Search

The handling of biomaterials is crucial for precision medicine in advanced-stage lung patients with only cytology or small biopsies available. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the quantity and quality of nucleic acids extracted from mixed stained slides (MSSs), including H&E, IHC and FISH, compared to the extraction from unstained slides (USs). A series of 35 lung adenocarcinoma surgical samples was selected to set up the method and the technical approach was validated in a series of 15 small biopsies and 38 cytological samples. DNA extracted from MSSs was adequate in all samples and the Real Time PCR was successful in 30/35 surgical samples (86%), 14/15 small biopsies (93%), and 33/38 cytological samples (87%). NGS using DNA extracted from MSSs was successful in 18/35 surgical samples (51%), 11/15 small biopsies (73%), and 26/38 cytological samples (68%). RNA extracted from MSSs was unsatisfactory in all cases showing an inadequate degree of fragmentation. Our technical approach based on the recovery of stained slides could represent a strategic way forward for DNA-based biomarker testing in lung cancer cases without biomaterials. The RNA extracted from MSSs did not represent a successful approach.

// Carminia Maria Della Corte 1 , Umberto Malapelle 2 , Elena Vigliar 2 , Francesco Pepe 2 , Giancarlo Troncone 2 , Vincenza Ciaramella 1 , Teresa Troiani 1 , Erika Martinelli 1 , Valentina Belli 1 , Fortunato Ciardiello 1 , Floriana Morgillo 1 1 Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento Medico-Chirurgico di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale “F. Magrassi e A. Lanzara,” Universita degli studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy 2 Dipartimento di Sanita Pubblica, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy Correspondence to: Floriana Morgillo, email: florianamorgillo@yahoo.com Keywords: EGFR inhibitors, lung cancer, cell signalling, hedgehog, EMT Received: January 13, 2017 Accepted: February 08, 2017 Published: February 18, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this work was to investigate the efficacy of sequential treatment with first-, second- and third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the mechanisms of acquired resistance occurring during the sequential use of these inhibitors. Experimental design: We developed an in vivo model of acquired resistance to EGFR-inhibitors by treating nude mice xenografted with HCC827, a human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line harboring EGFR activating mutation, with a sequence of first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) (erlotinib and gefitinib), of second-generation EGFR-TKI (afatinib) plus/minus the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab, and of third-generation EGFR-TKI (osimertinib). Results: HCC827-derived xenografts and with acquired resistance to EGFR-inhibitors were sensitive to the sequential use of first-, second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Continuous EGFR inhibition of first-generation resistant tumors by sequential treatment with afatinib plus/minus cetuximab, followed by osimertinib, represented an effective therapeutic strategy in this model. Whereas T790M resistance mutation was not detected, a major mechanism of acquired resistance was the activation of components of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway. This phenomenon was accompanied by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell lines established in vitro from gefitinib-, or afatinib- or osimertinib-resistant tumors showed metastatic properties and maintained EGFR-TKIs resistance in vitro , that was reverted by the combined blockade of Hh, with the selective SMO inhibitor sonidegib, and EGFR. Conclusions: EGFR -mutant NSCLC can benefit from continuous treatment with EGFR-inhibitors, indepenently from mechanisms of resistance. In a complex and heterogenous scenario, Hh showed an important role in mediating resistance to EGFR-inhibitors through the induction of mesenchymal properties.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and the ineffectiveness of the current therapies seriously limits the survival rate of NSCLC patients. In the search for new antitumor agents, nature has played a pivotal role providing a variety of molecules, which are likely to exert selective anti-tumour properties. Herein, we investigated the antiproliferative potential of Urtica dioica L. extract (UD) against NSCLC cell models with low sensitivity to cisplatin, a cytotoxic agent largely employed to cure NSCLCs. UD inhibited cell proliferation in the selected cells, while no toxic effects were observed in normal lung cells. Furthermore, the co-treatment of UD and cisplatin notably sensitised NSCLC cells to cisplatin. Mechanistically, we discovered that UD-promoted endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress via activation of the growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 153 (GADD153) triggering apoptosis. We also performed an extensive NMR analysis of UD, identifying rutin and oxylipins as the main secondary metabolites present in the mixture. Additionally, we discovered that an oxylipins’ enriched fraction contributes to the antiproliferative activity of the plant extract. In the future, this study may provide new chemical scaffolds for the design of anti-cancer agents that target NSCLCs with low sensitivity to cisplatinum.

Introduction: Osimertinib showed great clinical efficacy for activated-EGFR NCLC patient treatment. The aim of this work was to test the efficacy of a complete EGFR-inhibition by osimertinib plus the monoclonal antibody cetuximab or the MEK1/2-inhibitor selumetinib in EGFR-mutated NCLC in vivo models. Methods: We evaluated combinations of osimertinib plus selumetinib/cetuximab in HCC827 (E746-A759del/T790M-), H1975 (L858R/T790M+), and PC9-T790M (E746-A759del /T790M+) xenografts in second-line therapy after the development of resistance to osimertinib, and in first-line therapy, and we explored mechanisms of resistance to these treatments. Results: The addition of selumetinib or cetuximab to osimertinib in second-line therapy reverted the sensibility to osimertinib in the majority of mice, with a response rate (RR) of 50% to 80%, and a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of first- plus second-line of therapy of 28 weeks. The early use of combinations in first-line therapy increased the RR to 90%, with an mPFS not reached in all combination arms in the three xenografts models, with a statistically significant superiority (p < 0.005) as compared to osimertinib, achieving in first-line therapy an mPFS time of 17 to 18 weeks. Moreover, in ex vivo primary cell cultures obtained from osimertinib plus selumetinib-resistant tumors, we found Hedgehog pathway activation and we showed that therapy with an SMO inhibitor plus osimertinib and selumetinib inhibited proliferation and migratory and invasive properties of resistant cells. Conclusions: We showed that a dual vertical EGFR blockade with osimertinib plus selumetinib/cetuximab is a novel effective therapeutic option in EGFR-mutated NCLC and that hedgehog pathway activation and its interplay with MAPK is involved in resistance to these combination treatments.

