Search

Rationale: Cough is a key symptom in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: This study evaluated the prevalence, longitudinal change, associations, and prognostic significance of cough severity in patients with fibrotic ILD. Methods: We included consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD who completed the 100-mm Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Baseline cough severity and associations with patient demographics and clinical factors were determined. Relationships between baseline cough severity and health outcomes were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with IPF ( n  = 1,061) had higher median baseline cough severity than those with non-IPF fibrotic ILD ( n  = 2,825) (24 vs. 20 mm; P  < 0.001), with worse cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease for both cohorts. Worse cough severity was independently associated with worse health-related quality of life at baseline, larger annualized decline in Dl CO , development of disease progression, and reduced transplant-free survival in both IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohorts. The IPF cohort (2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9 mm) had larger annualized increments in cough severity than the non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohort (1.1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4 mm; P  = 0.004). There was no difference in worsening cough over time comparing those receiving and not receiving ILD-targeted therapy or with and without lung function decline. Conclusions: Cough is common in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD, with increasing cough severity over time irrespective of ILD-targeted therapy. Patient-reported cough severity has prognostic implications on health-related quality of life, disease progression, and survival in fibrotic ILD.

Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in CTDs has highly variable morphology. We aimed to identify imaging features and their impact on ILD progression, mortality, and immunosuppression response., Methods: Patients with CTD-ILD had high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) reviewed by expert radiologists blinded to clinical data for overall imaging pattern [usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP); non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP); organizing pneumonia (OP); fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP); and other]. Transplant-free survival and change in percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) were compared using Cox and linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and baseline FVC. FVC decline after immunosuppression was compared with pre-treatment., Results: Among 645 CTD-ILD patients, the most frequent CTDs were SSc (n = 215), RA (n = 127), and inflammatory myopathies (n = 100). NSIP was the most common pattern (54%), followed by UIP (20%), fHP (9%), and OP (5%). Compared with the case for patients with UIP, FVC decline was slower in patients with NSIP (by 1.1%/year, 95% CI 0.2, 1.9) or OP (by 3.5%/year, 95% CI 2.0, 4.9), and mortality was lower in patients with NSIP [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.93] or OP (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05, 0.57), but higher in fHP (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01, 2.40). The extent of fibrosis also predicted FVC decline and mortality. After immunosuppression, FVC decline was slower compared with pre-treatment in NSIP (by 2.1%/year, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8), with no change for UIP or fHP., Conclusion: Multiple radiologic patterns are possible in CTD-ILD, including a fHP pattern. NSIP and OP were associated with better outcomes and response to immunosuppression, while fHP had worse survival compared with UIP., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Previous studies have shown the importance of frailty in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD)., Research Question: Is the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) a valid tool to improve risk stratification in patients with fibrotic ILD?, Study Design and Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were included from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. The CFS was assessed using available information from initial ILD clinic visits. Patients were stratified into fit (CFS score 1-3), vulnerable (CFS score 4), and frail (CFS score 5-9) subgroups. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models with mixed effects were used to estimate time to death or lung transplantation. A derivation and validation cohort was used to establish prognostic performance. Trajectories of functional tests were compared using joint models., Results: Of the 1,587 patients with fibrotic ILD, 858 (54%) were fit, 400 (25%) were vulnerable, and 329 (21%) were frail. Frailty was a risk factor for early mortality (hazard ratio, 5.58; 95% CI, 3.64-5.76, P < .001) in the entire cohort, in individual ILD diagnoses, and after adjustment for potential confounders. Adding frailty to established risk prediction parameters improved the prognostic performance in derivation and validation cohorts. Patients in the frail subgroup had larger annual declines in FVC % predicted than patients in the fit subgroup (-2.32; 95% CI, -3.39 to -1.17 vs -1.55; 95% CI, -2.04 to -1.15, respectively; P = .02)., Interpretation: The simple and practical CFS is associated with pulmonary and physical function decline in patients with fibrotic ILD and provides additional prognostic accuracy in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: A visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple and easily administered tool for measuring the impact of disease; however, little is known about the use of a dyspnea VAS in interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: To validate the use of a dyspnea VAS in a large and heterogeneous cohort of patients with fibrotic ILD, including its minimal clinically important difference (MCID), responsiveness to change, and prognostic significance. Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were identified from a large prospective registry. The validity of a 100-mm dyspnea VAS was assessed by testing its correlation in change score with other measures of ILD severity, including the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease quality of life questionnaire Breathlessness and Activities Domain, the European Quality of Life VAS, forced vital capacity, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. The responsiveness of the dyspnea VAS was qualitatively confirmed on the basis of there being an observable difference in the change in dyspnea VAS across tertiles of change in anchor variables. The MCID in dyspnea VAS was calculated using both anchor (linear regression) and distribution (one-half standard deviation) approaches, with anchors including the above variables that had a correlation with dyspnea VAS (| r | ≥ 0.30). The association of dyspnea VAS with time to death or transplant was determined. Results: The cohort included 826 patients with fibrotic ILD, including 127 patients with follow-up measurements at 6 months. The mean baseline dyspnea VAS was 53 ± 24 mm. Dyspnea VAS change scores were moderately correlated with the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (| r | = 0.55) and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease quality of life questionnaire Breathlessness and Activities Domain (| r | = 0.44) and weakly correlated with the European Quality of Life VAS (| r | = 0.19), forced vital capacity percent predicted (| r | = 0.21), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide percent predicted (| r | = 0.05). The MCID was 2.7 to 4.5 using the more reliable anchor-based methods and 12.0 based on distribution-based methods. Dyspnea VAS was associated with time to death or transplant in unadjusted models and after adjustment for age and sex (hazard ratios, 1.16 and 1.15, respectively; P  < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This study provides support for the use of the dyspnea VAS in patients with fibrotic ILD, with an estimated anchor-based MCID of 5 mm.

Background: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with abnormal oxygenation; however, little is known about the accuracy of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ) compared with arterial blood gas (ABG) saturation (SaO 2 ), the factors that influence the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) and the impact of PaCO 2 on outcomes in patients with fibrotic ILD., Study Design and Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD enrolled in a large prospective registry with a room air ABG were included. Prespecified analyses included testing the correlation between SaO 2 and SpO 2 , the difference between SaO 2 and SpO 2 , the association of baseline characteristics with both the difference between SaO 2 and SpO 2 and the PaCO 2 , the association of baseline characteristics with acid-base category, and the association of PaCO 2 and acid-base category with time to death or transplant., Results: A total of 532 patients with fibrotic ILD were included. Mean resting SaO 2 was 92±4% and SpO 2 was 95±3%. Mean PaCO 2 was 38±6 mmHg, with 135 patients having PaCO 2 <35 mmHg and 62 having PaCO 2 >45 mmHg. Correlation between SaO 2 and SpO 2 was mild to moderate (r=0.39), with SpO 2 on average 3.0% higher than SaO 2 . No baseline characteristics were associated with the difference in SaO 2 and SpO 2 . Variables associated with either elevated or abnormal (elevated or low) PaCO 2 included higher smoking pack-years and lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC). Lower baseline lung function was associated with an increased risk of chronic respiratory acidosis. PaCO 2 and acid-base status were not associated with time to death or transplant., Interpretation: SaO 2 and SpO 2 are weakly-to-moderately correlated in fibrotic ILD, with limited ability to accurately predict this difference. Abnormal PaCO 2 was associated with baseline FVC but was not associated with outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MAD reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. KD reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. DA reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research and from Fonds de Recherche du Quebec en Santé. CD reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. JHF reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. KJ reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, University of Calgary School of Medicine; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, Theravance, Blade Therapeutics. MK reports grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris, Prometic; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, European Respiratory Journal, Belerophon, United Therapeutics, Nitto Denko, MitoImmune, Pieris, AbbVie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring. SDL reports consulting/personal fees and moderator honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim, honoraria from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, grants from AstraZeneca and the University of Saskatchewan. HM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead. VM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Roche; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. BM reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. JM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. D-CM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. CJR reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla, Veracyte., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment for patients with SSc-ILD are primarily consensus based. Methods: An international expert guideline committee composed of 24 individuals with expertise in rheumatology, SSc, pulmonology, ILD, or methodology, and with personal experience with SSc-ILD, discussed systematic reviews of the published evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists. The confidence in effect estimates, importance of outcomes studied, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications for health equity were all considered in making the recommendations. This was in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guideline development process, which is in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. Results: For treatment of patients with SSc-ILD, the committee: 1 ) recommends the use of mycophenolate; 2 ) recommends further research into the safety and efficacy of ( a ) pirfenidone and ( b ) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3 ) suggests the use of ( a ) cyclophosphamide, ( b ) rituximab, ( c ) tocilizumab, ( d ) nintedanib, and ( e ) the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Conclusions: The recommendations herein provide an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the treatment of patients with SSc-ILD and are intended to serve as the basis for informed and shared decision making by clinicians and patients.

