Search

Immune evasion is recognized as a key strategy for cancer survival and progression. Hence, various approaches to restore antitumor immune responses are currently being investigated. In particular, agents targeting immune checkpoints, such as the cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated antigen-4 receptor and programmed death-1 receptor, have shown potential for improving tumor responses and survival in lung cancer patients. With the first immunomodulating agents having been approved for treatment of selected lung cancer patients, there are high expectations that treatment outcomes may be improved with the incorporation of immunotherapies into the various treatment cascades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although progress could have been achieved in treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), outcome still remains poor. One of the strategies to improve survival currently under investigation is maintenance therapy, e.g. prolongation of treatment duration with the administration of an agent at the end of a defined number of initial chemotherapy cycles. This can consist of molecularly targeted or chemotherapeutic drugs which were already included in the induction therapy or different, potentially noncross-resistant agents. The latter represents the perhaps most promising strategy according to currently available data. Drugs chosen for this form of maintenance should be well tolerated with favorable toxicity profile. In the search for this, pemetrexed has classified as an encouraging agent for maintenance therapy as it can be easily delivered, has a favorable toxicity profile and has already demonstrated significant efficacy in advanced NSCLC. Here we review the current status of maintenance therapy with emphasis on pemetrexed in advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Introduction: Mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are frequently detected in lung adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar (BAC) differentiation and have been associated with increased response to small molecule EGFR inhibitors in some clinical studies. However, further molecular characterization of tumor cells carrying EGFR mutations (EGFR-mut) is warranted. Methods: By DNA sequencing, 120 patients with lung adenocarcinomas (70 tumors with BAC components) were screened for EGFR mutations within exons 18–21. Performing comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and immunohistochemistry, chromosomal imbalances and protein expression levels of EGFR, ErbB3 and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) were analyzed, respectively. Results: EGFR mutations were detected in 20/120 tumors. Tumors with BAC components carried more frequently EGFR mutations compared to adenocarcinomas without BAC histology (17/70=24% vs 3/50=6.0%; p =0.012). In a subsequent matched-pair analysis, CGH-analysis demonstrated similar mean numbers of chromosomal imbalances for EGFR mutated and wild-type tumors (8.6 vs 7.8 gains; 2.4 vs 2.7 losses), respectively. Furthermore, tumors with mutated EGFR demonstrated gains in chromosomes 7p, 16p and 20q and losses in chromosome 8p. Interestingly, EGFR mutated tumors showed higher VEGF expression (p =0.03) while differences in EGFR expression were not statistically significant. Conclusion: EGFR gene mutations are frequently seen in lung adenocarcinomas with BAC differentiation and can be linked to chromosomal imbalances and increased VEGF expression. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of serum tumor markers (Cyfra21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron-specific enolase, squamous cell carcinoma-antigen and TPAcyk) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving complete resection. Methods: Sixty-seven patients with histologically proven NSCLC and complete resection of stage I–IIIA disease were included. The serum levels of all markers were measured using commercially available immunoassays. Results: With a median follow-up of 86 months for surviving patients, those with initial Cyfra21-1 serum levels higher than 3.57 ng/ml had a significantly worse prognosis (P=0.014). The remaining serum tumor markers showed no prognostic impact. In a Cox regression model, Cyfra21-1 proved to be an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival and disease-free interval. In addition, Cyfra21-1 sustained as an independent prognostic factor in completely resected stage I/II disease. Conclusions: With a cut-off value of 3.57 ng/ml, Cyfra 21-1 was an independent prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC-patients with complete resection. Further evaluation is needed, particularly in stage I/II disease. When the prognostic impact is confirmed with larger patient numbers this may contribute to the identification of stratification variables for future treatment approaches of NSCLC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To investigate the impact of treatment time and patterns in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) ± immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: Patients were stratified by treatment year: A (2011–2014), B (2015–2017) and C (2018–2020). Tumor- and treatment-related characteristics regarding locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: One hundred and thirty-six consecutive patients were analyzed. All patients completed thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) to a total dose ≥ 60.0 Gy; 36 (26%) patients received ICI. Median PFS in subgroups A, B and C was 8.0, 8.2 and 26.3 months (p = 0.007). Median OS was 19.9 months, 23.4 months and not reached (NR), respectively. In group C, median LRRFS and PFS