Search

Purpose: Phase III studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy., Patients and Methods: Patients with EGFR -mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Coprimary pharmacokinetic noninferiority end points were trough concentrations (C trough ; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUC D1-D15 ). Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory end point., Results: Overall, 418 patients underwent random assignment (subcutaneous group, n = 206; intravenous group, n = 212). Geometric mean ratios of C trough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27 to 1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUC D1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98 to 1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92; nominal P = .02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 13% v 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% v 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for the first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab and to 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; the end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively., Conclusion: Subcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced IRRs, increased convenience, and prolonged survival.

Background: Capmatinib is a selective MET inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring METex14 mutations. However, the real-world outcomes of capmatinib are largely unknown. From June 2019, the French Early Access Program (EAP) provided capmatinib to METex14 NSCLC patients who were ineligible for or for whom first-line standard therapies had failed., Methods: IFCT-2104 CAPMATU was a multicenter study that included all METex14 NSCLC patients who received capmatinib as part of the EAP until August 2021. The primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR)., Results: A total of 146 patients were included. The median age was 74.9 years, 56.6 % were never-smokers, and 32.4 % had brain metastases. The median TTF, median PFS and median OS from capmatinib initiation were 5.1 months (95 % CI 4.2-6.0), 4.8 months (95 % CI 4.0-6.0) and 10.4 months (95 % CI 8.3-13.2), respectively. Evaluation of the best response to capmatinib was available for 134 patients and resulted in an ORR of 55.3 % (95 % CI 46.8 %-63.6 %). The median PFS was 7.7 months for treatment-naïve patients and 6.0 and 4.1 months for patients who had received one or 2 + prior lines of treatment, respectively. For patients with brain metastases, the median PFS was 3.0 months. Capmatinib had a known and manageable safety profile, with grade 3 to 4 adverse events, mostly peripheral edema (8.2 %), occurring in 17.8 % of patients., Conclusion: In this large real-world study of METex14 NSCLC patients, the efficacy of capmatinib was confirmed, with a manageable safety profile, even in patients with brain metastases and in those who received several lines of treatment. This study reinforces the key role of capmatinib for these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: M. Ferreira: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, BMS. A. Swalduz: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, BMS, Pfizer, Lilly. P. du Rusquec: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations: Roche, Pfizer, Sandoz, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Eisai, BMS, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Sanofi. Advisory Role: Sanofi, Takeda. A.C. Toffart: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Jannsen. J. Raimbourg: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS. V. Gounant: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi, Pfizer. S. Couraud: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Fabentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Sysmex, Cellgene, Takeda, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda. M. Wislez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, research funding: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, BMS, Roche. C. Descarpentries reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Novartis Pharma SAS, nonfinancial support from Roche SAS, nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim france, nonfinancial support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; G. Herbreteau reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Pierre Fabre Oncology. V. Westeel: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, BMS, Amgen, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi. A. B. Cortot: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Roche Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Novartis Pfizer Takeda Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche Novartis Pfizer Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Management of stage-III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on a multimodal strategy (surgery or radiotherapycombined with systemic drugs) remains controversial. Patients are treated with a curative intent, and available data suggestprolonged survival after complete resection. However, no consensual definition of "tumor resectability" exists. This study aimed to analyze the concordanceamong French tumor board meeting (TBM)-emittedtherapeutic decisions forstage-III-N2 NSCLC., Methods: Six patients with stage-III-N2 NSCLC discussed at Saint-Etienne University Hospital'sthoracic TBMs were selected, anonymouslyreported, and submitted to the participating TBMs. The primary goal of this multicenter, prospective, observational study was to assess the consistency of TBMpanel decisions for each case. The secondary endpointwas identifying the demographic or technical factors that potentiallyaffected decision-making., Results: Twenty-seven TBMs from university hospitals, a cancer center, general hospitals, and a private hospitalparticipated in this study. None of their decisions for the six cases were unanimous.The decisions were homogenous for three cases (78%, 85%, and 88% TBMs opted for medical treatment, respectively),andmore ambivalent for the other three (medical versus surgical strategies were favored by 44%/56%, 46%/54%, and 58%/42% TBMs, respectively). Interestingly, decisions regarding chemoradiationand perioperative chemotherapyinthe medical and surgical strategies, respectively, were also discordant. Hospital type, specialist participation in TBMs, and activity volumes were not significantly associated with therapeutic decisions., Conclusion: The results of this study highlight substantial disparities amongFrench TBMs regarding therapeutic management of stage-III-N2 NSCLC. The decisions were not associated with local conditions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In an open-label multicenter non-randomized non-comparative phase II study in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion), with disease progression after tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and no prior chemotherapy (NCT04042558), atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab showed some promising result. Beyond the clinical evaluation, we assessed safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to provide additional information on the relative impact of adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in this population., Materials: Patients received platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab-bevacizumab (PPAB cohort) or, if not eligible, platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab (PPA cohort). The incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. PROs were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-Core 30 and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer 13)., Result: Overall, 68 (PPAB) and 72 (PPA) patients were evaluable for safety. Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 83.8% (PPAB) and 63.9% (PPA). Grade 3-4 atezolizumab-related AEs occurred in 29.4% and 19.4%, respectively. Grade 3-4 bevacizumab-related AEs occurred in 36.8% (PPAB). Most frequent grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (19.1% in PPAB; 23.6% in PPA) and asthenia (16.2% in PPAB; 9.7% in PPA). In PPAB, we observed a global stability in global health security (GHS) score, fatigue and dyspnea with a constant tendency of improvement, and a significant improvement in cough. In PPA, we observed a significant improvement in GHS score with a significant improvement in fatigue, dyspnea and cough. At week 54, we observed an improvement from baseline in GHS score for 49.2% of patients. In both cohorts, patients reported on average no clinically significant worsening in their overall health or physical functioning scores., Conclusion: PPAB and PPA combinations seem tolerable and manageable in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC with oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion) after targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: P.T report adviser and consultant for TAKEDA, BMS, ROCHE, JANSSENS, AMGEN and ASTRA ZENECA; support for attending meeting for TAKEDA, BMS, ASTRA ZENECA and JANSSENS. G.R-B report adviser and consultant for TAKEDA, ASTRA ZENECA,SANOFI, BMS ; support for attending meeting for LILLY, ASTRA ZENECA, PFIZER, SANOGI, TAKEDA, BOEHRINGER. L.B-G report adviser and consultant for BMS, MSD, ROCHE, JANSSEN, TAKEDA, VIATRIS, ASTRA-ZENECA, SANOFI and LEOPHARMA; support for attending meeting for JANSSEN, TAKEDA, ASTRA-ZENECA,MSD. D.A report support for attending meeting for MSD, TAKEDA, SANOFI. H.M report support for attending meeting for ARAIR, MSD, PFIZER, TAKEDA and BOEHRINGER. R.V report adviser and consultant for MSD, JANSSEN, ROCHE, BMS, PFIZER, SANOFI and TAKEDA; support for attending meeting for JANSSEN, TAKEDA and SANOFI. G.J report support for attending meeting for Sanofi. P.F report adviser and consultant for SANOFI, MSD and ASTRA ZENECA; support for attending meeting for TAKEDA. A.V report adviser and consultant for PIERRE FABRE, AMGEN and MSD; support for attending meeting for PIERRE FABRE, AMGEN; Participation on “Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board ” for MSD, ASTRAZENECA, SANOFI, AMGEN, PIERRE FABRE. A.B report support for attending meeting for Takeda, Sanofi and BMS. F.S report adviser and consultant for; support for attending meeting for report adviser and consultant for; support for attending meeting for C.D report adviser and consultant for BMS, MSD, TAKEDA, AMGEN, ROCHE, PFIZER, SANOFI, JANSSEN; support for attending meeting for ROCHE, AMGEN , MSD, TAKEDA. C.C reports research support from AstraZeneca, Boerhinger, GSK, Sanofi, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen; adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, Boerhinger, GSK, Roche, Sanofi , BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen ; support for attending meeting for AstraZeneca, Boerhinger, GSK, Roche, Sanofi , BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen; L.G. reports research support from BMS, MSD, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda, adviser and consultant for Amgen, Janssens, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda; support for attending meeting for AstraZeneca, Amgen, MSD, Pfizer and Takeda. Participation on “Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board ” for Inhatarget Therapeutics; O.B reports adviser and consultant for BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Janssens, support for attending meeting for AstraZeneca and MSD. All other authors (L.A,E.D, C.R, E.H, F.S, B.C) have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Predictors for mortality and toxicity in older patients with cancer are mainly studied in cohorts with various cancers at different stages. This study aims to identify predictive geriatric factors (PGFs) for early death and severe