Search

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospective data., Objective: To define optimal postoperative coronal parameters after selective thoracic fusions (STFs) and to test these parameters against recommended criteria for when to perform an STF., Summary of Background Data: Previous studies have provided recommendations for when STF should be performed; however, clear parameters for target outcomes are lacking., Methods: Patients with Lenke 1C to 4C curves with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from a multicenter database who underwent STF with minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. Postoperative parameters included lumbar Cobb angle, trunk shift, coronal balance, percent lumbar correction, and deformity-flexibility quotient. First, the upper 95% confidence interval for each parameter was calculated (queried data threshold) and set as the limit of "optimal" outcomes. Second, an independent surgeon survey was performed, and in patients with unanimous surgeon agreement of "success," the upper 95% confidence interval was determined (surgeon-derived threshold). Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were compared between those above and below these 2 thresholds. Then, these outcomes were used to determine whether adherence to, or disregard for, previously published guidelines for STF were predictive of final outcome., Results: A total of 106 patients were analyzed. Target postoperative parameters as determined by the queried data and surgeon-derived thresholds were similar and rounded to: deformity-flexibility quotient less than 4, lumbar Cobb angle less than 26°, lumbar correction more than 37%, coronal balance 2 cm or less, and trunk shift less than 1.5 cm. Patients within target parameters had significantly better Scoliosis Research Society-22 satisfaction scores. Neither preoperative apical vertebral translation ratio more than 1.2 nor Cobb angle ratio more than 1.2 predicted 2-year success. Preoperative lumbar curve less than 45° and lumbar bend less than 25° were associated with increased likelihood of optimal outcomes., Conclusion: Optimal postoperative outcomes for STF should include a lumbar Cobb angle less than 26°, coronal balance 2 cm or less, deformity-flexibility quotient less than 4, lumbar correction more than 37%, and trunk shift less than 1.5 cm. These findings suggest that performing an STF in patients with a preoperative lumbar Cobb angle less than 45° or a preoperative lumbar bend less than 25° will increase one's chances of success., Level of Evidence: 4.

Object: Isthmic spondylolysis can significantly decrease functional abilities, especially in adolescent athletes. Although treatment can range from observation to surgery, direct screw placement through the fractured pars, or Buck's procedure, may be a more minimally invasive procedure than the more common pedicle screw-hook construct., Methods: Review of surgical databases identified 16 consecutive patients treated with Buck's procedure from 2004 to 2010. Twelve patients were treated at Miami Children's Hospital and 4 at Barrow Neurological Institute. Demographics and clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded and analyzed retrospectively., Results: The 16 patients had a median age of 16 years, and 14 were 20 years or younger at the time of treatment. Symptoms included axial back pain in 100% of patients with concomitant radiculopathy in 38%. Pars defects were bilateral in 81% and unilateral in 19% for a total of 29 pars defects treated using Buck's procedure. Autograft or allograft augmented with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein as well as postoperative bracing was used in all cases. Postoperatively, symptoms resolved completely or partially in 15 patients (94%). Of 29 pars defects, healing was observed in 26 (89.6%) prior to 1 revision surgery, and an overall fusion rate of 97% was observed at last radiological follow-up. There were no implant failures. All 8 athletes in this group had returned to play at last follow-up., Conclusions: Direct screw repair of the pars interarticularis defect as described in this series may provide a more minimally invasive treatment of adolescent patients with satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes, including return to play of adolescent athletes.

Study Design: A multisurgeon assessment of curve classification, selection of operative approach, and fusion levels via a case study presentation., Objectives: To evaluate the ability of a group of scoliosis surgeons, not involved in the development of a new classification system, to accurately choose the corresponding curve classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) cases and to evaluate the variability in the selection of operative approaches and both proximal and distal fusion levels in accordance with the new classification system in operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., Summary of Background Data: Recent evaluations using the King method for classifying AIS has shown poor intraobserver and interobserver reliability. A new, comprehensive classification system of AIS has been developed, but the result of a scoliosis surgeon's ability to apply the objective classification is unknown. In the surgical treatment of AIS, there are three choices for the operative approach (anterior, posterior, or both) and multiple choices for the selection of fusion levels., Methods: During an AIS roundtable discussion at a spinal surgery meeting, 28 scoliosis surgeons were presented seven cases of operative AIS via good quality slides. Standard preoperative radiographs and clinical photographs were presented, and the reviewers were asked to classify the cases by a new classification system, choose their preferred surgical approach, and classify both proximal and distal fusion levels., Results: For the seven cases presented, 84% of the curve types, 86% of lumbar modifiers, and 90% of sagittal thoracic modifiers were classified by the reviewers as described in the new classification. The case study found widely variable operative approaches and fusion levels chosen by the reviewers. There was an average of five different proximal (range, 4-8) and four different distal (range, 3-5) fusion levels chosen by the reviewers for each case., Conclusions: This case study assessment found a relatively high rate (84-90%) of agreement in curve classification of the individual components of a new classification system of AIS. This suggests the ability of a group of scoliosis surgeons to identify the specific criteria necessary for this new classification system of AIS. In addition, the high variability in selection of both operative approach and fusion levels confirms the current lack of standardized treatment paradigms. This further reinforces the need for a method to critically and objectively evaluate these variable treatments to determine the "best" radiographic and clinical results.

A prospective study of 12 patients with sagittal plane imbalance after multiple surgeries for scoliosis is reported. Reconstruction was attempted by posterior thoracolumbar junction osteotomy. Eighty-seven degrees of thoracic kyphosis (ending at L3) was improved to forty-one degrees (ending at T12). Lumbar lordosis was increased from 21 to 30 degrees, beginning at L1 afterward (L3 before). 8.7 cm posterior displacement of the sagittal weight-bearing axis was achieved. No permanent complications ensued. The procedure, without anterior surgery, corrects the deformity at the apical area. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation secured correction and fixation.