were 27.2 vs. NR; and 14.2 vs. 26.3 months in patients treated with and without ICI. On multivariate analysis planning target volume (PTV) ≥ 700 cc was a negative prognosticator of LRRFS (HR 2.194; p = 0.001), PFS (HR 1.522; p = 0.042) and OS (HR 2.883; p = 0.001); ICI was a predictor of LRRFS (HR 0.497; p = 0.062), PFS (HR 0.571; p = 0.071) and OS (HR 0.447; p = 0.1). In the non-ICI cohort, multivariate analyses revealed PTV ≥ 700 cc (p = 0.047) and a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 13.75 (p = 0.012) were predictors of PFS; PTV ≥ 700 cc (p = 0.017), SUVmax ≥ 13.75 (p = 0.002) and a total lung V20 ≥ 30% (V20 ≥ 30) (p < 0.05) were predictors of OS. Conclusions: Patients treated after 2018 had improved survival regardless of ICI use. Implementation of ICI resulted in further significant increase of all tested survival endpoints. PTV ≥ 700 cc and ICI were only prognosticators for LRRFS, PFS and OS in the analyzed cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Cytotoxic therapy for lung-cancer patients has only moderately improved during the last decades. Simultaneously, efforts of intensive research to increase our understanding of the molecular basis of lung cancer have been undertaken. The cancer cell has been characterised by several genetic changes that lead to altered cellular functions. In addition, multiple factors of the cancer-cell environment further affect the tumour cell via various receptors and subsequent signaling pathways. The increased knowledge of cellular signaling offers the opportunity to develop novel substances that target specific pathway molecules. In the current review, some of the most essential receptors and signaling pathways involved in lung cancer will be described. In conjunction, examples of novel target-specific agents that have already found their way into clinical trials will be discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: First-line durvalumab plus etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin (platinum-etoposide) showed a significant improvement in overall survival versus platinum-etoposide alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in the CASPIAN study. Here we report updated results, including the primary analysis for overall survival with durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide alone.Methods: CASPIAN is an ongoing, open-label, sponsor-blind, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial at 209 cancer treatment centres in 23 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older (20 years in Japan) and had treatment-naive, histologically or cytologically documented ES-SCLC, with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) in blocks of six, stratified by planned platinum, using an interactive voice-response or web-response system to receive intravenous durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide, durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide, or platinum-etoposide alone. In all groups, patients received etoposide 80-100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 of each cycle with investigator's choice of either carboplatin area under the curve 5-6 mg/mL/min or cisplatin 75-80 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle. Patients in the platinum-etoposide group received up to six cycles of platinum-etoposide every 3 weeks and optional prophylactic cranial irradiation (investigator's discretion). Patients in the immunotherapy groups received four cycles of platinum-etoposide plus durvalumab 1500 mg with or without tremelimumab 75 mg every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks. The two primary endpoints were overall survival for durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide and for durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.Findings: Between March 27, 2017, and May 29, 2018, 972 patients were screened and 805 were randomly assigned (268 to durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide, 268 to durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide, and 269 to platinum-etoposide). As of Jan 27, 2020, the median follow-up was 25·1 months (IQR 22·3-27·9). Durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide was not associated with a significant improvement in overall survival versus platinum-etoposide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-1·00]; p=0·045); median overall survival was 10·4 months (95% CI 9·6-12·0) versus 10·5 months (9·3-11·2). Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide showed sustained improvement in overall survival versus platinum-etoposide (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·62-0·91]; nominal p=0·0032); median overall survival was 12·9 months (95% CI 11·3-14·7) versus 10·5 months (9·3-11·2). The most common any-cause grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (85 [32%] of 266 patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide group, 64 [24%] of 265 patients in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group, and 88 [33%] of 266 patients in the platinum-etoposide group) and anaemia (34 [13%], 24 [9%], and 48 [18%]). Any-cause serious adverse events were reported in 121 (45%) patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide group, 85 (32%) in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group, and 97 (36%) in the platinum-etoposide group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 12 (5%) patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide group (death, febrile neutropenia, and pulmonary embolism [n=2 each]; enterocolitis, general physical health deterioration and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, pneumonia, pneumonitis and hepatitis, respiratory failure, and sudden death [n=1 each]), six (2%) patients in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group (cardiac arrest, dehydration, hepatotoxicity, interstitial lung disease, pancytopenia, and sepsis [n=1 each]), and two (1%) in the platinum-etoposide group (pancytopenia and thrombocytopenia [n=1 each]).Interpretation: First-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide showed sustained overall survival improvement versus platinum-etoposide but the addition of tremelimumab to durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide did not significantly improve outcomes versus platinum-etoposide. These results support the use of durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide as a new standard of care for the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.Funding: AstraZeneca. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In CASPIAN, first-line durvalumab + EP improved OS vs EP in patients with ES-SCLC. • Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were prespecified secondary endpoints. • Symptom burden was reduced in both arms over 12 months or until progression. • Durvalumab + EP delayed worsening of symptoms, functioning, and QoL vs EP. • Addition of durvalumab to EP had no additional detrimental impact on PROs. In the phase III CASPIAN study, first-line durvalumab plus etoposide in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved overall survival (primary endpoint) versus EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) at the interim analysis. Here we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles of durvalumab plus EP every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression, or up to 6 cycles of EP every 3 weeks. PROs, assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3 and its lung cancer module, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13), were prespecified secondary endpoints. Changes from baseline to disease progression or 12 months in prespecified key disease-related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, appetite loss) were analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. Time to deterioration (TTD) of symptoms, functioning, and global health status/quality of life (QoL) from randomization was analyzed. In the durvalumab plus EP and EP arms, 261 and 260 patients were PRO-evaluable. Patients in both arms experienced numerically reduced symptom burden over 12 months or until progression for key symptoms. For the improvements from baseline in appetite loss, the between-arm difference was statistically significant, favoring durvalumab plus EP (difference, −4.5; 99% CI: −9.04, −0.04; nominal p = 0.009). Patients experienced longer TTD with durvalumab plus EP versus EP for all symptoms (hazard ratio [95% CI] for key symptoms: cough 0.78 [0.600‒1.026]; dyspnea 0.79 [0.625‒1.006]; chest pain 0.76 [0.575‒0.996]; fatigue 0.82 [0.653‒1.027]; appetite loss 0.70 [0.542‒0.899]), functioning, and global health status/QoL. Addition of durvalumab to first-line EP maintained QoL and delayed worsening of patient-reported symptoms, functioning, and global health status/QoL compared with EP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy and safety of the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody atezolizumab, as compared with those of platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression are not known.Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial involving patients with metastatic nonsquamous or squamous NSCLC who had not previously received chemotherapy and who had PD-L1 expression on at least 1% of tumor cells or at least 1% of tumor-infiltrating immune cells as assessed by the SP142 immunohistochemical assay. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive atezolizumab or chemotherapy. Overall survival (primary end point) was tested hierarchically according to PD-L1 expression status among patients in the intention-to-treat population whose tumors were wild-type with respect to EGFR mutations or ALK translocations. Within the population with EGFR and ALK wild-type tumors, overall survival and progression-free survival were also prospectively assessed in subgroups defined according to findings on two PD-L1 assays as well as by blood-based tumor mutational burden.Results: Overall, 572 patients were enrolled. In the subgroup of patients with EGFR and ALK wild-type tumors who had the highest expression of PD-L1 (205 patients), the median overall survival was longer by 7.1 months in the atezolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (20.2 months vs. 13.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; P = 0.01). Among all the patients who could be evaluated for safety, adverse events occurred in 90.2% of the patients in the atezolizumab group and in 94.7% of those in the chemotherapy group; grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 30.1% and 52.5% of the patients in the respective groups. Overall and progression-free survival favored atezolizumab in the subgroups with a high blood-based tumor mutational burden.Conclusions: Atezolizumab treatment resulted in significantly longer overall survival than platinum-based chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, regardless of histologic type. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; IMpower110 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02409342.