Search

Summary Background Bevacizumab is a promising candidate for combination treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (eg, erlotinib), which could improve outcomes for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have previously shown in NEJ026, a phase 3 trial, that the combination of bevacizumab plus erlotinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in these patients. In further analyses, we aimed to examine the effects of bevacizumab–erlotinib on overall survival, time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death, and quality of life. Methods This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial (NEJ026) was done in 69 hospitals and medical, community-based centres across Japan. Eligible patients had stage IIIB, stage IV, or postoperative recurrent, EGFR-mutant (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg point mutation) NSCLC, had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, and were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence and minimisation to receive either 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 21 days, or 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified according to sex, smoking status, EGFR mutation subtype, and clinical disease stage. All participants, investigators, and study personnel (including those assessing outcomes) were unmasked to treatment allocation. We report the secondary outcomes of overall survival and quality of life (the period from enrolment to confirmation of a minimally important difference on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30), and the exploratory outcome of time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death. Overall survival and the exploratory outcome were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had response evaluations. Quality of life was analysed in patients in the modified intention-to-treat population who had completed the quality of life questionnaires. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000017069, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180056, and is currently closed. Findings Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were enrolled. 112 patients who received bevacizumab–erlotinib and 112 who received erlotinib only were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (Nov 30, 2019) and a median follow-up of 39·2 months (IQR 23·9–43·5), the median overall survival was 50·7 months (95% CI 37·3–not estimable [NE]) in the bevacizumab–erlotinib group and 46·2 months (38·2–NE) in the erlotinib-only group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·007, 95% CI 0·681–1·490; p=0·97). In analysis of the exploratory outcome, after a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 14·2–39·1), the median time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·1–35·9) in the bevacizumab–erlotinib group and 24·3 months (20·4–29·1) in the erlotinib-only group (HR 0·773, 95% CI 0·562–1·065). The median time between enrolment and confirmation of a minimally important difference on the EORTC QLQ-C30 was 6·0 months (95% CI 5·2–11·3) in the bevacizumab–erlotinib group and 8·3 months (5·7–13·9) in the erlotinib-only group (p=0·47). Interpretation The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not prolong survival in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but both treatment groups had relatively long survival durations. Why the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not affect overall survival is unclear, but it is possible that the beneficial effects of combination therapy were not seen because overall survival was influenced by treatment regimens used after disease progression. Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Background The effect of second‐line treatment on overall survival (OS) may be affected by subsequent treatment in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, in such patients, the correlation between post‐progression survival (PPS) and OS is unclear. Our study assessed the correlation of progression‐free survival (PFS) and PPS with OS, using individual patient data, in advanced NSCLC patients who were treated with second‐line nivolumab monotherapy, Methods Between January 2016 and March 2019, we evaluated 92 NSCLC patients who received second‐line nivolumab treatment after first‐line platinum‐based combination chemotherapy. Using individual patient data, the correlations of PFS and PPS with OS were examined. Results Linear regression and Spearman rank correlation analysis demonstrated that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.85, p, Post‐progression survival (PPS) influences overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients who receive second‐line nivolumab monotherapy. When compared with PFS, PPS was more strongly correlated with OS. Subsequent treatment after disease progression following second‐line nivolumab treatment had a significant impact on OS.

Background S‐1 monotherapy is effective and feasible for previously treated patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is not clear whether its effectiveness and tolerability in elderly patients are equivalent to those in younger patients. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of S‐1 monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC who had previously received other treatments. Methods We included 96 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced NSCLC treated with S‐1 alone as a subsequent‐line treatment at 12 medical facilities between January 2005 and March 2018 in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients, response to S‐1 monotherapy, and adverse events (AEs) were investigated, retrospectively. Results A total of 68 male and 28 female patients (median age, 78 [range: 75–86] years) were analyzed. In elderly patients who were treated with S‐1 monotherapy as a subsequent‐line treatment, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 8.3%, 43.8%, 3.4 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Observed AEs included anorexia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, reduced platelet count, and skin hyperpigmentation. Treatment‐related death was observed in one patient because of pneumonitis. In patients who experienced no progressive disease, subsequent‐line S‐1 alone was associated with longer PFS and OS. Conclusions S‐1 monotherapy is effective and feasible as a subsequent‐line treatment in elderly patients who were previously treated for NSCLC, and it produces results. S‐1 monotherapy could be one of the treatment choices for elderly patients with previously treated NSCLC., Kaplan–Meier analysis of (a) progression‐free survival (PFS) and (b) overall survival for the 96 patients in the study.

Objective Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during real-world osimertinib use were investigated in Japan. Methods Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with second-line or later oral osimertinib per the Japanese package insert (80 mg once daily) were included. Data were collected between 28 March 2016 and 31 August 2018. Results The median observation period in the safety analysis population (n = 3578) was 343.0 days. ADRs (defined as adverse events whose causality to osimertinib could not be denied by the attending physicians or manufacturer) were reported in 58.1% (2079/3578) of patients. ADRs of interstitial lung disease events were reported in 6.8% (245/3578; Grade ≥ 3, 2.9% [104/3578]) of patients, of whom 29 (11.8%) died (0.8% of patients overall). ADRs of QT interval prolonged, liver disorder and haematotoxicity were reported in 1.3% (45/3578; Grade ≥ 3, 0.1% [5/3578]), 5.9% (212/3578; Grade ≥ 3, 1.0% [35/3578]) and 11.4% (409/3578; Grade ≥ 3, 2.9% [104/3578]) of patients, respectively. In the efficacy analysis population (n = 3563), 119 (3.3%) patients had complete responses, 2373 (66.6%) had partial responses and 598 (16.8%) had stable disease. The objective response rate was 69.9%; disease control rate was 86.7%; and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.3 months. At 6 and 12 months, PFS rates were 77.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.9–78.9) and 53.2% (95% CI, 51.3–55.1) and overall survival rates were 88.3% (95% CI, 87.2–89.4) and 75.4% (95% CI, 73.8–77.0), respectively. Conclusions These data support the currently established benefit-risk assessment of osimertinib in this patient population., Real-world safety and efficacy data from Japanese patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC support the currently established benefit-risk assessment of osimertinib in this patient population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an effective subsequent-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unclear whether the efficacy and safety of subsequent-line ICI monotherapy in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) are similar to that in non-elderly patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ICI monotherapy in pretreated elderly patients with NSCLC. Between January 2016 and February 2018, 131 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who received subsequent-line ICI monotherapy at 13 Japanese institutions were enrolled in this study. Baseline characteristics, the efficacy of ICI treatment, and adverse events were evaluated. Ninety-eight men and 33 women (median age 77 [range 75–87] years) were enrolled. Among those who received subsequent-line ICI monotherapy, the overall response, disease control rates, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 27.4%, 61.8%, 4.5 months, and 16.0 months, respectively. Adverse events such as anorexia, fatigue, pneumonitis, and hypothyroidism were observed. There were two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis and thrombocytopenia. Subsequent-line ICI monotherapy in patients with good performance status (PS), receiving steroids for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and exhibiting partial response (PR) was associated with improved PFS, as well as OS in patients with good PS and PR. Subsequent-line ICI monotherapy in elderly patients, with previously treated NSCLC, was effective, safe and showed outcomes equivalent to those in non-elderly patients. Immunotherapy provides a survival benefit for elderly patients, who exhibit its efficacy and a favorable general condition.

Accumulating evidence indicates that CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and systemic CD4+ T-cell immunity play an important role in mediating durable antitumor responses. We longitudinally examined T-cell immunity in the peripheral blood of patients with non–small lung cancer and found that responders had significantly (P < 0.0001) higher percentages of effector, CD62Llow CD4+ T cells prior to PD-1 blockade. Conversely, the percentage of CD25+FOXP3+ CD4+ T cells was significantly (P = 0.034) higher in nonresponders. We developed a formula, which demonstrated 85.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity, based on the percentages of CD62Llow CD4+ T cells and CD25+FOXP3+ cells to predict nonresponders. Mass cytometry analysis revealed that the CD62Llow CD4+ T-cell subset expressed T-bet+, CD27−, FOXP3−, and CXCR3+, indicative of a Th1 subpopulation. CD62Llow CD4+ T cells significantly correlated with effector CD8+ T cells (P = 0.0091) and with PD-1 expression on effector CD8+ T cells (P = 0.0015). Gene expression analysis revealed that CCL19, CLEC-2A, IFNA, IL7, TGFBR3, CXCR3, and HDAC9 were preferentially expressed in CD62Llow CD4+ T cells derived from responders. Notably, long-term responders, who had >500-day progression-free survival, showed significantly higher numbers of CD62Llow CD4+ T cells prior to PD-1 blockade therapy. Decreased CD62Llow CD4+ T-cell percentages after therapy resulted in acquired resistance, with long-term survivors maintaining high CD62Llow CD4+ T-cell percentages. These results pave the way for new treatment strategies for patients by monitoring CD4+ T-cell immune statuses in their peripheral blood.

