Search

IntroductionLung-MAP S1400K was designed to evaluate the response to telisotuzumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-MET, in patients with c-MET-positive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Patients and methodsPatients with previously treated SCC with c-MET-positive tumors (H score ≥ 150, Ventana SP44 assay) were enrolled into 2 cohorts: Cohort 1 (immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive) and Cohort 2 (immune checkpoint inhibitor refractory). Telisotuzumab vedotin 2.7 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response assessments were performed every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, response within cohort, duration of response, and toxicities. Interim analysis was planned after 20 evaluable patients, with ≥ 3 responses needed to continue enrollment.ResultsForty-nine patients (14% of screened patients) were assigned to S1400K, 28 patients enrolled (15 in Cohort 1 and 13 in Cohort 2), and 23 were eligible. S1400K closed on December 21, 2018 owing to lack of efficacy. Two responses (response rate of 9%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-20%) were reported in cohort 1 (1 complete and 1 unconfirmed partial response), whereas 10 patients had stable disease, with a disease control rate of 52%. The median overall and progression-free survival was 5.6 and 2.4 months, respectively. There were 3 grade 5 events (2 pneumonitis, in Cohort 2, and 1 bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, in Cohort 1).ConclusionTelisotuzumab vedotin failed to meet the pre-specified response needed to justify continuing enrollment to S1400K. Pneumonitis was an unanticipated toxicity observed in patients with SCC.

BackgroundPrior comparisons of chemotherapy adverse events (AEs) by age and performance status (PS) are limited by the traditional maximum grade approach, which ignores low-grade AEs and longitudinal changes.Materials and methodsTo compare fatigue and neuropathy longitudinally by age (

PurposeThe irreversible ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib plus the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab was previously shown to overcome resistance to EGFR TKIs. We studied whether the combination of afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by preventing or delaying resistance.MethodsPatients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC without prior treatment of advanced disease were enrolled in this phase II, multicenter trial and randomly assigned to receive afatinib 40 mg orally daily plus cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks or afatinib alone. The primary end point was PFS.ResultsBetween March 25, 2015 and April 23, 2018, 174 patients were randomly assigned, and 168 (83 on afatinib + cetuximab and 85 on afatinib) were eligible. There was no improvement in PFS in patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.43; P = .94; median, 11.9 months v 13.4 months). Similarly, there was no difference in response rate (67% v 74%; P = .38) or overall survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.36; P = .44). Toxicity was greater with the combination: grade ≥ 3 adverse events related to treatment occurred in 72% of patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with 40% of those receiving afatinib alone, most commonly rash and diarrhea. Dose reductions were more common in patients receiving the combination, and 30% of patients in this arm discontinued cetuximab due to toxicity. At interim analysis, there was insufficient evidence to support continued accrual, and the trial was closed.ConclusionsThe addition of cetuximab to afatinib did not improve outcomes in previously untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC, despite recognized activity in the acquired resistance setting.

BackgroundOlder patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often not prescribed standard therapy. It is important to know which older patients would be candidates for aggressive therapy based on their prognosis, and to develop a model that can help determine prognosis.MethodsData on older patients (≥70 years) enrolled on 38 NCI cooperative group trials of advanced NSCLC from 1991 to 2011 were analyzed. Multivariable Cox PH model was built with a stepwise selection. We derived a prognostic score using the estimated Cox PH regression coefficient. We then calculated the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of survival in the testing set.ResultsThe final analysis included 1467 patients, who were randomly divided into a training (n = 963) and a testing set (n = 504). The prognostic risk score was calculated as: 3 (if male) + 3 (if PS = 1) + 8 (if PS = 2) + 11 (if initial stage = IV) + 4 (if weight loss). Patients were classified into two prognostic groups: good (0-8) and poor (≥9). The median survival in the two groups in the testing set were 13.15 (95% CI, 10.82-15.91) and 8.52 months (95% CI, 7.5-9.63), respectively. The model had area under the 1-year and 2-year ROCs (0.6 and 0.65, respectively) that were higher than existing models.ConclusionsMale gender, poor performance status, distant metastases and recent weight loss predict for poor overall survival (OS) in older patients with advanced NSCLC. This study proposes a simple prognostic model for older adults with advanced NSCLC.

ObjectiveConcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was the standard treatment for locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC). This study was performed to examine thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) parameters and their impact on adverse events (AEs).MethodsWe collected individual patient data from 3600 patients with LA-NSCLC who participated in 16 cooperative group trials of concurrent CRT. The TRT parameters examined included field design strategy (elective nodal irradiation [ENI] versus involved-field [IF] TRT [IF-TRT]) and TRT dose (60 Gy versus ≥60 Gy). The primary end point of this analysis was the occurrence of AEs. ORs for AEs were calculated with univariable and multivariable logistic models.ResultsTRT doses ranged from 60 to 74 Gy. ENI was not associated with more grade 3 or higher AEs than IF-TRT was (multivariable OR = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.543-1.102, p = 0.1545). Doses higher than 60 Gy (high-dose TRT) were associated with significantly more grade 3 or higher AEs (multivariable OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.501-2.203, p < 0.0001). In contrast, ENI was associated with significantly more grade 4 or higher AEs (multivariable OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.035-1.709, p = 0.0258). Doses higher than 60 Gy were also associated with more grade 4 or higher AEs (multivariate OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.191-1.700, p = 0.0001). Grade 5 AEs plus treatment-related deaths were more frequent with higher-dose TRT (p = 0.0012) but not ENI (p = 0.099).ConclusionsFor patients with LA-NSCLC treated with concurrent CRT, IF-TRT was not associated with the overall risk of grade 3 or higher AEs but was associated with significantly fewer grade 4 or higher AEs than ENI TRT. This is likely the result of irradiation of a lesser amount of adjacent critical normal tissue. Higher TRT doses were associated significantly with grade 3 or higher and grade 4 or higher AEs. On the basis of these findings and our prior report on survival, CRT using IF-TRT and 60 Gy (conventionally fractionated) were associated with more favorable patient survival and less toxicity than was the use of ENI or higher radiotherapy doses.

PurposeTo investigate the safety of accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy (AHRT) with concurrent chemotherapy (CT) for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThe primary objectives were to define the maximally tolerable course of accelerated radiation therapy and to describe toxicities of therapy. Total radiation therapy remained at 60 Gy. The number of once-daily fractions in each successive cohort was reduced as follows: cohort 1, 60 Gy in 27 fractions; cohort 2, 60 Gy in 24 fractions; cohort 3, 60 Gy in 22 fractions; and cohort 4, 60 Gy in 20 fractions. Concurrent treatment consisted of weekly carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2 and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2. Consolidation treatment consisted of carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 every weeks × 2 cycles. Maximum tolerated dose: Of 6 patients/cohort, ≤2 patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicity, and ≤1 patient experienced grade ≥4 toxicity.Results22 patients were accrued; of those, 21 patients were evaluable between July 2012 and May 2014. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 3 patients: 1 patient in cohort 2 (hemoptysis), 2 patients in cohort 3 (hemoptysis, pneumonitis). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined by cohort 2 (60 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction). Time to grade 5 toxicity was 9 months, 6 months, and 9 months after the start of treatment. The median follow-up time was 23.0 months (range, 7.6-30.6 months) in living patients, the median overall survival was 19.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.3-34.0 months), and the median progression-free survival was 12.2 months (95% CI 6.1-22.5 months).ConclusionsOnly modest hypofractionation was achievable as a result of long-term toxicities. Nevertheless, the MTD of 60 Gy given at 2.5 Gy/fraction allows completion of RT in 20% fewer treatments than conventional therapy. Further investigation of AHRT may help to better define the therapeutic index.

