Search

Background: Cancer immune evasion is critical in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has been targeted by immunotherapy. High soluble (s)PD-L1 is associated with reduced survival and treatment failure in advanced stages. Here we evaluated the effects of sPD-L1 on T cells, relapse free survival, and overall survival in early stage NSCLC., Methods: In vitro T cell stimulation was performed in the presence of sPD-L1 to evaluate its immunomodulatory activity. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were investigated for PD-L1 splice variants and enzymes involved in proteolytic cleavage (i.e. ADAM10). Plasma from 74 NSCLC (stage IA-IIIB), as well as an additional 73 (control cohort) patients was collected prior to curative surgery. Thereafter sPD-L1 levels from an immunosorbent assay were correlated with patient outcome., Results: In vitro sPD-L1 inhibited IFN-γ production and proliferation of T cells and induced a terminal effector CD4 T cell subtype expressing CD27. Data from the TCGA demonstrated that elevated mRNA levels of ADAM10 is a negative predictor of outcome in NSCLC patients. To investigate the clinical relevance of these in vitro and TCGA findings, we quantified sPD-L1 in the plasma of early-stage NSCLC patients. In the first cohort we found significantly higher sPD-L1 levels in relapsing NSCLC patients, with a multivariate analysis revealing high sPD-L1 (>1000 pg/mL) as an independent predictor of survival. However, these findings could not be validated in two independent control cohorts., Discussion: Although in vitro and TCGA data support the suppressive effect of sPD-L1 we were unable to translate this in our clinical setting. These results may be due to the small patient number and their heterogeneity as well as the lack of a standardized sPD-L1 ELISA. Our inconclusive results regarding the value of sPD-L1 in early stage NSCLC warrant assay validation and further investigation in larger (neo-)adjuvant trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: As real-world data regarding immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer are lacking for Austria, we conducted a retrospective study in six hospitals to present data from real-world practice., Methods: Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were stratified into two groups, either patients with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy (cohort 1) or patients with second-line nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy (cohort 2). Primary outcome measures were objective response rate and overall survival. A matched-pair analysis was performed to compare overall survival to patients from the Tyrolean Lung Cancer Project as a historical control group., Results: In total, 89 patients were identified, 42 patients in cohort 1 and 47 patients in cohort 2. The objective response rates were 43.3% and 31.4%, respectively. The median overall survival was 17.0 months (95% CI 11.7-21.5 months) in cohort 1 and 18.7 months (95% CI 9.5-23.4 months) in cohort 2. Treatment-related adverse events grades 3 and 4 were reported in 11.2% of patients. The matched-pair analysis showed a median overall survival of 15.2 months (95% CI 7.6-20.4 months) for first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy compared to 9.8 months (95% CI 7.8-11.6 months) for the historical control (p = 0.43). In cohort 2, a median overall survival of 20.3 months (95% CI 6.9-26.2 months) for second-line immunotherapy compared to 5.4 months (95% CI 3.2-11.7 months) for the historical control (p = 0.18) was shown., Conclusion: The results are comparable with other real-world studies and, when matched to historical controls, support the improvement in outcomes made possible by these agents., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The tumor-microenvironment (TME) represents an attractive therapeutic target in NSCLC and plays an important role for efficacy of cancer therapeutics. We hypothesized that upregulation of collagen synthesis might be associated with adverse outcome in NSCLC. Literature evidence suggests that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) decrease collagen deposition. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prognostic role of RASi intake and their influence on the TME in NSCLC., Methods: Four publicly available datasets were used to evaluate the impact of key enzymes involved in collagen biosynthesis. To investigate the influence of RASi intake on the TME and prognosis we evaluated a cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients and performed histopathological characterization of the TME. A three-dimensional microtissue in vitro model was developed to define the impact of RASi on collagen synthesis., Results: Expression of three genes of the collagen synthesis pathway, ALDH18A1, PLOD2 and P4HA1, was upregulated in NSCLC compared to normal lung tissue and linked to shortened overall survival in all investigated cohorts. Together, these genes formed a 'Collagen Signature' which represents an independent unfavourable prognostic factor in two NSCLC cohorts and was linked to alterations of the extracellular matrix deposition and cell cycle pathways. In the cohort of metastatic NSCLC, RASi intake was linked to improved overall response rate and survival. Exploratory in vitro experiments revealed that RASi led to a dose dependent reduction of collagen deposition and degradation of three-dimensional lung cancer cell spheroids., Conclusion: We demonstrate that collagen synthesis is a key upregulated process in the NSCLC TME and its transcriptional readout, the three gene Collagen Signature is independently associated with poor outcome. Pharmacological targeting of this pathways e.g. by RASi bears potential of improving outcome in NSCLC., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Patient pathways from first suspicious imaging until final surgical treatment vary and in some instances cause considerable delay. This study aims to investigate the impact of this delay on survival of lung cancer patients. The institutional database was queried to identify patients with primary lung cancer who were treated with primary surgery. Time intervals were defined as date of first suspicious medical images until date of surgical treatment. All patients received PET-CT staging and tissue confirmation prior to treatment planning in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Patients with unknown date of first contact, follow-up CT-scans of pulmonary nodules, or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. In total, 287 patients treated between 2009 and 2017 were included for further analysis. Median time between first suspicious medical imaging and surgical therapy was 62 (range 23-120) days and did not differ between male and female patients. Patients were then classified into two groups according to the duration of the medical work-up: group A up to 60 days, and group B from 61 to 120 days. Clinical T and N stages were comparable between the groups. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups. In the subgroup of cT2 tumors (87 patients), there was a significant survival benefit for patients in group A (p = 0.043), while nodal stages, stage migration, lymphatic vessel invasion, grading and other potentially survival-influencing clinical parameters were comparable between the groups. Delay between diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer may result in dismal outcome. Efforts need to focus on improving and streamlining patient pathways to shorten the delay until surgical treatment to a minimum. Process improvement might be achieved by stringent interdisciplinary work-up and a patient-centered approach.