Background Chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab is the standard treatment for the patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is a real-world data about the management of adverse events, such as pneumonitis, according to the different institutions. Here, we present the experience regarding the management of adverse events after the initiation of durvalumab as daily practice. Methods From July 2018 to August 2019, 41 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who underwent chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab, were retrospectively analyzed in the study using our medical records. Results The median age of patients was 72 years (range: 51-80 years). A total of 33 patients were male and eight were female, and 40 patients (98%) received a total radiation dose of 60 Gy as concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The median V20 for the entire cohort was 18.9% (range: 3.5-29.9). Any adverse events during chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab were observed in 32 patients (78.0%), while three patients (7.3%) experienced grade 3 toxicities. In total, 25 (61.0%) patients experienced pneumonitis, four (9.8%) thyroid dysfunction, three (7.3%) myopathy, two (4.9%) rash or eruption, one (2.4%) bowel disease and one (2.4%) malaise. Grade 3 pneumonitis, thyroid dysfunction and myopathy were observed in one (2.4%), one (2.4%) and one (2.4%), respectively. A total of 22 (53.7%) patients were unable to continue durvalumab due to pneumonitis. However, durvalumab was finally readministered to six patients. Conclusions The adherence to lung dose constraints such as V20 as well as close treatment monitoring are a prerequisite for the management of pneumonitis during maintenance therapy with durvalumab.

Pembrolizumab is an effective front-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients expressing high levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, it is unclear whether first-line pembrolizumab has similar efficacy among elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) and younger patients. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of front-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in older adults with NSCLC expressing high PD-L1. A total of 128 patients with advanced NSCLC expressing high PD-L1, including 47 older adults, received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy at ten institutions in Japan, between February 2017 and February 2018. Data related to patient characteristics, efficacy of pembrolizumab therapy, and the type and severity of adverse events were recorded. Overall, 47 patients [40 men and 7 women; median age 79 (range 75–88) years] were included in our analysis. In patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, overall response, disease control rates, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 53.1%, 74.4%, 7.0 months, and not reached, respectively. Common adverse events included anorexia, fatigue, skin rash, and hypothyroidism. Two treatment-related deaths were noted, due to pneumonitis and infection. First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with improved PFS in patients with non-progressive disease (PD). In patients with non-PD and good performance status (PS), pembrolizumab monotherapy improved OS. Elderly patients with NSCLC expressing high PD-L1 tolerated front-line pembrolizumab monotherapy well. Their survival outcomes were equivalent to those of younger patients. In patients with non-PD, first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy may improve PFS; in conjunction with good PS, it additionally improves OS.

Objectives: Programmed death-1(PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies have clinical benefits for cancer patients facing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the effect of steroid use on the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving PD-1 blockade remains unclear. Methods: NSCLC patients with complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD)/not evaluable (NE) status plus progression-free survival (PFS) of 180 days after PD-1 blockade from December 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively registered in our study and were divided into two groups: those with and without systemic steroid use for irAEs. Results: In total, 126 patients who had benefitted from PD-1 blockade were enrolled in our study, among them, 44 received systemic steroids for irAEs, and 82 had no adverse events or, if they did, did not receive systemic steroids. Among the 44 patients requiring steroids, interstitial lung disease (ILD), adrenal insufficiency, diarrhea, and liver dysfunction were observed in 19, 9, 4, and 4 patients, respectively. More side effects were observed in the group treated by steroids. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with and without systemic steroid use were 11.7 and 16.0 months (p &lt, 0.037) and 35.0 and 41.0 months (p &lt, 0.28), respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses of survival, systemic steroid treatment for irAEs was significantly associated with PFS. The occurrence of ILD, adrenal insufficiency, and fever was significant in patients who used systemic steroids for irAEs. Conclusions: Patients administered systemic steroids for irAEs due to PD-1 blockade treatment exhibited shorter PFS than those who were not. Systemic steroids might affect survival after PD-1 blockade even for patients who once acquired its clinical benefit.