Approximately a third of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with surgically resectable disease. Patients who undergo surgical resection are at a high risk of relapse, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The outcomes with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy are similar, and both are used in clinical practice. Recent trials investigated the role of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with early-stage disease. A phase III trial of adjuvant atezolizumab compared with standard of care (SOC) in patients with resected stage II or III disease and PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, and a second trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo in patients with stage IB–III (regardless of tumor proportion score PD-L1 expression), both demonstrated an improvement in DFS. In the neoadjuvant setting, results of a phase III trial of chemotherapy and nivolumab compared with chemotherapy alone revealed an improvement in pathological complete response rate and event-free survival in patients with stage IB–IIIA disease. Finally, for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant NSCLC, a phase III trial of osimertinib compared with SOC revealed an improvement in DFS. The results of these and ongoing trials illustrate the integration of immunotherapy and targeted therapies into the treatment paradigm of patients with surgically resected NSCLC and have led to FDA and EMA approvals in selected populations. Neoadjuvant trials have investigated novel endpoints such as major and complete pathological response, which have the potential to serve as surrogate endpoints for future trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High out-of-pocket costs may impact anticancer treatment uptake. The Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) program can reduce patient out-of-pocket cost for Medicare Part D-covered treatments. We examined whether the LIS increased uptake and reduced time to initiate orally administered anticancer drugs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified older adults (aged 65 years and older) diagnosed with advanced NSCLC from 2007 through 2013 and categorized them as full LIS, partial LIS, or non-LIS. We used propensity-score weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the likelihood of and time to initiate Part D treatments. Part B medication uptake was our negative control because supplemental insurance reduces out-of-pocket costs for those drugs. All statistical tests were two-sided.Results: Among 19 746 advanced NSCLC patients, approximately 10% initiated Part D treatments. Patients with partial or no LIS were less likely to initiate Part D treatments than were those with full subsidies (partial LIS vs full LIS HRIPTW = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.62 to 0.97; non-LIS vs full LIS HRIPTW = 0.87, 95% confidence interval  = 0.79 to 0.95). Time to initiate Part D treatments was also slightly shorter among full-LIS patients (full LIS mean [SD] = 10.8 [0.04] months; partial LIS mean [SD] = 11.3 [0.08] months; and non-LIS mean [SD] = 11.1 [0.03] months, P < .001). Conversely, patients with partial or no LIS had shorter time to initiation of Part B drugs.Conclusions: Patients receiving the full LIS had higher orally administered anticancer treatment uptake than patients without LIS. Notably, patients with partial LIS had the lowest treatment uptake, likely because of their low incomes combined with high expected out-of-pocket spending. High out-of-pocket costs for Part D medications may be a barrier to treatment use for patients without full LIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We have recently reported the primary results of CALGB 140503 (Alliance), a randomized trial in patients with peripheral cT1aN0 non–small cell lung cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh) treated with either lobar resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SLR). Here we report differences in disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) between LR, segmental resection (SR), and wedge resection (WR). We also report differences between WR and SR in terms of surgical margins, rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR), and expiratory flow rate at 6 months postoperatively. Between June 2007 and March 2017, a total of 697 patients were randomized to LR (n = 357) or SLR (n = 340) stratified by clinical tumor size, histology, and smoking history. Ten patients were converted from SLR to LR, and 5 patients were converted from LR to SLR. Survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan–Maier estimator and tested by the stratified log-rank test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare margins and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between groups, and the χ2 test was used to test the associations between recurrence and groups. A total of 362 patients had LR, 131 had SR, and 204 had WR. Basic demographic and clinical and pathologic characteristics were similar in the 3 groups. Five-year DFS was 64.7% after LR (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.6%-70.1%), 63.8% after SR (95% CI, 55.6%-73.2%), and 62.5% after WR (95% CI, 55.8%-69.9%) (P =.888, log-rank test). Five-year OS was 78.7% after LR, 81.9% after SR, and 79.7% after WR (P =.873, log-rank test). Five-year LCSS was 86.8% after LR, 89.2% after SR, and 89.7% after WR (P =.903, log-rank test). LRR occurred in 12% after SR and in 14% after WR (P =.295). At 6 months postoperatively, the median reduction in % FEV1 was 5% after WR and 3% after SR (P =.930). In this large randomized trial, LR, SR, and WR were associated with similar survival outcomes. Although LRR was numerically higher after WR compared to SR, the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the reduction of FEV1 between the SR and WR groups. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Landmark investigation two decades ago demonstrated sex-based disparities among participants in cancer cooperative group trials. Although federal efforts have aimed to improve representation of female patients in government-sponsored research, less is known about sex disparities in the broader landscape of modern oncologic randomized controlled trials. Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified randomized controlled trials related to colorectal or lung cancer (the two most common non-sex-specific disease sites). Among the 147 included trials, the proportion of female patients enrolled on trial was on average 6.8% (95% confidence interval = -8.8% to -4.9%) less than the proportion of female patients in the population by disease site (P < .001). Whereas no statistically significant underrepresentation of women was noted within the 26 cooperative group trials, sex disparities were markedly heightened for the 121 noncooperative-group-sponsored trials. Furthermore, underrepresentation of women did not improve with time. Future efforts should therefore focus on addressing these pervasive sex-based enrollment disparities beyond cooperative group trials alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This meta-analysis compared safety profiles (selected drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) of first-line pemetrexed plus carboplatin (PCb) area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/min•mL (PCb5) or 6 mg/min•mL (PCb6), two widely used regimens in clinical practice for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.Methods: All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 21 days with either of two carboplatin doses for up to 4-6 cycles. Safety profiles of PCb doses were compared using three statistical analysis methods: frequency table analysis (FTA), generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM), and the propensity score method. Efficacy outcomes of PCb5 and PCb6 regimens were summarized.Results: A total of 486 patients mainly from the US, Europe, and East Asia were included in the analysis; 22% (n = 105) received PCb5 in one trial and 78% (n = 381) received PCb6 in four trials. The FTA comparison demonstrated that PCb5 vs PCb6 was associated with a statistically significantly lower incidence of TEAEs, including all-grade thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. In the GLMM analysis, PCb5 patients were numerically less likely to experience all-grade and grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The propensity score regression analysis showed PCb5 group patients were significantly less likely than PCb6 group patients to experience all-grade hematologic TEAEs and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia. After applying propensity score 1:1 matching, FTA analysis showed that the PCb5 group had significantly less all-grade and grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Overall efficacy outcomes, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, were similar between the two carboplatin doses.Conclusions: Acknowledging the limitations of this meta-analysis of five trials, heterogeneous in patient's characteristics and trial designs, the results show that the PCb5 regimen was generally associated with a better safety profile than PCb6 across three statistical approaches, with no apparent impact on survival outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the authors discuss an article in the journal which deals with the use of the drugs selumetinib and docetaxel to treat patients with KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, and it mentions heterogeneity and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Most patients with lung cancer have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype and have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Improvements in both first-line and subsequent therapies are allowing longer survival and enhanced quality of life for these patients. The median overall survival observed in many second-line trials is approximately 9 months, and many patients receive further therapy after second-line therapy. The cytotoxic agents pemetrexed and docetaxel and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib and gefitinib are standard second-line therapies. For patients with EGFR mutation, a TKI is the favored second-line therapy if not already used in first-line therapy. For patients without the EGFR mutation, TKIs are an option, but many oncologists favor cytotoxic therapy. The inhibitor of the EML4/ALK fusion protein, crizotinib, has recently become a standard second-line treatment for patients with the gene rearrangement and has promise for patients with the ROS1 rearrangement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately one third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer have unresectable stage IIIA or stage IIIB disease, and appropriate patients are candidates for chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. The optimal treatment paradigm is currently undefined. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, compared with sequential chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), results in superior overall survival outcomes as a result of better locoregional control. Recent trials have revealed efficacy for newer chemotherapy combinations similar to that of older chemotherapy combinations with concurrent TRT and a lower rate of some toxicities. Ongoing phase III trials will determine the roles of cisplatin and pemetrexed concurrent with TRT in patients with nonsquamous histology, cetuximab, and the L-BLP25 vaccine. It is unlikely that bevacizumab will have a role in stage III disease because of its toxicity. Erlotinib, gefitinib, and crizotinib have not been evaluated in stage III patients selected based on molecular characteristics. The preliminary results of a phase III trial that compared conventionally fractionated standard-dose TRT (60 Gy) with high-dose TRT (74 Gy) revealed an inferior survival outcome among patients assigned to the high-dose arm. Hyperfractionation was investigated previously with promising results, but adoption has been limited because of logistical considerations. More recent trials have investigated hypofractionated TRT in chemoradiotherapy. Advances in tumor targeting and radiation treatment planning have made this approach more feasible and reduced the risk for normal tissue toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy uses changes in tumor volume to adjust the TRT treatment plan during therapy, and trials using this strategy are ongoing. Ongoing trials with proton therapy will provide initial efficacy and safety data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the activity of carboplatin and cetuximab in NSCLC. Patients and Methods: This was a single arm, multicenter phase II trial, and the primary objective was response rate. Results: The overall response rate observed was 9% (95% confidence interval [ CI], 3–19), the progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.6), the median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.9–10.5), and 1-year survival rate was 33% (95% CI, 21–45). Conclusion: The combination of carboplatin and cetuximab demonstrated lower activity than double agent platinum-based therapy and does not warrant further development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the U.S., the