Background: Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has features of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), but without meeting criteria for a specific CTD. We compared baseline characteristics, survival, and response to treatment of IPAF to both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD., Methods: Measurements were extracted from a prospective registry. Baseline features and survival were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD. Linear trajectory of lung function decline (%-predicted forced vital capacity [FVC%] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO%]) before and after initiation of mycophenolate or azathioprine were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD using linear mixed models., Results: Compared to CTD-ILD (n = 1240), patients with IPAF (n = 128) were older, more frequently male, and had greater smoking history. Compared to unclassifiable ILD (n = 665), patients with IPAF were younger, more frequently female, and had worse baseline lung function. IPAF had higher mortality compared to CTD-ILD and similar risk of mortality compared to unclassifiable ILD. Mycophenolate initiation was associated with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% in patients with IPAF, and azathioprine initiation with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% decline in IPAF and DLCO% decline in CTD-ILD., Conclusion: Patients with IPAF had worse survival compared to those with CTD-ILD and similar mortality to unclassifiable ILD, with treatment being associated with stabilization in lung function in all three ILDs. It is uncertain whether IPAF should be considered a distinct ILD diagnostic subgroup., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CJR, NK, KAJ, DA, HM, JF, MK, NH, SV report personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: SV reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: JA reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: BZ reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Donohoe reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: N. Hambly reports grants from Roche and Janssen; personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Janssen. Conflict of interest: K.A. Johannson reports grants from Three Lakes and University Hospital Foundation. K.J. reports consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Pliant Therapeutics, Three Lakes, Thyron and Brainomix. Conflict of interest: D. Assayag reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: J. Fisher reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: V. Marcoux reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd and Astra Zeneca, grants from the University of Saskatchewan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Hoffman-La Roche. VM reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. Conflict of interest: H. Manganas reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, Hoffmann La Roche, Galapagos, BMS. Conflict of interest: N. Khalil reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla Abbvie, Bellerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics, LabCorp, Structure Therapeutics and Astra Zeneca. M. Kolb reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics and Structure Therapeutics. M. Kolb reports payment for expert testimony from Roche. Conflict of interest: C.J. Ryerson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Trevi Therapeutics, Pliant Therapeutics, Astrazeneca and Veracyte., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Hypoxemia in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) indicates disease progression and is of prognostic significance. The onset of hypoxemia signifies disease progression and predicts mortality in fibrotic ILD. Accurately predicting new-onset exertional and resting hypoxemia prompts appropriate patient discussion and timely consideration of home oxygen. Objectives: We derived and externally validated a risk prediction tool for both new-onset exertional and new-onset resting hypoxemia. Methods: This study used ILD registries from Canada for the derivation cohort and from Australia and the United States for the validation cohort. New-onset exertional and resting hypoxemia were defined as nadir oxyhemoglobin saturation < 88% during 6-minute-walk tests, resting oxyhemoglobin saturation < 88%, or the initiation of ambulatory or continuous oxygen. Candidate predictors included patient demographics, ILD subtypes, and pulmonary function. Time-varying Cox regression was used to identify the top-performing prediction model according to Akaike information criterion and clinical usability. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index and goodness-of-fit (GoF) likelihood ratio test. A categorized risk prediction tool was developed. Results: The best-performing prediction model for both new-onset exertional and new-onset resting hypoxemia included age, body mass index, a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and percent predicted forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide. The risk prediction tool exhibited good performance for exertional hypoxemia (C-index, 0.70; GoF, P  = 0.85) and resting hypoxemia (C-index, 0.77; GoF, P  = 0.27) in the derivation cohort, with similar performance in the validation cohort except calibration for resting hypoxemia (GoF, P  = 0.001). Conclusions: This clinically applicable risk prediction tool predicted new-onset exertional and resting hypoxemia at 6 months in the derivation cohort and a diverse validation cohort. Suboptimal GoF in the validation cohort likely reflected overestimation of hypoxemia risk and indicated that the model is not flawed because of underestimation of hypoxemia.