chemotherapy related adverse events (CRAEs) in patients aged ≥70 years with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC)., Material and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the multicenter, randomized, phase 3 ESOGIA trial that compared, for patients ≥70 years with mNSCLC, a treatment algorithm based on performance status and age to another algorithm based on geriatric assessment. To identify PGFs of three-month mortality and grade 3, 4, or 5 CRAEs, multivariate Cox models and logistic models, adjusted for treatment group and center, and stratified by randomization arm, were constructed., Results: Among 494 included patients, 145 (29.4%) had died at three months and 344 (69.6%) had severe chemotherapy toxicity. For three-month mortality, multivariate analyses retained mobility (Test Get up and Go), instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) dependence and weight loss as PGFs. The combined effect of IADL ≤2/4 and weight loss ≥3 kg was strongly associated with three-month mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.71 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.64-12.32]). For chemotherapy toxicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 was independently associated with grade3, 4, or 5 CRAEs (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.94 [1.06-3.56])., Discussion: Mobility, IADL dependence, and weight loss were predictive of three-month mortality in a population aged ≥70 years treated for mNSCLC, while comorbidities were independently associated with severe chemotherapy toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors have no conflicts of interest and disclosures., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of therapeutics for lung cancer, and several are currently in development for this malignancy. The structure of these molecules is based on an antibody that targets a protein on the lung cancer cell surface and a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker. Many protein targets, including TROP2, c-MET, CEACAM5, HER2, and HER3 have been identified. In metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) without alterations in oncogenic drivers, platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) interaction are the standard first-line treatments. In patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended. However, although the prognosis of patients with metastatic NSCLC differs between such with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers, most patients eventually experience disease progression. A novel therapeutic class is needed in routine practice to overcome the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and EGFR/ALK TKIs. Several ADCs have already been approved for other cancers, such as breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma. This review summarizes the knowledge about the efficacy and tolerance profiles of ADCs targeting TROP2, HER2, HER3, CEACAM5 and c-MET in metastatic NSCLC with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The management of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains heterogeneous and complex, even after the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This observational study from France evaluated real-world practices in managing stage III NSCLC., Methods: Between 2020 and 2022, we conducted a physician practice survey in 41 medical centers across France, and retrospectively analyzed aggregated information from 417 consecutive charts of patients with stage III NSCLC. We collected information on diagnostic and staging procedures, biomarker testing, surgical and non-surgical treatments, and follow-up., Results: According to the physician survey, diagnostic workup of stage III NSCLC primarily relied on positron emission tomography/computed tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging, performed for the majority of patients in 100 % and 78 % of centers, respectively. Of 417 patient charts, 414 were evaluable with 53 % of patients having stage IIIA disease, 37 % IIIB, and 10 % IIIC. The most common node involvement was N2 (59 %). Programmed death-ligand 1 testing was conducted for 98 % of patients. Invasive staging (mediastinoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound) was performed in 41 % of patients, of whom 83 % had N2 or N3 nodal involvement. Surgical resection was offered to 120 patients (29 %), with 85 % achieving R0 resection. In 292 charts of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, 190 patients (65 %) were offered CRT followed by consolidation immunotherapy. Within these patients, concurrent CRT was more frequently employed (52 %) than sequential CRT (13 %)., Conclusions: Diagnostic procedures and treatment modalities in French medical centers generally align with clinical guidelines for stage III NSCLC, except for invasive staging that was less commonly performed than expected., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jean-Bernard Auliac reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory, paid expert testimony, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited that includes: consulting or advisory and paid expert testimony. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb Co that includes: consulting or advisory, paid expert testimony, and travel reimbursement. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: consulting or advisory, paid expert testimony, and speaking and lecture fees. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with Amgen Inc that includes: consulting or advisory, paid expert testimony, and speaking and lecture fees. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with MSD France SAS that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: paid expert testimony, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Jean-Bernard Auliac reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH that includes: travel reimbursement. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb Co that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with MSD France SAS that includes: funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited that includes: funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Amgen Inc that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Eli Lilly and Company that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Laurent Greillier reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: travel reimbursement. Etienne Martin reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Etienne Martin reports a relationship with Varian Medical Systems Inc that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Etienne Martin reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Etienne Martin reports a relationship with Ipsen that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Etienne Martin reports a relationship with MSD France SAS that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Etienne Martin reports a relationship with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Sabine Ano reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment. Marc Lefrancois reports a relationship with CMI Group that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Marc Lefrancois reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory. Alexis Cortot reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants and paid expert testimony. Alexis Cortot reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory, paid expert testimony, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Alexis Cortot reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Alexis Cortot reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: paid expert testimony and speaking and lecture fees. Alexis Cortot reports a relationship with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited that includes: paid expert testimony, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Alexis Cortot reports a relationship with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: paid expert testimony. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR -mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR -mutant NSCLC.

Background: We designed this study based on both a physician practice survey and real-world patient data to: (1) evaluate clinical management practices in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) among medical centers located across France; and (2) describe first-line treatment patterns among patients with ES-SCLC following the introduction of immunotherapy into clinical practice., Methods: A 50-item questionnaire was completed by physicians from 45 medical centers specialized in SCLC management. Responses were collected from June 2022 to January 2023. The survey questions addressed diagnostic workup of ES-SCLC, chemoimmunotherapy in first-line and second-line settings, and use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and radiotherapy. In parallel, using a chart review approach, we retrospectively analyzed aggregated information from 548 adults with confirmed ES-SCLC receiving first-line treatment in the same centers., Results: In ES-SCLC, treatment planning is based on chest computed tomography (CT) (as declared by 100% of surveyed centers). Mean time between diagnosis and treatment initiation was 2-7 days, as declared by 82% of centers. For detection of brain metastases, the most common imaging test was brain CT (84%). The main exclusion criteria for first-line immunotherapy in the centers were autoimmune disease (87%), corticosteroid therapy (69%), interstitial lung disease (69%), and performance status ≥ 2 (69%). Overall, 53% and 36% of centers considered that patients are chemotherapy-sensitive if they relapse within ≥ 3 months or ≥ 6 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy, respectively. Among the 548 analyzed patients, 409 (75%) received chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line treatment, 374 (91%) of whom received carboplatin plus etoposide and 35 (9%) cisplatin plus etoposide. Overall, 340/548 patients (62%) received maintenance immunotherapy. Most patients (68%) did not receive radiotherapy or PCI., Conclusions: There is an overall alignment of practices reflecting recent clinical guidelines among medical centers managing ES-SCLC across France, and a high prescription rate of immunotherapy in the first-line setting., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of brain metastasis (BM). Little is known about immune checkpoint inhibitor activity in the central nervous system, especially in patients receiving monotherapy for tumors with a tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. This noninterventional, retrospective, multicenter study, conducted with the GFPC, included treatment-naïve patients strongly positive for PD-L1 (TPS ≥ 50%) with BM receiving first-line single-agent pembrolizumab treatment between May 2017 and November 2019. The primary endpoints were centrally reviewed intracranial overall response rates (ORRs), centrally reviewed intracranial progression-free survival (cPFS), extracranial PFS, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. Forty-three patients from five centers were included. Surgical or local radiation therapy was administered to 31 (72%) patients, mostly before initiating ICI therapy (25/31). Among 38/43 (88.4%) evaluable patients, the intracranial ORR was 73%. The median PFS was 8.3 months. The cerebral and extracerebral median PFS times were 9.2 and 5.3 months, respectively. The median OS was 25.5 months. According to multivariate analysis, BM surgery before ICI therapy was the only factor significantly associated with both improved PFS (HR = 0.44) and OS (HR = 0.45). This study revealed the feasibility and outcome of front-line pembrolizumab treatment in this population with BM.