Summary Background Resistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy develops in almost half of patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1 year of treatment. The JO25567 phase 2 trial comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy with erlotinib monotherapy established the activity and manageable toxicity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC. We did a phase 3 trial to validate the results of the JO25567 study and report here the results from the preplanned interim analysis. Methods In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 NEJ026 trial, we recruited patients with stage IIIB–IV disease or recurrent, cytologically or histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR genomic aberrations from 69 centres across Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, and one or more measurable lesions based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day plus intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib 150 mg per day monotherapy. Randomisation was done by minimisation, stratified by sex, smoking status, clinical stage, and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This study is ongoing; the data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Sept 21, 2017. Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one response evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069. Findings Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n=114) or erlotinib alone (n=114). 112 patients in each group were evaluable for efficacy, and safety was evaluated in 112 patients in the combination therapy group and 114 in the monotherapy group. Median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 7·0–15·7). At the time of interim analysis, median progression-free survival for patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group was 16·9 months (95% CI 14·2–21·0) compared with 13·3 months (11·1–15·3) for patients in the erlotinib group (hazard ratio 0·605, 95% CI 0·417–0·877; p=0·016). 98 (88%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 53 (46%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3–4 adverse event was rash (23 [21%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 24 [21%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). Nine (8%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and five (4%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (two [2%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group) and grade 4 hepatic dysfunction (one [1%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and one [1%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation The results of this interim analysis showed that bevacizumab plus erlotinib combination therapy improves progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC. Future studies with longer follow-up, and overall survival and quality-of-life data will be required to further assess the efficacy of this combination in this setting. Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Background It remains unclear why radiation clinically provides a synergistic effect when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate whether the therapeutic efficacy of nivolumab is improved as a result of a history of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods From February 2016 to December 2017, 124 consecutive patients were administered nivolumab for pretreated advanced NSCLC. The patients were divided into RT and non-RT groups. Results Sixty-six (53%) of the 124 patients had been administered RT before the initiation of nivolumab, 52 (42%) received extracranial RT, and 40 (32%) were treated with thoracic RT. The median number of nivolumab cycles was 4 (range: 1-43). The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of nivolumab in all patients were 28.0% and 58.4%, respectively. The ORR (36.4%) was significantly higher in patients who had received previous RT than in patients who had not received any RT (19%). The therapeutic efficacy of nivolumab was particularly noteworthy in patients with non-adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma histology administered extracranial RT, with ORRs of 48.3% and 52.6%, and DCRs of 87.1% and 84.2%, respectively. Conclusion Previous RT was an independent prognostic marker of favorable prognosis after nivolumab administration and improved the response rate to nivolumab treatment. Previous RT was clinically identified to have a synergistic effect with nivolumab treatment, increasing the response rate and improving the outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Whether primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) should be administered immediately after the initiation of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (DR) to prevent the occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. Our retrospective study aimed to elucidate whether PEG-G-CSF could control the occurrence of FN as a result of DR in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-three patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer who had received DR were eligible for our analysis. Of the 33 patients, 29 received prophylactic PEG-G-CSF immediately after DR, but none developed FN. However, FN was observed in 2 (50%) of the 4 patients that were not administered PEG-CSF. The overall response and disease control rates in the 29 patients with prophylactic PEG-GSF were 31% and 62%, respectively. The median progression-free and overall survival rates of the patients with and without prophylactic PEG-GSF were 177 and 163 days (P = 0.20), and 628 and 274 days (P = 0.13), respectively. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF suppressed the occurrence of FN secondary to the administration of DR.