Introduction: In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), nintedanib slowed the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC; mL/year) over 52 weeks compared with placebo. We assessed the efficacy of nintedanib across subgroups in the INBUILD trial by baseline characteristics., Methods: We assessed the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks and time to progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (absolute decline from baseline in FVC % predicted > 10%) or death over the whole trial in subgroups based on sex, age, race, body mass index (BMI), time since diagnosis of ILD, FVC % predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted, composite physiologic index (CPI), GAP (gender, age, lung physiology) stage, use of anti-acid therapy and use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at baseline., Results: The effect of nintedanib versus placebo on reducing the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks was consistent across the subgroups by baseline characteristics analysed. Interaction p values did not indicate heterogeneity in the treatment effect between these subgroups (p > 0.05). Over the whole trial (median follow-up time ∼19 months), progression of ILD or death occurred in similar or lower proportions of patients treated with nintedanib than placebo across the subgroups analysed, with no heterogeneity detected between the subgroups., Conclusions: In the INBUILD trial, no heterogeneity was detected in the effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of ILD progression across subgroups based on demographics, ILD severity or use of anti-acid therapy or DMARDs. These data support the use of nintedanib as a treatment for progressive pulmonary fibrosis., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02999178., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Clinical practice guidelines separately describe radiologic patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), without direction on whether or how to apply these approaches concurrently within a single patient., Research Question: How can we integrate guideline-defined radiologic patterns to diagnose interstitial lung disease (ILD) and what are the pitfalls associated with described patterns that require reassessment in future guidelines?, Study Design and Methods: Patients from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis underwent detailed reevaluation in standardized multidisciplinary discussion. CT scan features were quantified by chest radiologists masked to clinical data, and guideline-defined patterns were assigned. Clinical data then were provided to the radiologist and an ILD clinician, who jointly determined the leading diagnosis., Results: Clinical-radiologic diagnosis in 1,593 patients was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in 26%, fHP in 12%, connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) in 34%, idiopathic pneumonia with autoimmune features in 12%, and unclassifiable ILD in 10%. Typical and probable UIP patterns corresponded to a diagnosis of IPF in 66% and 57% of patients, respectively. Typical fHP pattern corresponded to an fHP clinical diagnosis in 65% of patients, whereas compatible fHP was nonspecific and associated with CTD-ILD or IPAF in 48% of patients. No pattern ruled out CTD-ILD. Gas trapping affecting > 5% of lung parenchyma on expiratory imaging was an important feature broadly separating compatible and typical fHP from other patterns (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.91)., Interpretation: An integrated approach to guideline-defined UIP and fHP patterns is feasible and supports > 5% gas trapping as an important branch point. Typical or probable UIP and typical fHP patterns have moderate predictive values for a corresponding diagnosis of IPF and fHP, although occasionally confounded by CTD-ILD; compatible fHP is nonspecific., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Some patients with rheumatoid arthritis develop interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) that develops into progressive pulmonary fibrosis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib versus placebo in patients with progressive RA-ILD in the INBUILD trial., Methods: The INBUILD trial enrolled patients with fibrosing ILD (reticular abnormality with traction bronchiectasis, with or without honeycombing) on high-resolution computed tomography of >10% extent. Patients had shown progression of pulmonary fibrosis within the prior 24 months, despite management in clinical practice. Subjects were randomised to receive nintedanib or placebo., Results: In the subgroup of 89 patients with RA-ILD, the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks was -82.6 mL/year in the nintedanib group versus -199.3 mL/year in the placebo group (difference 116.7 mL/year [95% CI 7.4, 226.1]; nominal p = 0.037). The most frequent adverse event was diarrhoea, which was reported in 61.9% and 27.7% of patients in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, over the whole trial (median exposure: 17.4 months). Adverse events led to permanent discontinuation of trial drug in 23.8% and 17.0% of subjects in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively., Conclusions: In the INBUILD trial, nintedanib slowed the decline in FVC in patients with progressive fibrosing RA-ILD, with adverse events that were largely manageable. The efficacy and safety of nintedanib in these patients were consistent with the overall trial population. A graphical abstract is available at: https://www.globalmedcomms.com/respiratory/INBUILD&#95;RA-ILD . Key Points • In patients with rheumatoid arthritis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (mL/year) over 52 weeks by 59% compared with placebo. • The adverse event profile of nintedanib was consistent with that previously observed in patients with pulmonary fibrosis, characterised mainly by diarrhoea. • The effect of nintedanib on slowing decline in forced vital capacity, and its safety profile, appeared to be consistent between patients who were taking DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline and the overall population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Objective: In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) with an adverse event profile characterized mainly by gastrointestinal events. We analysed the effects of nintedanib in the subset of Asian subjects., Methods: Subjects with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who had shown progression of ILD at any time within the prior 24 months despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. We analysed the rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks in all Asian subjects and in Asian subjects with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like fibrotic pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)., Results: One hundred sixty-four subjects in the INBUILD trial were of Asian race. The rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks in this subgroup was -116.8 in the nintedanib group and -207.9 in the placebo group (difference: 91.0 [95% CI: 8.1, 173.9]; nominal p = 0.03). In Asian subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT, the rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks was -130.1 in the nintedanib group and -224.2 in the placebo group (difference: 94.1 [5.5, 182.7]; nominal p = 0.04). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 19.0% of the nintedanib group and 13.8% of the placebo group., Conclusion: In Asian patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in FVC with adverse events that were manageable for most patients., (© 2023 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the representative phenotype of interstitial lung disease where severe scarring develops in the lung interstitium. Although antifibrotic treatments are available and have been shown to slow the progression of IPF, improved therapeutic options are still needed. Recent data indicate that macrophages play essential pro-fibrotic roles in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Historically, macrophages have been classified into two functional subtypes, "M1″ and "M2," and it is well described that "M2″ or "alternatively activated" macrophages contribute to fibrosis via the production of fibrotic mediators, such as TGF-β, CTGF, and CCL18. However, highly plastic macrophages may possess distinct functions and phenotypes in the fibrotic lung environment. Thus, M2-like macrophages in vitro and pro-fibrotic macrophages in vivo are not completely identical cell populations. Recent developments in transcriptome analysis, including single-cell RNA sequencing, have attempted to depict more detailed phenotypic characteristics of pro-fibrotic macrophages. This review will outline the role and characterization of pro-fibrotic macrophages in fibrotic lung diseases and discuss the possibility of treating lung fibrosis by preventing or reprogramming the polarity of macrophages. We also utilized a systematic approach to review the literature and identify novel and promising therapeutic agents that follow this treatment strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Biological sex, gender, and race are important considerations in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs)., Research Question: Does a patient's sex assigned at birth, and race, influence ILD treatment initiation?, Study Design and Methods: Patients with ILD from three longitudinal prospective registries were compared in this observational study. ILD-related medications included antifibrotics and immunomodulating medications. Race was dichotomized as "White" vs "non-White." Time to treatment initiation was determined from the date of the initial ILD registry visit to the date of first medication initiation. Proportions of treated patients were compared between groups by χ 2 test. Cox proportional analysis was used to determine how sex and race were associated with time to treatment initiation stratified by ILD diagnosis., Results: A total of 4,572 patients were included across all cohorts. The proportion of men who received treatment was higher than for women in the Canadian cohort (47% vs 40%; P < .001), and the proportion of White patients who received treatment was also higher compared with non-White patients (46% vs 36%; P < .001). In contrast, the proportion of treated men in the Chicago cohort was lower compared with women (56% vs 64%; P = .005), and that of White patients was lower compared with non-White patients (56% vs 69%; P < .001). No sex- or race-based differences in proportions of patients treated were found in the Australasian cohort. White race was significantly associated with earlier treatment initiation compared with non-White race across diagnoses in the Canadian cohort, whereas the opposite association was found in the Australasian cohort., Interpretation: Sex- and race-based differences exist in the initiation of ILD treatment, with variability across different cohorts in different countries. Reasons for these differences need to be further explored in future studies., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) includes a large group of conditions that lead to scarring of the lungs. The lack of available 5-level EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) data has limited the ability to conduct economic evaluations in ILD. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a mapping algorithm that predicts EQ5D utilities from commonly collected pulmonary function measurements (forced vital capacity [FVC] and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO]) in fibrotic ILDs., Methods: EQ5D utility and pulmonary function measurements from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were included. Ordinary least squares (OLS), beta regression, two-part, and tobit models were used to map EQ5D utilities from FVC or DLCO. Model performance was assessed by comparing the predicted and observed utilities. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to test how well models performed across different patient characteristics. The models were then externally validated in the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry., Results: The OLS model performed as well as other more complex models (root mean squared error: 0.17 for FVC and 0.16 for DLCO). As with the other models, the OLS algorithm performed well across the different subgroups (except for EQ5D utilities < 0.5) and in the external validation cohort., Conclusion: We developed a mapping algorithm that predicts EQ5D utilities from FVC and DLCO, with the intent that this algorithm can be applied to clinical trial populations and real-world cohorts that have not prioritized collection of health-related utilities. The mapping algorithm can be used in future economic evaluations of potential ILD therapies., Competing Interests: Drs. Wong, Johannson, Marcoux, Assayag, Manganas, Kolb, Ryerson report personal fees and/or grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Drs. Marcoux, Assayag, Kolb, and Ryerson report grants and/or personal fees from Roche Canada, outside the submitted work. Dr. Marcoux reports grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Drs. Wong and Assayag report personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Johannson reports grants from The Chest Foundation, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, UCB Biopharma SPRL and personal fees from Blade Therapeutics, Theravance, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., outside the submitted work. Dr. Manganas reports grants from Galapagos, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kolb reports grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research, grants and personal fees from Prometic, other from European Respiratory Journal, personal fees from Third Pole, MitoImmune, Abbvie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring, and grants and personal fees from Pieris, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ryerson reports personal fees from Pliant Therapeutics and Veracyte, outside the submitted work;. Drs. Sun, Cox, Fisher, Khalil, Palmer, de Graaff, Walters, Hopkins, Zappala, Goh, Moodley, Navaratnam, Corte, and Zhang report nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2023 Wong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.K. Rajan reports grants to their institution, consulting fees and lecture fees from Cipla and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from the Indian Chest Society; and support from Cipla to attend a European Respiratory Society meeting, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. V. Cottin reports an unrestricted grant to their institution from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Fibrogen, RedX Pharma and PureTech; payment or honoraria and support for attending meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche/Promedior, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb and Galapagos, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. R. Dhar reports external expert contracts from Cipla and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from the Indian Chest Society, Cipla and Boehringer Ingelheim; and support for attendance at a European Respiratory Society meeting from Cipla. S. Danoff reports grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb (Myositis ILD Trial), Boehringer Ingelheim (INBUILD and INBUILD-ON Trials) and Roche/Genentech (TRAIL Trial); royalties from UpToDate; advisory board fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Lupin Pharma; payment for presentations from the France Foundation; funding for travel to present lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim; and participation on data safety monitoring boards for Galecto and Galapagos, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as a role as senior medical adviser and interim CMO for the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and membership of the board of directors of the American Thoracic Society. K.R. Flaherty reports research grants paid to their institution by Boehringer Ingelheim; and consulting fees paid to them by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Blade Therapeutics, Shionogi, DevPro, AstraZeneca, Pure Health, Fibrogen, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Pliant, United Therapeutics, Arrowhead, Lupin, Polarean and PureTech, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. K.K. Brown reports lung fibrosis research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; being an external science advisor to AbbVie, CSL Behring, Dispersol, Huitai Biomedicine, Lilly, RedX Pharma, Theravance and Translate Bio; being a DMC chair for Biogen; scientific advisory board membership for Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, DevPro Biopharma, Galapagos NV, Galecto, Open Source Imaging Consortium, Pliant, Sanofi and Third Pole; DMC membership for Humanetics; and a scientific collaboration with Sekisui Medical Co., all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as leadership or fiduciary roles for the Fleischner Society and Open Source Imaging Consortium. A. Mohan declares no competing interests. E. Renzoni declares a research contract payment and advisory board meeting payment to their institution by Boehringer Ingelheim; lecture fees paid to their institution by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Chiesi; and registration and travel expenses for the American Thoracic Society conference, paid by Boehringer Ingelheim, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. M. Mohan reports no competing interests. Z. Udwadia reports no competing interests. P. Shenoy reports no competing interests. D. Currow reports intellectual property payments and royalties from Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd, a manufacturer of sustained-release morphine; and consulting fees from Helsinn Pharmaceuticals, in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as leadership or fiduciary roles for the Dust Diseases Board of New South Wales and the Board of the Cancer Institute NSW. A. Devraj reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Galecto, Galapagos, Brainomix and Vicore, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. B. Jankharia reports payment or honoraria to their institution from Cipla India, Lupin India, Boehringer Ingelheim and German Remedies India, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as being a past president of the Indian Musculoskeletal Society and the Indian Radiology and Imaging Association. R. Kulshrestha reports no competing interests. S. Jones reports grants to their institution from Boehringer Ingelheim and Trevi for being Chair of Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis (APF) and President of the European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation (EU-IPFF) (both these organisations implement projects in partnership with industry; the author is not involved in these projects and does not gain personally); reports payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Vicore and Roche (paid to their institution); and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board as Galecto DSMB for an anti-fibrotic therapy, in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. C. Ravaglia reports no competing interests. S. Quadrelli reports speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. R. Iyer reports no competing interests. S. Dhooria reports no competing interests. M. Kolb reports research funding for pre-clinical work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Pieris; research funding for a clinical project from Roche; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla, AbbVie, Belerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; payment for court testimony from Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Covance and United Therapeutics; and an allowance paid to their institution from the European Respiratory Society relating to their duties as European Respiratory Journal Chief Editor, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. A.U. Wells reports payments or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Veracyte, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Patients with interstitial lung disease can develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterised by an irreversible, progressive decline in lung function despite treatment. Current therapies slow, but do not reverse or stop, disease progression and are associated with side-effects that can cause treatment delay or discontinuation. Most crucially, mortality remains high. There is an unmet need for more efficacious and better-tolerated and -targeted treatments for pulmonary fibrosis. Pan-phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been investigated in respiratory conditions. However, the use of oral inhibitors can be complicated due to class-related systemic adverse events, including diarrhoea and headaches. The PDE4B subtype, which has an important role in inflammation and fibrosis, has been identified in the lungs. Preferentially targeting PDE4B has the potential to drive anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects via a subsequent increase in cAMP, but with improved tolerability. Phase I and II trials of a novel PDE4B inhibitor in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have shown promising results, stabilising pulmonary function measured by change in forced vital capacity from baseline, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Further research into the efficacy and safety of PDE4B inhibitors in larger patient populations and for a longer treatment period is needed., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Kolb declares research funding for pre-clinical work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Pieris, and research funding for clinical work from Roche; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla, AbbVie, Bellerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics and LabCorp; payment or honoraria from Roche, Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim; payment for expert testimony from Roche; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for United Therapeutics and LabCorp; and received an allowance as the chief editor of the European Respiratory Journal. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani declares grants or contracts from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; personal consulting fees from Apellis; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Chiesi; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs or other services from Translate Bio. Conflict of interest: T.M. Maher declares consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blade Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Galecto, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Pliant, Respivant, Theravance and Veracyte; and payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: Functional capacity, as measured by the 6-min walk test (6MWT), is often reduced in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). This study evaluated longitudinal changes and the prognostic significance of 6MWT parameters, and explored change in oxygenation status as a physiological criterion to define disease progression in patients with fibrotic ILD., Research Questions: What are the trajectories and prognostic value of 6MWT parameters in patients with fibrotic ILD?, Study Design and Methods: Using prospective registries in Australia and Canada, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD were stratified by the presence of criteria for progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). The cumulative incidence of exertional and resting hypoxemia and changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and composite indices (distance-saturation product and distance-saturation-oxygen product) were determined, with prognostic significance evaluated at the time of meeting criteria for PPF. New-onset exertional or resting hypoxemia was evaluated as another potential criterion for PPF., Results: Patients with IPF/PPF (n = 126) and non-IPF/PPF (n = 227) had a similar cumulative incidence of exertional hypoxemia and annualized decline in 6MWD and composite indices, which varied across each PPF criterion. Patients with IPF/non-PPF (n = 231) and non-IPF/non-PPF (n = 531) had a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia than those with IPF/PPF, with an annualized increase in 6MWD and composite indices in the non-IPF/non-PPF group. Exertional or resting hypoxemia at the time of meeting criteria for PPF was independently associated with reduced transplant-free survival in IPF and non-IPF, adjusting for patient demographics and lung function. Adding new-onset exertional or resting hypoxemia as a physiological criterion reduced the median time to development of PPF from 11.2 to 6.7 months in IPF and from 11.7 to 5.6 months in non-IPF in patients who eventually met both definitions (P < .001 for both)., Interpretation: Patients with IPF/PPF and non-IPF/PPF have comparable deterioration in functional capacity. Oxygenation status provides prognostic information in PPF and may assist in defining disease progression in fibrotic ILD., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Interstitial lung disease is a known complication of rheumatoid arthritis, with a lifetime risk of developing the disease in any individual of 7·7%. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pirfenidone for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD)., Methods: TRAIL1 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 34 academic centres specialising in interstitial lung disease in four countries (the UK, the USA, Australia, and Canada). Adults aged 18-85 years were eligible for inclusion if they met the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and had interstitial lung disease on a high-resolution CT scan imaging and, when available, lung biopsy. Exclusion criteria include smoking, clinical history of other known causes of interstitial lung disease, and coexistant clinically significant COPD or asthma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2403 mg oral pirfenidone (pirfenidone group) or placebo (placebo group) daily. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the composite endpoint of a decline from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) of 10% or more or death during the 52-week treatment period assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary endpoints included change in absolute and FVC% over 52 weeks, the proportion of patients with a decline in FVC% of 10% or more, and the frequency of progression as defined by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02808871., Findings: From May 15, 2017, to March 31, 2020, 231 patients were assessed for inclusion, of whom 123 patients were randomly assigned (63 [51%] to the pirfenidone group and 60 [49%] to the placebo group). The trial was stopped early (March 31, 2020) due to slow recruitment and the COVID-19 pandemic. The difference in the proportion of patients who met the composite primary endpoint (decline in FVC% from baseline of 10% or more or death) between the two groups was not significant (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the pirfenidone group vs nine [15%] of 60 patients in the placebo group; OR 0·67 [95% CI 0·22 to 2·03]; p=0·48). Compared with the placebo group, patients in the pirfenidone group had a slower rate of decline in lung function, measured by estimated annual change in absolute FVC (-66 vs -146; p=0·0082) and FVC% (-1·02 vs -3·21; p=0·0028). The groups were similar with regards to the decline in FVC% by 10% or more (five [8%] participants in the pirfenidone group vs seven [12%] in the placebo group; OR 0·52 [95% CI 0·14-1·90]; p=0·32) and the frequency of progression as defined by OMERACT (16 [25%] in the pirfenidone group vs 19 [32%] in the placebo group; OR 0·68 [0·30-1·54]; p=0·35). There was no significant difference in the rate of treatment-emergent serious adverse events between the two groups, and there were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Due to early termination of the study and underpowering, the results should be interpreted with caution. Despite not meeting the composite primary endpoint, pirfenidone slowed the rate of decline of FVC over time in patients with RA-ILD. Safety in patients with RA-ILD was similar to that seen in other pirfenidone trials., Funding: Genentech., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SKD reports grants and salary support from Brigham and Women's Hospital, during the study; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees and non-financial support from Galaplagos; personal fees from Galecto, and Lupin Pharma; grants from Bristol Meyers Squibb; salary support from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, and Royalties for Topics on systemic erythematous pneumonia- interstitial lung disease and myositis- interstitial lung disease from UpToDate, outside the submitted work. IG reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and personal fees from Ad Alta, Amplia, Accendatech, and Lassen, outside the submitted work. PFD served on an unpaid advisory committee at Boehringer Ingleheim, and reports receiving non-financial support for serving as a site-principal investigator for Bristol Myers and Genentech, outside the submitted work. RV reports grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Sun Pharma, outside the submitted work. PGC reports grants from InterMune, outside the submitted work. KRF reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Roche/Genentech, Bellerophon, Respivant, Shionogi, DevPro, AstraZeneca, Pure Health, Horizon, Fibrogen, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Pliant, United Therapeutics, Arrowhead, Lupin, Polarean, Pure Tech, Trevi Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Daewong, DevPro, Dispersol, Immumet, and NeRRe Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. LT reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. MBS reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Veracyte, and Genentech; financial support from Genentech, United Therapeutics, Veracyte; honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics, and Veracyte, and meeting and travel support from Genentech and the American College of Chest Physicians. NC reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Redex, Novartis, Liminal Biosciences, Vicor Pharma, Bridge Biotherapeutics, and Roche, outside the submitted work. DAL reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and grants and personal fees from Calyx, outside the submitted work; DAL has a patent issued on systems and methods for automatic detection and quantification of pathology using dynamic feature classification (US10706533B2). DCC reports that Roche/Genentech provided the investigational medicinal product free of charge during the study; and that he served as principal investigator for a trial site in a Roche sponsored study outside the submitted work, in which per patient fees were paid to the site. MK reports grants from Genentech, during the study; grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and Canadian Institute for Health Research; an allowance as chief editor from European Respiratory Journal; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche Canada; and personal fees from Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring, and DevPro; and served as a site principal investigator for industry sponsored clinical trials (Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim); outside the submitted work. GR served as a consultant/steering committee member for IPF and PPF studies for Roche/Genentech and served on a data safety monitoring board for an IPF study (Avalyn), outside the submitted work. HJG reports receiving support to participate as a member of the Clinical Coordinating Center and coprincipal investigator, from Genentech, during the study. FAW is currently an employee at Avalyn. IOR reports grants from Genentech/Roche, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Genentech/Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Immunomet, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is characterised by progressive physiological, symptomatic and/or radiographic worsening. The real-world prevalence and characteristics of PF-ILD remain uncertain., Methods: Patients were enrolled from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis between 2015 and 2020. PF-ILD was defined as a relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥10%, death, lung transplantation or any two of: relative FVC decline ≥5% and <10%, worsening respiratory symptoms or worsening fibrosis on computed tomography of the chest, all within 24 months of diagnosis. Time-to-event analysis compared progression between key diagnostic subgroups. Characteristics associated with progression were determined by multivariable regression., Results: Of 2746 patients with fibrotic ILD (mean±sd age 65±12 years; 51% female), 1376 (50%) met PF-ILD criteria in the first 24 months of follow-up. PF-ILD occurred in 427 (59%) patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 125 (58%) with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), 281 (51%) with unclassifiable ILD (U-ILD) and 402 (45%) with connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD). Compared with IPF, time to progression was similar in patients with HP (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.79-1.17), but was delayed in patients with U-ILD (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96) and CTD-ILD (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.74). Background treatment varied across diagnostic subtypes, with 66% of IPF patients receiving antifibrotic therapy, while immunomodulatory therapy was utilised in 49%, 61% and 37% of patients with CHP, CTD-ILD and U-ILD, respectively. Increasing age, male sex, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lower baseline pulmonary function were independently associated with progression., Conclusions: Progression is common in patients with fibrotic ILD, and is similarly prevalent in HP and IPF. Routinely collected variables help identify patients at risk for progression and may guide therapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.M. Farooqi reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: A. Dvorkin-Gheva reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Donohoe reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Garlick was an employee for the medical department of Boehringer Ingelheim at the time of the preparation of this manuscript. Conflict of interest: C. Scallan reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: S.G. Chong reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: S. MacIsaac reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: D. Assayag reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: K.A. Johannson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary and University of Calgary School of Medicine; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, Theravance and Blade Therapeutics. Conflict of interest: C.D. Fell reports educational grants and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation; personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; Chair of the Boards for the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: V. Marcoux reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Roche; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: H. Manganas reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead. Conflict of interest: J. Morisset reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: A. Comes reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: J.H. Fisher reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: S. Shapera reports educational grants and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman La-Roche Canada; served on the medical advisory board for the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: A.S. Gershon reports a research grant from the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: T. To reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: A.W. Wong reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: M. Sadatsafavi reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: P.G. Wilcox reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: A.J. Halayko reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: N. Khalil reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: G. Cox reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: L. Richeldi reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, Celgene, RespiVant, CSL Behring, Nitto, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla, Zambon, Promedior, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Fibrogen. Conflict of interest: C.J. Ryerson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla and Veracyte. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris and Prometic; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, European Respiratory Journal, Belerophon, United Therapeutics, Nitto Denko, MitoImmune, Pieris, AbbVie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon and CSL Behring. Conflict of interest: N. Hambly reports grants from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background and Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a frequent cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, the impact of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity in ILD without connective tissue disease (CTD) is unclear. We examined the association of seropositivity with ILD progression, mortality and response to immunosuppression in non-CTD ILD., Methods: A total of 1570 non-CTD patients (with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features or unclassifiable ILD) and 181 RA-ILD patients were included from a prospective registry. Longitudinal forced vital capacity (FVC), transplant-free survival and incidence of progressive fibrosing-ILD (PF-ILD) were compared between seronegative non-CTD ILD (reference group), seropositive non-CTD ILD and RA-ILD using linear mixed-effect and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, smoking pack-years and baseline FVC. Interaction between seropositivity and immunosuppression on FVC decline was assessed in patients with ≥6 months of follow-up before and after the treatment., Results: Two hundred and seventeen (13.8%) patients with seropositive non-CTD ILD had similar rates of FVC decline and transplant-free survival compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD, but more frequently met the criteria for PF-ILD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35, p = 0.004). RA-ILD had slower FVC decline (p = 0.03), less PF-ILD (HR = 0.75, p = 0.03) and lower likelihood of lung transplant or death (HR = 0.66, p = 0.01) compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD. No interaction was found between seropositivity and treatment on FVC decline in non-CTD ILD., Conclusion: Seropositivity in non-CTD ILD was not associated with improved outcomes or treatment response, highlighting the importance of other disease features in determining prognosis and predicting response to immunosuppression., (© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background: When considering the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), experienced clinicians integrate clinical features that help to differentiate IPF from other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, thus generating a "pre-test" probability of IPF. The aim of this international working group perspective was to summarize these features using a tabulated approach similar to chest HRCT and histopathologic patterns reported in the international guidelines for the diagnosis of IPF, and to help formally incorporate these clinical likelihoods into diagnostic reasoning to facilitate the diagnosis of IPF. Methods: The committee group identified factors that influence the clinical likelihood of a diagnosis of IPF, which was categorized as a pre-test clinical probability of IPF into "high" (70-100%), "intermediate" (30-70%), or "low" (0-30%). After integration of radiological and histopathological features, the post-test probability of diagnosis was categorized into "definite" (90-100%), "high confidence" (70-89%), "low confidence" (51-69%), or "low" (0-50%) probability of IPF. Findings: A conceptual Bayesian framework was created, integrating the clinical likelihood of IPF ("pre-test probability of IPF") with the HRCT pattern, the histopathology pattern when available, and/or the pattern of observed disease behavior, into a "post-test probability of IPF." The diagnostic probability of IPF was expressed using an adapted diagnostic ontology for fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Interpretation: The present approach will help incorporate the clinical judgment into the diagnosis of IPF, thus facilitating the application of IPF diagnostic guidelines and, ultimately improving diagnostic confidence and reducing the need for invasive diagnostic techniques.