Intracranial progression after curative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurs from 10 to 50% and is difficult to manage, given the heterogeneity of clinical presentations and the variability of treatments available. The objective of this study was to develop a mechanistic model of intracranial progression to predict survival following a first brain metastasis (BM) event occurring at a time [Formula: see text]. Data included early-stage NSCLC patients treated with a curative intent who had a BM as the first and single relapse site (N = 31). We propose a mechanistic mathematical model able to derive computational markers from primary tumor and BM data at [Formula: see text] and estimate the amount and sizes of (visible and invisible) BMs, as well as their future behavior. These two key computational markers are [Formula: see text], the proliferation rate of a single tumor cell; and [Formula: see text], the per day, per cell, probability to metastasize. The predictive value of these individual computational biomarkers was evaluated. The model was able to correctly describe the number and size of metastases at [Formula: see text] for 20 patients. Parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (HR 1.65 (1.07-2.53) p = 0.0029 and HR 1.95 (1.31-2.91) p = 0.0109, respectively). Adding the computational markers to the clinical ones significantly improved the predictive value of OS (c-index increased from 0.585 (95% CI 0.569-0.602) to 0.713 (95% CI 0.700-0.726), p < 0.0001). We demonstrated that our model was applicable to brain oligoprogressive patients in NSCLC and that the resulting computational markers had predictive potential. This may help lung cancer physicians to guide and personalize the management of NSCLC patients with intracranial oligoprogression., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Background: Few data are available on the impact of venous thrombotic events (VTE) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with immunotherapy., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the ESKEYP study, a national, retrospective, multicenter study that consecutively included all PD-L1 ≥ 50% mNSCLC patients who initiated first-line treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy. From May 2017 to November 2019, 845 patients were included (from availability of pembrolizumab in this indication in France to the authorization of the combination with chemotherapy). Impact of VTE and patient characteristics were analyzed., Results: Of the 748 patients (88.5%) with available data, the incidence of VTE was 14.8% (111/748). At pembrolizumab initiation, Khorana score was ≥ 2 for 55.0% (61/111) of them. Recurrence of VTE was reported for 4 of the 111 patients and 5 had bleeding complications. Patients with VTE were significantly younger, had more frequently long-term corticosteroids treatment and more often liver metastases. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with VTE compared to patients without VTE: 6.1 (95% CI 4.1-9.0) months vs. 8.3 (6.9-10.3) months (p = 0.03). VTE did not significantly impact overall survival (OS): 15.2 (10.0-24.7) months with VTE and 22.6 (18.4-29.8) months without VTE (p = 0.07). In multivariate analysis for PFS and OS, HRs for VTE were 1.3 (0.99-1.71), p = 0.06 and 1.32 (0.99-1.76), p = 0.05., Conclusion: The incidence of VTE appears to be as high with in first-line immunotherapy as with chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC, with in patient with VTE, a no significant trend for lower PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. more marked impact on PFS than on OS., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Atezolizumab is an anti-PDL1 approved for treating lung cancer. A threshold of 6 μg/mL in plasma has been associated with target engagement. The extent to which patients could be overexposed with the standard 1200 mg q3w dosing remains unknown. Here, we monitored atezolizumab peak and trough levels in 27 real-world patients with lung cancer as part of routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a population approach and optimal dosing-intervals were simulated with respect to the target trough levels. No patient had plasma levels below 6 μg/mL. The results showed that the mean trough level after the first treatment was 78.3 ± 17 μg/mL, that is, 13 times above the target concentration. The overall response rate was 55.5%. Low-grade immune-related adverse events was observed in 37% of patients. No relationship was found between exposure metrics of atezolizumab (i.e., minimum plasma concentration, maximum plasma concentration, and area under the curve) and pharmacodynamic end points (i.e., efficacy and toxicity). Further simulations suggest that the dosing interval could be extended from 21 days to 49 up to 136 days (mean: 85.7 days, i.e., q12w), while ensuring plasma levels still above the 6 μg/mL target threshold. This observational, real-world study suggests that the standard 1200 mg q3w fixed-dose regimen of atezolizumab results in significant overexposure in all the patients. This was not associated with increased side effects. As plasma levels largely exceed pharmacologically active concentrations, interindividual variability in PK parameters did not impact efficacy. Our data suggest that dosing intervals could be markedly extended with respect to the target threshold associated with efficacy., (© 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Anti-PD1/PDL1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) transformed the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the response rate remains disappointing and toxicity may be life-threatening, making urgent identification of biomarkers predictive for efficacy. Immunologic Constant of Rejection signature (ICR) is a 20-gene expression signature of cytotoxic immune response with prognostic value in some solid cancers. Our objective was to assess its predictive value for benefit from anti-PD1/PDL1 in patients with advanced NSCLC., Methods: We retrospectively profiled 44 primary tumors derived from NSCLC patients treated with ICI as single-agent in at least the second-line metastatic setting. Transcriptomic analysis was performed using the nCounter ® analysis system and the PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. We then pooled our data with clinico-biological data from four public gene expression data sets, leading to a total of 162 NSCLC patients treated with single-agent anti-PD1/PDL1. ICR was applied to all samples and correlation was searched between ICR classes and the Durable Clinical Benefit (DCB), defined as stable disease or objective response according to RECIST 1.1 for a minimum of 6 months after the start of ICI., Results: The DCB rate was 29%; 22% of samples were classified as ICR1, 30% ICR2, 22% ICR3, and 26% ICR4. These classes were not associated with the clinico-pathological variables, but showed enrichment from ICR1 to ICR4 in quantitative/qualitative markers of immune response. ICR2-4 class was associated with a 5.65-fold DCB rate when compared with ICR1 class. In multivariate analysis, ICR classification remained associated with DCB, independently from PDL1 expression and other predictive immune signatures. By contrast, it was not associated with disease-free survival in 556 NSCLC TCGA patients untreated with ICI., Conclusion: The 20-gene ICR signature was independently associated with benefit from anti-PD1/PDL1 ICI in patients with advanced NSCLC. Validation in larger retrospective and prospective series is warranted., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: VEGF/VEGFR autocrine loop is a hallmark of pleural mesothelioma (PM). We thus assayed the prognostic and predictive values of VEGFR-2 [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 or Flk-1] and CD34, a marker of endothelial cells, in samples from patients accrued in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study ('MAPS', NCT00651456)., Materials and Methods: VEGFR2 and CD34 expression were assayed using immunohistochemistry in 333 MAPS patients (74.3%), and their prognostic value was evaluated in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in univariate and multivariate analyses, before validation by bootstrap methodology., Results: Positive VEGFR2 or CD34 staining was observed in 234/333 (70.2%) and 322/323 (99.6%) of tested specimens, respectively. VEGFR2 and CD34 staining correlated weakly, yet significantly, with each other (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). High VEGFR2 expression or high CD34 levels were associated with longer OS in PM patients in multivariate analysis (VEGFR2: adjusted [adj.] hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.88; 0.95], p < 0.001; CD34: adj. HR: 0.86, 95 %CI [0.76; 0.96], p = 0.010), with only high VEGFR2 expression resulting in significantly longer PFS (VEGFR2: adj. HR: 0.96, 95 %CI [0.92; 0.996], p = 0.032). Stability of these results was confirmed using bootstrap procedure. Nevertheless, VEGFR2 expression failed to specifically predict longer survival in bevacizumab-chemotherapy combination trial arm, regardless of whether the VEGFR2 score was combined or not with serum VEGF concentrations., Conclusion: VEGFR2 overexpression independently correlated with longer OS or PFS in PM patients, such biomarker deserving prospective evaluation as stratification variable in future clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Franck Morin reports financial support was provided by Roche-France (2013). Solenn Brosseau reports financial support was provided by CHU de Caen (APRI 2012). Gerard Zalcman reports financial support was provided by League against Cancer (2012). Guenaelle Levallet reports financial support was provided by Fond de Recherche en Santé Respiratoire (FRSR 2012)., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies (mAbs) are approved immunotherapy agents to treat metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Only a minority of patients responds to these treatments and biomarkers predicting response are currently lacking., Methods: Immunoscore-Immune-Checkpoint (Immunoscore-IC), an in vitro diagnostic test, was used on 471 routine single FFPE-slides, and the duplex-immunohistochemistry CD8 and PD-L1 staining was quantified using digital-pathology. Analytical validation was performed on two independent cohorts of 206 NSCLC patients. Quantitative parameters related to cell location, number, proximity and clustering were analysed. The Immunoscore-IC was applied on a first cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients (n = 133), treated with anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 mAbs. Another independent cohort (n = 132) served as validation., Findings: Anti-PDL1 clone (HDX3) has similar characteristics as anti-PD-L1 clones (22C3, SP263). Densities of PD-L1+ cells, CD8+ cells and distances between CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells were quantified and the Immunoscore-IC classification was computed. Using univariate Cox model, 5 histological dichotomised variables (CD8 free of PD-L1+ cells, CD8 clusters, CD8 cells in proximity of PD-L1 cells, CD8 density and PD-L1 cells in proximity of CD8 cells) were significantly associated with Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (all P < 0.0001). Immunoscore-IC classification improved the discriminating power of prognostic model, which included clinical variables and pathologist PD-L1 assessment. In two categories, the Immunoscore-IC risk-score was significantly associated with patients' PFS (HR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.26-0.59), P < 0.0001) and Overall Survival (OS) (HR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.27-0.65), P < 0.0001) in the training-set. Further increased hazard ratios (HR) were found when stratifying patients into three-category Immunoscore-IC (IS-IC). All patients with Low-IS-IC progressed in less than 18 months, whereas PFS at 36 months were 34% and 33% of High-IS-IC patients in the training and validation sets, respectively., Interpretation: Immunoscore-IC is a powerful tool to predict the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with NSCLC., Funding: Veracyte, INSERM, Labex Immuno-Oncology, Transcan ERAnet European project, ARC, SIRIC, CARPEM, Ligue Contre le Cancer, ANR, QNRF, INCa France, Louis Jeantet Prize Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JG has patents associated with the immune prognostic biomarkers. JG is co-founder of HalioDx, a Veracyte company. Immunoscore® a registered trademark owned by the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and licenced to Veracyte., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aimed to describe quality of life (QoL) five years after diagnosis, in a representative sample of lung cancer (LC) survivors, to compare the QoL of survivors aged 70 years or older with that of younger ones, and to identify factors associated with poorer long-term QoL in both age groups., Materials and Methods: Our study sample consists of all individuals with a LC diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2011, who participated in the French national survey VICAN 5., Results: A total of 371 participants had LC. At the time of the survey, 21.3% of the participants were 70 years or older. In this older age group, feeling self-conscious about appearance and suspected neuropathic pain were independently associated with physical QoL impairment and lower Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory score, and suspected neuropathic pain was associated with impaired mental QoL. In younger patients, impaired physical QoL was independently associated with male gender, metastatic cancer, suspected neuropathic pain, report of severe after-effects of LC and difficulty breathing at rest in the past 7 days, and impaired mental QoL was independently associated with male gender, impaired ECOG-PS, and anxiety., Conclusion: Factors associated with an impaired QoL in LC survivors, varied according to patient age. In both populations, psychological support and adapted physical activity can be offered to improve mental QoL and physical symptomatology. For older survivors with neuropathic pain, analgesic therapies can be discussed to improve long-term QoL., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous reports showed limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as single-agent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion. We aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab (when eligible) in this patient subgroup., Methods: We conducted a French national open-label multicentre non-randomised non-comparative phase II study in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion), with disease progression after tyrosine kinase inhibitor and no prior chemotherapy. Patients received platinum, pemetrexed, atezolizumab, bevacizumab (PPAB cohort) or, if not eligible to bevacizumab, platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab (PPA cohort). The primary end-point was the objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) after 12 weeks, evaluated by blind independent central review., Results: 71 patients were included in PPAB cohort and 78 in PPA cohort (mean age, 60.4/66.1 years; women 69.0%/51.3%; EGFR mutation, 87.3%/89.7%; ALK rearrangement, 12.7%/5.1%; ROS1 fusion, 0%/6.4%, respectively). After 12 weeks, objective response rate was 58.2% (90% confidence interval [CI], 47.4-68.4) in PPAB cohort and 46.5% (90% CI, 36.3-56.9) in PPA cohort. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.3 (95% CI 6.9-9.0) months and 17.2 (95% CI 13.7-NA) months in PPAB cohort and 7.2 (95% CI 5.7-9.2) months and 16.8 (95% CI 13.5-NA) months in PPA cohort, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 69.1% of patients in PPAB cohort and 51.4% in PPA cohort; Grade 3-4 atezolizumab-related adverse events occurred in 27.9% and 15.3%, respectively., Conclusion: Combination approach with atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab and platinum-pemetrexed achieved promising activity in metastatic EGFR-mutated or ALK/ROS1-rearranged NSCLC after tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure, with acceptable safety profile., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: O.B reports adviser and consultant for BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Takeda; P.T reports adviser and consultant for Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen-Cillag and Novartis; F.G reports research support from Takeda and Pfizer, adviser and consultant for Amgen, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Pfizer and Takeda; C.R reports research support from AstraZeneca, reports adviser and consultant for BMS, AstraZeneca and Takeda; L.B-G reports adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Amgen, Takeda, Viatris, Ipsen and Pfizer; M.G reports research support from BMS and Roche, adviser and consultant for BMS, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sanofi; C.C reports adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen; C.Da. reports adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, BMS and Novartis; A.S. reports adviser and consultant for Roche and Lilly; A-C.T reports adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, BMS, Leo Pharma, Amgen, Nutrician, Pfizer; H.D. reports research support from MSD and Pfizer, adviser and consultant BMS, Amgen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Roche; C.De. reports adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, BMS, Sandoz, Novartis, Lilly and Pfizer; L.G. reports research support from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda, adviser and consultant for Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung cancer has become the leading cause of cancer death for men and women. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer a therapeutic option. At this stage, cytological samples are often the less invasive source for diagnosis and the determination of predictive markers. We assessed the ability of cytological samples to perform diagnosis, and to establish molecular profile and PD-L1 expression, which are essential for the therapeutic management of patients., Methods: We included 259 cytological samples with suspected tumor cells and assessed the ability to confirm the type of malignancy by immunocytochemistry. We summarized results of molecular testing by next generation sequencing (NGS) and PD-L1 expression from these samples. Finally, we analyzed the impact of these results in the patient management., Results: Among the 259 cytological samples, 189 concerned lung cancers. Of these, immunocytochemistry confirmed the diagnosis in 95%. Molecular testing by NGS was obtained in 93% of lung adenocarcinomas and non-small cell lung cancer. PD-L1 results were obtained in 75% of patients tested. The results obtained with cytological samples led to a therapeutic decision in 87% of patients., Conclusion: Cytological samples are obtained by minimally invasive procedures and can provide enough material for the diagnosis and therapeutic management in lung cancer patients.

Background: Few real-world data are available in patients with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line immunotherapy, particularly in those with brain metastases at treatment initiation., Methods: This was a national, retrospective, multicenter study that consecutively included all patients with PD-L1-positive (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%) advanced NSCLC who initiated first-line treatment with pembrolizumab as a single agent between May 2017 (date of availability of pembrolizumab in this indication in France) to November 22, 2019 (approval of the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy combination). Data were collected from medical records with local response assessment., Results: The cohort included 845 patients and 176 (20.8%) had brain metastases at diagnosis. There were no significant differences in outcomes for patients with and without brain metastases: 9.2 (95% CI 5.6-15) and 8 (95% CI 6.7-9.2, p = 0.3) months for median progression-free survival (PFS) and, 29.5 (95% CI 17.2-NA) and 22 (95% CI 17.8-27.1, p = 0.3) months for median overall survival (OS), respectively. Overall response rates were 47% and 45% in patients with and without cerebral metastases. In multivariate analysis, performance status 2-4 vs. 0-1 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 4 vs. < 4 were the main independent negative factors for OS; brain metastasis was not an independent factor for OS., Conclusion: In this large multicenter cohort, nearly 20% of patients initiating pembrolizumab therapy for advanced NSCLC had cerebral metastases. There was no significant difference in response rates, PFS and OS between patients with and without brain metastases., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The detection of ROS1 and ALK rearrangements is performed for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Several techniques can be used on cytological samples, such as immunocytochemistry (ICC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and, more recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is gradually becoming the gold standard. We performed a retrospective study to compare ALK and ROS1 rearrangement results from immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS methods from 131 cytological samples. Compared to NGS, the sensitivity and specificity of ICC were 0.79 and 0.91, respectively, for ALK, and 1 and 0.87 for ROS1. Regarding FISH, the sensitivity and specificity were both at 1 for ALK and ROS1 probes. False-positive cases obtained by ICC were systematically corrected by FISH. When using ICC and FISH techniques, results are very close to NGS. The false-positive cases obtained by ICC are corrected by FISH, and the true-positive cases are confirmed. NGS has the potential to improve the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in cytological samples; however, the cost of this technique is still much higher than the sequential use of ICC and FISH.

Background: A phase Ia/Ib trial of metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOV) driven by a mathematical model was performed in heavily pretreated metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer or Pleural Mesothelioma patients. Disease Control Rate, progression free survival, toxicity and PK/PD were the main endpoints., Methods: Best MOV scheduling was selected using a simplified phenomenological, semi-mechanistic model with a total weekly dose of 150-mg vinorelbine. Computation of individual PK parameters was performed using population approach., Results: The mathematical model proposed the following metronomic schedule for a 150-mg weekly dose of vinorelbine: 60 mg D1, 30 mg D2, 60 mg D4. A total of 37 heavily pre-treated patients (30 evaluable) were enrolled. Grade III/IV neutropenia was observed in 30% patients. Median PFS was 11 weeks. Disease Control Rate was 73% (i.e.; 13% partial response and 60% stable disease). A large variability in drug exposure (AUC 0-24 h : 53%) and PK parameters (Cl: 83%) were observed among patients. Simulated trough levels after D2 and D4 showed similarly 56-73% variability among patients. Drug exposure was not associated with efficacy, but neutropenia was more frequent in patients with AUC > 250 ng/ml.h. Tumor burden, performance status and neutrophils-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with PFS, suggesting that MOV would be indicated in selected patients. We built a composite score to predict efficacy, mixing baseline tumor size and NLR showing 84% selectivity and 75% specificity., Conclusions: MOV was characterized by important variability in drug exposure among patients. However, and despite being all heavily pre-treated, 73% of disease control rate and 11 weeks PFS were achieved with manageable toxicities. PK/PD relationships yielded conflicting results depending on the initial tumor burden and BSA, suggesting that patients should be carefully selected prior to be scheduled for metronomic regimen. Possible role NLR could play as a predictive marker suggests immunomodulating features with MOV., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Exercise has been reported to alleviate disease as well as treatment impact in patients with lung cancer. Nevertheless, there is limited information available regarding the perception of lung cancer dedicated healthcare professionals' and their advice on exercise., Materials and Methods: An online survey exploring healthcare professionals' practice patterns, perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of exercise in patients with lung cancer was conducted within members of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group (LCG)., Results: One hundred forty-one healthcare providers completed the survey, mainly medical and radiation oncologists. Overall, 63% of the study participants declared that they frequently assessed exercise level in their patients, and 43% of them reinforced the importance of exercise. However, only 10% referred patients to an exercise program or specialist. Although the majority of the respondents had a positive perception regarding the benefits and safety of exercise (even in patients with advanced disease and/or bone metastasis), two-thirds of clinicians reported not having adequate training about exercise counselling. Moreover, 53% reported to lack of knowledge of guidelines referring to exercise in patients with cancer. Several obstacles and facilitators to improve exercise promotion in lung cancer care were identified., Conclusion: Healthcare providers recognize the relevance and feasibility of exercise as part of cancer treatment intervention, but specific pathways to do the referral are frequently missing. Future structured and well-designed strategies and initiatives are needed to support an effective referral in order to implement exercise interventions routinely in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Lung cancer remains the most frequent cause of brain metastases (BMs) and is responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Intracranial response to systemic treatments is inconsistent due to several mechanisms: genomic heterogeneity, blood-tumor barrier, and the brain-specific microenvironment. We conducted a study using data from the SAFIR02-LUNG trial. The primary objective was to compare the molecular profiles of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without BMs. The secondary objective was to explore central nervous system (CNS) outcomes with various maintenance treatment regimens., Methods: In total, 365 patients harboring interpretable molecular data were included in this analysis. Clinical and biological data were collected. Genomic analyses were based on array-comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing (NGS) following the trial recommendations., Results: Baseline genomic analyses of copy number variations identified a 24-gene signature specific to lung cancer BM occurrence, all previously known to take part in oncogenesis. NGS analysis identified a higher proportion of KRAS mutations in the BM-positive group (44.3% versus 32.3%), especially G12C mutations (63% versus 47%). Protein interaction analyses highlighted several functional interactions centered on EGFR. Furthermore, the risk of CNS progression was decreased with standard pemetrexed maintenance therapy. The highest rate of CNS progression was observed with durvalumab, probably because of the specific intracranial immune microenvironment., Conclusion: This work identified a 24-gene signature specific to lung cancer with BM. Further studies are needed to precisely determine the functional implications of these genes to identify new therapeutic targets for the treatment of lung cancer with BM., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The Hippo pathway effector YAP is dysregulated in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). YAP's target genes include the secreted growth factor amphiregulin (AREG), which is overexpressed in a wide range of epithelial cancers and plays an elusive role in MPM. We assayed the expression of YAP and AREG in MPM pathology samples and that of AREG additionally in plasma samples of patients from the randomized phase 3 IFCT-0701 Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS) using immunohistochemistry and ELISA assays, respectively. MPM patients frequently presented high levels of tumor AREG (64.3%), a high cytosolic AREG expression being predictive of a better prognosis with longer median overall and progression-free survival. Surprisingly, tumor AREG cytosolic expression was not correlated with secreted plasma AREG. By investigating the AREG metabolism and function in MPM cell lines H2452, H2052, MSTO-211H and H28, in comparison with the T47D ER+ breast cancer cell line used as a positive control, we confirm that AREG is important for cell invasion, growth without anchorage, proliferation and apoptosis in mesothelioma cells. Yet, most of these MPM cell lines failed to correctly execute AREG posttranslational processing by metalloprotease ADAM17/tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme (TACE) and extracell secretion. The favorable prognostic value of high cytosolic AREG expression in MPM patients could therefore be sustained by default AREG posttranslational processing and release. Thus, the determination of mesothelioma cell AREG content could be further investigated as a prognostic marker for MPM patients and used as a stratification factor in future clinical trials., (© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Purpose: An assessment of the impact of functional status (FS) evaluated using a combination of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and the short version of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), on 3- and 6- month mortality and on 3-month unplanned hospitalizations in older patients treated for lung cancers., Method and Objectives: This observational retrospective study was conducted between September 2015 and January 2019 at Marseille University Hospital (AP-HM). During this period, all consecutive outpatients aged 70 years or older referred for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) before the initiation of lung cancer treatment were enrolled., Results: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were analyzed: the median age was 78.7 years and 74.0% were male. Almost half of the patients were metastatic (45.4%). Concerning FS, 41.9% of patients had no ADL-IADL impairment, 30.0% had either IADL or ADL impairment, and both ADL-IADL were impaired for 28.1%. Impaired ADL-IADL was associated with poor nutritional