Search

Background: Patient self-assessment via a mobile app detects actionable symptoms and has been shown to detect lung cancer relapses early, thereby lengthening survival., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of chief symptoms associated with the main tobacco-induced pathologies in both current and ex-smokers through a self-assessment smartphone app and to evaluate the app's capacity to encourage users to quit smoking or reduce consumption, as well as its impact on early lung cancer stages at the time of diagnosis., Methods: Current and ex-smokers were recruited through an advertising campaign in Sarthe county (France) proposing the free download of a smartphone app. App users were asked to answer 13 questions related to symptoms associated with tobacco-induced diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], cardiovascular diseases, cancer). In the event of any positive answer, a message was displayed recommending the user to consult a physician. In addition, they were asked about smoking cessation intention before and after answering these 13 questions. Finally, incidence of stage 1 or 2 lung cancers diagnosed during the launch period of our application was evaluated by comparing data from various sources to those from the same period during the previous year., Results: Of the 5671 users who were eligible for evaluation, an alert was sent to the majority (4118/5671, 72.6%), with a higher incidence for current smokers (2833/3679, 77.0% vs 1298/1992, 65.2%; P<.001). The most frequent symptoms triggering the notifications were fatigue (2023/5671, 35.7%), cough (1658/5671, 29.2%), dyspnea (1502/5671, 26.5%), and persistent chest pain (1286/5671, 22.7%). Of the current smokers, 14.0% (515/3679) showed symptoms suggesting COPD, 15.5% (571/3679) showed symptoms suggesting stable angina, 12.4% (455/3679) probably had lower extremity artery disease, and 6.8% (249/3679) had possible cancer. Of the users, 36.5% (1343/3679) claimed that they thought about quitting smoking, and 48.7% (1795/3679) had thought about reducing their consumption. Surgery-eligible stage 1 and 2 lung cancer incidence was 24% (14/58) during the study period versus 9% (5/54) during the previous year in Sarthe county (P=.04), whereas it remained unchanged in the neighboring county of Maine-et-Loire., Conclusions: A majority of current and ex-smokers showed worrying symptoms, and the use of a self-assessment smartphone app may drive a majority of smokers toward the intention of smoking cessation or decreasing consumption. A randomized study should be performed to confirm this intention and to support the potential increase of symptomatic lung cancer detection at early, surgery-accessible stages., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04048954; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04048954., (©Edouard Stavaux, François Goupil, Guillaume Barreau, Anne Lise Septans, Bertrand Dautzenberg, Armelle Foulet-Rogé, Norbert Padilla, Thierry Urban, Fabrice Denis. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 23.02.2022.)

Smoking is the cause of addictive behavior. Tobacco addiction is a chronic disease that makes difficult to stop smoking and leads to further use. Smoking is a risk factor for COPD, asthma and lung cancer; it may be the cause of severe perioperative complications. This finding justifies that smokers benefit from advice of stopping smoking and smoking cessation assistance. Helping patients to stop smoking increases the chances of quitting, improves the prognosis of tobacco-related diseases, the effectiveness of their treatments and the quality of life of the patients. This article updates the modalities of smoking cessation assistance in smokers with COPD, asthma and lung cancer in operated patients. The goal of the management must be the complete cessation of tobacco smoke intoxication, which alone reduces tobacco mortality., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

E-cigarettes remain controversial because the scientific evidence of short term and long term effects on tolerance and the health value of a switch from tobacco to e-cigarettes is contested and controversial. Nevertheless the quality of e-cigarettes and e-liquids has improved. The main ingredients, propylene glycol, vegetable glycerine and nicotine are pharmaceutical-grade quality in most e-liquids. Flavors are almost all food grade. The high quality of ingredients has decreased the presence of impurities in e-liquids. The emissions of e-cigarettes do not contain solid particles or carbon monoxide. Nitrosamine content is at least one hundred times lower than in tobacco smoke. E-cigarette emissions in normal use do not contain any harmful constituents at significant levels except nicotine. UK public health authorities have stated that e-cigarette use is likely to be at least 95% less toxic than cigarette use. There are benefits from having a well-regulated legal market. In countries where e-liquid containing nicotine is not allowed, "do-it-yourself" liquids are common and have handling risks and may sometimes contain toxic impurities. Though e-cigarettes should never be assumed safe products for non-smokers, for smokers, the e-cigarette is at least 20 times less dangerous than the cigarette. Tobacco cessation specialists in countries where nicotine containing e-cigarettes are available increasingly provide counselling for e-cigarette use to stop smoking or to reduce smoking at the request of patients. Based on current knowledge, for patients with lung or other forms of cancer who would otherwise continue to smoke, e-cigarettes offer an alternative way to quit smoking while they undergo medical treatment., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postoperative radiotherapy is commonly used to treat patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, but its effect on overall survival has not been established., Methods: After undergoing complete surgical resection, 728 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (221 Stage I, 180 Stage II, and 327 Stage III) were randomized to receive either postoperative radiotherapy at a total dose of 60 gray or observation only . The main end point was overall survival., Results: At the reference date, 218 of 355 patients in the control group had died and 262 of 373 in the radiotherapy group had died. Five-year overall survival was 43% for the control group and 30% for the radiotherapy group (P = 0.002, log rank test; relative risk [RR]: 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.59). This result was not modified by adjustment for potential prognostic factors. The excess mortality rate for the radiotherapy group was due to an excess of intercurrent deaths (P = 0.0001; RR: 3.47; the 5-year intercurrent death rate was 8% for the control group and 31% for the radiotherapy group). Radiotherapy had no significant effect on local recurrence (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.64-1.14) and no effect on metastasis (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.85-1.31). The rate of non-cancer-related death increased with the dose per fraction delivered.