prevalence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is declining, probably reflecting the decreasing prevalence of tobacco use. However, a significant number of patients will receive a diagnosis of SCLC, and approximately 40% of patients with SCLC will have limited-stage (LS) disease, which is potentially curable with the combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The standard therapy for LS-SCLC is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and the 5-year survival rate observed in clinical trials is approximately 25%. The standard chemotherapy remains cisplatin and etoposide, but carboplatin is frequently used in patients who cannot tolerate or have a contraindication to cisplatin. Substantial improvements in survival have been made through improvements in radiation therapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the preferred therapy for patients who are appropriate candidates. The optimal timing of concurrent chemoradiotherapy is during the first or second cycle, based on data from meta-analyses. The optimal radiation schedule and dose remain topics of debate, but 1.5 Gy twice daily to a total of 45 Gy and 1.8-2.0 Gy daily to a total dose of 60-70 Gy are commonly used treatments. For patients who obtain a near complete or complete response, prophylactic cranial radiation reduces the incidence of brain metastases and improves overall survival. The ongoing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B and the European and Canadian phase III trials will investigate different radiation treatment paradigms for patients with LS-SCLC, and completion of these trials is critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been intense investigation into the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a therapeutic target in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently there are two EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib and gefitinib, approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. In a phase III trial (BR.21), treatment with erlotinib resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival in patients who had experienced progression after one or two previous chemotherapy treatments in comparison with best supportive care (BSC). In contrast, in the Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial, treatment with gefitinib did not result in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival time in comparison with BSC in patients who had received one or two previous chemotherapy treatments and were refractory to or intolerant of the previous chemotherapy. After the results of the ISEL trial, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration restricted the use of gefitinib, and gefitinib was effectively removed from routine clinical practice within the U.S. However, gefitinib was approved in other countries and clinical trials investigating gefitinib continued. Recently the Iressa Nonsmall cell lung cancer Trial Evaluating REsponse and Survival against Taxotere (INTEREST) trial met the primary endpoint of demonstrating noninferiority in terms of overall survival for gefitinib (250 mg daily) in comparison with docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Patients treated with gefitinib experienced a lower rate of treatment-related toxicity and higher rate of improvement in quality of life. Results of recent gefitinib trials have been provocative, and suggest a role for gefitinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standard formulation paclitaxel requires the use of solvents, such as Cremphor-EL®, which contribute to some of the toxicities commonly associated with paclitaxel-based therapy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab™-paclitaxel) is a novel solvent-free formulation of paclitaxel. The formulation is prepared by high-pressure homogenization of paclitaxel in the presence of serum albumin into a nanoparticle colloidal suspension. The human albumin-stabilized paclitaxel particles have an average size of 130 nm. Nab-paclitaxel has several practical advantages over Cremphor-EL-paclitaxel, including a shorter infusion time (30 min) and no need for premedications for hypersensitivity reactions. The nab-paclitaxel formulation eliminates the impact of Cremphor-EL on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and utilizes the endogenous albumin transport mechanisms to concentrate nab-paclitaxel within the tumor. A recent Phase III trial compared nab- and Cremphor-EL-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel experienced a higher response, longer time to tumor progression and, in patients receiving second-line or greater therapy, a longer median survival. Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel had a significantly lower rate of severe neutropenia and a higher rate of sensory neuropathy. The preclinical and clinical data indicate that the nab-paclitaxel formulation has significant advantages over Cremphor-EL-paclitaxel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the influence of clinical covariates, particularly pre-chemotherapy gross tumor volume (GTV), post-chemotherapy GTV, on overall survival in the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and materials: We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients who were enrolled on three consecutive clinical trials, which employed the treatment paradigm of two cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic radiation therapy. The pre-chemotherapy GTV, post-chemotherapy GTV, change in GTV, histology, disease stage, performance status, age, race, treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone were evaluated to determine their impact on overall survival. The log10 of the GTV was used to normalize the data and thereby reduce the impact of exceptionally large values. Results: Both the log10 of the post-chemotherapy GTV and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status covariates were highly prognostic for overall survival (p =0.006 and p =0.008, respectively). Disease stage (at diagnosis) was also significant (p =0.048). The log10 pre-chemotherapy GTV covariate was borderline significant (p =0.067). The strongest prognostic model was the two-covariate model, which contained the log10 post-chemotherapy GTV and ECOG performance status covariates, (model χ 2 of 18.67, with p =0.001 for each covariate). Conclusions: The log10 post-chemotherapy GTV has significant prognostic survival value when the strategy of induction chemotherapy is employed in the treatment on stage III NSCLC. ECOG performance status and stage were also significant prognostic factors for survival. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Background:: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel both have significant single agent activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because both are cell cycle and phase specific in their mechanism of action, frequent exposure should optimize activity. Phase I data support that gemcitabine is maximally converted to the active metabolite when it is infused at a rate of 10mg/(m2 min). Based on this, we designed a phase II trial to examine gemcitabine 800mg/m2 infused over 80min with paclitaxel 110mg/m2 infused over 3h both on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days as first line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The primary objectives were to assess the response rate, toxicity and survival of the combination in advanced NSCLC. Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of paclitaxel on the pharmacokinetic (PK) distribution of gemcitabine, the ability to achieve a concentration of 10–20μM when gemcitabine was infused at a rate of 10mg/(m2 min), as well as to assess the quality of life (QOL) with the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) questionnaire. Methods:: Patients with NSCLC, no prior treatment, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1, adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function were eligible for this trial. Paclitaxel 110mg/m2 was infused over 3h, followed by gemcitabine 800mg/m2 infused over 80min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for the first 2 patients, and then amended to days 1 and 8 every 21 days after the first 2 patients required day 15 dose omissions due to myelosupression. Results:: Thirty-nine patients were treated. Nine PS = 0; 28 PS = 1; Stage IIIB = 3, Stage IV = 36; median age 62 (range: 39–77). A median of six cycles (range: 0–10) was delivered. Grade 3–4 toxicities observed in ≥10% of patients included leucopenia in 26%, neutropenia in 28%, dyspnea in 13%, febrile neutropenia in 3% (1 patient). Fourteen of 39 (35%, 95% CI: 21–53%) patients had a partial response (PR), 14 of 39 (35%, 95% CI: 21–53%) had stable disease (SD) and 5 patients (13%, 95% CI: 4–27%) had progressive (PD). Median survival was 10.4 months (95% CI: 5.3–13.6). One-and two-year survival rates were 35% (95% CI: 21–53%) and 5% (95% CI: 0.6–17%), respectively. QOL as measured by the FACT-L and the trial outcome index (TOI) did not change significantly from baseline over the course of therapy. Conclusions:: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is an active and well-tolerated combination in advanced NSCLC. Patients on this trial had no significant change in their QOL as assessed by the FACT-L questionnaire. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article discusses a study by Tudor Ciuleanu and colleagues which reported a phase 3 clinical trial of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were enrolled in the study following administration of four cycles of first-line platinum-based therapy, and then patients having a response or those with a stable disease were randomised to immediate initiation of pemetrexed or placebo until disease progression. The trial reported a significant improvement in overall NSCLC survival following pemetrexed administration.

The objective response rate and progression-free survival observed with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) in patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are modest. The adverse events associated with EGFR TKIs are manageable but they must be considered in the context of the limited efficacy. The development of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as second-line therapy has reduced the role of EGFR TKIs in EGFR wild-type NSCLC. Recently, there has been increased recognition of the benefit of the earlier integration of palliative care and symptom management, and this is reasonable alternative to treatment with an EGFR TKI for many patients. My practice pattern for patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC is platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy, immunotherapy as second-line therapy, and single-agent chemotherapy as third-line therapy for patients with preserved performance status who want to pursue further therapy. Only a small proportion of patients are eligible for fourth-line therapy, and I prefer to enroll them in clinical trials rather than use EGFR TKIs. I suspect that the use of EGFR TKIs in clinical use and as a comparator arm for clinical trials will continue to decline over the next several years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a treatable, but not curable, clinical entity in patients given the diagnosis at a time when their performance status (PS) remains good. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to update the previous edition of the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines. Results The use of pemetrexed should be restricted to patients with nonsquamous histology. Similarly, bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (and as continuation maintenance) should be restricted to patients with nonsquamous histology and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of 0 to 1; however, the data now suggest it is safe to use in those patients with treated and controlled brain metastases. Data at this time are insufficient regarding the safety of bevacizumab in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation who have an ECOG PS of 2. The role of cetuximab added to chemotherapy remains uncertain and its routine use cannot be recommended. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy are the recommended treatment of those patients identified as having an EGFR mutation. The use of maintenance therapy with either pemetrexed or erlotinib should be considered after four cycles of first-line therapy in those patients without evidence of disease progression. The use of second- and third-line therapy in stage IV NSCLC is recommended in those patients retaining a good PS; however, the benefit of therapy beyond the third-line setting has not been demonstrated. In the elderly and in patients with a poor PS, the use of two-drug, platinum-based regimens is preferred. Palliative care should be initiated early in the course of therapy for stage IV NSCLC. Conclusions Significant advances continue to be made, and the treatment of stage IV NSCLC has become nuanced and specific for particular histologic subtypes and clinical patient characteristics and according to the presence of specific genetic mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of an article discussing targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is presented.

