Search

Background: Centrally located lung tumours present a challenge because of their tendency to exhibit symptoms such as airway obstruction, atelectasis, and bleeding. Surgical resection of these tumours often requires sacrificing the lungs, making definitive radiotherapy the preferred alternative to avoid pneumonectomy. However, the proximity of these tumours to mediastinal organs at risk increases the potential for severe adverse events. To mitigate this risk, we propose a dual-method approach: deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy combined with adaptive radiotherapy. The aim of this single-centre, single-arm phase II study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy., Methods: Patients diagnosed with centrally located lung tumours according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, are enrolled and subjected to DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the one-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse events, as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)., Discussion: Delivering definitive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours presents a dilemma between ensuring optimal dose coverage for the planning target volume and the associated increased risk of adverse events. DIBH provides measurable dosimetric benefits by increasing the normal lung volume and distancing the tumour from critical mediastinal organs at risk, leading to reduced toxicity. DIBH adaptive radiotherapy has been proposed as an adjunct treatment option for abdominal and pelvic cancers. If the application of DIBH adaptive radiotherapy to centrally located lung tumours proves successful, this approach could shape future phase III trials and offer novel perspectives in lung tumour radiotherapy., Trial Registration: Registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ); registration number: jRCT1052230085 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1052230085 )., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To develop a prediction model (PM) for target positioning using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images., Methods: Nineteen patients with lung cancer underwent orthogonal rotational kV x-ray imaging lasting 70 s. IR markers placed on their abdominal surfaces and an implanted gold marker located nearest to the tumor were considered as external surrogates and the target, respectively. Four different types of regression-based PM were trained using surrogate motions and target positions for the first 60 s, as follows: Scenario A: Based on the clinical scenario, 3D target positions extracted from projection images were used as they were (PM CL ). Scenario B: The short-arc 4D-CBCT waveform exhibiting eight target positions was obtained by averaging the target positions in Scenario A. The waveform was repeated for 60 s (W 4D-CBCT ) by adapting to the respiratory phase of the external surrogate. W 4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PM 4D-CBCT ). Scenario C: The Amsterdam Shroud (AS) signal, which depicted the diaphragm motion in the superior-inferior direction was extracted from the orthogonal projection images. The amplitude and phase of W 4D-CBCT were corrected based on the AS signal. The AS-corrected W 4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PM AS-4D-CBCT ). Scenario D: The AS signal was extracted from single projection images. Other processes were the same as in Scenario C. The prediction errors were calculated for the remaining 10 s., Results: The 3D prediction error within 3 mm was 77.3% for PM 4D-CBCT , which was 12.8% lower than that for PM CL . Using the diaphragm waveforms, the percentage of errors within 3 mm improved by approximately 7% to 84.0%-85.3% for PM AS-4D-CBCT in Scenarios C and D, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the prediction errors of PM 4D-CBCT and PM AS-4D-CBCT ., Conclusion: PM AS-4D-CBCT outperformed PM 4D-CBCT , proving the efficacy of the AS signal-based correction. PM AS-4D-CBCT would make it possible to predict target positions from 4D-CBCT images without gold markers., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

To evaluate the reproducibility of dose-based radiomic (dosiomic) features between dose-calculation algorithms for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We analyzed 105 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung SBRT between March 2011 and December 2017. Radiation doses of 48, 60, and 70 Gy were prescribed to the isocenter in 4-8 fractions. Dose calculations were performed using X-ray voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) on the iPlan radiation treatment planning system (RTPS). Thereafter, the radiation doses were recalculated using the Acuros XB (AXB) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) on the Eclipse RTPS while maintaining the XVMC-calculated monitor units and beam arrangements. A total of 6808 dosiomic features were extracted without preprocessing (112 shape, 144 first-order, and 600 texture features) or with wavelet filters to eight decompositions (1152 first-order and 4800 texture features). Features with absolute pairwise concordance correlation coefficients-|CC con |-values exceeding or equaling 0.85 were considered highly reproducible. Subgroup analyses were performed considering the wavelet filters and prescribed doses. The numbers of highly reproducible first-order and texture features were 34.8%, 26.9%, and 31.0% for the XVMC-AXB, XVMC-AAA, and AXB-AAA pairs, respectively. The maximum difference between the mean |CC con | values was 0.70 and 0.11 for the subgroup analyses of wavelet filters and prescribed dose, respectively. The application of wavelet filter-based dosiomic analyses may be limited when using different types of dose-calculation algorithms for lung SBRT., (© 2022. Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.)