Background and Objective: Inhalational exposures are a known cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but little is understood about their prevalence across ILD subtypes and their relationship with pulmonary function and survival., Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were identified from the multicentre Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Patients completed questionnaires regarding ILD-related occupational and environmental exposures. The relationship between exposures and the outcomes of baseline age, gender, family history, pulmonary function and survival was analysed using linear and logistic regression models, linear mixed-effect regression models and survival analysis using multivariable Cox proportional hazards along with the log-rank test., Results: There were 3820 patients included in this study, with 2385 (62%) having ILD-related inhalational exposure. Exposed patients were younger, particularly in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis subgroup. Inhalational exposure was associated with male gender (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28-1.68, p < 0.001) and family history of pulmonary fibrosis (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.40-2.15, p < 0.001). Patients with any inhalational exposure had improved transplant-free survival (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, p = 0.001); this effect persisted across diagnostic subtypes. The relationship between exposures and annual change in forced vital capacity varied by ILD subtype., Conclusion: Patients with fibrotic ILD report high prevalence of inhalational exposures across ILD subtypes. These exposures were associated with younger age at diagnosis, male gender and family history of pulmonary fibrosis. Identification of an inhalational exposure was associated with a survival benefit. These findings suggest that inhaled exposures may impact clinical outcomes in patients with ILD, and future work should characterize the mechanisms underlying these relationships., (© 2022 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Rationale: Multimorbidity is common and leads to substantial concomitant medication burden in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), which may affect tolerability of ILD-targeted medications and health outcomes. Objectives: To determine the associations of concomitant medication burden with tolerability of ILD-targeted medications and survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF ILD. Methods: Patients with IPF receiving nintedanib or pirfenidone and patients with non-IPF ILD receiving azathioprine or mycophenolate were identified from two Australian and Canadian registries. Baseline concomitant medication burden was evaluated using three measures: medication count, polypharmacy (⩾5 medications), and the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI). Medication intolerance and discontinuation were evaluated at 6 months and 1 year after initiation of ILD-targeted medications, respectively. Cox regression models and likelihood ratio tests were used to determine the prognostic significance of medication burden on transplant-free survival. Results: In 645 treated patients with IPF, 43% experienced adverse reactions leading to intolerance (defined as dose reduction, temporary dose interruption, or permanent drug discontinuation) of antifibrotic medications within 6 months of initiation, with high baseline concomitant medication burden being consistently associated with intolerance (medication count: P  = 0.005; polypharmacy: P  = 0.006; MRCI: P  = 0.004). This association was not observed for immunosuppressive medications in 1,255 treated patients with non-IPF ILD, who also had a lower intolerance (18%). Baseline concomitant medication burden was not independently associated with permanent discontinuation of antifibrotic (29%) and immunosuppressive medications (20%) at 1 year. The MRCI was the only measure of concomitant medication burden associated with transplant-free survival in both cohorts ( P  < 0.01 for both), which improved prognostication beyond common clinical factors and the ILD-GAP index ( P  < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: Concomitant medication burden is associated with intolerance of antifibrotic medications in patients with IPF. Medication regimen complexity is superior to simpler evaluation of concomitant medication burden for predicting prognosis in ILD.

Background: Mortality risk assessment in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is challenging. Our objective was to determine the prognostic significance of BMI and change in weight in the most common fibrotic ILD subtypes., Research Question: Could BMI and weight loss over time be reliable prognostic indicators in patients with fibrotic ILD?, Study Design and Methods: This observational retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with fibrotic ILD from the six-center CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF, derivation) and the ILD registry at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF, validation). Patients were subcategorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI 25-29.9), or obese (BMI > 30). Annual change in weight was calculated for all years of follow-up as the slope of best fit using the least square method based on every available measurement. Separate multivariable analyses evaluated the associations of BMI and change in weight with mortality, adjusting for common prognostic variables., Results: The derivation and validation cohorts included 1,786 and 1,779 patients, respectively. Compared with patients with normal BMI, mortality was highest in patients who were underweight (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; 95% CI, 1.88-5.43; P < .001) and was lowest in those who were overweight (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75; P < .001) or obese (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.37-0.83; P < .001) in the analysis adjusted for the ILD-GAP (gender, age, physiology) Index. Patients who had a weight loss of at least 2 kg within 1 year had increased risk of death in the subsequent year (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.97; P = .04) after adjustment for the ILD-GAP Index and baseline BMI category, with a plateau in risk for patients with greater weight loss. Consistent results were observed in the validation cohort., Interpretation: Both BMI and weight loss are independently associated with 1-year mortality in fibrotic ILD. BMI and weight loss may be clinically useful prognostic indicators in fibrotic ILD., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. All rights reserved.)

