Search

Background: The presence of lymph node (LN) metastasis directly affects the treatment strategy for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used in patients with advanced LUAD to identify targeted genes, while early detection of pathologic LN metastasis using NGS has not been assessed., Methods: Clinicopathologic features and molecular characteristics of 224 patients from Ruijin Hospital were analyzed to detect factors associated with LN metastases. Another 140 patients from Huashan Hospital were set as a test cohort., Results: Twenty-four out of 224 patients were found to have lymph node metastases (10.7%). Pathologic LN-positive tumors showed higher mutant allele tumor heterogeneity (p < 0.05), higher tumor mutation burden (p < 0.001), as well as more frequent KEAP1 (p = 0.001), STK11 (p = 0.004), KRAS (p = 0.007), CTNNB1 (p = 0.017), TP53, and ARID2 mutations (both p = 0.02); whereas low frequency of EGFR mutation (p = 0.005). A predictive nomogram involving male sex, solid tumor morphology, higher T stage, EGFR wild-type, and TP53, STK11, CDKN2A, KEAP1, ARID2, KRAS, SDHA, SPEN, CTNNB1, DICER1 mutations showed outstanding efficiency in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.819) and the test cohort (AUC = 0.780)., Conclusion: This study suggests that the integration of genomic profiling and clinical features identifies early-invasive LUAD patients at higher risk of LN metastasis. Improved identification of LN metastasis is beneficial for the optimization of the patient's therapy decisions., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Robot-assisted lobectomy (RAL) is increasingly used as an alternative to video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is little evidence of any difference in postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between these two approaches., Research Question: Is RAL superior to VAL in improving quality of life in patients with resectable NSCLC?, Study Design and Methods: We performed a single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial from May 2017 to May 2020 with 320 enrolled patients undergoing RAL or VAL for resectable NSCLC (RVlob trial; NCT03134534). Postoperative pain was evaluated by visual analog score or numeric rating score on postoperative day 1 and at weeks 4, 24, and 48. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire in Lung Cancer (QLQ-LC13), and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were also administered at weeks 4, 24, and 48 after surgery., Results: One hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent RAL and 163 underwent VAL. The mean pain score of patients after RAL was significantly lower at week 4 (2.097 ± 0.111 vs 2.431 ± 0.108; P = .032). QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 summary scores (P > .05) were similar for both RAL and VAL during the first 48 weeks of follow-up. HRQoL scores assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire were also comparable between the two groups (P > .05) during the whole study period., Interpretation: Both RAL and VAL showed satisfactory and comparable HRQoL and postoperative pain up to 48 weeks after surgery, despite some minor statistical differences at week 4., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03134534; URL: www., Clinicaltrials: gov., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine whether RAL affects perioperative outcomes and long-term efficacy in NSCLC patients, compared with traditional VAL., Summary of Background Data: RAL is a promising treatment for NSCLC. However, its efficacy has not been fully evaluated., Methods: A single-center, open-labeled prospective randomized clinical trial was launched in May 2017 to compare the efficacy of RAL and VAL. By May 2020, 320 patients were enrolled. The perioperative results of RAL and VAL were compared., Results: The 320 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the RAL group (n = 157) and the VAL group (n = 163). Perioperative outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups, including the length of hospital stay (P = 0.76) and the rate of postoperative complications (P = 0.45). No perioperative mortality occurred in either group. The total amount of chest tube drainage {830 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 550-1130 mL] vs 685 mL [IQR, 367.5-1160 mL], P = 0.007} and hospitalization costs [$12821 (IQR, $12145-$13924) vs $8009 (IQR, $7014-$9003), P < 0.001] were significantly higher in the RAL group. RAL group had a significantly higher number of LNs harvested [11 (IQR, 8-15) vs 10 (IQR, 8-13), P = 0.02], higher number of N1 LNs [6 (IQR, 4-8) vs 5 (IQR, 3-7), P = 0.005], and more LN stations examined [6 (IQR, 5-7) vs 5 (IQR, 4-6), P < 0.001]., Conclusions: Both RAL and VAL are safe and feasible for the treatment of NSCLC. RAL achieved similar perioperative outcomes, together with higher LN yield. Further follow-up investigations are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of RAL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03134534)., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)