status, depression, mobility, and cognitive disorders. In a logistic regression model, ADL or IADL impairment (aOR = 2.1; 95% CI [1.0-4.2]; p = 0.037) and impaired ADL-IADL (aOR = 2.6; 95% CI [1.2-5.3]; p = 0.012) were independently associated with a higher risk of unplanned hospitalizations within 3 months. In the multivariate Cox model, 6-month mortality risk was independently associated with impaired ADL-IADL (aHR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.3-4.4]; p = 0.008)., Conclusion: The combination of ADL and IADL scales to assess FS is a prognostic marker of the mortality risk at 6 months in older patients with lung cancer and should be more largely used by oncologists in treatment decision making., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Thymic epithelial tumors are rare neoplastic proliferations of thymic epithelial cells. The aggressiveness of these malignancies increases as higher is the histologic subtype, being thymic carcinoma the most aggressive subtype, with a greater tendency to metastatic spread. In metastatic setting, there is no standard treatment after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. In this scenario, monotherapy treatment either with lenvatinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic properties, or pembrolizumab, an immune-checkpoint inhibitor, has reported clinical activity. Potential combination of both agents may have synergistic activity as reported in other cancer types. PECATI trial is a single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II study aiming to assess the activity and safety of the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in 43 patients with advanced B3-thymoma or thymic carcinoma who progressed on or after at least one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the trial is 5-month progression-free survival rate and the secondary endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response, and overall survival., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Cancer therapies targeting actionable molecular alterations (AMA) have developed, but the clinical routine impact of high-throughput molecular profiling remains unclear. We present a monocentric experience of molecular profiling based on liquid biopsy in patients with cancer., Methods: Patients included had solid cancer and underwent cfDNA genomic profiling with FoudationOne Liquid CDx (F1LCDx) test, analyzing 324 genes. Primary endpoint was to describe patients with an AMA for whom clinical decisions were impacted by F1LCDx test results., Results: 191 patients were included, mostly with lung cancer (46%). An AMA was found in 52%. The most common molecular alterations were: TP53 (52%), KRAS (14%) and DNMT3 (11%). The most common AMA were: CHEK2 (10%), PIK3CA (9%), ATM (7%). There was no difference in progression-free survival (2.66 months vs. 3.81 months, p = 0.17), overall survival (5.3 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.64), or PFS2/PFS1 ratio ≥ 1.3 (20% vs. 24%, p = 0.72) between patients receiving a molecularly matched therapy (MMT) or a non-MMT, respectively. Patients with a MMT had an overall response rate of 19% and a disease control of 32%., Conclusions: Routine cfDNA molecular profiling is feasible and can lead to the access of targeted therapies. However, no notable benefit in patient's outcomes was shown in this unselected pan-cancer study.

Purpose: HER2 exon 20 insertions and point mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1%-2% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No targeted therapy is approved for this subset of patients. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the combination of two antibodies against human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2 [HER2] trastuzumab and pertuzumab with docetaxel; trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and docetaxel., Methods: The IFCT 1703-R2D2 trial is a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II study. Patients with HER2 -mutated, advanced NSCLC who progressed after ≥ 1 platinum-based treatment were enrolled. Patients received pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg and 420 mg thereafter; trastuzumab at an 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety (NCT03845270)., Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled and treated. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 31-84 years), 35% were smokers, 72% were females, 15% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 30% had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 29% (n = 13), and 58% had stable disease (n = 26). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.5). The median duration of response in patients with a confirmed response (n = 13) was 11 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 14.9). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 64% of the patients. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%), and anemia (9%)., Conclusion: Triple therapy with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel is feasible and effective for HER2 -mutated pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results highlight the effectiveness of the HER2 antibody-based strategy, which should be considered for these patients., Competing Interests: Julien MazieresConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly/ImClone, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Blueprint Medicines, Hengrui TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb Charles RicordelConsulting or Advisory Role: BMS, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Takeda Laurent GreillierHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Takeda, AbbVie, Novartis, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, MSD, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD Gérard ZalcmanHonoraria: Roche, Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Inventiva PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Inventiva Pharma (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Da Volterra (Inst)Research Funding: Roche (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Roche (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Takeda (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, AbbVie Charlotte DomblidesHonoraria: AstraZeneca, BMSConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Roche Jeannick MadelaineTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca/Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim France, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda Jaafar BennounaHonoraria: Servier, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, DaichiiConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Servier, AstraZeneca, Novartis, AmgenResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb Céline MascauxHonoraria: Roche, Astrazeneca, Kephren, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, MSD, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, AstraZeneca, Kephren, Amgen Denis Moro-SibilotConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly/ImClone, Sanofi, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, MSD Oncology, ARIAD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, Becton DickinsonResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim France (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst)Expert Testimony: MSD OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Lilly/ImClone, Pfizer, MSD Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb François PinquieHonoraria: Roche, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, MSD Alexis B. CortotHonoraria: Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, TakedaResearch Funding: Merck Serono (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Roche (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis Jacques CadranelHonoraria: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer IngelheimConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Lilly, NovartisResearch Funding: Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst) Virginie WesteelConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, MSD Oncology, RocheSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Novartis (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology Benjamin BesseResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Onxeo (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Inivata (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Celgene (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Cristal Therapeutics (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), OSE Immunotherapeutics (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Tolero Pharmaceuticals (Inst), 4D Pharma (Inst), Aptitude Health (Inst), cergentis (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction: Advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NsqNSCLC) progressing at the induction of a first-line of platin-based chemotherapy is a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis and few second-line treatment options., Materials and Methods: This single-stage phase II prospective multicenter open-label trial performed in platin-based refractory (i.e. progressing during induction phase of first-line platin-based chemotherapy) advanced NsqNSCLC assessed the efficacy of the nintedanib-docetaxel combination in second-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 12 weeks with a cut-off at 30% for ineffectiveness and 50% for minimal efficacy., Results: A total of 59 patients from 23 centers were included (mean age, 58.5 years; male gender, 73.6%; performance status 0-1, 100%; former/current smokers, 92.5%; adenocarcinoma, 92.5%, median platin-based first-line chemotherapy, 2). Nintedanib-docetaxel combination was administered for a median of 4 cycles. The rate of PFS at 12 weeks was 39.6% (95% CI, 28.2-56.8). Median PFS was 2.7 (95% CI, 1.4-4.1) months and one-year PFS was 11.8% (95% CI, 4.8-22.2). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 (95% CI, 4.3-8.2) months and 12-month OS was 32.1% (95% CI, 19.8-45.0); 18-month OS was 27.6% (95% CI, 16,1-40.4). Twenty-nine (53.7%) patients reported at least one serious treatment-related adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of at least one study drug in 12 (22.2%) patients., Conclusion: The predefined minimal efficacy was not demonstrated. However, a number of NsqNSCLC patients refractory to first-line platin-based chemotherapy appeared to benefit from this combination., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Assessment of vulnerability with the G8 screening tool according to cancer localization and weight of the G8 items when screening frailty in thoracic and lung cancer (TLC) compared to other cancer localizations., Methods: This study was conducted retrospectively on all G8 data collected for older cancer patients between April 2015 and December 2019 at Marseille University Hospital., Results: One thousand four hundred and thirty-one patients were included; the median age was 80.6 years and 62.3% of the patients were men. The most common type of cancer was thoracic cancer (34.5%). A majority of patients with thoracic cancers (74.4%) had an impaired G8. In a logistic regression model, male gender, age < 80 years, BMI < 23 kg/m 2 , normal psychological status, and health status perception were independent factors associated with thoracic cancers., Conclusion: Improving nutritional status and maintaining mental health are important issues to consider before treatment initiation in older patients with thoracic cancers., (© 2021. European Geriatric Medicine Society.)