Purpose: We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the value of the addition of cisplatin to teniposide (VM26) and to investigate the schedule dependence of the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM26, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty-five NSCLC patients were randomized to receive VM26 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 or 360 mg/m2 on day 1 only, either as a single drug or in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 x 2 factorial design of this study., Results: The response rate of the two cisplatin-containing arms was superior to that of the two arms that contained VM26 only (22% v 6%, P < .001); progression-free survival and survival times were also longer in the cisplatin-containing arms (median, 4.3 v 2.2 months, P = .003; median 7.2 v 5.9 months, P = .008, respectively). Toxicity was significantly higher in the cisplatin-containing arms; the most frequent side effects were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The schedule of VM26 did not significantly influence the response rate, progression-free survival interval, or survival duration. However, the response rate of the 1-day administration was significantly lower than that of the 3-day administration when given as single drugs., Conclusion: The addition of cisplatin to VM26 improves the response rate, progression-free survival interval, and survival duration over VM26 alone, although at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity. Cisplatin should be considered as the basis for combination chemotherapies in advanced NSCLC.

Background: The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an unresolved question., Methods: From October, 1982, to November, 1986, 267 patients with resected NSCLC were included in a randomized trial. The adjuvant allocated treatments were either postoperative radiotherapy, 60 Gy in 6 weeks (radiotherapy group = 129 patients), or three courses of postoperative COPAC (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, vincristine, lomustine) chemotherapy followed by a similar radiotherapy schedule (chemotherapy/radiotherapy group = 138 patients)., Results: The sex ratio (M:F) was 19/1; mean age was 57 +/- 9 years. According to postoperative staging, 8 patients were Stage I, 70 were Stage II, and 189 were Stage III. The histologic type was squamous cell carcinoma in 175 patients, adenocarcinoma in 57, and large cell carcinoma in 35. The minimum follow-up was 6 years. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Death was recorded in 233 patients. No significant difference was observed in terms of disease free interval (P = 0.47, log-rank test), or overall survival (P = 0.68, log-rank test). With respect to the first site of relapse, distant metastasis occurred more frequently in the radiotherapy group (P = 0.09, log-rank test) whereas local relapse occurred similarly in both groups (P = 0.27). An interaction was observed between lymph node involvement and treatment in terms of overall survival., Conclusions: The COPAC chemotherapy as postoperative treatment failed to improve overall survival in patients with resected NSCLC receiving postoperative radiotherapy but decreased the pattern of metastatic progression, mainly in the N2 patients.

Background: A positive influence of anticoagulant treatment in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been suggested by experimental and clinical data., Methods: In a multicenter clinical trial, 277 patients with SCLC were randomized either to receive or not to receive subcutaneous heparin injections for 5 weeks at effective doses, which were monitored by blood coagulation tests. All patients received one of the two chemotherapy regimens studied in this trial, for eight courses in the case of patients with complete or partial response, and subsequently were randomized to receive delayed thoracic radiotherapy after these eight courses., Results: In comparison to the 139 patients who did not receive heparin, the 138 patients who received anticoagulant treatment obtained better complete response rates (37% vs. 23%, P = 0.004), better median survival (317 days vs. 261 days, P = 0.01), and better survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years (40% vs. 30%, 11% vs. 9% and 9% vs. 6%, respectively). At subgroups analysis, the results on survival were obtained for limited forms (P = 0.03) but not for extensive diseases (P = 0.31). No important bleeding or thrombocytopenia was related to heparin treatment., Conclusions: These results confirm the value of anticoagulant treatment in SCLC, already suspected for warfarin and now proven for heparin, but the modes of administration and the biologic explanations for this activity still warrant further investigation.

In 1985, the authors began a phase II study to assess the PCV perioperative polychemotherapy (cisplatin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, vindesine 3 mg/m2) in patients with resectable bronchogenic non-small cell carcinoma. Patients were randomized to receive either two preoperative courses of PCV chemotherapy, surgery, and two postoperative courses of PCV chemotherapy (PCV group) or immediate surgery (surgery group). A staging procedure using the CT scan was performed before randomization and, additionally, before surgery in the PCV group. There were 26 randomized patients, 13 in each group. In the PCV group, 11 patients agreed to receive the two preoperative courses of chemotherapy. A response was observed in five patients (45%), and a progression was observed in four patients (36%) leading to a cancellation of surgery in two of them. Postoperative care was the same for each group. Although no death could be related to chemotherapy, it was decided to stop entering new patients into this trial because of the rate of preoperative progression in the PCV group.

So far there is no good evidence that chemotherapy improves survival in non small cell lung cancer. Reports of randomized trials testing chemotherapy versus supportive treatment alone are very few. In recent years, more and more emphasis has been put on the quality of life for cancer patients. Subjective tests such as Anamnestic comparative self Assessment (A.C.S.A. test, Dr. Bernheim) were designed as well as objective ones, using different types of self evaluation. However very few studies have been focused on this aspect in patients with non small cell lung cancer. Therefore the G.E.T.C.B. (Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement des Cancers Bronchiques) decided to initiate a cooperative randomized trial (02 CB 84) in metastatic epidermoid and large cell bronchus carcinoma, in order to test the potential benefit from chemotherapy in these tumors and how it affects the quality of live. In this trial, C.O.P.A.C. combination (Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Cis-Platinum, Adriamycin and CCNU) is randomized versus no chemotherapy. The quality of life is assessed monthly on the one hand by a modified A.C.S.A. test performed by a physician and on the other hand by a question list given to the patient. This question list attempts to evaluate the impact of disease as a reference point. Finally protocol 02 CB 84 (activated in 05/84) may give information about the effect of chemotherapy on both survival and quality of life.