honoraria for consulting, advisory role or lectures from AstraZeneca, Agilent/Dako, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer and Roche Genentech. UM has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Merck and AstraZeneca. FDM has served in a consultant/advisory role for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche Genentech, Takeda and Pfizer. CR has received speakers’ bureau from AstraZeneca and MSD, a research grant from the Lung Cancer Research Foundation–Pfizer, and research support from Guardant Health and Biomark; has an advisory board role with ARCHER, Inivata and Merck Serono; and hasconsulted for Mylan and Oncopass., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Despite the high prevalence of Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), for a long time it has been defined as an 'undruggable target', with precision medicine not considered as an adequate approach to treat this subgroup of patients. After several years of efforts, preliminary data from early clinical trials have recently demonstrated that direct pharmacological inhibition of KRAS p.G12C mutation is possible, emerging as an effective targeted treatment for about 10-12% of patients with advanced NSCLC, with potential relevant impact on their long-term survival and quality of life. This review reports the current status of KRAS mutations detection in the Italian real-word scenario, summarises the biological basis of KRAS inhibition in NSCLC and provides an updated overview of therapeutic strategies, discussing the potential reasons for past failures and analysing the upcoming challenges related to the advent of new targeted agents in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement F.P. reports receiving consultant's fee from MSD and Astra Zeneca; U.P. reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Amgen and Merck; M.D.R. reports receiving speaker bureau/consultant's fee from Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Bio-Rad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis and Ipsen; L.R. reports receiving consultant's fee from Astra Zeneca, Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim; R.D. reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead and EUSA Pharma; G.T. reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Roche, MSD, Pfizer and Bayer; S.N. declared speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. The other authors have no conflict to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A number of treatments have been developed for HER1, 2 and 3-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of which the most successful have been the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in HER1-mutant tumours resulting in highly improved progression-free survival. Human epidermal growth factor (HER)2 and 3-driven tumours represent the minority of NSCLC, and effective therapies in these patients still represent an unmet medical need. The encouraging results seen with anti-HER2 and anti-HER3 monoclonal antibodies need to be validated in larger studies, even if the greatest obstacle is represented by the exiguous number of patients bearing deregulated HER2/3 system and abnormalities of signal transduction pathway. Considering NSCLC tumour heterogeneity, which affects response and resistance to treatment, combined multiparametric approaches, such as liquid biopsy together with radiomics, may provide a better understanding of the tumour dynamics and clonal selection during the treatments., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: Insights into the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could provide important information for further patient management, including the choice of second-line treatment. The EGFR T790M mutation is the most common mechanism of resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. Owing to its biologic relevance in the response of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the selective pressure of treatment, the present study investigated whether the occurrence of T790M at progression differed among patients receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib., Patients and Methods: The present retrospective study included patients with NSCLC with an EGFR activating mutation, who had received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib as first-line treatment. Plasma samples for the analysis of cell-free DNA were taken at disease progression and analyzed using a digital droplet polymerase chain reaction EGFR mutation assay., Results: A total of 83 patients were enrolled; 42 had received gefitinib or erlotinib and 41afatinib. The patient characteristics were comparable across the 2 groups. The median time to progression (TTP) was 14.4 months for the gefitinib and erlotinib group and 10.2 months for the afatinib group (P = .09). Of the 83 patients, 47 (56.6%) were positive for the T790M in plasma. A greater incidence of T790M was observed in patients with progression during gefitinib or erlotinib therapy compared with patients treated with afatinib (33 [79%] vs. 14 [34%], respectively; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-18.5; P = .0001)., Conclusions: Although gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib showed a comparable TTP in patients receiving first-line therapy, the incidence of T790M differed among them, as demonstrated by the present study, which could have implications for the choice of second-line treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In the current paper a panel of AIOM experts in the field of thoracic malignancies discussed these topics, analyzing available scientific evidences, with the final aim of providing a summary of clinical recommendations, which may guide physicians in their current practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Silvia Novello, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi, Orbassano (Italy). COI: consultant and/or speaker's fee for Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Abbvie, Celgene, AZ, Boehringer Ingelheim., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : As of today, one of the cornerstones of NSCLC treatment is represented by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) treatment in the form of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. However, apart from currently approved, recommended and employed agents (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab), several new agents are currently under development and investigation both in monotherapy and in combinational settings. Areas covered : This paper aims to discuss both the current state of the art and the most interesting emerging PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors and their present and future role in metastatic NSCLC treatment. Expert opinion : Great scientific interest lies in combinational settings, involving both already developed FDA and EMA approved and not approved agents and anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, that will certainly provide data about pharmacodynamic and clinical properties of these associations, enhancing our understanding of ICIs and cancer immunotherapy. Moreover, new potential predictive biomarkers are much needed, especially considering the less decisive role of PD-L1 in treatment algorithms involving chemo-immune combinations and the current lack of other validated predictive biomarkers.