Background: The primary analysis of the INBUILD trial showed that in subjects with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), nintedanib slowed the decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 52 weeks. We report the effects of nintedanib on ILD progression over the whole trial., Methods: Subjects with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, who had ILD progression within the 24 months before screening despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice, were randomised to receive nintedanib or placebo. Subjects continued on blinded randomised treatment until all subjects had completed the trial. Over the whole trial, mean±sd exposure to trial medication was 15.6±7.2 and 16.8±5.8 months in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively., Results: In the nintedanib (n=332) and placebo (n=331) groups, respectively, the proportions of subjects who had ILD progression (absolute decline in FVC ≥10% predicted) or died were 40.4% and 54.7% in the overall population (hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.83; p=0.0003) and 43.7% and 55.8% among subjects with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like fibrotic pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.91; p=0.009). In the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, the proportions who had an acute exacerbation of ILD or died were 13.9% and 19.6% in the overall population (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98; p=0.04) and 15.0% and 22.8% among subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.97; p=0.03)., Conclusion: Based on data from the whole INBUILD trial, nintedanib reduced the risk of events indicating ILD progression., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K.R. Flaherty reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech; and personal fees from Bellerophon, Blade Therapeutics, Celgene, FibroGen, Respivant, Sanofi Genzyme and Veracyte. Conflict of interest: A.U. Wells reports personal fees from Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: V. Cottin reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Actelion and Roche/Promedior; grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer/MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Fibrogen, Galapagos, Galecto, Novartis, Sanofi and Shionogi. Conflict of interest: A. Devaraj reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Galecto, GlaxoSmithKline and Roche. Conflict of interest: Y. Inoue reports other from Asahi Kasei, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Roche, Savara, Inc., Shionogi and Taiho; and grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Conflict of interest: L. Richeldi reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and personal fees from Asahi Kasei, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, FibroGen, ImmuneWorks, Nitto, Pliant Therapeutics, Promedior, Respivant and Toray. Conflict of interest: S.L.F. Walsh reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Bracco, Galapagos, Open Source Imaging Consortium, Roche and Sanofi. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris, Prometic, Roche; personal fees from Algernon, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Indalo and Third Pole, Inc.; and other from the European Respiratory Society. Conflict of interest: D. Koschel reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Roche. Conflict of interest: T. Moua has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Stowasser is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Conflict of interest: R-G. Goeldner is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. Conflict of interest: R. Schlenker-Herceg is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Conflict of interest: K.K. Brown reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; personal fees from Biogen, Blade Therapeutics, DevPro Biopharma, Dispersol, Galapagos, Galecto, Huitai Biomedicine, Humanetics, Lifemax, Lilly, Pliant, Third Pole Therapeutics and Theravance; and other from the Open Source Imaging Consortium., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Rationale: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) is a group of pathologic entities characterized by scarring of the lungs and high morbidity and mortality. Research investigating how socioeconomic and residential factors impact outcomes in patients with fILD is lacking. Objectives: To determine the association between neighborhood-level disadvantage and presentation severity, disease progression, lung transplantation, and mortality in patients with fILD from the United States and Canada. Methods: We performed a multicenter, international, prospective cohort study of 4,729 patients with fILD from one U.S. and eight Canadian ILD registry sites. Neighborhood-level disadvantage was measured by the area deprivation index in the United States and the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation in Canada. Measurements and Main Results: In the U.S. but not in the Canadian cohort, patients with fILD living in neighborhoods with the greatest disadvantage (top quartile) experience the highest risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 1.51, P  = 0.002), and in subgroups of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the top quartile of disadvantage experienced the lowest odds of lung transplantation (odds ratio = 0.46, P  = 0.04). Greater disadvantage was associated with reduced baseline DL CO in both cohorts, but it was not associated with baseline FVC or FVC or DL CO decline in either cohort. Conclusions: Patients with fILD who live in areas with greater neighborhood-level disadvantage in the United States experience higher mortality, and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis experience lower odds of lung transplantation. These disparities are not seen in Canadian patients, which may indicate differences in access to care between the United States and Canada.