Introduction: This open-label, phase 1-2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, plus immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab in previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES SCLC)., Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, previously treated (two or more lines of therapy) ES SCLC were enrolled into two cohorts. Cohort 1 received 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T (once every 6 wk for two cycles) plus 360 mg nivolumab (two 3-wk cycles beginning on week 4). Cohort 2 received the same dosage of Rova-T as cohort 1 plus 1 mg/kg nivolumab (four 3-wk cycles) and 1 mg/kg ipilimumab (beginning week 4). Both cohorts received 480 mg nivolumab every 4 weeks starting at week 10. Key objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and efficacy (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1). The response-related results are based on centrally read data., Results: A total of 42 patients received therapy: cohort 1, n = 30; cohort 2, n = 12. Overall, 43% received two or more previous lines of therapy. All patients experienced one or more treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 41 patients reported AEs considered related to the study drug by the investigator. The most frequent TEAE was pleural effusion (n = 20, 48%); most common grade greater than or equal to 3 was anemia (n = 9, 21%). Three grade 5 TEAEs considered related to the study drug were reported (cohort 1): pneumonitis (n = 2), acute kidney injury (n = 1). The objective response rate was 30% (12 of 40): cohort 1, 27.6% (8 of 29); cohort 2, 36.4% (4 of 11); all partial responses., Conclusions: Despite encouraging antitumor activity in previously treated ES SCLC, combination therapy with Rova-T and nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab was not well tolerated at the dose levels and administration schedules evaluated., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand, is expressed in SCLC tumors but is not detectable in normal adult tissues. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate containing a DLL3-targeting antibody tethered to a cytotoxic agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine by means of a protease-cleavable linker. The efficacy and safety of Rova-T compared with topotecan as second-line therapy in patients with SCLC expressing high levels of DLL3 (DLL3-high) was evaluated., Methods: The TAHOE study was an open-label, two-to-one randomized, phase 3 study comparing Rova-T with topotecan as second-line therapy in DLL3-high advanced or metastatic SCLC. Rova-T (0.3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 42-day cycle for two cycles, with two additional cycles available to patients who met protocol-defined criteria for continued dosing. Topotecan (1.5 mg/m 2 ) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS)., Results: Patients randomized to Rova-T (n = 296) and topotecan (n = 148) were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age was 64 years, and 77% had the extensive disease at initial diagnosis. The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 6.3 months (5.6-7.3) in the Rova-T arm and 8.6 months (7.7-10.1) in the topotecan arm (hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.82]). An independent data monitoring committee recommended that enrollment be discontinued because of the shorter OS observed with Rova-T compared with topotecan. Safety profiles for both drugs were consistent with previous reports., Conclusions: Compared with topotecan, which is the current standard second-line chemotherapy, Rova-T exhibited an inferior OS and higher rates of serosal effusions, photosensitivity reaction, and peripheral edema in patients with SCLC. A considerable unmet therapeutic need remains in this population., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Therapies targeting immune checkpoints, such as the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, have become the standard-of-care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but people living with HIV (PLWH) were excluded from these studies., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab in PLWH with advanced NSCLC., Design: The CHIVA2 study was a nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial in PLWH with previously treated advanced NSCLC., Setting: National multicenter prospective study., Participants: patients had viral load of <200 copies/mL, regardless of their CD4+ T-cell count., Intervention: Nivolumab was administered in second or third line, as monotherapy intravenously at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, until disease progression or limiting toxicity., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was disease control rate, evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Adverse events were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0., Results: Sixteen patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled: 14 (88 %) were men, median age was 58 years (range: 44-71), and all were smokers. The median duration of nivolumab treatment was 3.5 months (range: 0.5-26.5). The median follow-up was 23.6 months. Disease control rate was 62.5 % for 15 evaluable patients at 8 weeks (2 with partial response, 8 with stable disease, and 5 with disease progression). Twelve (75 %) patients had treatment-related adverse events, which were mild or moderate, except for one patient experiencing severe pruritus, onycholysis, and pemphigoid. There were no opportunistic infections or unexpected immune-related events. HIV viral load was stable during treatment. An increase in proliferating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells was observed after 3 nivolumab cycles in a subgroup of 9 patients., Conclusions and Relevance: Second/third-line nivolumab treatment was well-tolerated and beneficial in PLWH with NSCLC. Future trials should investigate immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line settings., Trial Registration: EudraCT.ema.europa.eu registration number: 2016-003796-22., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is currently used in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, regardless of PD-L1 expression status. A study comparing chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone has never been performed in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%. The aim of this trial is to perform such a comparison as first-line treatment in patients not eligible for locally advanced treatment who have expression of PD-L1 on ≥50% of tumor cells. The expected results are a reduction in the risk of early progression. A higher objective tumor response is also expected with the combination of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab compared with pembrolizumab alone. The study will allow a direct comparison of the proportion of patients who derive long-term benefit from the treatment. Clinical trial number: EudraCT (2020-002626-86); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04547504).

Introduction: HIV is an exclusion criterion for most lung cancer (LC) trials, however LC is the most common non-AIDS-defined malignancy in people living with HIV (PLHIV), poorer prognosis than the general population. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was a prognostic marker in LC patients from the general population. This study assessed ctDNA's prognostic value in PLHIV from a dedicated phase II trial., Methods: Overall, 61 PLHIV with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) participated in the IFCT Phase II trial evaluating first-line four-cycle carboplatin (Ca) AUC5 pemetrexed (P) 500 mg/m 2 induction therapy every 3 weeks, followed by P maintenance therapy. Blood samples collected before treatment were analyzed to detect ctDNA using ultra-deep targeted next-generation-sequencing (NGS)., Results: Appropriate samples were available from 55 PLVIH and analyzed for ctDNA detection. Including 42 males (76.4 %), 52.9 years median age, 51 smokers (92.7 %), five with non-squamous NSCLC Stage III (9%), 50 Stage IV (91 %), and performance status (PS) 0-2. ctDNA was detected in 35 patients (64 %), 22 with high and 13 with low ctDNA levels. Overall, 77 % were positive for TP53, 29 % for KRAS, and 11 % for STK11 mutations, more than one alteration was detected in 43 % of samples. Multivariate analysis showed that positive ctDNA was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR, 4.31, 95 %CI: 2.06-8.99, p < 0.0001), and shorter OS (HR, 3.52, 95 %CI: 1.72-7.19, p < 0.001). Moreover, OS was significantly longer for patients with low ctDNA levels at diagnosis as compared to high (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: We show that ctDNA detection using ultra-deep NGS is an independent prognostic factor in PLHIV with advanced NSCLC., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Lung cancer affects older adults and is the leading solid tumor in terms of death. A Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is recommended before cancer treatment to guide therapy management., Patients and Methods: This study was conducted between September 2015 and January 2019. During this period of time, all consecutive older outpatients referred for a CGA before initiation of lung or thoracic tumor treatment were included. The objectives were to describe the impact of geriatric factors on unplanned hospitalizations and overall survival (OS). The study was approved by a local ethics committee., Results: Overall, 228 patients were recruited. The median age was 78.7 ± 5 years. The majority (82%) of patients were diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer, and the most common (40.4%) treatment was systemic therapy. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with unplanned hospitalizations within the first 3 months were male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-7.2), systemic therapy (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.2), and fall history (aOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-8.2). Factors associated with a decrease in OS in the multivariate Cox model analysis were male gender (hazard ratio [HR], 3.9; 95% CI, 2.1-7.3), stage IV (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.6), G8 ≤ 14 (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-11.4), systemic therapy (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.5), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4), and impaired handgrip strength (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5)., Conclusion: G8 score and handgrip strength are important to predict OS in older adults treated for thoracic tumors. In the CGA, fall history was associated with unplanned hospitalization., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC., Methods: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested., Results: Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P = .37; median, 9.2 v 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%)., Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals., Competing Interests: Taofeek K. OwonikokoStock and Other Ownership Interests: Cambium Medical TechnologiesConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Celgene, Lilly, Sandoz, Abbvie, Eisai, G1 Therapeutics, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, BerGenBio, Amgen, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, Boehringer Ingelheim, EMD Serono, Xcovery, Bayer, Heron Pharmaceutical, ARMO BioSciences, MerckSpeakers' Bureau: AbbvieResearch Funding: Novartis, Astellas Pharma, Celgene, Bayer, Stem CentRx, Regeneron, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Abbvie, G1 Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, United Therapeutics, Amgen, Loxo/Lilly, Fujifilm, Pfizer, Aeglea Biotherapeutics, Incyte, MerckPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Overcoming acquired resistance to chemotherapy treatments through suppression of STAT3, Selective chemotherapy treatments and diagnostic methods related thereto, DR4 modulation and its implications in EGFR-target cancer therapy ref:18089 PROV (CSP) United States patent application no. 62/670,210 June 26, 2018 (Co-Inventor), Soluble FAS ligand as a biomarker of recurrence in thyroid cancer; provisional patent 61/727,519 (Inventor)Other Relationship: Roche/Genentech, EMD SeronoUncompensated Relationships: Reflexion Medical Keunchil ParkConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Blueprint Medicines, Amgen, Merck KGaA, LOXO, Abbvie, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, JNJ, Eisai, Puma BiotechnologySpeakers' Bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, AZDResearch Funding: AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology Ramaswamy GovindanHonoraria: Genentech/Abbvie, Abbvie, GeneplusConsulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech/Roche, Abbvie, Celgene, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Lilly, Ignyta, Nektar, Phillips