Background It is unclear whether the chemotherapy response improves after exposure to immunotherapy. Antiangiogenic agents have been shown to stimulate the immune system and cause synergistic effects that stimulate tumor shrinkage. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate improvement of the efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel after the failure of nivolumab as a PD-1 inhibitor. Methods From February 2016 to December 2017, 152 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) administered nivolumab in our institution were identified. We reviewed the records of 20 NSCLC patients administered ramucirumab plus docetaxel after nivolumab failure. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was prophylactically administered to 18 patients (90%) after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel. Results The median age of the patients was 70 (range: 55-77) years. Twelve patients were male and eight were female. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 16 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in three, and other in one. The ORR of ramucirumab plus docetaxel was 60%, and the PFS and OS were 169 and 343 days, respectively. Among the 20 patients, 12 achieved a partial response, giving an ORR of 60.0%. Six patients had stable disease and two had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 90%. Gastrointestinal adverse events were frequently observed in 19 patients. Conclusions Ramucirumab plus docetaxel achieved a higher response rate when administered immediately after nivolumab failure compared to regimens without prior nivolumab administration.

Re-challenge of erlotinib after gefitinib failure is reported to yield some benefit in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, little is known about the re-challenge of afatinib after 1st generate on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure.From May 2015 to August 2018, 62 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutation received afatinib after gefitinib and/or erlotinib failure at our institution was included in our retrospective study.The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of afatinib as re-challenge were 17.0% and 79.2%, respectively. The median time on treatment of 1st generation EGFR-TKI (1st TKI) was 14 months. By multivariate analysis, smoking, performance status (PS), and time on treatment of 1st TKI with more than 10 months were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors predicting a worse progression-free survival (PFS), and significant prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) were PS and time on treatment of 1st TKI with more than 10 months, especially in patients with exon 19 deletion.Re-challenge of afatinib was identified as one of the therapeutic options after 1st TKI failure in the patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation when the time of treatment by prior 1st TKI is more than 10 months.

The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence and risk factors for pneumonitis when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are combined with palliative thoracic radiotherapy (RT) for lung cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients with lung cancer who received ICIs after palliative thoracic RT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Their ICIs were pembrolizumab (n = 17), nivolumab (n = 8) and atezolizumab (n = 4). Median follow-up period was 10 months. The median interval between starting RT and starting ICI was 25 days. Pneumonitis events were grade 1 (n = 10; 34%), grade 2 (n = 4; 14%) and grade 3 (n = 3; 10%). Obstructive pneumonia was significantly associated with grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis (P = 0.036). Age, sex, ICI agent, interval between RT and ICI and history of ICI before RT were not associated with grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. Tumor volume; Brinkman index; dosimetric factors, such as lung V5, V10, V20, V30 and mean lung dose (MLD); lactate dehydrogenase; and C-reactive protein did not significantly differ between the grade ≤ 1 and grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis groups. Levels of sialylated carbohydrate antigen KL-6 were evaluated in 27 patients before RT; they significantly differed between patients with grade ≤ 2 pneumonitis (mean: 431 U/ml) and those with grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis (mean: 958 U/ml; P

Background: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the impact of first-line treatment on overall survival (OS) may be influenced by subsequent therapies. Thus, using patient-level data, we assessed the relationships of progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS) with OS among patients with high-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC. Methods: We reviewed data from 133 patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC at 6 Japanese centers between February 2017 and December 2018. The correlations of PFS and PPS with OS were evaluated at the patient level. Results: Linear regression analyses and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient revealed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.76, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.65), while PFS was only moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.71, p < 0.05, and R2 = 0.4). Furthermore, PPS was significantly associated with performance status at the end of pembrolizumab monotherapy, as well as the use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy after pembrolizumab monotherapy (both p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC, PPS was more strongly correlated with OS, relative to the relationship between PFS and OS. Therefore, subsequent treatment appears to significantly influence OS in patients with disease progression following first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Background Lung cancer is most common among older individuals. However, polypharmacy and comorbidities, which are also more common in older individuals, can limit treatment options. Previous studies suggest that afatinib can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients. This study investigated the anti-tumour activity and safety profile of first-line afatinib in previously-untreated elderly Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, performed in multiple centres in Japan. Previously untreated patients, aged ≥75 years, with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were managed with protocol-defined dose adjustments. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central review. Results In total, 38 patients received at least one dose of afatinib, and 37 were evaluable for response. Median age was 77.5 years (range 75–91), all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and 60.5% had Del19-positive disease. Median follow-up was 838 days. ORR was 75.7% (2 complete responses and 26 partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5–19.0). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months (95% CI, 35.2–not reached); the 2-year OS rate was 78.3%. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhoea (28.9%), paronychia (23.7%), and rash/acne (15.8%). Dose reductions due to TRAEs were reported in 78.9% of patients, and eight (21.1%) patients discontinued afatinib due to TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion Although dose adjustments were relatively common in this small group of Japanese patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, discontinuation occurred much less frequently, and most patients were able to stay on treatment for well over a year. Further, afatinib was associated with high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS. Trial registration The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT) as trial number 031180136 (date of initial registration: 19 February 2019), and the University Hospital Network (UMIN) as trial number 000017877 (date of initial registration: 11 June 2015).

Background There is currently insufficient information available on effective therapies that can be administered to patients with non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs). However, sequential treatment via programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) blockade followed by EGFR‐TKI rechallenge is suggested to improve the therapeutic efficacy in such patients. Methods A total of 75 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations treated with afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib after EGFR‐TKI treatment failure were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 patients were treated with EGFR‐TKI rechallenge immediately after the failure of PD‐1 blockade therapy (experimental group) and the remaining 62 patients did not receive PD‐1 inhibitor therapy before EGFR‐TKI rechallenge (control group). Blood samples were collected at two time points; before the initiation of anti‐PD‐1 therapy and at EGFR‐TKI rechallenge. Results The objective response rates of EGFR‐TKI rechallenge in the experimental and control groups were 46.1% and 16.1%, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.026). In the experimental group, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after EGFR‐TKI rechallenge were 5.0 and 25.0 months, respectively, and no statistically significant difference in the percentage of lymphocytes before immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and EGFR‐TKIs was observed in patients with partial response (PR) and without PR after EGFR‐TKI rechallenge. In particular, the sequential treatment of PD‐1 blockade therapy followed by EGFR‐TKI rechallenge was consecutively repeated three times in two out of 13 patients in the experimental group, and EGFR‐TKI rechallenge consecutively for the third time yielded a PR without increased toxicities. Conclusions EGFR‐TKI rechallenge immediately after PD‐1 blockade treatment was identified as an effective therapy for NSCLC patients with resistance to EGFR‐TKIs., Repeated rechallenge of EGFR‐TKI • EGFR‐TKI rechallenge immediately after PD‐1 blockade treatment may be effective for patients with resistance to EGFR‐TKIs.• The results of our study provide a new strategy in sequencing treatment of lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been described to markedly improve patient survival. However, reports describing the antitumor therapeutic efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with autoantibodies are scarce.MethodsThis study examined the efficacy and feasibility of ICIs in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An ANA titer greater than 1:40 and 1:80 was defined as positive and high, respectively. Patients who were treated with ICIs at Saitama Medical University, International Medical Center between January 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsOne hundred and nineteen of the 266 patients (44.7%) who received nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab had positive ANA titers. Their median age was 69 (range, 39–84) years. The overall response rate of the ANA-positive patients was 35.9% (37/103), which was not less than that of the ANA-negative group. The median progression-free survival in the ANA-positive group was 6.3 months versus 4.3 months in the ANA-negative group (p = 0.08). Twenty-seven ANA-positive patients (10.2%) had high ANA titers. However, ICI efficacy was not decreased in these patients. Regardless of the cutoff of ANA titers (1:40 or 1:80), the rate of patients who experienced adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionThe administration of ICIs to ANA-positive patients has clinical benefits. The prevalence of adverse events in the ANA-positive group was not higher than that in the ANA-negative group.

Background/aim Promising reports have described the combination of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) with carboplatin plus pemetrexed or bevacizumab. However, no analysis of afatinib with platinum-doublet chemotherapies has been performed. Patients and methods We evaluated the safety and antitumor efficacy of afatinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who progressed during first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Results Ten patients received 20 or 30 mg/day afatinib with carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2). Dose-limiting toxicities included delay of afatinib ≥14 days, grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 hypokalemia, grade 3 serum amylase increase and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The recommended dose of afatinib was 20 mg/day in this combination therapy. Overall response rate was 30% and median progression-free survival was 13.7 months. Conclusion This is the first study to investigate the combination of afatinib, carboplatin and pemetrexed. At the recommended dose, this combination was well tolerated and had a good clinical efficacy.

