1. Optimal kVp selection for dual-energy imaging of the chest: Evaluation by task-specific observer preference tests.
- Author
-
Williams, D. B., Siewerdsen, J. H., Tward, D. J., Paul, N. S., Dhanantwari, A. C., Shkumat, N. A., Richard, S., Yorkston, J., and Van Metter, R.
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL imaging systems , *IMAGING phantoms , *IMAGE quality in radiography , *PHOTODIODES , *X-rays , *POLYETHYLENE , *MEDICAL innovations , *MEDICAL technology - Abstract
Human observer performance tests were conducted to identify optimal imaging techniques in dual-energy (DE) imaging of the chest with respect to a variety of visualization tasks for soft and bony tissue. Specifically, the effect of kVp selection in low- and high-energy projection pairs was investigated. DE images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom formed the basis for observer studies, decomposed from low-energy and high-energy projections in the range 60–90 kVp and 120–150 kVp, respectively, with total dose for the DE image equivalent to that of a single chest radiograph. Five expert radiologists participated in observer preference tests to evaluate differences in image quality among the DE images. For visualization of soft-tissue structures in the lung, the [60/130] kVp pair provided optimal image quality, whereas [60/140] kVp proved optimal for delineation of the descending aorta in the retrocardiac region. Such soft-tissue detectability tasks exhibited a strong dependence on the low-kVp selection (with 60 kVp providing maximum soft-tissue conspicuity) and a weaker dependence on the high-kVp selection (typically highest at 130–140 kVp). Qualitative examination of DE bone-only images suggests optimal bony visualization at a similar technique, viz., [60/140] kVp. Observer preference was largely consistent with quantitative analysis of contrast, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio, with subtle differences likely related to the imaging task and spatial-frequency characteristics of the noise. Observer preference tests offered practical, semiquantitative identification of optimal, task-specific imaging techniques and will provide useful guidance toward clinical implementation of high-performance DE imaging systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF