Search

Background: Human papilloma virus (HPV) has been associated with the development and modulation of response in a series of neoplasms. In the case of lung adenocarcinoma, its role in etiology and pathogenesis is still controversial. Considering that this infection brings foreign epitopes, it could be of prognostic significance in patients with lung adenocarcinoma treated with immunotherapy., Methods: In a retrospective cohort study we evaluated the presence of HPV genomic material in lung adenocarcinoma primary lesions with the INNO-LiPA platform. Viral replication was also evaluated by detecting the presence of oncoprotein E6/E7 messenger RNA (mRNA) by quantitative RT-PCR. To confirm possible hypotheses regarding viral oncogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) were evaluated with stromal fibrosis and immunoscore., Results: A total of 133 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 34 tested positive for HPV, reaching an estimated prevalence of 25.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.2% to 32.9%]. E6/7 mRNA was identified in 28 out of the 34 previously positive cases (82.3%). In immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients, the median overall survival reached 22.3 months [95% CI 19.4 months- not reached (NR)] for HPV-negative and was not reached in HPV-positive (HPV+) ones (95% CI 27.7-NR; P = 0.008). With regard to progression-free survival, HPV- patients reached a median of 9.2 months (95% CI 7.9-11.2 months) compared to 14.3 months (95% CI 13.8-16.4 months) when HPV was positive (P = 0.001). The overall response rate for HPV+ patients yielded 82.4% compared to 47.1% in negative ones. No differences regarding programmed death-ligand 1, VEGF, HIF1, stromal fibrosis, or immunoscore were identified., Conclusions: In patients with HPV+ lung adenocarcinoma, a significant benefit in overall response and survival outcomes is observed., Competing Interests: Disclosure AFC discloses financial research support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Foundation Medicine, Roche Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher, Broad Institute, Amgen, Flatiron Health, Teva Pharma, Rochem Biocare, Bayer, INQBox and The Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research – FICMAC. Additionally, he was linked and has received honoraria as an advisor, participated in speakers' bureau. He gave expert testimony to EISAI, Merck Serono, Jannsen Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Celldex Therapeutics, Foundation Medicine, Eli Lilly, Guardant Health, Illumina, and Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research – FICMAC. OA reports personal fees from Pfizer, grants and individual fees from AstraZeneca, grants and individual fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche, outside the submitted work. CR reports relation with Mylan, Archer Biosciences, Oncopass, Inivata, Merck Serono Novartis, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Guardant Health, and AstraZeneca as part of speakers' bureau. Also, he received research funding from Pfizer and had uncompensated relationships with OncoDNA, Biomark, and Guardant Health. GR discloses travel, accommodations, and expenses from AstraZeneca and Pfizer, and consulting advisory role with Roche, Amgen, and Pfizer. UM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Merck, and BMS for participation in a speaker bureau; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Amgen, Merck, and BMS for acting in an advisory role; financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Amgen that was paid directly to his institution outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Accumulated evidence indicates that patients with lung cancer are a vulnerable population throughout the pandemic. Limited information is available in Latin America regarding the impact of the pandemic on medical care. The goal of this study was to describe the clinical and social effect of COVID-19 on patients with thoracic cancer and to ascertain outcomes in those with a confirmed diagnosis., Materials and Methods: This cohort study included patients with thoracic neoplasms within a single institution between March 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021. All variables of interest were extracted from electronic medical records. During this period, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-2) was applied to evaluate and identify more common psychological disorders., Results: The mean age for the total cohort (n = 548) was 61.5 ± 12.9 years; non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequent neoplasm (86.9%), advanced stages predominated (80%), and most patients were under active therapy (82.8%). Any change in treatment was reported in 23.9% of patients, of which 78.6% were due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Treatment delays (≥7 days) were the most frequent modifications in 41.9% of cases, followed by treatment suspension at 37.4%. Patients without treatment changes had a more prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.21, p < .001 and HR 0.28, p < .001, respectively). The mean DASS-21 score was 10.45 in 144 evaluated patients, with women being more affected than men (11.41 vs. 9.08, p < .001). Anxiety was reported in 30.5% of cases, followed by depression and distress in equal proportions (18%). Depressed and stressed patients had higher odds of experiencing delays in treatment than patients