After the cessation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy due to an immune-related adverse event (irAE), it remains unclear whether retreatment with ICI is more effective than its discontinuation. To explore the clinical significance of its retreatment, patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had treatment interruption of nivolumab due to irAEs were identified and the clinical differences between discontinuation and retreatment with nivolumab were retrospectively reviewed. 49 (26%) of 187 patients treated with nivolumab experienced the cessation of treatment due to a serious irAE. Retreatment was chosen in 21 patients (retreatment cohort), while 28 patients discontinued treatment (discontinuation cohort). The most common irAEs requiring treatment cessation in 49 patients included pneumonitis (59.2%), adrenal insufficiency (8.2%), liver dysfunction (8.2%) renal dysfunction (8.2%), colitis (6.1%), hypothyroidism (4.1%), and rash (2.0%). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 initial irAEs did not differ between the retreatment and discontinuation cohorts; however, the incidence of renal dysfunction and colitis was higher in the retreatment cohort than in the discontinuation cohort. Retreatment with nivolumab displayed an overall response rate of 15%, without a significant increase in irAEs. The median overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ significantly between the retreatment and discontinuation cohorts, irrespective of the efficacy of prior nivolumab. Retreatment exhibited a slightly higher efficacy without a significant increase in irAEs; however, the clinical significance of retreatment and discontinuation was similar in NSCLC patients that led to treatment interruption due to any irAE after initial nivolumab.

Background The aim of our study was to retrospectively assess the incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) related to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment immediately before and/or after the administration of a PD-1 antibody. Methods We analyzed the data of 26 patients who underwent treatment with EGFR-TKIs immediately before and/or after the administration of an anti-PD-1 antibody. Results Four out of the 26 patients developed ILD during EGFR-TKI treatment: three patients during the administration of osimertinib immediately after, and one during afatinib immediately before treatment with an anti-PD-1 antibody. Three of 12 patients who underwent EGFR-TKI therapy immediately after anti-PD-1 antibody treatment experienced osimertinib-induced ILD. ILD was not observed in the five patients administered an anti-PD-1 antibody followed by first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion ILD was observed in the treatment sequence of an anti-PD-1 antibody followed by osimertinib, but not with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

9506 Background: In NEJ026, a phase III trial comparing bevacizumab plus erlotinib (BE) to erlotinib monotherapy (E) for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we demonstrated the progression-free survival (PFS) of BE was significantly superior to E (Saito et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):625-635.). However overall survival analysis were immature at the cutoff date. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve pts with advanced non-squamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-mutation were randomly assigned to receive either combination with erlotinib (150 mg daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg iv q3w) or erlotinib (150 mg daily). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, RR, safety, and QoL. Results: The 226 pts were assigned to BE (n=112) and E (n=114). For the follow-up OS analysis, the data cut-off date was 30 November 2019. Median follow up time was 39.2 months. Median OS was 50.7 months (95% CI, 37.3 months to not reached) with BE and 46.2 months (95% CI, 38.2 months to not reached) with E (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.48). Twenty-nine patients (25.9%) in BE and twenty-six patients (23.2%) in E were treated by osimertinib as second line treatment. The median survival time between enrollment and progressive disease of second-line treatment (median PFS2) was 28.6 months (95% CI, 22.1 months to 35.9) with BE and 24.3 months (95% CI, 20.4 months to 29.1 months) with E (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.10). In both arms, the median OS of patients with osimertinib second-line treatment were longer than other second-line chemotherapy groups [50.7 months (95% CI, 38.0 months to 50.7 months) vs 40.1 months (95% CI, 29.5 months to not reached), (hazard ratio, 0.645; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.03), respectively. Conclusion: The additional effect of bevacizumab on erlotinib monotherapy for NSCLC with EGFR mutations gradually decreased in the order of PFS2 and survival, with no significant differences. Clinical trial information: UMIN000017069 .