Our previous works demonstrated the ability of metformin to revert resistance to gefitinib, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) EGFR/LKB1 wild-type (WT) cell lines. However, the optimal dose of metformin to be used in non-diabetic patients still remains to be defined. The phase I-II trial METformin in Advanced Lung cancer (METAL) was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate safety and activity of metformin combined with erlotinib in second-line treatment of patients with stage IV NSCLC, whose tumours harbour the WT EGFR gene. Purpose Our previous works demonstrated the ability of metformin to revert resistance to gefitinib, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) EGFR/LKB1 wild-type (WT) cell lines. However, the optimal dose of metformin to be used in non-diabetic patients still remains to be defined. The phase I-II trial METformin in Advanced Lung cancer (METAL) was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate safety and activity of metformin combined with erlotinib in second-line treatment of patients with stage IV NSCLC, whose tumours harbour the WT EGFR gene.Patients and methods We report results from the safety run-in part designed to detect acute toxicities, to study pharmacokinetics and to identify the recommended phase II dose (RPD) to be used for the following phase of the study. In the run-in phase, metformin treatment was administered according to a dose escalation scheme and, subsequently, combined with erlotinib.Results Twelve patients were enrolled. Common adverse events were diarrhoea, decreased appetite, abdominal pain, vomiting and skin toxicity, mostly reversible with symptomatic medical treatment. Dose-limiting toxicities were vomiting and diarrhoea registered in the initial cohort receiving metformin 2000 mg plus erlotinib at 150 mg die, which was declared the maximum administered dose. Only one of nine patients treated at the next lower dose of 1500 mg of metformin plus erlotinib at 150 mg experienced G3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Metformin plasma-concentration profile confirmed the trend already observed in nondiabetic population. Glycemic profiles showed stability of the blood glucose level within the physiological range for non-diabetic subjects. At a follow-up of 30 weeks, six (50%) patients experienced a disease control (5 SD and 1 partial response).Conclusions The RP2D of metformin dose was defined at 1500 mg/day to be combined with erlotinib 150 mg.

We present the rationale and study design of the METAL (METformin in Advanced Lung cancer) trial (EudraCT number: 2014-000349-59), a multicenter, open label phase II study, designed to evaluate the safety and activity of metformin combined with erlotinib as second-line therapy in patients with stage IV nonesmall-cell lung cancer. This is a 2-part trial, consisting of a safety run-in part followed by a phase II part. The primary end point for the first part is the maximum tolerated dose and the identification of the recommended phase II dose of metformin in combination with erlotinib. Secondary end points are the study of pharmacokinetics and the antitumor activity evaluation of the experimental combination. The primary end point of part II is the time to disease progression with the combination, and antitumor activity as a secondary end point. Based on the statistical design, we plan to enroll approximately 60 patients.

Purpose: EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have been found to be effective against lung cancer, but clinical resistance to these agents has developed as their usage has increased. Metformin is a widely used antidiabetic drug and also displays significant growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic effects in several cancer models, alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs. Experimental Design: The effects of gefitinib, a selective EGFR-TKI, and metformin on a panel of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines were assessed by using MTT, bromide assay, flow cytometry, anchorage-independent growth, coimmunoprecipitation, and Western blot analysis. Results: The combination of metformin with gefitinib induced a strong antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect in NSCLC cell lines that harbored wild-type LKB1 gene. Treatment with metformin as single agent, however, induced an activation and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) through an increased C-RAF/B-RAF heterodimerization. The inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation and of downstream signaling by adding gefitinib to metformin treatment abrogated this phenomenon and induced a strong apoptotic effect in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Metformin and gefitinib are synergistic in LKB1 wild-type NSCLC cells. However, further studies are required to investigate better the effect of metformin action on the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway and the best context in which to use metformin in combination with molecular targeted agents. Clin Cancer Res; 19(13); 3508–19. ©2013 AACR.

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers representing approximately 20% of all lung cancers, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The frequency appears to be approximately 3% for LCNEC. Diagnosis of LCNEC requires attention to neuroendocrine features by light microscopy and confirmation by immunohistochemical staining for neuroendocrine markers. Both SCLC and pulmonary LCNEC are high-grade and poor-prognosis tumors, with higher incidence in males and smokers and peripheral localization. LCNEC is very rare, and the precise diagnosis on small specimens is very difficult, so we have still too few data to define a standard of treatment for pulmonary LCNECs. Data of literature, most based on retrospective analysis, indicated a poor 5-year overall survival, with a high incidence of recurrence after surgery, even in stage I disease. Primary surgery should be the first option in all operable patients because there is no validate therapeutic approach for LCNEC due to lack of clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens remain only an option for potentially resectable tumors. In advanced stages, SCLC-like chemotherapy seems the best option of treatment, with a good response rate but a poor overall survival (from 8 to 16 months in different case series). New agents are under clinical investigation to improve LCNEC patients' outcome. We reviewed all data on treatment options feasible for pulmonary LCNEC, both for localized and extensive disease.