Cancer immunotherapy is a success story of translational medicine that has led to improved survival in patients with different difficult-to-treat types of cancer, such as metastasized melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma. These novel therapeutic agents exert their antitumor effects by activating the patients' immune system against cancer cells. Immunotherapy can be divided into active agents, such as anti-tumour vaccines or adoptive T-cell transfer, and passive immunotherapies like monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers. After initial experimental use, broad clinical application revealed a number of important cardiovascular side effects of immunotherapeutics, which limit treatment options and decrease patients' prognosis and quality of life. With the rising rate of new immunotherapeutics at a hand, the number of patients receiving cancer immunotherapy will constantly increase, resulting in improved long-term survival rates. This review aims to summarize available cancer immunotherapies, their mechanism of action, currently known cardiovascular toxicities and their treatment. Further optimization of patient care will depend on the combined efforts by oncologists, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons to identify patients at risk and the implementation of interdisciplinary screening and treatment strategies. It is therefore crucial to familiarize heart specialists with novel cancer therapeutics and their potential adverse effects., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Recently, the combination of antiangiogenic agents, chemotherapy and immunotherapy has shown synergistic anticancer effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The future for this approach appears bright in lung cancer treatment; however, many challenges remain to be overcome regarding its true potential, optimal sequence and timing of therapy, and safety profile. In this review, we will discuss the current status and future direction of antiangiogenic therapy for the treatment of NSCLC, and highlight emerging strategies, such as tumor vessel normalization (TVN)., Recent Findings: Bevacizumab was the first antiangiogenic agent approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Recently, the combination of chemotherapy/antiangiogenic therapy with immunotherapy showed high efficacy in first-line settings. A subgroup of patients with liver metastasis and driver mutation-addicted tumors benefited most, suggesting that the metastatic location, as well as the genetic background of the tumor, are key determinants for therapy responses., Summary: The efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies in unselected patients is rather limited. The tumor microenvironment has appeared to be more complex and heterogeneous than previously assumed. Only a contextual rather than a cell-specific approach might provide valuable insights towards the clinical validation of combinational therapies.

Introduction: Clinical manifestation of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mainly occurs at advanced stages. Thus, the scientific community is evaluating different screening programs in high-risk patients to detect NSCLC at an earlier stage to improve survival. However, up to now patient selection and modalities have been discussed controversially. In this analysis we aimed to focus on asymptomatic NSCLC patients, whose disease was detected coincidentally and to elaborate the significance and effect of incidentally detected NSCLC on survival., Patients and Methods: Medical files of 1279 consecutive NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Incidentally detected asymptomatic NSCLC patients were compared with patients with tumor-specific symptoms., Results: In 117 of 1279 patients an asymptomatic diagnosis was ascertained by coincidence (9.1%). A smoking history of ≥ 30 pack-years was documented in 41 (58.6%) of 70 evaluable patients with incidentally detected NSCLC. Patients with incidentally diagnosed NSCLC were characterized by lower stages at diagnosis, a better performance status, and a higher proportion of previous or present other malignancies. Overall survival (OS) was significantly superior in patients with an asymptomatic diagnosis compared with patients with symptoms (median OS, 38.9 months vs. 16.1 months; P < .001). In a Cox proportional hazard model, incidental diagnosis proved to be an independent prognostic factor with regard to OS., Conclusion: Our findings point to the advantage of asymptomatic detection of NSCLC and might underline the benefit of screening programs. Further research on the detection of lung cancer in asymptomatic patients outside of existing screening criteria is warranted., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of lung cancer (LC) is increased in patients with a history of liver transplantation (LT). The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with postliver transplantation LC (PLTLC) with cohorts of patients with "transplant-naive" LC, and LT patients without LC., Patients and Methods: All the patients who had undergone LT or had been diagnosed with LC from 1987 to 2012 were included in the present analysis. The PLTLC cohort was compared with a LT cohort (n = 725) and the local LC registry (n = 2803). The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were computed in the classic manner after adjustment for sex, age, and year of follow-up., Results: Within the LT cohort, 22 patients (5 women) developed PLTLC (2.3%). The SIR for LC in LT recipients was 4.4 in the women and 2.6 in the men. The PLTLC cohort was older at LT (58.4 vs. 53.3 years; P = .028). Also, 90.5% of the PLTLC group had a history of smoking; 8 patients (42.1%) had had LC detected by annual routine lung cancer screening. The median post-LT survival was significantly inferior in the PLTLC cohort (117.1 vs. 182.6 months; P = .041). The median overall survival (OS), starting from the diagnosis of LC, was similar in the PLTLC and LC cohort (14.7 vs. 15.1 months; P = .519)., Conclusion: The incidence of LC is significantly increased in the LT population. Therefore, LC screening might be an option for LT patients with a history of smoking. The prognosis of LC does not seem to be impaired by LT, suggesting a minor effect of LT on OS in patients with lung cancer., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cardiovascular (CV) disease often share a comparable demographic profile. The aim of this analysis was to assess the significance and prevalence of preexisting CV comorbidity and events in NSCLC., Patients and Methods: A total of 715 consecutive NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 at the Medical University of Innsbruck were retrospectively assessed regarding CV comorbidities, risk factors, cancer treatment, CV events occurring after the start of treatment, and outcome., Results: At least one CV comorbidity was present in 462 (67.2%) of 687 evaluable patients. CV events were documented in 68 patients (9.5%), with conduction disorders being the most prevalent (n = 19), followed by cardiomyopathy (n = 13), myocardial infarction (n = 13), sudden CV death (n = 12), need of revascularization (n = 6), and pericardial effusion (n = 5). Median time between diagnosis of NSCLC and CV event was 13.9 months. CV comorbidities and events both showed a direct correlation with increasing age, affecting up to 87.3% and 35.2% of all octogenarians in the study, respectively. The following CV comorbidities were significantly associated with CV events: atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiomyopathy. Overall survival was not reduced in patients experiencing a CV event compared to patients without an event., Conclusion: CV disease and events are frequently observed in NSCLC patients. To provide definitive recommendations on impact, prevention, and screening of CV disease in NSCLC, prospective trials are desirable., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Different strategies for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage NSCLC have already been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of a chemoimmunotherapy when limited to two cycles., Methods: Between 01/2007 and 03/2010 41 patients with primarily resectable NSCLC stage IB to IIIA were included. Treatment consisted of two cycles cisplatin (40 mg/m2 d1+2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2 d1) q3 weeks, accompanied by the administration of cetuximab (400 mg/m2 d1, then 250 mg weekly). The primary endpoint was radiological response according to RECIST., Results: 40 patients were evaluable for toxicity, 39 for response. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia 25%, leucopenia 11%, febrile neutropenia 6%, nausea 8% and rash 8%. 20 patients achieved a partial response, 17 a stable disease, 2 were not evaluable. 37 patients (95%) underwent surgery and in three of them a complete pathological response was achieved. At a median follow-up of 44.2 months, 41% of the patients had died, median progression-free survival was 22.5 months., Conclusions: Two cycles of cisplatin/ docetaxel/ cetuximab showed promising efficacy in the neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage NSCLC and rapid operation was possible in 95% of patients. Toxicities were manageable and as expected., Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register; Eudract-Nr: 2006-004639-31.