Background: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) may represent undiagnosed early-stage or subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILA are often observed incidentally in patients who subsequently develop clinically overt ILD. There is limited information on consensus definitions for, and the appropriate evaluation of, ILA. Early recognition of patients with ILD remains challenging, yet critically important. Expert consensus could inform early recognition and referral., Research Question: Can consensus-based expert recommendations be identified to guide clinicians in the recognition, referral, and follow-up of patients with or at risk of developing early ILDs?, Study Design and Methods: Pulmonologists and radiologists with expertise in ILD participated in two iterative rounds of surveys. The surveys aimed to establish consensus regarding ILA reporting, identification of patients with ILA, and identification of populations that might benefit from screening for ILD. Recommended referral criteria and follow-up processes were also addressed. Threshold for consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement., Results: Fifty-five experts were invited and 44 participated; consensus was reached on 39 of 85 questions. The following clinically important statements achieved consensus: honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis indicate potentially progressive ILD; honeycombing detected during lung cancer screening should be reported as potentially significant (eg, with the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System "S-modifier" [Lung-RADS; which indicates clinically significant or potentially significant noncancer findings]), recommending referral to a pulmonologist in the radiology report; high-resolution CT imaging and full pulmonary function tests should be ordered if nondependent subpleural reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, centrilobular ground-glass nodules, or patchy ground-glass opacity are observed on CT imaging; patients with honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis should be referred to a pulmonologist irrespective of diffusion capacity values; and patients with systemic sclerosis should be screened with pulmonary function tests for early-stage ILD., Interpretation: Guidance was established for identifying clinically relevant ILA, subsequent referral, and follow-up. These results lay the foundation for developing practical guidance on managing patients with ILA., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Several tools have been developed to objectively assess HRQoL in this patient population, but none are in use in routine clinical practice., Objectives: To develop a rapid, specific tool that can be used for patients with IPF during routine clinic visits., Methods: A novel and simple five-item numerical rating scale was developed and compared with two other previously validated tools. 100 consecutive patients with IPF managed at a centre for interstitial lung disease were recruited to complete the Raghu scale for pulmonary fibrosis (R-Scale-PF), King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD), and the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in addition to pulmonary function and 6-min walk tests., Measurements and Main Results: All 100 patients successfully completed the three HRQoL tools with 53 completing them again at follow-up visits. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α 0.825) with minimal floor/ceiling effect. Concurrent validity of the R-Scale-PF was moderate to high compared with the K-BILD ( r =-0.713) and the EQ-5D-5L ( r =-0.665). Concurrent validity was moderate with physiologic measures (forced vital capacity, r =-0.307, 6-min walking distance, r =-0.383). The R-Scale-PF demonstrated good known-groups validity when comparing scores across stages of disease severity., Conclusions: The R-Scale-PF correlates well with the K-BILD and EQ-5D-5L. It is hoped that this novel simple numerical rating scale tool, subject to validation in patients from other centres, will provide an opportunity to objectively measure HRQoL in routine clinical practice for patients with IPF., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C. Scallan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Strand has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Hayes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Kadura has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Collins reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Ho has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Spada has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W. Canestaro has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and Canadian Institute for Health Research, other (site PI in industry-sponsored clinical trials) from Roche, grants, personal fees for advisory board work and other (site PI in industry-sponsored clinical trials) from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees for advisory board work from Roche, Liminal and Pieris, other (chief editor allowance) from European Respiratory Journal, personal fees for advisory board work from Third Pole, MitoImmune, Abbvie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon and CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. Raghu has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Rationale: Early access to subspecialty care is associated with improved outcomes for patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Access to ILD care may be limited for patients living far from subspecialty clinics. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that greater travel distance to access ILD clinical care would be associated with more severe disease at time of referral and worse clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were recruited from a multicenter national pulmonary fibrosis registry. Residential postal codes were geocoded to estimate travel distance from the home to the clinic. Travel distance was dichotomized at ⩽70 km (near) and >70 km (far). Demographics and disease severity at the initial referral, changes in lung function, and the risk of death or lung transplant were analyzed in unadjusted and adjusted models for their association with travel distance. Results: The cohort included 1,162 patients, of whom 856 lived near to their ILD clinic and 306 lived far from their ILD clinic. Patients residing farther from their clinic were younger, more likely to have smoked, had a greater 6-minute-walk distance, and had lower composite risk scores than patients residing closer to their clinic. In models adjusted for age, sex, and baseline forced vital capacity, patients from farther away had a greater risk of death or lung transplant than patients residing closer (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.11), a finding predominantly driven by patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.16-3.94). Conclusions: Patients with fibrotic ILD with a longer travel distance to their ILD clinic had better prognostic indices at baseline but had a higher risk of death or lung transplant in the total cohort and in patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD. Assuming that disease epidemiology and severity are distributed evenly across geographic regions, these findings raise important questions about equitable access to patient care in large healthcare regions with centralized subspecialty programs.

Rationale: Real-life pharmacological treatment patterns of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) remain elusive. Objectives: To determine how often and with what medications patients with ILD are treated in Canadian tertiary care clinics. Methods: All patients with ILD prospectively enrolled in the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were included in this observational study. All first instances of medication for each patient were compiled. The time between the diagnosis of ILD and the first initiation of an ILD-related medication was compared across diagnostic categories. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify variables associated with time-to-treatment initiation, stratified by diagnostic category. Results: Out of 2,652 patients, a total of 1,483 (56%) were treated with an ILD-related medication during the median follow up of 3.0 years (1.4-5.9), including 349/646 (54%) patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who received an antifibrotic. Patients with IPF were treated earlier and in greater proportion than those with non-IPF ILD ( P  = 0.001). Male sex and lower lung function were associated with shorter time-to-treatment initiation in the full cohort. Conclusions: Overall, 56% of patients with ILD seen across seven Canadian specialized ILD clinics received pharmacological treatment over a median follow up of 3 years. Further studies are needed to assess longitudinal patterns of treatment and their influence on key outcomes.

Objective: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease. Pulmonary complications of SSc are some of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine prevalence and survival estimates of SSc and SSc with interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) in the Canadian province of Ontario using administrative data over 10 years., Methods: Using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes adapted for Canada (ICD-10-CA), adult patients diagnosed with SSc and SSc-ILD between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2018, were identified from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and the Discharge Abstract Database administrative databases. SSc was identified first, and ILD was included if presence occurred after SSc diagnosis. Prevalence estimates were determined for both SSc and SSc-ILD. For survival rates, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated., Results: At the start of the 2017/18 fiscal year (final year of the cohort), there were 2114 prevalent SSc cases for a cumulative prevalence of 19.1 per 100,000 persons, as well as 257 prevalent cases of SSc-ILD that generated a prevalence of 2.3 cases per 100,000 persons. Mean ages were 57 and 58 years with 84% and 80% females for patients with SSc and SSc-ILD, respectively. One-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 85.0%, 64.5%, and 44.9% for the SSc group and 77.1%, 44.4%, and 22.0% for the SSc-ILD group, respectively., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study provides the first population-based estimates of SSc and SSc-ILD in Canada for prevalence and survival. Results confirm that the prevalence estimates of SSc-ILD fall within the Canadian threshold for rare disease. It also demonstrates the poor survival in SSc, especially when ILD is also present., (© 2021 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) include a large number of diseases and causes with variable outcomes often associated with progressive fibrosis. Although each of the individual fibrosing ILDs are rare, collectively, they affect a considerable number of patients, representing a significant burden of disease. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the typical chronic fibrosing ILD associated with progressive decline in lung. Other fibrosing ILDs are often associated with connective tissues diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis-ILD (RA-ILD) and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD), or environmental/drug exposure. Given the vast number of progressive fibrosing ILDs and the disparities in clinical patterns and disease features, the course of these diseases is heterogeneous and cannot accurately be predicted for an individual patient. As a consequence, the discovery of novel biomarkers for these types of diseases is a major clinical challenge. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperons that have been extensively described to be involved in fibrogenesis. Their extracellular forms (eHSPs) have been recently and successfully used as therapeutic targets or circulating biomarkers in cancer. The current review will describe the role of eHSPs in fibrosing ILDs, highlighting the importance of these particular stress proteins to develop new therapeutic strategies and discover potential biomarkers in these diseases.

Rationale: The University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSDSOBQ) is a frequently used domain-specific dyspnea questionnaire; however, there is little information available regarding its use and minimum important difference (MID) in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). We aimed to describe the key performance characteristics of the UCSDSOBQ in this population., Methods: UCSDSOBQ scores and selected anchors were measured in 1933 patients from the prospective multi-center Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Anchors included the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Concurrent validity, internal consistency, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness were assessed, followed by estimation of the MID by anchor-based (linear regression) and distribution-based methods (standard error of measurement)., Results: The UCSDSOBQ had a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97), no obvious floor or ceiling effect, strong correlations with SGRQ, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-VAS (|r| > 0.5), and moderate correlations with FVC%, DLCO%, and 6MWD (0.3 < |r| < 0.5). The MID estimate for UCSDSOBQ was 5 points (1-8) for the anchor-based method, and 4.5 points for the distribution-based method., Conclusion: This study demonstrates the validity of UCSDSOBQ in a large and heterogeneous population of patients with fibrotic ILD, and provides a robust MID estimate of 5-8 points.