Gilmore Oncology, Jounce Therapeutics, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Achilles Therapeutics Neal ReadyConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Abbvie, Celgene, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, G1 Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, RemeronSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Martin ReckConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, MSD Oncology, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Samsung BioepisSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics Solange PetersHonoraria: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, IlluminaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Regeneron, Merck Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Lilly, Abbvie, Bayer, Biocartis, Debiopharm Group, Illumina, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Incyte, Bioinvent, Clovis Oncology, VaccibodyResearch Funding: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Amgen, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Illumina, Merck Serono, Novartis, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim, Iovance BiotherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Sanofi, IncyteUncompensated Relationships: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, ESMO, European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP), Annals on Oncology associate editor Alejandro NavarroHonoraria: Pfizer, Roche, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer IngelheimExpert Testimony: Oryzon Genomics, MedsirTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Jerónimo Rodríguez-CidConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Mexico), MSD Oncology, Takeda, BayerSpeakers' Bureau: MSD Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Mexico), Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bayer, Lilly, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Mexico), Roche, Celltrion, Lilly, BeiGene, AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Michael SchenkerResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, MSD, Pfizer/EMD Serono, Lilly, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Jong-Seok LeeConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Ivor PercentConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbvie, Takeda, PharmaMar, Gilead Sciences, G1 TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Heat Biologics, Merck, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Incyte, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EpicentRx, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Altum Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma Carlos H. BarriosStock and Other Ownership Interests: Biomarker, MedSIR, TummiHonoraria: Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, MSD, Lilly, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Zodiac PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Libbs, MSD Oncology, United Medical, LillyResearch Funding: Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Mylan, Merrimack, Merck, Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Biomarin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Abraxis BioScience, AB Science, Asana Biosciences, Medivation, Exelixis, ImClone Systems, LEO Pharma, Millennium, Janssen, Clinica Atlantis, INC Research, Halozyme, Covance, Celgene, inVentiv Health, Merck KGaA, Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Polyphor, PharmaMarTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS Brazil, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Lilly Laurent GreillierHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Takeda, Abbvie, Novartis, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, MSD, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD Sofia BakaConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, NovartisResearch Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, MSD Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Takeda, Genesis PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Demo Pharmaceutical Wen Hong LinEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb Giovanni SelvaggiEmployment: Xcovery Holdings IncOther Relationship: Xcovery Holdings Inc Christine BaudeletEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb Jonathan BadenEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & JohnsonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Dimple PandyaEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Bristol-Myers Squibb Parul DoshiEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Hye Ryun KimSpeakers' Bureau: Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche/GenentechNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Lung cancer affects older and older old adults and is the leading cause of death by cancer. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is recommended before and during cancer treatment to guide therapy management in this population., Methods: This study was conducted between September 2015 and January 2019 at Marseille University Hospital (AP-HM). During this period, all consecutive outpatients 70 years or older referred for a CGA before initiation of lung cancer treatment were enrolled. The objective of this study was to compare lung and thoracic cancer management of octogenarians (≥80 years) and their geriatric profile versus patients aged 70 to 79 years (<80 years)., Findings: In our study, 228 patients were recruited. The median age was 78.7 ± 5 years. There were 94 octogenarians (41.2%), 36.2% of them were diagnosed with stage IV neoplasm and the most common treatment was chemotherapy (43.6%). The logistic regression analysis highlights that handgrip strength was the most commonly impaired domain (OR 2.3; 95% CI [1.3-4.3]) in octogenarians and that they are more likely than their younger counterparts to be treated by targeted therapy (OR 9.8; 95% CI [1.0-92.9]). Overall survival (OS) was similar in both age groups (log rank = 0,95)., Interpretation: In our study, octogenarians and patients <80 years had equivalent survival, across the different thoracic cancer treatments and tumor stages. Measure of muscle strength in CGA could be very useful in a clinical setting to help improve the management of older old patients treated for lung or thoracic cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We investigated on the benefit/risk ratio of surgery in octogenarians with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Material and Methods: From 2005-2020, 100 octogenarians were operated on for a clinical stage IA to IIA NSCLC. All patients had undergone whole body PET -scan and brain imaging. Operability was assessed according to current guidelines regarding the cardiopulmonary function. Since 2015, patients followed a dedicated geriatric evaluation pathway. Minimally invasive approaches were used in 66 patients, and a thoracotomy in 34., Results: Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 4 complications occurred in 15 patients within 90 days, including 7 fatalities. At multivariable analysis, the number of co-morbidities was their single independent prognosticator. Following resection, 24 patients met pathological criteria for adjuvant therapy among whom 3 (12.5 %) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Five-year survival rates were overall (OS) 47 ± 6.3 %, disease-free (DFS) 77.6 ± 5.1 %, and lung cancer-specific (CSS) 74.7 ± 6.3 %. Diabetes mellitus impaired significantly long-term outcomes in these 3 dimensions. OS was improved since the introduction of a dedicated geriatric assessment pathway (72.3 % vs. 6.4 %, P = 0.00002), and when minimally invasive techniques were used (42.3 % vs. 11.3 %; P = 0.02). CSS was improved by the performance of systematic lymphadenectomy (55.3 % vs. 26.9 %; P = 0.04). Multivariable and recursive partitioning analyses showed that a decision tree could be built to predict overall survival on the basis of diabetes mellitus, high co-morbidity index and low ppoDLCO values., Conclusions: The introduction of a dedicated geriatric assessment pathway to select octogenarians for lung cancer surgery was associated with OS values that are similar to outcomes in younger patients. The use of minimally invasive surgery and the performance of systematic lymphadenectomy were also associated with improved long-term survival. Octogenarians with multiple co-morbid conditions, diabetes mellitus, or low ppo DLCO values may be more appropriately treated with SBRT., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

HIV infection is an exclusion criterion in lung cancer trials. This multicentre phase II trial aimed to assess feasibility, efficacy and safety of first-line carboplatin plus pemetrexed (CaP) followed by pemetrexed (P) maintenance in people living with HIV (PLHIV) with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).Four cycles of CaP were followed by P-maintenance therapy in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. The primary objective was a disease control rate (DCR) ≥30% after 12 weeks.Of the 61 PLHIV enrolled, 49 (80%) had a performance status of 0-1, and 19 (31%) had brain metastases. Median CD4 lymphocyte count was 418 cells·µL -1 (range 18-1230), median CD4 lymphocyte nadir was 169.5 cells·µL -1 (1-822); 48 (80%) patients were virologically controlled. Four-cycle inductions were achieved by 38 (62%) patients, and 31 (51%) started P-maintenance (median of 4.1 cycles (range 1-19)). The 12-week DCR was 50.8% (95% CI 38.3-63.4) and partial response rate 21.3%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (95% CI 2.7-4.4) and 7.6 months (5.7-12.8), respectively. Patients with a performance status of 0-1 had the longest median progression-free survival (4.3 months, 95% CI 3.1-5.2) and overall survival (11.9 months, 95% CI 6.4-14.3). During induction, CaP doublet was well tolerated apart from grade 3-4 haematological toxicities (neutropenia 53.8%; thrombocytopenia 35.0%; anaemia 30.0%). Two fatal treatment-related sepses were reported. No opportunistic infections were experienced.In PLHIV with advanced NS-NSCLC, first-line four-cycle CaP induction followed by P-maintenance was effective and reasonably well-tolerated. Further studies should evaluate combination strategies of CaP with immunotherapy in PLHIV., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Lavole has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Greillier reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Takeda, Abbvie and Novartis, outside the submitted work; travel and accommodation expenses from MSD and Pfizer. Conflict of interest: J. Mazières has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Monnet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Kiakouama-Maleka has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: X. Quantin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.P. Spano reports personal fees for consultancy from MSD, Roche and Biogaran, personal fees for advisory board work from Lilly, Mylan and Novartis, personal fees for advisory board work and lectures from Pfizer and Leopharma, personal fees for lectures from Pierre Fabre Oncology, AstraZeneca and Gilead, grants from BMS and MSD Avenir, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Lena has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Fraisse has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Janicot has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Audigier-Valette has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Langlais has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Morin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Makinson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Cadranel reports grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis and Pfizer, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Purpose of Review: Lung cancer is still the first cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has drastically changed the prognosis of some patients, but the rate of long responders does not exceed 20%. Moreover, ICIs are not adverse events-free and remain expensive. Therefore, predictive biomarkers of long-term benefit to ICI are required., Recent Findings: The two main fields being evaluated currently are PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB). The first one is the only one used in routine practice, and the second is being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials. In addition, other biomarkers are being assessed as complex signatures, tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes, T cell receptor repertoire, or molecular profiling. The aim of this review is to summarize the current validated or promising biomarkers in lung cancer which could help to better select patients who will respond to ICI.