The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the current paper a panel of AIOM experts in the field of thoracic malignancies discussed the available scientific evidences, with the final aim of providing a summary of clinical recommendations, which may guide physicians in their current practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Silvia Novello Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi, Orbassano (Italy) E-mail: silvia.novello@unito.it COI: consultant and/or speaker's fee for Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Abbvie, Celgene, Astra Zeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Other co-authors have no COI to declare., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Liquid biopsy has emerged as an alternative source of nucleic acids for the management of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ( EGFR )-mutant non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The use of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been recently introduced in clinical practice, resulting in the improvement of the identification of druggable EGFR mutations for the diagnosis and monitoring of response to targeted therapy. EGFR -dependent (T790M and C797S mutations) and independent (Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition [ MET ] gene amplification, Kirsten Rat Sarcoma [ KRAS ], Phosphatidyl-Inositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic subunit Alpha isoform [ PI3KCA ], and RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 [ BRAF ] gene mutations) mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been evaluated in plasma samples from NSCLC patients using highly sensitive methods (i.e., digital droplet PCR, Next Generation Sequencing), allowing for the switch to other therapies. Therefore, liquid biopsy is a non-invasive method able to detect the molecular dynamic changes that occur under the pressure of treatment, and to capture tumor heterogeneity more efficiently than is allowed by tissue biopsy. This review addresses how liquid biopsy may be used to guide the choice of treatment strategy in EGFR -mutant NSCLC.

Introduction: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for the identification of T790M mutation in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients can replace tissue re-biopsy for resistance characterization and, being non-invasive, may be applied for disease monitoring. We analysed ctDNA during osimertinib treatment to correlate mutational levels with clinical outcome and to predict pattern of resistance., Materials and Methods: Forty patients with advanced NSCLC receiving osimertinib for T790M + disease after previous EGFR-TKI were enrolled in a pilot study to collect plasma at baseline and every 12 weeks until progression. Molecular analysis of ctDNA was performed by ddPCR and Therascreen®. When feasible at progression, tissue re-biopsy and NGS analysis were performed., Results: Thirty-eight patients had baseline plasma samples suitable for molecular analysis. Patients with low levels of the EGFR activating mutation in ctDNA [< 2200 copies/mL or allele frequency (AF) < 6.1%] showed better progression-free survival (17.8 or 17.8 months vs. 4.3 or 2.7, p = 0.022 or p = 0.018, respectively) and overall survival (23.6 or 23.6 vs. 7.7 or 7.3, p = 0.016 or p = 0.013, respectively) than patients with high levels (≥ 2200 copies/mL or AF ≥ 6.1%). Patients with detectable EGFR mutations in plasma (shedders) presented worse outcome than negative subjects (non-shedders). Low levels of T790M, higher T790M/activating mutation ratio and complete clearance after 2 months were associated with a trend towards better outcome. Tissue re-biopsy at resistance showed 3 patients with EGFR C797S, 1 with MET amplification, 1 with MYC amplification, 1 with PTEN loss, 3 with SCLC transformation., Conclusions: The mutational analysis performed on plasma plays a significant role in prognostic stratification, especially for the EGFR activating mutation, since patients with absence or low levels of mutations presented a better outcome to osimertinib. At progression, tissue re-biopsy remains a crucial issue for the identification of resistance mechanisms., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Systemic treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically since the introduction of targeted therapies. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a valuable approach to monitor the clonal evolution of tumors during treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and to detect resistance mutations., Case Presentation: A NSCLC patient with exon 19 deletion (ex19del) of EGFR was treated with osimertinib after multiple lines of treatment and obtained a partial response that lasted over 26 months. Blood was collected at each visit and ctDNA was extracted to monitor ex19del by digital droplet PCR. Within a few weeks from the beginning of osimertinib, ex19del disappeared from plasma but appeared again and steadily increased a few months later anticipating tumor progression. Interestingly, the change in ex19del was much more pronounced than other mutations, since T790M appeared 3 months after the increase of ex19del, and C797S was detectable a few weeks before clinical disease progression. Then the patient received cytotoxic chemotherapy, which was associated with a decrease in ex19del and disappearance of T790M and C797S; however, at disease progression, all EGFR mutations increased again in plasma together with MET amplification which was detected by NGS., Conclusions: The measurement of ex19del changes in ctDNA is a simple and sensitive approach to monitor clinical outcome to osimertinib and, potentially, to other therapeutic interventions.

