1. Control of the expiratory flow in a lung model and in healthy volunteers with an adjustable flow regulator: a combined bench and randomized crossover study.
- Author
-
Schmidt J, Martin A, Wenzel C, Weber J, Wirth S, and Schumann S
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Exhalation, Female, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive physiopathology, Young Adult, Lung physiology, Lung Volume Measurements methods, Models, Biological, Positive-Pressure Respiration methods, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive therapy, Tidal Volume physiology
- Abstract
Background: Pursed-lips breathing (PLB) is a technique to attenuate small airway collapse by regulating the expiratory flow. During mandatory ventilation, flow-controlled expiration (FLEX), which mimics the expiratory flow course of PLB utilizing a digital system for measurement and control, was shown to exert lung protective effects. However, PLB requires a patient's participation and coordinated muscular effort and FLEX requires a complex technical setup. Here, we present an adjustable flow regulator to mimic PLB and FLEX, respectively, without the need of a patient's participation, or a complex technical device., Methods: Our study consisted of two parts: First, in a lung model which was ventilated with standard settings (tidal volume 500 ml, respiratory rate 12 min
-1 , positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2 O), the possible reduction of the maximal expiratory flow by utilizing the flow regulator was assessed. Second, with spontaneously breathing healthy volunteers, the short-term effects of medium and strong expiratory flow reduction on airway pressure, the change of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and breathing discomfort was investigated., Results: In the lung model experiments, expiratory flow could be reduced from - 899 ± 9 ml·s-1 down to - 328 ± 25 ml·s-1 . Thereby, inspiratory variables and PEEP were unaffected. In the volunteers, the maximal expiratory flow of - 574 ± 131 ml·s-1 under baseline conditions was reduced to - 395 ± 71 ml·s-1 for medium flow regulation and to - 266 ± 58 ml·s-1 for strong flow regulation, respectively (p < 0.001). Accordingly, mean airway pressure increased from 0.6 ± 0.1 cmH2 O to 2.9 ± 0.4 cmH2 O with medium flow regulation and to 5.4 ± 2.4 cmH2 O with strong flow regulation, respectively (p < 0.001). The EELV increased from baseline by 31 ± 458 ml for medium flow regulation and 320 ± 681 ml for strong flow regulation (p = 0.033). The participants rated breathing with the flow regulator as moderately uncomfortable, but none rated breathing with the flow regulator as intolerable., Conclusions: The flow regulator represents an adjustable device for application of a self-regulated expiratory resistive load, representing an alternative for PLB and FLEX. Future applications in spontaneously breathing patients and patients with mandatory ventilation alike may reveal potential benefits., Trial Registration: DRKS00015296, registered on 20th August, 2018; URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do ., (© 2021. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF