Search

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown modest antitumor activity in unselected advanced sarcomas. Histology driven approach to patient selection is the current standard for off-label anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) immunotherapy use., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced sarcoma who were treated with off label anti-PD1 immunotherapy at our center., Results: A total of 84 patients with 25 histological subtypes were included. Nineteen patients (23%) had a cutaneous primary tumor site. Eighteen patients (21%) were classified as having clinical benefit, including 1 patient with complete response, 14 with partial response, and 3 with stable disease lasting over 6 months with previously progressive disease. Cutaneous primary site location was associated with higher clinical benefit rate (58% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), longer median PFS (8.6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.003) and OS (19.0 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.011), compared to non-cutaneous primary. Patients with histological subtypes that pembrolizumab is indicated per current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines had modestly higher rate of clinical benefit versus other histologies, however, the difference was statistically insignificant (29% vs. 15%, p = 0.182) and no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS was observed between these groups. Immune-related adverse events were more frequently seen among patients with clinical benefit (72% vs. 35%, p = 0.007)., Conclusions: Anti-PD1-based immunotherapy is highly efficacious in advanced sarcomas of cutaneous primary site. Cutaneous primary site location is a stronger predictor of ICI response than histologic subtype and should be accounted for in treatment guidelines and clinical trial design., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Primary pulmonary sarcomas (PPS) and pulmonary carcinosarcomas (PCS) are rare aggressive lung malignancies. We reviewed our 21-year experience with the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of both tumors, comparing their clinical, histopathologic, and treatment results., Methods: All patients with PPS or PCS who underwent surgical and nonsurgical treatment between 1998 and 2019 at our cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was constructed., Results: In total, 100 patients were analyzed: 45 with PPS and 55 with PCS. Among patients with PPS, 31 of 45 (69%) underwent surgery with 1 (3%) operative mortality. For patients with PCS, 29 of 55 (53%) underwent surgery with no operative mortality. Patients with PPS were younger than PCS (P < .01). Fewer patients were smokers among PPS (58%) versus PCS (93%) (P < .01). For resected PPS, mean tumor size was 8.2 ± 4.1 cm (range 2.2-18.0) compared with 10.1 ± 5.0 cm (range 3.9-17.0) for unresected PPS. Tumor size for resected PCS was 6.2 ± 2.6 cm (range 2.0-10.5) versus 6.8 ± 3.5 cm (range 1.2-13.5) for unresected PCS. Of resected patients, 5 of 31 (16%) with PPS and 9 of 29 (31%) with PCS were node positive. Overall survival estimates were as follows: for PPS, median survival and 5-year overall survival for resected versus unresected cases were 39.6 months/28.7% versus 4.9 months/7.8%. For PCS, survival estimates were 23.6 months/31.0% versus 14.9 months/28.2%, respectively. In multivariable analyses (N = 100), age, smoking history, histology, and surgery were risk factors of survival., Conclusions: At initial evaluation, PPS and PCS presented with large-sized tumors and usually were not stage I. Surgery had a positive impact on survival among patients with PPS. Whenever feasible, surgical resection, even in locally advanced disease, may yield long-term survival in these aggressive lung tumors, although the level of evidence is low., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for metastatic sarcoma can result in long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to describe factors associated with survival in a series of patients undergoing PM for metastatic sarcoma., Methods: We reviewed all patients undergoing PM for metastatic sarcoma over a 12-year period (2000-2012). Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcomes. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models., Results: A total of 120 patients underwent PM with a median follow-up was 48 months. Among 81 (85%) patients who presented with local disease, the median disease free interval (DFI) was 13 months and median overall survival (OS) was 48 months. Fourteen patients (15%) had synchronous metastasis with a median OS of 21 months. On multivariate analysis, synchronous metastasis (P = 0.005), older age (P = 0.02), and number of lung lesions (P = 0.003) were associated with poor survival. The median OS of patients with a DFI ≥12 versus <12 months following primary resection was 93 and 43 months (P = 0.004)., Conclusion: While patients with a DFI >12 months have the best OS following PM, patients with a DFI <12 months also have excellent outcomes as compared to systemic therapy and should be considered for PM., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)