It remains unclear whether the accumulation of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) before the initiation of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody can predict the outcome after its treatment. The aim of this study is to retrospectively examine the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG uptake as a predictive marker of anti-PD-1 antibody. Eighty-five patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) just before administration of nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy were eligible in our study, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and the maximum of standardized under value (SUVmax) on 18F-FDG uptake were assessed. Objective response rate, median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 36.6%, 161 days and 716 days, respectively. The frequency of any immune-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients with low 18F-FDG uptake on PET than in those with high uptake. By multivariate analysis, the tumor metabolic activity by TLG and MTV was identified as an independent prognostic factor for predicting outcome after anti-PD-1 antibody therapy, but not SUVmax, predominantly in patients with adenocarcinoma. Metabolic tumor indices as TLG and MTV on 18F-FDG uptake could predict the prognosis after anti-PD-1 antibodies in patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have become one of standard therapy. It was demonstrated that nivolumab therapy for resectable NSCLC patients prior to surgery resulted in major pathological responses in 40% of the patients. On the other hand, adjuvant nivolumab therapy for melanoma resulted in longer recurrence-free survivals. Thus, it is still uncertain which host immunological status is appropriate for ICI therapy, before or after surgery. In this study, we examined the peripheral blood, and tumor tissues to elucidate immunological impact of surgery in NSCLC patients. Methods The present study comprised of 20 surgically resectable early (stage I, II, or IIIA) NSCLC patients in Saitama Medical University International Medical Center. Peripheral blood samples were collected before and after surgical resection of NSCLC. PBMCs were analyzed with LSR FortessaTM. Results Interestingly, more effector memory (EM) CCR7-CD45RA- CD8+ T cells and CD62Llow CD4+ T cells were observed in early stage NSCLC patients, compared with stage IV NSCLC patients. Significant decrease of the percentages of EM CD8+ T cells (P = 0.0045) and CD62Llow CD4+ T cells (P Conclusions After surgical removal of lung cancer, EM type T cells were converted to CM type T cells. It seems that surgery may have negative influence for innate immunity. Because PD-1 blockade therapy only activates primed effector T cells, the immunological status before surgery seems more appropriate for ICI therapy. Legal entity responsible for the study Saitama Medical University International Medical Center. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

9006Background: Development of treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had been focused on monotherapy of gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib. Combinations of EGFR-TKIs and VEGF inhibitors are one of candidates for next strategy for EGFR-mutated tumor. We conducted a phase III study comparing BE to E. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive pts with advanced non-squamous NSCLC harbouring EGFR-mutation were randomly assigned to receive either combination with erlotinib (150 mg daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg iv q3w) or erlotinib (150 mg daily). Status of EGFR mutations in plasma samples were monitored routinely during the study treatment and a second-line treatment. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, RR, safety, and QoL. We hypothesized that hazard ratio of PFS was 0.63. It was estimated that 147 events would be needed for the study to have a power of 80% and a two-sided significance level of 5%. Accordingly, this study was planned to enroll 214 pts in total. Results: Betw...

e19583 Background: PF is commonly concomitant disorder with lung cancer. Because PF sometimes deteriorates and results unfavorable clinical course, patients with PF are excluded from most cancer clinical trials. S-1 is a novel active oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent consisting of tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium. Although most anti-cancer agent have pulmonary toxicity, post marketing surveillance reported S-1 has lower pulmonary toxicity incidence. We have conducted feasibility study of S-1 and carboplatin combination for patients with advanced or ineligible for other treatment modality of NSCLC patients. Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC, clinically diagnosed pulmonary fibrosis, aged 80 years old or younger, performance status 0-2 and chemo naive were eligible for the study. Carboplatin (AUC 5) was administered on day 1 and S-1 (80mg/m2/day) on day 1 to 14 for four to six cycles. Endpoints were response rate, common safety profiles and effect to PF. Results: From March 2009 to December 2011, 21 pts (19 males/ 2 females, median age 67 years old, ranged 55 to 77, 10 adenocarcinoma, 10 squamous, 1 adenosquamous, stage IIA: 1, IIIA: 3, IIIB: 9, IV: 4, recurrence: 4) were enrolled. All patients had moderate or severe PF. Treatment delivery; 1 cycle: 3pts, 2: 3pts, 3: 3pts, 4: 10pts, 5; 1pts, 6: 1pts. Partial responses were observed in 7 patients (RR; 33%). The median progression free survival duration was 4.0 months and the median overall survival duration in 10.4 months. During the treatment, 2 patient experienced moderate deterioration of pulmonary fibrosis, 1 experienced infectious pneumonia, all three patients recovered from the event. There was no treatment related death. Besides pulmonary toxicity, most common adverse events were myelotoxicities. Conclusions: This is the first trial of S-1 and carboplatin combination for patients with PF and NSCLC. The study revealed S-1 and carboplatin combination was feasible and active even in patients with PF and NSCLC who are usually excluded from cancer clinical trials.