Search

Study Design: Retrospective Review.Objective: The aim of this study was to determine medical, radiographic, and surgical risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion.Summary Of Background Data: ASD is a recognized outcome of spinal fusion that leads to increased costs and debilitating symptoms for patients. However, a comprehensive understanding of risk factors for the development of this surgical outcome does not exist.Methods: The medical records of patients who received their first lumbar fusion for any indication were retrospectively examined for preoperative medical comorbidities and medications, as well as surgical approach and perioperative complications. A blinded reviewer assessed radiographs for each patient to examine sagittal alignment after fusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the risk of developing ASD on the basis of one or more predictors.Results: A total of 137 patients fit the inclusion criteria; 9% required a follow-up operation for degeneration at segments adjacent to the fusion. The ASD group had a mean follow-up of 21.1 months prior to revision surgery and an overall follow-up of 41.0 months. The average follow-up in the control group was 14.0 months. Statistically significant independent predictors of developing ASD included antidepressant use [odds ratio (OR) = 5.4], diagnosis of degenerative scoliosis (OR = 34.2), fusion of L4-S1 (OR = 56.5), having no decompressions adjacent to the fusion, and low sacral slope (OR = 0.9). No patient who developed ASD received a decompression adjacent to the fusion such that an OR could not be generated for this independent predictor.Conclusion: This study is the first to use a combination of medical, surgical, and postoperative sagittal balance as risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. The awareness of these risk factors may allow for better patient selection and surgical technique to decrease the probability of acquiring this adverse outcome.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background context Some, smaller studies have investigated the effect of preoperative depression on postoperative improvement in quality of life (QOL). However, they have not used the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) in self-reported depression. Purpose To assess the effect of preoperative depression as measured by the PHQ-9 on postoperative improvement in QOL. Study design A retrospective review at a single tertiary-care referral center. Patient sample Patients who underwent lumbar decompression or fusion between 2008 and 2012. Outcomes measures A self-reported EuroQol five-dimensions (EQ-5D) quality-adjusted life-years Index. Methods Quality of life data were collected using the institutional prospectively collected database of patient-reported health status measures. The EQ-5D questionnare, PDQ, and PHQ-9 were used. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of preoperative depression on QOL improvement. Results Elevated preoperative pain (PDQ, β=−0.0017, p=.0009) and worsened depression (PHQ-9, β=−0.0044, p=.0359) were significantly associated with diminished postoperative improvement in QOL, as measured by the EQ-5D. Furthermore, greater depression (PHQ-9, odds ratio [OR] 0.93, p<.0001) and pain (PDQ, OR 0.99, p=.02) were associated with significantly diminished postoperative improvement exceeding the minimum clinically important difference. Conclusions Increased preoperative pain and depression were shown to be associated with significantly reduced improvement in postoperative QOL, as measured by the EQ-5D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Intraoperative blood loss (IOBL) is unavoidable during surgery; however, high IOBL is associated with increased morbidity and increased risk for requiring allogenic blood transfusion, itself associated with poorer outcomes.Purpose: Here we sought to develop and validate a predictive calculator for IOBL that could be used by surgeons to estimate likely blood loss.Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort.Patient Sample: Series of consecutive patients who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery for degenerative pathologies over a 27-month period at a single tertiary care center.Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was IOBL. Secondary outcome was the occurrence of "major intraoperative bleeding," defined as IOBL exceeding 1 L.Methods: Charts of included patients were reviewed for medical comorbidities, preoperative laboratory data, surgical plan, and anesthesia records. Univariate linear regressions were performed to find significant predictors of IOBL, which were then subjected to a multivariate analysis to identify the final model. Model training was performed using 70% of the included cohort and external validation was performed using 30% of the cohort. Results of the model were deployed as a freely available online calculator.Results: We identified 1,281 patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Mean age was 60±15 years, mean Charlson Comorbidity score was 1.1±1.6, and 51.8% were male. There were no significant differences between the training and validation cohorts with regard to any of the demographic variables or intraoperative variables; tranexamic acid use and surgical invasiveness were also similar in both cohorts. Multivariate analysis identified body mass index (βₙ=7.14; 95% confidence interval [3.15, 11.13]; p<.001), surgical invasiveness (βₙ=29.18; [24.62, 33.74]; p<.001), tranexamic acid use (βₙ=-0.093; [-0.171, -0.014]; p=.02), and surgical duration (βₙ=2.13; [1.75, 2.51]; p<.001) as significant predictors of IOBL. The model had an overall fit of r=0.693 in the validation cohort. Construction of a receiver-operating curve for predicting major IOBL showed a C-statistic of 0.895 within the validation cohort.Conclusion: Here we identify and validate a model for predicting IOBL in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. The model was a moderately strong predictor of absolute IOBL and was demonstrated to predict the occurrence of major IOBL with a high degree of accuracy. We propose it may have future utility when counseling patients about surgical morbidity and the probability of requiring transfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Lumbar fusion is a common and costly procedure in the United States. Reimbursement for surgical procedures is increasingly tied to care quality and patient safety as part of value-based reimbursement programs. The incidence of adverse quality events among lumbar fusion patients is unknown using the definition of care quality (patient safety indicators [PSI]) used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The association between insurance status and the incidence of PSI is similarly unknown in lumbar fusion patients.Purpose: This study sought to determine the incidence of PSI in patients undergoing inpatient lumbar fusion and to quantify the association between primary payer status and PSI in this population.Study Design: A retrospective cohort study was carried out.Patient Sample: The sample comprised all adult patients aged 18 years and older who were included in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) that underwent lumbar fusion from 1998 to 2011.Outcome Measure: The incidence of one or more PSI, a validated and widely used metric of inpatient health-care quality and patient safety, was the primary outcome variable.Methods: The NIS data were examined for all cases of inpatient lumbar fusion from 1998 to 2011. The incidence of adverse patient safety events (PSI) was determined using publicly available lists of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association between primary payer status (Medicaid and self-pay relative to private insurance) and the incidence of PSI.Results: A total of 539,172 adult lumbar fusion procedures were recorded in the NIS from 1998 to 2011. Patients were excluded from the secondary analysis if "other" or "missing" was listed for primary insurance status. The national incidence of PSI was calculated to be 2,445 per 100,000 patient years of observation, or approximately 2.5%. In a secondary analysis, after adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid and self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more PSI during the inpatient episode relative to privately insured patients (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.27).Conclusions: Among patients undergoing inpatient lumbar fusion, insurance status is associated with the adverse health-care quality events used to determine hospital reimbursement by the CMS. The source of this disparity must be studied to improve the quality of care delivered to vulnerable patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]