Purpose: Heart dose and heart disease increase the risk for cardiac toxicity associated with radiation therapy. We hypothesized that computed tomography (CT) coronary calcifications are associated with cardiac toxicity and may help ascertain baseline heart disease.Methods and Materials: We analyzed the cumulative incidence of cardiac events in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving median 74 Gy on prospective dose-escalation trials. Events were defined as symptomatic effusion, pericarditis, unstable angina, infarction, significant arrhythmia, and/or heart failure. Coronary calcifications were delineated on simulation CTs using radiation software program (130 HU threshold). Calcifications were defined as "none," "low," and "high," with median volume dividing low and high.Results: Of 109 patients, 26 had cardiac events at median 26 months (range, 1-84 months) after radiation therapy. Median follow-up in surviving patients was 8.8 years (range, 2.3-17.3). On simulation CTs, 64 patients (59%) had coronary calcifications with median volume 0.2 cm3 (range, 0.01-8.3). Only 16 patients (15%) had baseline coronary artery disease. Cardiac events occurred in 7% (3 of 45), 29% (9 of 31), and 42% (14 of 33) of patients with no, low, and high calcifications, respectively. Calcification burden was associated with cardiac toxicity on univariate (low vs none: hazard ratio [HR] 5.0, P = .015; high vs none: HR 8.1, P < .001) and multivariate analyses (low vs none: HR 7.0, P = .005, high vs none: HR 10.6, P < .001, heart mean dose: HR 1.1/Gy, P < .001). Four-year competing risk-adjusted event rates for no, low, and high calcifications were 4%, 23%, and 34%, respectively.Conclusions: The presence of coronary calcifications is a cardiac risk factor that can identify high-risk patients for medical referral and help guide clinicians before potentially cardiotoxic cancer treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context.--Precise subtype diagnosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma is increasingly relevant, based on the availability of subtype-specific therapies, such as bevacizumab and pemetrexed, and based on the subtype-specific prevalence of activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Objectives.-To establish a baseline measure of interobserver reproducibility for non-small cell lung carcinoma diagnoses with hematoxylin-eosin for the current 2004 World Health Organization classification, to estimate interobserver reproducibility for the therapeutically relevant squamous/nonsquamous subsets, and to examine characteristics that improve interobserver reproducibility. Design.--Primary, resected lung cancer specimens were converted to digital (virtual) slides. Based on a single hematoxylin-eosin virtual slide, pathologists were asked to assign a diagnosis using the 2004 World Health Organization classification. Kappa statistics were calculated for each pathologist-pair for each slide and were summarized by classification scheme, pulmonary pathology expertise, diagnostic confidence, and neoplastic grade. Results.--The 12 pulmonary pathology experts and the 12 community pathologists each independently diagnosed 48 to 96 single hematoxylin-eosin digital slides derived from 96 cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma resection. Overall agreement improved with simplification from the comprehensive 44 World Health Organization diagnoses (κ = 0.25) to their 10 major header subtypes (κ = 0.48) and improved again with simplification into the therapeutically relevant squamous/nonsquamous dichotomy (κ = 0.55). Multivariate analysis showed that higher diagnostic agreement was associated with better differentiation, better slide quality, higher diagnostic confidence, similar years of pathology experience, and pulmonary pathology expertise. Conclusions.--These data define the baseline diagnostic agreement for hematoxylin-eosin diagnosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma, allowing future studies to test for improved diagnostic agreement with reflex ancillary tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]