without depression (odds ratio [OR] 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-13.23, p = .006 and OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.2-10.06, p = .006, respectively)., Conclusion: Treatment adjustments in patients with thoracic malignancies often occurred to avoid COVID-19 contagion with detrimental effects on survival. Psychological disorders could have a role in adherence to the original treatment regimen., Implications for Practice: The pandemic has placed an enormous strain on health care systems globally. Patients with thoracic cancers represent a vulnerable population, with increased morbidity and mortality rates. In Mexico, treatment modifications were common during the pandemic, and those who experienced delays had worse survival outcomes. Most treatment modifications were related to a patient decision rather than a lockdown of health care facilities in which mental health impairment plays an essential role. Moreover, the high case fatality rate highlights the importance of improving medical care access. Likewise, to develop strategies facing future threats that may compromise health care systems in non-developed countries., (© 2021 AlphaMed Press.)

Purpose: BIM activation is essential for epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-triggered apoptosis in EGFR -mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A deletion in the intron two of the BIM gene results in generation of alternatively spliced isoforms that impairs their apoptotic response to TKIs, conferring the NSCLC cells intrinsic resistance to these medications. Patients with both alterations have poor clinical evolution. The current study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab (Bev) versus EGFR-TKIs alone as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and BIM deletions ( BIMdel )., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted. BIMdel was detected using polymerase chain reaction analysis and direct sequencing of DNA. BIM protein expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry, and BIM mRNA levels by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Clinical characteristics, overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events were compared between both groups., Results: Thirty-three patients were included; 15 received EGFR-TKIs, and 18 received EGFR-TKIs plus Bev. The median age was 63 years, with a majority of recruited female patients. All included individuals had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 2 or less. The addition of Bev resulted in a significantly higher ORR (94.4% v 40%, P > .001). Median PFS was longer with the use of the combination therapy (11.12 v 7.87 months; P = .001). Median overall survival tended to be longer in the EGFR-TKIs plus Bev (30.9 v 25.4 months; P = .06) but failed to reach statistical significance. Response in terms of both partial and complete as well as overall favorably affected PFS., Conclusion: EGFR-TKIs plus Bev conferred a significantly higher ORR and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and BIMdel. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings., Competing Interests: Andrés F. CardonaHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, CelldexConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Foundation Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC)Speakers' Bureau: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Foundation MedicineTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Foundation Medicine Gonzalo RecondoConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Amgen, Pfizer, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb-Ono PharmaceuticalResearch Funding: AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Pfizer Leonardo RojasConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, MSD Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Boehringer IngelheimSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Boehringer IngelheimTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, MSD Luis CorralesConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD Oncology, PfizerSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD OncologyResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology Claudio MartínConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, RocheSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca Feliciano BarrónSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Carolina SoteloTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AACR July RodríguezSpeakers' Bureau: Bayer, AstraZeneca Christian RolfoConsulting or Advisory Role: Archer, Inivata, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Boston PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: MSD, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Lung Cancer Research FoundationTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca(OPTIONAL) Uncompensated Relationships: Guardant Health Jorge OteroConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Hernán CarranzaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Amgen, PfizerSpeakers' Bureau: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Merck Carlos VargasHonoraria: Roche, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Pfizer, MSD, MSD, BmsSpeakers' Bureau: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Oscar ArrietaHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, PfizerResearch Funding: AstraZeneca, Roche, Merck Sharp & DohmeNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: To date, studies regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus standard of care (SoC) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not shown a significant effect in terms of overall survival (OS). Additionally, the effect of PCI among high-risk patients has been scarcely studied. The objective of this randomized phase 2 study was to evaluate the role of PCI in a population of patients at high risk for development of brain metastases (BM)., Methods and Materials: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed NSCLC without baseline BM, harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels at the time of diagnosis. Participants received systemic therapy according to molecular status, those without progressive disease were then assigned to receive SoC or SoC + PCI (25 Gy in 10 fractions). The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of brain metastases (CBM). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and OS. Quality of life and neurocognitive function are discussed in a separate article (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01603849)., Results: From May 2012 to December 2017, 84 patients were enrolled in the study, with 41 patients allocated to receive PCI and 43 received SoC. Patients allocated to receive PCI had a CBM at 24 months of 7% versus 38% in those allocated to the SoC arm. PCI was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.035-0.42) for developing BM. A benefit in OS was also observed (64.5 vs 19.8 months; hazard ratio: 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.78; P =∙007)., Conclusions: Among a selected population at high risk for developing BM, PCI significantly decreased CBM in addition to increasing progression-free survival and OS. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate PCI in epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with NSCLC, showing a significant improvement in CBM. This relevant information should be of particular importance in the context of patients without access to third-generation targeted agents. Further studies are warranted to ascertain this effect., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several studies have shown that the non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) genomic background among Hispanics differs from other populations. The finding of low-frequency genomic alterations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can increase diagnostic accuracy and could improve treatment in NSCLC., Methods: Data from 54 Hispanic patients with advanced NSCLC with high clinical suspicion for ALK, EGFR, and ROS1 mutations were collected (including young age, female sex, and non-smokers). cfDNA was extracted from plasma and analyzed using a commercial next-generation sequencing test (Guardant360) which detects genomic alterations in 74 genes., Results: The median age was 56 years (range 31-83). Most patients were female (661.1%) and never smokers (72.3%). Among the patients included, 96% (52/54) had cfDNA detectable alterations with a mean number of 3.37 cfDNA alterations per test (range 1-10). cfDNA was able to detect some genomic alterations previously undetected by tissue biopsy. Among patients with insufficient or unavailable tissue to perform testing, mutations in EGFR and ALK which led to a change in therapy were determined using cfDNA in 28.8 and 3.8% of cases, respectively. Among patients with cfDNA alterations, 46.1% (n = 24) were switched to a targeted therapy with a median progression-free survival of 11.1 months (95% CI 7.6-14.6) and an overall survival of 40.3 months (95% CI 27.1-53.6). Concurrent genetic mutations with TP53 and KRAS negatively impacted the prognosis., Conclusions: In a selected population of NSCLC Hispanic patients, comprehensive cfDNA analysis allowed a treatment change in 46.1% of the cases. Guardant360 allows the identification of genomic alterations to improve treatment selection and increase prognosis., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: The association between cancer-induced weight-loss (CIWL) and poor clinical outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy is scarcely understood. We evaluated the use of a cachexia-grading system in IO-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in order to predict clinical outcomes., Materials: 300 patients with NSCLC, who received immunotherapy during any line of therapy, were included. All patients were graded according to a previously validated cachexia scale, which takes into consideration body mass index (BMI) and weight loss, stratifying patients into five risk categories (0 [pre-cachexia] - 4 [refractory cachexia]). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS)., Results: Ninety-one (30.3%) patients were classified in the low risk category, 176 (58.6%) were classified in the intermediate risk category and 33 (11%) were in the high risk category. Patients classified as low-risk had a significantly longer OS compared with those with intermediate or high risk (22.4 mo, [95%CI: 16.6-NR] vs. 17.1 [95%CI: 13.5-22.4] vs. 8.0 [3.9-18.4]; p  < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, hemoglobin and ORR, hazard of death increased as per the cachexia risk scale (Hazard ratio: 1.62 [1.22-2.16]; p  = 0.001)., Conclusion: Cachexia is independently associated with worse OS in NSCLC patients who receive immunotherapy, highlighting the role for nutritional assessment.