Background and Objective: Physical frailty is associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations in older adults. We describe the prevalence of physical frailty and its prognostic impact in patients with a spectrum of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD)., Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD at the McMaster University ILD programme were prospectively followed up from November 2015 to March 2020. Baseline data were used to classify patients as non-frail (score = 0), pre-frail (score = 1-2) or frail (score = 3-5) based on modified Fried physical frailty criteria. The association between physical frailty and mortality was assessed using time-to-event models, adjusted for age, sex, lung function and diagnosis using the ILD Gender-Age-Physiology (ILD-GAP) score., Results: We included 463 patients (55% male, mean [SD] age 68 [11] years); 82 (18%) were non-frail, 258 (56%) pre-frail and 123 (26%) frail. The most common ILD diagnoses were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 183, 40%) and connective tissue disease-associated-ILD (n = 79, 17%). Mean time since diagnosis was 2.7 ± 4.6 years. There were 56 deaths within the median follow-up of 1.71 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.24, 2.31) years. Both frail and pre-frail individuals had a higher risk of death compared to those categorized as non-frail at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.14, 95% CI 1.27-13.5 for pre-frail and aHR 4.41, 95% CI 1.29-15.1 for frail)., Conclusion: Physical frailty is prevalent in patients with ILD and is independently associated with an increased risk of death. Assessment of physical frailty provides additional prognostic value to recognized risk scores such as the ILD-GAP score, and may present a modifiable target for intervention., (© 2021 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background: In the INBUILD trial in patients with chronic fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and a progressive phenotype, nintedanib reduced the rate of ILD progression with adverse events that were manageable for most patients. We investigated the potential impact of immunomodulatory therapies on the efficacy and safety of nintedanib., Methods: Subjects with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, who had shown progression of ILD within the prior 24 months despite management in clinical practice, were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. Certain immunomodulatory therapies were restricted for the first 6 months. We analyzed post-hoc the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 52 weeks in subgroups by glucocorticoid use at baseline and in analyses excluding subjects or FVC measurements taken after initiation of restricted immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies., Results: Of 663 subjects, 361 (54.4%) were taking glucocorticoids at baseline (353 at a dose of ≤ 20 mg/day). In the placebo group, the adjusted rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks was numerically greater in subjects taking than not taking glucocorticoids at baseline (- 206.4 [SE 20.2] vs - 165.8 [21.9]). The difference between the nintedanib and placebo groups was 133.3 (95% CI 76.6, 190.0) mL/year in subjects taking glucocorticoids at baseline and 76.1 (15.0, 137.2) mL/year in subjects who were not (interaction P = 0.18). The effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of FVC decline in analyses excluding subjects or measurements taken after initiation of restricted immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies was similar to the primary analysis. The adverse event profile of nintedanib was similar between subjects who did and did not use prohibited or restricted therapies at baseline or during treatment with trial drug., Conclusions: In patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, the effect of nintedanib on reducing FVC decline was not influenced by the use of immunomodulatory therapies. Nintedanib can be used in combination with immunomodulatory therapies in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02999178. Registered 21 December 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02999178.

Pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive lung disease characterized by myofibroblast accumulation and excessive extracellular matrix deposition. We sought to investigate the role of FKBP13 (13-kD FK506-binding protein), an endoplasmic reticulum-resident molecular chaperone, in various forms of pulmonary fibrosis. We first characterized the gene and protein expression of FKBP13 in lung biopsy specimens from 24 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and 17 control subjects. FKBP13 expression was found to be elevated in the fibrotic regions of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis lung tissues and correlated with declining forced vital capacity and dyspnea severity. FKBP13 expression was also increased in lung biopsy specimens of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and sarcoidosis-associated interstitial lung disease. We next evaluated the role of this protein using FKBP13 -/- mice in a bleomycin model of pulmonary fibrosis. Animals were assessed for lung function and histopathology at different stages of lung injury including the inflammatory (Day 7), fibrotic (Day 21), and resolution (Day 50) phases. FKBP13 -/- mice showed increased infiltration of inflammatory cells and cytokines at Day 7, increased lung elastance and fibrosis at Day 21, and impaired resolution of fibrosis at Day 50. These changes were associated with an increased number of cells that stained positive for TUNEL and cleaved caspase 3 in the FKBP13 -/- lungs, indicating a heightened cellular sensitivity to bleomycin. Our findings suggest that FKBP13 is a potential biomarker for severity of interstitial lung diseases and that it has a biologically relevant role in protecting mice against bleomycin-induced injury, inflammation, and fibrosis.

Background: Comorbidities are frequent and have been associated with poor quality of life, increased hospitalizations, and mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, it is unclear how comorbidities lead to these negative outcomes and whether they could influence ILD disease progression. The goal of this study was to identify clusters of patients based on similar comorbidity profiles and to determine whether these clusters were associated with rate of lung function decline and/or mortality., Methods: Patients with a major fibrotic ILD (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and unclassifiable ILD) from the CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF) were included. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering of comorbidities, age, sex, and smoking pack-years was conducted for each ILD subtype to identify combinations of these features that frequently occurred together in patients. The association between clusters and change in lung function over time was determined using linear mixed effects modeling, with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking pack-years. Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess differences in survival between the clusters., Results: Discrete clusters were identified within each fibrotic ILD. In IPF, males with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) had more rapid decline in FVC %-predicted (- 11.9% per year [95% CI - 15.3, - 8.5]) compared to females without any comorbidities (- 8.1% per year [95% CI - 13.6, - 2.7]; p = 0.03). Females without comorbidities also had significantly longer survival compared to all other IPF clusters. There were no significant differences in rate of lung function decline or survival between clusters in the other fibrotic ILD subtypes., Conclusions: The combination of male sex and OSA may portend worse outcomes in IPF. Further research is required to elucidate the interplay between sex and comorbidities in ILD, as well as the role of OSA in ILD disease progression.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has affected virtually all aspects of patient care. Health-care systems around the world are trying simultaneously to treat patients with COVID-19, prepare for its long-term impacts, and treat patients with other acute and chronic diseases. There are multiple ways that the COVID-19 pandemic will directly affect patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), particularly given their common risk factors for poor outcomes. Major issues for patients with ILD will include restricted access to key components of the diagnostic process, new uncertainties in the use of common ILD pharmacotherapies, limited ability to monitor both disease severity and the presence of medication adverse effects, and significantly curtailed research activities. The purpose of this review is to summarize how COVID-19 has impacted key components of the diagnosis and management of fibrotic ILD as well as to provide strategies to mitigate these challenges. We further review major obstacles for researchers and identify priority areas for future ILD research related to COVID-19. Our goals are to provide practical considerations to support the care of patients with ILD during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide a road map for clinicians caring for these patients during future infectious disease outbreaks., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) develops in a large percentage of patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients with CTD-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) often present at a young age, suggesting that ILD likely impacts workplace productivity. Objectives: We aimed to determine the employment rate and workplace productivity loss, along with its associated factors and estimated costs, in patients with fibrotic CTD-ILD. Methods: Patients with fibrotic CTD-ILD from the six centers of the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were eligible. Health-related productivity loss was assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Proposed factors associated with low workplace productivity were forced into a multivariable regression model. Average productivity loss in hours/week was used to calculate the costs of productivity loss based on hourly wages obtained from national census data matched for age and sex. Workplace productivity loss outcomes were compared between patients with CTD-ILD and patients with a non-CTD fibrotic ILD. Results: Of 375 eligible patients with fibrotic CTD-ILD, 113 (30%) were employed. Productivity loss was reported by 59% of employed patients, with a mean loss of 9.4 ± 1.2 hours/week, including 3.9 ± 0.9 hours/week from absenteeism and 5.5 ± 0.7 hours/week from presenteeism. Employment among patients 25-54 years of age with fibrotic CTD-ILD was 27% lower than that in the matched general Canadian population (56% vs. 83%; P  < 0.001). Employment among patients ≥55 years of age with CTD-ILD was 17% lower than that in the matched population (19% vs. 36%; P  < 0.001). Workplace productivity loss was not associated with respiratory symptoms or lung physiology. Annual costs of productivity loss were calculated at 13,593 Canadian dollars per employee with fibrotic CTD-ILD. Workplace productivity loss was similar in patients with fibrotic CTD-ILD and those with non-CTD fibrotic ILD. Conclusions: Patients with fibrotic CTD-ILD frequently report workplace productivity loss, which is unexplained by respiratory symptoms or lung physiology and is associated with significant costs.