Search

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in ad libitum energy intake when inpatient adults were exposed to diets with equal calories and protein but varied widely in the ratio of carbohydrate to fat. METHODS: 16 adults without diabetes were admitted to the Metabolic Clinical Research Unit in the NIH Clinical Center for four continuous weeks and were randomized to receive either a plant-based, low-fat (LF) diet or an animal-based, low-carbohydrate (LC) diet for two weeks, followed by the alternate diet for two weeks. The LF diet was ∼75% carbohydrate and ∼10% fat, whereas the LC was ∼10% carbohydrate and ∼75% fat. The LF diet had ∼4-fold more fiber and was ∼60% of the energy density of the LC diet. Both diets were matched for protein and the presented calories were double each subject's maintenance energy requirements, as calculated from their measured resting energy expenditure multiplied by 1.6. Participants received three daily meals, had continuous access to snacks, and were instructed to eat as much or as little as they wanted. Leftovers were weighed to determine food intake. ProNutra software was used to calculate energy and nutrient intake. RESULTS: The study enrolled 9 men and 7 women with an age (mean ± SE) of 29 ± 1.7 years and body mass index (BMI) of 27.5 ± 1.5. During exposure to the LF diet, participants consumed 726 ± 84 kcal/d less than during the LC diet (P

OBJECTIVES: To explore postprandial responses to isocaloric meals after ∼2 weeks on an ad libitum Low Carbohydrate (LC) diet vs. a Low Fat (LF) diet. METHODS: 16 healthy volunteers without diabetes were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to consume a LC or LF diet for 2 weeks immediately followed by 2 weeks of the alternate diet. The LC diet was composed of ∼75% fat, ∼10% carbohydrate, and ∼15% protein; the LF diet was ∼75% carbohydrate, ∼10% fat, and ∼15% protein. Daily meals and snacks were matched for presented calories and participants were instructed to consume as much or as little as desired. On day 13 of each diet after an 8 hour fast, participants consumed a liquid meal containing 30% of energy requirements with a macronutrient composition corresponding to the prevailing diet. Blood was drawn at 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360 minutes post meal consumption. Plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, insulin, c-peptide, free fatty acids, and triglycerides were measured. RESULTS: 7 females and 9 males with an age of (mean ± SE) 28.7 ±1.7 y and BMI of 27.5 ± 1.5 kg/m(2) completed the study. During the LC diet, baseline levels of triglycerides and lactate were significantly lower (−33.5 ± 9.1 mg/dl; P = 0.003, −0.18 ± 0.05 mM; P = 0.002, respectively) and glucose, insulin, and c-peptide also tended to be lower (−3.7 ± 2.0 mg/dl; P = 0.09, −2.2 ± 1.2 µU/ml; P = 0.08, −0.35 ± 0.17 ng/ml; P = 0.06, respectively) whereas free fatty acids were significantly higher (0.28 ± 0.06 mM; P = 0.0005) compared to the LF diet. Average postprandial levels of glucose, lactate, insulin, and c-peptide were significantly lower following the LC meal (−11 ± 3 mg/dl; P = 0.003, −0.88 ± 0.06 mM; P

OBJECTIVES: To describe the effects of ad libitum low-fat (LF) and low-carbohydrate (LC) diets on body weight and fat mass. METHODS: Sixteen adults without diabetes spent 29 continuous days residing at the Metabolic Clinical Research Unit of the NIH Clinical Center where they were fed ad libitum either an animal-based, LC diet (75% fat, 10% carbohydrates, 15% protein) or a plant-based, LF diet (75% carbohydrates, 10% fat, 15% protein). Participants were randomly assigned to one diet for the first phase of the study (14 days), after which they were switched to the other diet for the remainder of the study. Participants were given three meals daily and were provided with additional snacks amounting to 200% of their daily energy requirements as determined by their resting energy expenditure multiplied by 1.6. Subjects were told that this was not a weight loss study and were not informed about the primary study aim. They were instructed to eat as much or as little as they desired. Total body weight and fat mass were measured using a calibrated scale and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, respectively. Subjects were blinded to their data and wore loose-fitting scrubs to avoid any feedback regarding changes in the fit of their clothing. RESULTS: Subjects included 7 women and 9 men, with an age of (mean ± SE) 29 ± 1.7 years and BMI of 27.5 ± 1.5 at baseline. Participants lost weight on both diets, with the LC diet resulting in 1.34 ± 0.31 kg of weight loss (P = 0.0006) and the LF diet resulting in 1.09 ± 0.31 kg of weight loss (P = 0.003) which was not significantly different from the LC diet (P = 0.58). However, participants lost 0.6 ± 0.17 kg of body fat on the LF diet (P = 0.002) but the LC diet did not result in significant body fat loss (0.04 ± 0.17 kg; P = 0.8) and the difference in body fat loss between the diets was statistically significant (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: While participants lost similar amounts of weight on both diets, only the LF diet led to significant body fat loss. Early weight loss with a LC diet does not necessarily reflect a similar state of negative energy balance as compared with a LF diet. FUNDING SOURCES: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.