Background: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may help understand the molecular response to pharmacologic treatment and provide information on dynamics of clonal heterogeneity. Therefore, this study evaluated the correlation between treatment outcome and activating EGFR mutations (act-EGFR) and T790M in cfDNA in patients with advanced NSCLC given osimertinib., Methods: Thirty-four NSCLC patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs, positive for both act-EGFR and T790M in cfDNA at the time of progression were enrolled in this study. Plasma samples were obtained at osimertinib baseline and after 3 months of therapy; cfDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR and results were expressed as mutant allele frequency (MAF)., Results: At baseline, act-EGFR MAF was significantly higher than T790M (p < 0.0001). act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR MAF ratio were significantly correlated with disease response (p = 0.02). Cut-off values of act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR ratio of 2.6% and 0.22 were found, respectively. The PFS of patients with act-EGFR MAF of > 2.6% and < 2.6%, were 10 months vs. not reached, respectively (p = 0.03), whereas patients with T790M/act-EGFR ≤ 0.22 had poorer PFS than patients with a value of > 0.22 (6 months vs. not reached, respectively, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR MAF ratio are potential markers of outcome in patients treated with osimertinib.

The clinical introduction of EGFR-TKIs within the oncologic armamentarium has changed the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) creating widespread expectations both in patients and clinicians. However, several gaps in current understanding leave open important questions regarding the use of these drugs in clinical practice. For instance, there is uncertainty in regard to which EGFR-TKI should be given first in naive patients with EGFR-driven malignancies since different generations of drugs are available with different pharmacological profiles. Furthermore, acquired drug resistance may limit the therapeutic potential of EGFR-TKIs and the choice of the best treatment strategy after first-line treatment failure is still debated. This review article is aimed at describing the pharmacological properties of EGFR-TKIs and the current treatment options for NSCLC patients who develop acquired resistance. This information might be useful to design new rational and more effective pharmacological strategies in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Among the potential mechanisms involved in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer, the manifestation of stem-like properties in cancer cells seems to have a crucial role. Alterations involved in the development of TKI resistance may be acquired in a very early phase of tumorigenesis, supporting the hypothesis that these aberrations may be present in cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this regard, the characterization of tumor subclones in the initial phase and the identification of the CSCs may be helpful in planning a specific treatment to target selected biomarkers, suppress tumor growth, and prevent drug resistance. The aim of this review is to elucidate the role of CSCs in the development of resistance to TKIs and its implication for the management of patients. Stem Cells 2018;36:633-640., (© AlphaMed Press 2018.)