Background: Brigatinib has demonstrated its efficacy as first-line therapy and in further lines for ALK -positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, real-world data in Latin America are scarce. Methods: From January 2018 to March 2020, 46 patients with advanced ALK -positive NSCLC received brigatinib as second or further line of therapy in Mexico and Colombia. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end point was time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Results: At a median follow-up of 9.3 months, the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 11.6-18.8), and TTD was 18.46 months (95% CI: 9.54-27.38). The estimated overall survival at 12 months was 80%. Safety profile was consistent with previously published data. Conclusion: Brigatinib is an effective treatment for previously treated ALK -positive NSCLC patients in a real-world setting.

Background: The intestinal microbiota is an important factor in modulating immune-mediated tumor cell destruction. Alterations in the microbiome composition have been linked to reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. Therefore, antibiotic treatment (ATB), which modifies the diversity of the gut bacteria populations, could lead to a reduced efficacy of ICI treatments., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) alone, or in combination in three different countries in Latin America were included. After identification, patients were placed into three groups: Non-ATB exposed (no-ATB), exposed within 30 days of the first dose of ICI (pre-ICI ATB) and patients receiving ATB concomitantly with ICI (ICI-ATB). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rates to treatment with ICI were assessed., Results: A total of 140 patients were included, of which 32 patients (23%) received ATB treatment. The most common ATB types were fluoroquinolones and B-lactams. No differences in survival according to antibiotic type were identified. Median OS in patients not exposed to ATB was 40.6 months (95% CI: 32-67.7), compared with 20.3 months (95% CI: 12.1-non-reached [NR]) for patients with pre-ICI ATB treatment and 24.7 months (95% CI: 13-NR) for patients treated with ATB concomitantly with ICI. There were no significant differences in terms of PFS, or response rates across all treatment groups., Conclusions: Antibiotic treatment was associated with reduced OS in Hispanic patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs., (© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the cornerstone treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer that harbor oncogenic EGFR mutations. The counterpart of these drugs is the financial burden that they impose, which often creates a barrier for accessing treatment in developing countries. The aim if the present study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of three different first and second generation TKIs., Methods: We designed a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of three different TKIs (afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib) administered as first-line therapy for patients with NSCLC that harbor EGFR mutations., Results: We included 99 patients with the following TKI treatment; 40 treated with afatinib, 33 with gefitinib, and 26 with erlotinib. Median PFS was not significantly different between treatment groups; 15.4 months (95% CI 9.3-19.5) for afatinib; 9.0 months (95% CI 6.3- NA) for erlotinib; and 10.0 months (95% CI 7.46-14.6) for gefitinib. Overall survival was also similar between groups: 29.1 months (95% CI 25.4-NA) for afatinib; 27.1 months (95% CI 17.1- NA) for erlotinib; and 23.7 months (95% CI 18.6-NA) for gefitinib. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean TKIs costs; being afatinib the most expensive treatment. This difference was observed in the daily cost of treatment (p < 0.01), as well as the total cost of treatment (p = 0.00095). Cost-effectiveness analysis determined that afatinib was a better cost-effective option when compared with first-generation TKIs (erlotinib and gefitinib)., Conclusion: In our population, erlotinib, afatinib, and gefitinib were statistically equally effective in terms of OS and PFS for the treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC population. Owing to its marginally increased PFS and OS, the cost-effectiveness analysis determined that afatinib was a slightly better cost-effective option when compared with first-generation TKIs (erlotinib and gefitinib).

