Search

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological follow-up of patients suffering from fixed post-traumatic and postinflammatory kyphotic deformities of the thoracic and lumbar spine and treated by posterior transpedicular wedge resection osteotomy of the spine., Methods: A total of 28 patients received a posterior transpedicular wedge resection osteotomy. A prospective follow-up was performed preoperatively, postoperatively and after 3, 6 and 12 months. The kyphotic angle of the fractured segment was evaluated as well as the clinical parameters the self-reported visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry score., Results: The median pain scores (VAS) and the Oswestry disability scores (p<0.05) decreased significantly from pretreatment to post-treatment. Postoperatively a significant correction of the kyphotic angle could be achieved with a mean of 28 degrees (range 14-44 degrees ). In the follow-up after 1 year there was a 7 degrees increase in kyphosis., Conclusions: Transpedicular wedge resection osteotomy of the thoracic and lumbar spine offers a safe surgical technique for the treatment of fixed postinflammatory kyphotic deformities.

Primary malignant spinal tumors and solitary vertebral metastases of selected tumor entities in the thoracolumbar spine are indications for total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). This study aimed to describe our oncological and surgical management and to analyze the treatment results by management with TES for extra- and intracompartmental solitary spinal metastases and primary malignant vertebral bone tumors. In 15 patients (3 malignant bone tumors and 12 solitary metastases), tumors were distributed in the thoracic (n = 8) and lumbar (n = 7) spine. Tumors were classified as intra- (n = 8) and extracompartmental (n = 7). All patients underwent TES via a laterally extended posterior approach followed by dorsoventral reconstruction. Function and quality of life were assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI) and SF-36 score. At follow-up (100%; mean: 33 +/- 22 months), 11 patients had no evidence of disease. Two patients were alive with the disease and two were dead of the disease (no primary bone tumors). Histology revealed negative margins (R0) in all patients with wide (n = 11) and marginal (n = 4) resections. Two patients developed pulmonal metastases of which they died at 4 and 16 months of survival. No local recurrence was observed. Major complications did not occur. TES resulted in an acceptable outcome in the quality of life and function. TES is a demanding procedure reaching wide to marginal resections in a curative approach. In conjunction with multimodal therapies, local recurrences can effectively be prevented while control of distant disease needs to be improved. Proper selection of adequate patients combined with careful surgical planning are prerequisites for low complication rates, acceptable function and improved overall prognosis.

A retrospective clinical-radiological study to evaluate the long-term outcome after artificial disc replacement was performed. The objective is to investigate long-term results after implantation of a modular type artificial disc prosthesis in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD). Total disc replacement (TDR) is a surgical procedure intended to save segmental spinal function, and thus replace spondylodesis. Short-term results are promising, whereas long-term results are scarce. The Charité TDR is the oldest existing implant, therefore, the longest possible follow-up is presented here. Seventy-one patients were treated with 84 Charité TDRs types I-III. Indication for TDR was moderate to severe DDD. Fifty-three patients (63 TDRs) were available for long-term follow-up of 17 years. Evaluation included Oswestry disability index, visual analog scale, overall outcome score, plain and extension/flexion radiographs. Implantation of Charité TDR resulted in a 60% rate of spontaneous ankylosis after 17 years. No significant difference between the three types of prostheses was found concerning clinical outcome. Reoperation was necessary in 11% of patients. Although no adjacent segment degeneration was observed in the functional implants (17%), these patients were significantly less satisfied than those with spontaneous ankylosis. TDR, nowadays, is an approved procedure. Proof that long-term results of TDR implantation in DDD are at least as good as fusion results is still missing.