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of independent calculation-based verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with lung cancer using a secondary treatment planning system (sTPS). In all, 50 patients with lung cancer who underwent VMAT-SBRT between April 2018 and May 2019 were included in this study. VMAT-SBRT plans were devised using the Collapsed-Cone Convolution in RayStation (primary TPS: pTPS). DICOM files were transferred to Eclipse software (sTPS), which utilized the Eclipse software, and the dose distribution was then recalculated using Acuros XB. For the verification of dose distribution in homogeneous phantoms, the differences among pTPS, sTPS, and measurements were evaluated using passing rates of a dose difference of 5% (DD5%) and gamma index of 3%/2 mm (γ3%/2 mm). The ArcCHECK cylindrical diode array was used for measurements. For independent verification of dose-volume parameters per the patient's geometry, dose-volume indices for the planning target volume (PTV) including D 95% and the isocenter dose were evaluated. The mean differences (± standard deviations) between the pTPS and sTPS were then calculated. The gamma passing rates of DD5% and γ3%/2 mm criteria were 99.2 ± 2.4% and 98.6 ± 3.2% for pTPS vs. sTPS, 92.9 ± 4.0% and 94.1 ± 3.3% for pTPS vs. measurement, and 93.0 ± 4.4% and 94.3 ± 4.1% for sTPS vs. measurement, respectively. The differences between pTPS and sTPS for the PTVs of D 95% and the isocenter dose were -3.1 ± 2.0% and -2.3 ± 1.8%, respectively. Our investigation of VMAT-SBRT plans for lung cancer revealed that independent calculation-based verification is a time-efficient method for patient-specific quality assurance., (© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: During therapeutic beam irradiation, an unvisualized three-dimensional (3D) target position should be estimated using an external surrogate with an estimation model. Training periods for the developed model with no additional imaging during beam irradiation were optimized using clinical data., Methods: Dual-source 4D-CBCT projection data for 20 lung cancer patients were used for validation. Each patient underwent one to three scans. The actual target positions of each scan were equally divided into two equal parts: one for the modeling and the other for the validating session. A quadratic target position estimation equation was constructed during the modeling session. Various training periods for the session-i.e., modeling periods (T M )-were employed: T M  ∈ {5,10,15,25,35} [s]. First, the equation was used to estimate target positions in the validating session of the same scan (intra-scan estimations). Second, the equation was then used to estimate target positions in the validating session of another temporally different scan (inter-scan estimations). The baseline drift of the surrogate and target between scans was corrected. Various training periods for the baseline drift correction-i.e., correction periods (T C s)-were employed: T C  ∈ {5,10,15; T C  ≤ T M } [s]. Evaluations were conducted with and without the correction. The difference between the actual and estimated target positions was evaluated by the root-mean-square error (RMSE)., Results: The range of mean respiratory period and 3D motion amplitude of the target was 2.4-13.0 s and 2.8-34.2 mm, respectively. On intra-scan estimation, the median 3D RMSE was within 1.5-2.1 mm, supported by previous studies. On inter-scan estimation, median elapsed time between scans was 10.1 min. All T M s exhibited 75th percentile 3D RMSEs of 5.0-6.4 mm due to baseline drift of the surrogate and the target. After the correction, those for each T M s fell by 1.4-2.3 mm. The median 3D RMSE for both the 10-s T M and the T C period was 2.4 mm, which plateaued when the two training periods exceeded 10 s., Conclusions: A widely-applicable estimation model for the 3D target positions during beam irradiation was developed. The optimal T M and T C for the model were both 10 s, to allow for more than one respiratory cycle., Trial Registration: UMIN000014825 . Registered: 11 August 2014.

Knowledge of the imaging doses delivered to patients and accurate dosimetry of the radiation to organs from various imaging procedures is becoming increasingly important for clinicians. The purposes of this study were to calculate imaging doses delivered to the organs of lung cancer patients during real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) with three-dimensional (3D), and four-dimensional (4D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), using Monte Carlo techniques to simulate kV X-ray dose distributions delivered using the Vero4DRT. Imaging doses from RTTT, 3D-CBCT and 4D-CBCT were calculated with the planning CT images for nine lung cancer patients who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with RTTT. With RTTT, imaging doses from correlation modeling and from monitoring of imaging during beam delivery were calculated. With CBCT, doses from 3D-CBCT and 4D-CBCT were also simulated. The doses covering 2-cc volumes (D2cc) in correlation modeling were up to 9.3 cGy for soft tissues and 48.4 cGy for bone. The values from correlation modeling and monitoring were up to 11.0 cGy for soft tissues and 59.8 cGy for bone. Imaging doses in correlation modeling were larger with RTTT. On a single 4D-CBCT, the skin and bone D2cc values were in the ranges of 7.4-10.5 cGy and 33.5-58.1 cGy, respectively. The D2cc from 4D-CBCT was approximately double that from 3D-CBCT. Clinicians should Figure that the imaging dose increases the cumulative doses to organs.

Purpose: To quantify the accuracy of extracted target motion trajectories in dual-source four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) by comparison with the actual three-dimensional (3D) target motion acquired simultaneously during 4D-CBCT scan., Materials and Methods: 4D-CBCT scans were performed for 19 different sinusoidal-like patterns and 13 lung cancer patients with implanted markers. Internal (In) or external (Ex) surrogates with amplitude (Amp)- or phase (Ph)-based sorting were used for the reconstructions. The targets were a pseudo-tumor and implanted marker for the phantom and clinical studies, respectively. The accuracy was evaluated by determining the maximum error (MaxE i ) between the 3D target position extracted from 4D-CBCT and the actual 3D target position detected by fluoroscopy in each ith phase (0⩽i⩽7)., Results: Median peak-to-peak target displacements in the superior-inferior (SI) direction were 20.6 and 20.6mm in the phantom and clinical studies, respectively. In the phantom and clinical studies, the maximum of median MaxE i s in the SI direction was 4.6 and 9.2mm in the In_Ph reconstruction. In the clinical study, the maximum of median MaxE i s was observed during the end-inhalation phase among all reconstruction approaches., Conclusions: This study showed the magnitude of underestimation toward the inferior direction of target motion in clinical 4D-CBCT., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)