Purpose: Although extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly responsive to first-line therapy, virtually all patients develop resistance with short survival. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting delta-like 3 protein (DLL3). This open-label, single-arm, phase II study (TRINITY) assessed safety and efficacy of Rova-T in patients with DLL3-expressing SCLC in the third-line and beyond (3L+) setting., Patients and Methods: Patients with DLL3-expressing SCLC (determined by mouse antibody immunohistochemistry [IHC] assay), and ≥2 prior regimens, received 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T once every 6 weeks for two cycles. During study, a rabbit antibody IHC assay was developed and used for the final analysis, with DLL3-positive and DLL3-high defined as ≥25% and ≥75% of tumor cells positive for DLL3, respectively. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Among 339 patients enrolled, 261 (77%) had two prior lines of therapy and 78 (23%) had ≥3. DLL3-high and DLL3-positive tumors by rabbit IHC were seen in 238 (70%) and 287 (85%) patients, respectively. The remaining 52 (15%) were DLL3-negative only by rabbit IHC or had missing results. ORR was 12.4%, 14.3%, and 13.2% in all, DLL3-high, and DLL3-positive patients, respectively. Median OS was 5.6 months in all patients and 5.7 months in DLL3-high patients. The most common adverse events (AE) were fatigue, photosensitivity reaction, and pleural effusion. Grade 3-5 AEs were seen in 213 (63%) patients., Conclusions: Rova-T is the first targeted agent in SCLC to use DLL3, a novel biomarker. However, results demonstrate modest clinical activity in 3L+ SCLC, with associated toxicities., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Improved outcome has been shown in patients with synchronous oligometastatic (sOM) NSCLC when treated with radical intent. As a uniform definition of sOM NSCLC is lacking, we developed a definition and diagnostic criteria by a consensus process., Methods: A pan-European multidisciplinary consensus group was established. Consensus questions were built on the basis of current controversies, and definitions were extracted from a survey, cases and a systematic review. This statement was formulated during a consensus meeting., Results: It was determined that definition of sOM NSCLC is relevant when a radical treatment that may modify the disease course (leading to long-term disease control) is technically feasible for all tumor sites with acceptable toxicity. On the basis of the review, a maximum of five metastases and three organs was proposed. Mediastinal lymph node involvement was not counted as a metastatic site. Fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography-computed tomography and brain imaging were considered mandatory. A dedicated liver magnetic resonance imaging scan was advised for a solitary liver metastasis, and thoracoscopy and biopsies of distant ipsilateral pleural sites were recommended for a solitary pleural metastasis. For mediastinal staging, fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography-computed tomography was deemed the minimum requirement, with pathological confirmation recommended if this influences the treatment strategy. Biopsy of a solitary metastatic location was mandated unless the multidisciplinary team is of the opinion that the risks outweigh the benefits., Conclusion: A multidisciplinary consensus statement on the definition and staging of sOM NSCLC has been formulated. This statement will help to standardize inclusion criteria in future clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The IFCT-GFPC-0701 MAPS phase III trial highlighted significant improvement in overall survival from adding bevacizumab to the standard first-line chemotherapy regimen [cisplatin plus pemetrexed (PC)] in advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We present the results of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a secondary endpoint of MAPS., Patients and Methods: HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the lung cancer-specific module QLQ-LC13 at randomization and then every 9 weeks until disease progression.HRQoL deterioration-free survival (QFS), used to analyze longitudinal HRQoL data, was defined as the interval between randomization and the occurrence of the first clinically relevant definitive deterioration compared with the HRQoL score at baseline, or death., Results: A total of 448 patients were included in the MAPS trial between 2008 and 2014. At baseline, 425 patients (94.8%) completed the HRQoL questionnaire. We report that adding bevacizumab to cisplatin and pemetrexed (PCB) significantly improved QFS for the peripheral neuropathy dimension, with a median QFS of 12.09 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.59-13.67] in the PCB arm versus 7.59 months (95% CI, 6.57-8.61) in the PC arm [HR (PCB vs. PC) = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91; P = 0.004]. QFS was also longer in the PCB arm for the pain dimension (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.02; P = 0.08)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced MPM had no negative impact on HRQoL. A significant improvement in the peripheral neuropathy and pain HRQoL dimensions was even observed., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Anticancer immune responses are negatively regulated by programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) T-cell membrane protein interaction with its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), on cancer cells. We sought to assess the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in tumor samples from patients enrolled onto the IFCT-0701 MAPS randomized phase 3 trial (NCT00651456)., Patients and Methods: Tumor samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for percentages of PD-L1 membrane-stained tumor cells using the E1L3N clone, and data were correlated to survival by multivariate Cox models including stratification variables., Results: PD-L1 staining was assessed in 214 (47.75%) of 448 patients. Epithelioid subtype represented 83.7% (179/214). Absence of PD-L1 staining occurred in 137 (64.1%) of 214 malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) samples, while 77 (35.9%) of 214 were PD-L1 positive, with 50 (64.9%) of 77 showing < 50% PD-L1-expressing tumor cells. Sarcomatoid/biphasic subtypes were more commonly PD-L1 positive than epithelioid subtype (P < .001). In patients with 1% or more PD-L1-stained tumor cells, median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months versus 22.2 months for other patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.67; P = .14). OS did not differ according to PD-L1 positivity in multivariate analyses (adjusted HR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.49; P = .55). With a 50% cutoff, PD-L1-positive patients displayed a 10.5 months median OS versus 19.3 months for patients with lower PD-L1 expression (HR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.27-2.93; P = .002). OS did not significantly differ in adjusted Cox models (adjusted HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94; P = .47). In the 179 epithelioid MPM patients, high PD-L1 staining (≥ 50% of tumor cells) negatively affected OS, although not significantly, showing a 12.3-month median OS (95% CI, 4.3-21.6) versus 23-month (95% CI, 18.5-25.2) for patients with tumor PD-L1 staining in < 50% cells (P = .071). The progression-free survival (PFS) differences were statistically significant, with a longer 9.9-month median PFS in patients with low PD-L1 staining (< 50% cells) compared to 6.7 months of median PFS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50% cells) (P = .0047)., Conclusion: Although high PD-L1 tumor cell expression was associated with poorer OS in MPM patients from the MAPS trial, its prognostic influence was lost in multivariate analyses in the whole cohort, while PD-L1 expression was strongly associated with the sarcomatoid/biphasic subtypes. In the epithelioid MPM subset of patients, high PD-L1 tumor expression (≥ 50%) negatively affected OS and PFS, with this prognostic influence remaining statistically significant for PFS after adjustment in multivariate Cox model., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: KRAS mutation is the most frequent molecular alteration found in advanced NSCLC; it is associated with a poor prognosis without available targeted therapy. Treatment options for NSCLC have been recently enriched by the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and data about its efficacy in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC are discordant. This study assessed the routine efficacy of ICIs in advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC., Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data were extracted from the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs and with available molecular analysis between April 2013 and June 2017. Analysis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was performed if exploitable tumor material was available., Results: A total of 282 patients with ICI-treated (in the first line or more) advanced NSCLC (all histological subgroups) who were treated with ICIs (anti-programmed death 1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 antibodies), including 162 (57.4%) with KRAS mutation, 27 (9.6%) with other mutations, and 93 (33%) with a wild-type phenotype, were identified. PD-L1 analysis was available for 128 patients (45.4%), of whom 45.3% and 19.5% had PD-L1 expression of 1% or more and 50%, respectively (49.5% and 21.2%, respectively, in the case of the 85 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC). No significant difference was seen in terms of objective response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival between KRAS-mutant NSCLC and other NSCLC. No significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival were observed between the major KRAS mutation subtypes (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12V, and G13C). In KRAS-mutant NSCLC, unlike in non-KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the efficacy of ICIs is consistently higher, even though not statistically significant, for patients with PD-L1 expression in 1% or more of tumor cells than for those with PD-L1 expression in less than 1% of tumor cells, and this finding is especially true when PD-L1 expression is high (PD-L1 expression ≥50%)., Conclusion: For patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC (all mutational subtypes), the efficacy of ICI is similar to that for patients with other types of NSCLC. PD-L1 expression seems to be more relevant for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in KRAS-mutant NSCLC than it is in other types of NSCLC., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are available for first- and further lines of treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These treatments are associated with adverse events called immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). The incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of IRAEs are quite acknowledged; however, the link between IRAEs and the efficacy of ICIs requires further clarification. The objectives of this study were to assess the association between IRAEs incidence and severity and ICIs efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC., Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical, biological, treatment, and outcome data were collected from patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least 1 cycle of ICIs from April 2013 to February 2017. The primary endpoint was to assess the association of IRAEs incidence with overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the association of IRAEs with progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR)., Results: Overall, 270 patients were studied. The median OS was 14 months, median PFS was 2.6 months, ORR was 13%, and DCR was 51%. OS, PFS, and ORR were significantly better for patients with IRAEs compared with patients with no IRAEs, translating to median OS not reached versus 8.21 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.46; P < .001); PFS was 5.2 versus 1.97 months (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.32-0.57; P < .001); and ORR was 212.9% versus 5.7% (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.18-11.05; P < .001)., Conclusions: This report presents the largest case series showing longer OS and PFS and better ORR when IRAEs occurred in a population of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs. The biological background for this phenomenon is being explored prospectively., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This randomized phase II trial aimed at evaluating the engineered programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab in SCLC progressing after first-line platinum-etoposide chemotherapy., Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or conventional chemotherapy (up to 6 cycles of topotecan or re-induction of initial chemotherapy). Patients were not selected based on PD-L1 tissue expression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 6 weeks. A two-stage design with 2:1 randomization and O'Brien-Fleming stopping rules was used. The null hypothesis was rejected if more than 12 of 45 patients were responders., Results: Overall, 73 patients were randomized (atezolizumab n = 49; chemotherapy n = 24). At 6 weeks, 1 of 43 eligible atezolizumab patients achieved an objective response (2.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-6.8), whereas 8 others had stable disease (20.9% disease control rate; 95% CI: 8.8-33.1). Among eligible chemotherapy patients (n = 20), 10% achieved an objective response (65% disease control rate). Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.2-1.5) with atezolizumab and 4.3 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.9) with chemotherapy. Overall survival did not significantly differ between groups. Median overall survival was 9.5 months versus 8.7 months for the atezolizumab and the chemotherapy group, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio atezolizumab : 0.84, 95% CI: 0.45-1.58; p = 0.60). Two atezolizumab patients (4.2%) experienced grade 3 fatigue, and two others grade 1 dysthyroidism. Among 53 evaluable specimens, only 1 (2%) had positive immunohistochemical PD-L1 staining (SP142 clone)., Conclusions: Atezolizumab monotherapy in relapsed SCLC failed to show significant efficacy. No unexpected safety concerns were observed., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)