Objectives: EGFR T790M mutation is the most common mechanism of resistance to first-/second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and could be overcome by third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as osimertinib. Liquid biopsy, a non-invasive technique used to test the presence of the resistant mutation, may help avoiding tissue re-biopsy. However, analysing only circulating-free DNA, information about other less frequent and coexisting resistance mechanisms may remain unrevealed., Materials and Methods: All patients reported in this series participated in the ASTRIS trial, a real world treatment study testing the efficacy of osimertinib (80mg os die) in advanced T790M-positive NSCLC progressed to prior EGFR-TKI. Patients were considered eligible to osimertinib if T790M positive on tissue or plasma samples. In our patients, EGFR molecular testing on blood sample was conducted with digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)., Results: We report our experience of five patients treated with osimertinib after T790M detection on liquid biopsy that presented a disease progression at first tumor assessment mediated by SCLC transformation, as evidenced at tissue re-biopsies. All patients showed low ratio T790M/activating mutation in the blood before osimertinib (lower than 0.03). For three patients, EGFR mutational analysis was T790M-negative when re-assessed by using a less sensitive method (therascreen ® ) on the same liquid biopsy sample analysed by ddPCR before osimertinib therapy., Conclusion: Although liquid biopsy is a relevant tool to diagnose T790M presence in NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR-TKI, in case of a low ratio T790M/activating mutation, tissue biopsy should be considered to exclude the presence of SCLC transformation and/or other concomitant resistance mechanisms., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disease progression occurs after a median of 9 to 10 months of crizotinib treatment. Several mechanisms of resistance have been identified and include ALK mutations and amplification or the activation of bypassing signaling pathways. Rebiopsy in NSCLC patients represents a critical issue and the analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has a promising role for the identification of resistance mechanisms., Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were enrolled after disease progression during crizotinib treatment; cfDNA was analyzed using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (BioRad, Hercules, CA) for ALK (p.L1196M, p.G1269A, and p.F1174L) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) (codons 12 and 13) mutations., Results: ALK secondary mutations (p.L1196M, p.G1269A, and p.F1174L) were identified in 5 patients; 1 patient had 2 ALK mutations (p.L1196M and p.G1269A). Overall, 10 patients presented KRAS mutations (7 p.G12D, 2 p.G12V, and 1 p.G12C mutations, respectively). In 3 patients KRAS mutations were associated with ALK mutations. cfDNA was monitored during the treatment with second-generation ALK inhibitors and the amount of ALK as well as KRAS mutations decreased along with tumor regression., Conclusion: ALK and KRAS mutations are associated with acquired resistance to crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. In particular, ALK acquired mutations can be detected in plasma and could represent a promising tumor marker for response monitoring., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: KRAS oncogene mutations (MUTKRAS) drive resistance to EGFR inhibition by providing alternative signaling as demonstrated in colo-rectal cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the efficacy of treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) depends on activating EGFR mutations (MUTEGFR). However, inhibition of EGFR may select resistant cells displaying alternative signaling, i.e., KRAS, or restoration of EGFR activity due to additional MUTEGFR, i.e., the c.2369C > T (p.T790MEGFR)., Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the appearance of MUTKRAS during EGFR-TKI treatment and their contribution to drug resistance., Methods: This study used cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cftDNA) to evaluate the appearance of codon 12 MUTKRAS and p.T790MEGFR mutations in 33 advanced NSCLC patients progressing after an EGFR-TKI., Results: p.T790MEGFR was detected in 11 (33.3%) patients, MUTKRAS at codon 12 in 3 (9.1%) while both p.T790MEGFR and MUTKRAS codon 12 were found in 13 (39.4%) patients. Six patients (18.2%) were KRAS wild-type (WTKRAS) and negative for p.T790MEGFR. In 8 subjects paired tumor re-biopsy/plasma samples were available; the percent concordance of tissue/plasma was 62.5% for p.T790MEGFR and 37.5% for MUTKRAS. The analysis of time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in WTKRAS vs. MUTKRAS were not statistically different, even if there was a better survival with WTKRAS vs. MUTKRAS, i.e., TTP 14.4 vs. 11.4 months (p = 0.97) and OS 40.2 vs. 35.0 months (p = 0.56), respectively., Conclusions: MUTKRAS could be an additional mechanism of escape from EGFR-TKI inhibition and cftDNA is a feasible approach to monitor the molecular development of drug resistance.

NSCLC is an aggressive disease with one of the poorer prognosis among cancers. The disappointing response to chemotherapy drives the search for genetic biomarkers aimed at both attaining an earlier diagnosis and choosing the most appropriate chemotherapy. In this scenario, epigenomic markers, such as DNA methylation, histone acetylation and the expression of noncoding RNAs, have been demonstrated to be reliable for the stratification of NSCLC patients. Newest techniques with increased sensitivity and the isolation of nucleic acids from plasma may allow an early diagnosis and then monitoring the efficacy over time. However, prospective confirmatory studies are still lacking. This article presents an overview of the epigenetic markers evaluated in NSCLC and discusses the role of their real-time detection in the clinical management of the disease.

In non-small-cell lung cancer, the molecular diagnosis of somatic mutations is instrumental for the choice of the most appropriate treatment. However, despite an initial response, resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors occurs and thereafter tumors progress. For this reason, next generation inhibitors able to overcome acquired resistances are currently in development. Therefore, the identification of the molecular determinants of resistance is needed to adapt treatment accordingly. The analysis of circulating cell-free tumor DNA represents a powerful tool to monitor the somatic changes induced by treatment. This review focuses on the most recent advantages in the diagnosis of acquired resistance in circulating cell-free tumor DNA and underlines the strategies ready to be translated in the clinical practice.