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to describe a large consecutive cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated in daily routine within the last 25 years. An extensive list of general baseline characteristics (comorbidities, laboratory values, symptoms, performance state), NSCLC related factors (stage, histology), treatment related parameters (approach, applied therapies) and outcome (PFS, RFS, OS, perspective of decades) were analyzed in detail., Patients and Methods: Medical files of 2293 consecutive NSCLC patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2009 at the Medical University of Innsbruck and affiliated hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were documented within our institution's comprehensive lung cancer project "Twenty-Year Retrospective of Lung Cancer (TYROL study)"., Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 64.1 years and 1611 patients (70.3%) were male. Most patients were diagnosed in stage IV (37.9%). The most frequent comorbidities present at diagnosis were cardiovascular disease (62.1%) and COPD (62.0%). The most common symptoms at diagnosis were coughing (54.7%) and dyspnea (45.3%). Of all 2293 patients 1981 (86.4%) received adequate antineoplastic treatment. In total 874 patients were radically operated, 119 received radiotherapy/radio-chemotherapy and the majority of patients (n=1278) were treated in palliative intent. A 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th-line palliative therapy was administered to 612, 278, 102, and 36 patients. Median OS, RFS and PFS were 16.4 months, 86.4 months and 5.1 months, respectively. A multitude of factors was associated with all three outcome variables. Of note, outcome has improved stepwise in the recent decade based on increased response rates leading to prolonged OS., Conclusion: This work incorporates most clinical aspects relevant in the treatment of NSCLC and beyond. Therefore, this comprehensive analysis provides a definite benchmark for prognostication and epidemiology of NSCLC in a Western European society., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become more and more individualized with the availability of potent and less toxic therapies. However, there are still patients who do not receive antineoplastic treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of 'no treatment', its reasons, and the outcome of untreated NSCLC patients in recent years., Patients and Methods: Medical files of 1,256 consecutive NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2009 at the Medical University of Innsbruck and affiliated hospitals were retrospectively analyzed., Results: In 66 of the 1,256 patients (5.3%), the absence of antineoplastic treatment could be ascertained. The median age was 72.1 years, and 42 patients (63.3%) were males. The majority of patients presented with stage IV (n=45; 68.2%). Treatment was omitted due to physical deterioration in 41 patients (62.1%), and 25 patients (37.9%) refused any treatment. The median overall survival of the untreated patients was 3.1 months (refusal: 9.7 months; physical deterioration: 2.1 months)., Conclusion: This study provides information on the incidence of NSCLC patients without antineoplastic treatment and gives a detailed description of the characteristics and comorbidities. These data might help clinicians in the survival estimations of their NSCLC patients in scenarios like therapy refusal or poor physical condition., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: Neoadjuvant therapy with a platinum based doublet is an option in NSCLC patients with upfront resectable disease. However, the role of neoadjuvant induction in stages IIIA and IIIB and in initially not resectable patients is unclear., Patients and Methods: In this phase II trial, 78 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, of whom 56 were considered not resectable at initial diagnosis, were treated with three neoadjuvant cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin and subjected to radical surgery if resectable. Definitive radiochemotherapy (RCT) using weekly docetaxel was the prespecified alternative if patients were not resectable at restaging. The primary objective was response to neoadjuvant induction., Results: After induction, 36 (46%) were radically operated and 24 (31%) were treated with RCT. Overall, 32 patients (41%) completed the entire study plan. Partial response to induction therapy was observed in 43 patients (55%); furthermore, 19 of 56 initially not resectable cases (34%) became resectable upon induction. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.5 and 16.4 months for the whole cohort. Encouragingly, conversion to resectability was predictive for favorable outcome. On the other hand, patients who were not resectable at restaging and received RCT were characterized by a rather unfavorable prognosis (5-year and 10-year OS, whole cohort: 20% and 12%; RCT: 8% and 0%; surgery: 37% and 24%, respectively)., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant induction with the doublet docetaxel/cisplatin and subsequent radical resection resulted in favorable survival. Of note, conversion to resectability was mandatory for the chance of cure in patients considered initially not resectable., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is not clear whether or not the fate of patients suffering from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has improved. To better understand the course of disease, we aimed at documenting disease features at initial diagnosis, sequences of therapy modalities and outcome in consecutive patients over two decades. We postulated that SCLC patients might have benefitted from refined diagnosis and treatment options during the last decade., Methods: All SCLC cases diagnosed at the Innsbruck University Hospital and associated institutions between 1991 and 2011 have been documented in detail in accordance with a prespecified protocol., Results: A total of 484 patients diagnosed with SCLC were followed. The most important symptoms at initial diagnosis were cough, dyspnea and tumor pain in 55%, 51% and 44%, respectively. Patients who were operated during early stage of disease (n = 26) had a favorable 5-year, relapse-free survival (74%). A total of 112 patients with locally advanced disease were treated by radiochemotherapy in curative intent (RCT), and achievement of CR offered a chance of long term overall survival (OS), reaching 44% after 10-years. In the palliative setting (median OS in 304 evaluable patients, 9.7 months), a therapeutic progress in the more recent decade could not be observed. Parameters independently associated with favorable OS were: response to therapy and prophylactic brain irradiation in patients with RCT; and response, age < 70 years and absence of LDH elevation in the palliative setting., Conclusions: In this comprehensive view on SCLC, the findings on symptomatology, comorbidity, and spectrum of treatments may help to better understand individual courses of the disease. Overall, modern medicine failed to translate into substantial benefit of SCLC patients, except in patients in locally advanced disease receiving multimodal therapy., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)