Study Design: An in vitro biomechanical study of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the human thoracolumbar spine., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro biomechanical properties of 3 different expandable cages with a nonexpandable cage., Summary and Background Data: Recently, there has been a rapid increase in the use and the commercial availability of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine. Although all 3 expandable cages, evaluated in this study, are approved for clinical use in Europe, little information is available concerning the biomechanical properties of these implants., Material and Methods: Thirty-two human thoracolumbar spines (T11 to L3) were tested in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending with a nondestructive loading technique using an unconstrained testing apparatus. Three-dimensional displacement was measured using an optical measurement system. First, all motion segments were tested intact. After complete corporectomy of L1, cages were implanted according to producer's information. The following implants (n = 8/group) were tested: 1) meshed titanium cage (nonexpandable cage, DePuy AcroMed); 2) X-tenz (expandable cage, DePuy AcroMed); 3) Synex (expandable Cage; Synthes); and 4) VBR (expandable cage, Ulrich). Finally, posterior stabilization using the Universal Spine System (Synthes), posterior-anterior stabilization using the Universal Spine System (Synthes), and anterior plating (Locking Compression Plate, Synthes) was applied to each test specimen. The mean apparent stiffness values, range of motion, and neutral and elastic zone were calculated from the corresponding load-displacement curves., Results: No significant differences could be determined between the in vitro biomechanical properties of expandable and nonexpandable cages. In comparison to the intact motion segment, isolated anterior stabilization using cages and anterior plating significantly decreased stiffness and increased range of motion in all directions. In contrast, additional posterior stabilization significantly increased stiffness and decreased range of motion in all directions compared to the intact motion segment. The combined anterior-posterior stabilization demonstrated greatest stiffness results., Conclusion: Biomechanical results indicate that design variations of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement are of little importance. Additionally, no significant difference could be determined between the biomechanical properties of expandable and nonexpandable cages. After corporectomy, isolated implantation of expandable cages plus anterior plating was not able to restore normal stability of the motion segment. Therefore, isolated anterior stabilization using cages plus Locking Compression Plate should not be used for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine.

Introduction: Due to a recent increase in the commercial availability of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement, this study was designed to gain more information about their biomechanical properties. All three expandable cages evaluated in this study are approved for clinical use, but little knowledge about their biomechanical properties exists., Material and Methods: Human thoracolumbar spines (T11 to L3) ( n=32) were tested in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending with a nondestructive stiffness method. Three-dimensional displacement was measured using an optical measurement system. All motion segments were tested intact. After L1 corporectomy, cages were implanted and the following groups ( n=8 each) were tested: (1) meshed titanium cage (nonexpandable cage, DePuy Acromed), (2) X-tenz (expandable cage, DePuy Acromed), (3) Synex (expandable Cage, Synthes), and (4) VBR (expandable cage, Ulrich). Finally, posterior stabilization and posterior-anterior stabilization, both using USS (Synthes), and anterior plating (LCDCP, Synthes) was applied. The mean apparent stiffness values, ranges of motion, and neutral and elastic zones were calculated from the corresponding load/displacement curves., Results: No significant differences were found between the in vitro biomechanical properties of expandable and nonexpandable cages. Compared to the intact motion segment, isolated anterior stabilization using cages and anterior plating significantly decreased stiffness and increased range of motion in all directions. Additional posterior stabilization significantly increased stiffness and decreased range of motion in all directions compared to the intact motion segment. Combined anterior-posterior stabilization demonstrated the greatest stiffness results., Conclusion: Design variations of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement do not show any significant effect on the biomechanical results. There was no significant difference found, between the biomechanical properties of expandable and non-expandable cages. After corporectomy, isolated implantation of expandable cages plus anterior plating was not able to restore normal stability of the motion segment. As a consequence, isolated anterior stabilization using cages plus LCDCP should not be used for vertebral body replacement in the thoraco-lumbar spine.

Introduction: A biodegradable interbody cage for lumbar spine fusion would be able to solve several problems associated with the use of metallic cages. In a biomechanical in vitro study using human lumbar spines three different biodegradable poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lacitide)(PLDLLA) cages were compared to metallic cages of the same design., Material and Method: 40 human cadaver lumbar specimens (L3-S1) were tested in flexion, extension, rotation, and bending with a non-destructive flexibility method using a nonconstrained testing apparatus. Seven different groups were examined: (1) control group (intact) (n = 40); (2) unstable group (after discectomy L4/5) (n = 40), (3) autologous iliac crest bone graft (n = 8), (4) BAK-Cage (n = 8), (5) BIO-Cage 1 (PLDLLA) (n = 8), (6) BIO-Cage 2 (PLD-LLA/hydroxylapatite-buffer) (n = 8) and (7) BIO-Cage 3 (PLDLLA/hydroxylapatite particles of different size) (n = 8). Additionally, destructive compression tests of all implants were performed., Results: In comparison to the intact motion segment all cages showed significantly lower range of motion (ROM) in all test modes (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in stiffness values and ROM between BIO-Cages and metallic cages. Axial compression stiffness and failure load were significantly highest for metallic BAK-cages (P < 0.05). No significant difference for failure load was observed between BIO-cage 1 and the intact motion segment. However, in comparison to the intact motion segment failure load was significantly lower for BIO-cage 2 and 3 (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: The results of this study are encouraging, because the biodegradable cages were able to limit lumbar spine motion similar to the metallic cages. Especially, the biodegradable PLDLLA cage consisting of pure polymer (BIO-Cage 1) showed adequate initial compression strength. However, further in vivo animal experiments are essential prior to the clinical application of biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cages.