Importance: Because of socioeconomic factors, many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not receive immunotherapy in the first-line setting. It is unknown if the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide clinical benefits in immunotherapy-naive patients with disease progression after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy., Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC following platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of EGFR variants or programmed cell death ligand 1 status., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (PROLUNG) trial randomized 78 patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either pembrolizumab plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone from December 2016 through May 2019., Interventions: The experimental arm received docetaxel on day 1 (75 mg/m2) plus pembrolizumab on day 8 (200 mg) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles followed by pembrolizumab maintenance until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The control arm received docetaxel monotherapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety., Results: Among 78 recruited patients, 32 (41%) were men, 34 (44%) were never smokers, and 25 (32%) had an EGFR/ALK alteration. Forty patients were allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus docetaxel, and 38 were allocated to receive docetaxel. A statistically significant difference in ORR, assessed by an independent reviewer, was found in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus docetaxel vs patients receiving docetaxel (42.5% vs 15.8%; odds ratio, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.34-11.54; P = .01). Patients without EGFR variations had a considerable difference in ORR of 35.7% vs 12.0% (P = .06), whereas patients with EGFR variations had an ORR of 58.3% vs 23.1% (P = .14). Overall, PFS was longer in patients who received pembrolizumab plus docetaxel (9.5 months; 95% CI, 4.2-not reached) than in patients who received docetaxel (3.9 months; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7) (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.46; P < .001). For patients without variations, PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-not reached) vs 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.3) (P < .001), whereas in patients with EGFR variations, PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-not reached) vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.2) (P = .04). In terms of safety, 23% (9 of 40) vs 5% (2 of 38) of patients experienced grade 1 to 2 pneumonitis in the pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and docetaxel arms, respectively (P = .03), while 28% (11 of 40) vs 3% (1 of 38) experienced any-grade hypothyroidism (P = .002). No new safety signals were identified., Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 study, the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel was well tolerated and substantially improved ORR and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC who had previous progression after platinum-based chemotherapy, including NSCLC with EGFR variations., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02574598.

Background: To compare survival outcomes of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immunotherapy as first-, second- or beyond line, versus matched patients receiving standard chemotherapy with special characterization of hyperprogressors., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 296 patients with unresectable/metastatic NSCLC treated with either, first-, second-, third- or fourth-line of immunotherapy was conducted. A matched comparison with a historical cohort of first-line chemotherapy and a random forest tree analysis to characterize hyperprogressors was conducted., Results: Median age was 64 years (range 34-90), 40.2% of patients were female. A total of 91.2% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 1. Immunotherapy as first-line was given to 39 patients (13.7%), second-line to 140 (48.8%), and as third-line and beyond to 108 (37.6%). Median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI 9.67-14 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.27 months (95% CI 3.97-5.0). Factors associated with increased survival included treatment with immunotherapy as first-line (P < 0.001), type of response (P < 0.001) and PD-L1 status (P = 0.0039). Compared with the historical cohort, immunotherapy proved to be superior in terms of OS (P = 0.05) but not PFS (P = 0.2). A total of 44 hyperprogressors were documented (19.8%, [95% CI 14.5-25.1%]). Leukocyte count over 5.300 cells/dL was present in both hyperprogressors and long-term responders., Conclusions: Patients who receive immune-checkpoint inhibitors as part of their treatment for NSCLC have better overall survival (OS) compared with matched patients treated with standard chemotherapy, regardless of the line of treatment., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Precision oncology is the field that places emphasis on the diagnosis and treatment of tumors that harbor specific genomic alterations susceptible to inhibition or modulation. Although most alterations are only present in a minority of patients, a substantial effect on survival can be observed in this subgroup. Mass genome sequencing has led to the identification of a specific driver in the translocations of the tropomyosin receptor kinase family (NTRK) in a subset of rare tumors both in children and in adults, and to the development and investigation of Larotrectinib. This medication was granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for NTRK-positive tumors, regardless of histology or age group, as such, larotrectinib was the first in its kind to be approved under the premise that molecular pattern is more important than histology in terms of therapeutic approach. It yielded significant results in disease control with good tolerability across a wide range of diseases including rare pediatric tumors, salivary gland tumors, gliomas, soft-tissue sarcomas, and thyroid carcinomas. In addition, and by taking different approaches in clinical trial design and conducting allocation based on biomarkers, the effects of target therapies can be isolated and quantified. Moreover, and considering developing nations and resource-limited settings, precision oncology could offer a tool to reduce cancer-related disability and hospital costs. In addition, developing nations also present patients with rare tumors that lack a chance of treatment, outside of clinical trials. This, in turn, offers the possibility for international collaboration, and contributes to employment, education, and health service provisions. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Objective: To analyze the differences in the clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as the clinical outcome of patients by sex and hormonal status., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study among 1 104 NSCLC patients. Clinic-pathologic data was recorded and survival outcomes were compared between male and female sex patients, and further by pre and postmenopausal status in females., Results: Women were significantly more likely to be non-smokers (p<0.001), had higher frequency of wood-smoke exposure (p<0.001), EGFR-sensitizing mutations (p<0.001), had better performance status (p=0.020) and had a better overall survival (OS) compared to men (p=0.021). Differences were found also by hormonal status, postmenopausal women had a longer OS compared to premenopausal women (31.1 vs. 19.4 months p=0.046)., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Objective: Lung cancer is one the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Symptomatic manifestations of the disease generally occur in the advanced-stage setting, and therefore an important number of patients have advanced or metastatic disease by the time they are diagnosed. This situation contributes to a poor prognosis in the treatment of lung cancer. Evidencebased clinical recommendations are of great value to support decision-making for daily practice, and thus improving health care quality and patient outcomes., Materials and Methods: This document was an initiative of the Mexican Society of Oncology (SMEO) in collaboration with Mexican Center of Clinical Excellence (Cenetec) according to Interna- tional Standards. Such standards included those described by the IOM, NICE, SIGN and GI-N. An interdisciplinary Guideline Development Group (GDG) was put together which included medical oncologists, surgical oncologistsc, radiation therapists, and methodologists with expertise in critical appraisal, sys- tematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines development., Results: 62 clinical questions were agreed among members of the GDG. With the evidence identified from systematic reviews, the GDG developed clinical recommendations using a Modified Delphi Panel technique. Patients' representatives validated them., Conclusions: These Clinical Practice Guideline aims to support the shared decision-making process for patients with different stages of non-small cell lung cancer. Our goal is to improve health-care quality on these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Objectives: Evidence is rapidly accumulating for the use of radical consolidative treatment (RCT) for patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, published studies have several limitations, including a selection of patients whose favorable characteristics might dictate therapeutic success, as well as scarce prospective data regarding overall survival (OS). The objective of this study was to determine whether RCT increases OS in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC., Materials and Methods: In this prospective, single-arm phase II study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of RCT in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC in terms of OS. Patients with pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC who presented ≤5 synchronous, any-site metastases (including central nervous system [CNS] metastases), as assessed by PET-CT, were included. All patients received four initial cycles of systemic treatment. Following, those with stable disease/partial response received RCT to the primary site and metastases. The response to RCT was evaluated with PET-CT. The primary end-point was OS. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) and best response by PET-CT. The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02805530)., Results: Thirty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 55.8 years (range: 33-75 years). At diagnosis, 43.2% of patients presented with CNS metastases. Following RCT, 19 (51.4%) patients achieved a complete-response (CR) by PET-CT, while 18 (48.6%) had a non-complete response (NON-CR). The median OS was nonreached (NR) and was positively affected by CR on PET-CT (NR vs. 27.4 [95% CI: 16.4-38.3]; p = 0.011). The median PFS was 23.5 months (95% CI: 13.6-33.3) and was positively affected by CR on PET-CT (NR vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 11.7-16.9]; p < 0.001; HR: 0.19 [0.07-0.52]; p=0.001)., Conclusion: Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC who undergo RCT have a high response rate and favorable OS. Patients with a CR by PET-CT have significantly longer OS, rendering this an important potential prognostic marker., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)