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have extensive-stage disease at presentation, and prognosis remains poor. Recently, immunotherapy has demonstrated clinical activity in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The CASPIAN trial assessed durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, in combination with etoposide plus either cisplatin or carboplatin (platinum-etoposide) in treatment-naive patients with ES-SCLC.Methods: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 209 sites across 23 countries. Eligible patients were adults with untreated ES-SCLC, with WHO performance status 0 or 1 and measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1 ratio) to durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide; durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum-etoposide; or platinum-etoposide alone. All drugs were administered intravenously. Platinum-etoposide consisted of etoposide 80-100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 of each cycle with investigator's choice of either carboplatin area under the curve 5-6 mg/mL per min or cisplatin 75-80 mg/m2 (administered on day 1 of each cycle). Patients received up to four cycles of platinum-etoposide plus durvalumab 1500 mg with or without tremelimumab 75 mg every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks in the immunotherapy groups and up to six cycles of platinum-etoposide every 3 weeks plus prophylactic cranial irradiation (investigator's discretion) in the platinum-etoposide group. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We report results for the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group versus the platinum-etoposide group from a planned interim analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned study treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872, and is ongoing.Findings: Patients were enrolled between March 27, 2017, and May 29, 2018. 268 patients were allocated to the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group and 269 to the platinum-etoposide group. Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival, with a hazard ratio of 0·73 (95% CI 0·59-0·91; p=0·0047]); median overall survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·5-14·8) in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group versus 10·3 months (9·3-11·2) in the platinum-etoposide group, with 34% (26·9-41·0) versus 25% (18·4-31·6) of patients alive at 18 months. Any-cause adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 163 (62%) of 265 treated patients in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group and 166 (62%) of 266 in the platinum-etoposide group; adverse events leading to death occurred in 13 (5%) and 15 (6%) patients.Interpretation: First-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide significantly improved overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC versus a clinically relevant control group. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profiles of all drugs received.Funding: AstraZeneca. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comprehensively investigate the association of CT morphology and clinical findings of adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation status. Retrospectively included 282 patients who was pathologically proved as lung adenocarcinoma with known EGFR mutation status (mutations: 138 patients, female: 86, median age: 66 years; wildtype: 144 patients, female: 67, median age: 62 years) and their pre-treatment CT scans were analyzed. CT findings and clinical information were collected. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. Adjusted for age, gender and smoking history of two groups, significantly more patients with pleural tags, pleural and liver metastases were found in the EGFR mutated group (P = 0.007, 0.004, and 0.043, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis found that the model included age, gender, smoking history, air bronchogram, pleural tags, pleural and liver metastasis had a moderate predictive value for EGFR mutation status (AUC = 0.741, P < .0001). Exon-19 deletion was associated with air bronchogram which adjusted for age, gender and smoking history (P = 0.007, OR: 2.91, 95%CI: 1.25–7.79). The evidence of pleural tags, pleural and liver metastases go along with a higher probability of EGFR mutation in adenocarcinoma patients and air bronchogram is positively associated with Exon-19 deletion mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulmonary function may decline after induction chemotherapy and predict perioperative complications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy is largely indeterminate. Objective: To assess whether adjuvant chemotherapy alters pulmonary function and impacts on treatment-related adverse events. Methods: In a trial on adjuvant chemotherapy (the TREAT trial), 132 patients with R0-resected NSCLC were randomised to 4 cycles of cisplatin-vinorelbine (CVb, n = 65) or cisplatin-pemetrexed (CPx, n = 67). Pulmonary function tests (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1, forced vital capacity, FVC, total lung capacity, TLC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, DLCO, and blood gas analyses, BGA) were analysed before and 30 days after the last chemotherapy, and changes were calculated (Δ = mean differences). Results: Overall,FVC increased significantly (Δ +290 ml, n = 76; p < 0.0001), while TLC did not change (Δ +220 ml, n = 41; p = 0.174). For CPx, FEV1 increased significantly (Δ +150 ml, n = 47; p = 0.0017), but not for CVb (Δ +30 ml, n = 30). DLCO decreased only for CVb (-8%, n = 6) but not for CPx (-0.39%, n = 17; p = 0.58). BGA did not change (p = 0.99). In a Cox regression analysis, baseline pulmonary function did not influence treatment failure. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy seems not to result in a decrease of pulmonary function parameters. A significant FVC increase was probably due to ongoing postoperative improvement. Decline of DLCO was noted with CVb but not with CPx. Pulmonary function does not impact on treatment failure. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, accounting for nearly one-fifth of all cancer-related deaths. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has become one of the most promising approaches in the treatment of advanced lung cancer, although beneficial responses are seen only in a proportion of patients. To improve immunotherapy treatment responses in lung cancer, we need to identify which immunosuppression mechanisms are activated in the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we investigated gene expression profiles in intra-tumoral immune cells in lung cancer, focusing on tumor-associated macrophages, and interactions with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Our data highlight two newly described immunosuppressive pathways, which may represent novel innate immune checkpoints dampening the anti-tumor T cell immune response in lung cancer. Our results substantiate the importance of tumor-associated macrophages as a mediator of immunosuppression and a promising target for immunotherapy. Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors shows beneficial responses, but only in a proportion of patients. To improve immunotherapy in NSCLC, we need to map the immune checkpoints that contribute immunosuppression in NSCLC-associated immune cells and to identify novel pathways that regulate immunosuppression. Here, we investigated the gene expression profiles of intra-tumoral immune cells isolated from NSCLC patients and compared them to the expression profiles of their counterparts in adjacent healthy tissue. Transcriptome analysis was performed on macrophages, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The data was subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment and weighted correlation network analysis in order to identify mediators of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment in NSCLC. Immune cells from NSCLC revealed a consistent differential expression of genes involved in interactions between myeloid cells and lymphocytes. We further identified several immunosuppressive molecules and pathways that may be activated in tumor-associated macrophages in NSCLC. Importantly, we report novel data on immune cell expression of the newly described CD200/CD200R1 pathway, and the leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LILRs), which may represent novel innate immune checkpoints, dampening the anti-tumor T cell immune response in NSCLC. Our study substantiates the importance of tumor-associated macrophages as a mediator of immunosuppression and a promising target for immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Concurrent platinbased chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance treatment with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the new standard of care for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The present study compares the oncological outcome of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy to those treated with chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab (CRT-IO) in the real-world setting. Median follow-up for entire cohort was 33.1 months and median overall survival was 27.2 months. In the CRT-IO cohort after a median follow-up of 20.9 (range: 6.3–27.4) months, local-regional-progression-free-survival, progression-free, and overall survival (PFS, OS) were significantly improved compared to the historical cohort of conventional chemoradiotherapy patients. This real-world analysis demonstrated that durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) led to significant improvement of local-regional control, PFS, and OS in PD-L1 expressing inoperable stage III NSCLC patients compared to a historical cohort. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by maintenance treatment with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is a new standard of care for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The present study compares the oncological outcome of patients treated with CRT to those treated with CRT and durvalumab (CRT-IO) in the real-world setting. The analysis was performed based on the retro- and prospectively collected data of 144 consecutive inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated between 2011–2020. Local-regional-progression-free-survival (LRPFS—defined as progression in the mediastinum, hilum and/or supraclavicular region at both sites and the involved lung), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated from the last day of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 33.1 months (range: 6.3–111.8) and median overall survival was 27.2 (95% CI: 19.5–34.9) months. In the CRT-IO cohort after a median follow-up of 20.9 (range: 6.3–27.4) months, median PFS was not reached, LRPFS (p = 0.002), PFS (p = 0.018), and OS (p = 0.005) were significantly improved vs. the historical cohort of conventional CRT patients. After propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis with age, gender, histology, tumor volume, and treatment mode, and exact matching for T-and N-stage, 22 CRT-IO patients were matched 1:2 to 44 CRT patients. Twelve-month LRPFS, PFS, and OS rates in the CRT-IO vs. CRT cohort were 78.9 vs. 45.5% (p = 0.002), 60.0 vs. 31.8% (p = 0.007), and 100 vs. 70.5% (p = 0.003), respectively. This real-world analysis demonstrated that durvalumab after CRT led to significant improvement of local-regional control, PFS, and OS in PD-L1 expressing inoperable stage III NSCLC patients compared to a historical cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]