Search

Objectives: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is an effective pulmonary vasodilator. However, the efficacy of iNO in former premature infants with established bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has not been studied. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of iNO in reducing pulmonary artery pressure in infants with severe BPD as measured by echocardiography. Study Design: Prospective, observational study enrolling infants born at less than 32 weeks gestation and in whom (1) iNO therapy was initiated after admission to our institution, or (2) at the outside institution less than 48 h before transfer and received an echocardiogram prior to iNO initiation, and (3) had severe BPD. Data were collected at three time-points: (1) before iNO; (2) 12–48 h after initiation of iNO; and (3) 48–168 h after initiation of iNO. The primary outcome was the effect of iNO on pulmonary artery pressure measured by echocardiography in patients with severe BPD between 48 and 168 h after initiating iNO therapy. Results: Of 37 enrolled, 81% had echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) before iNO and 56% after 48 h of iNO (p = 0.04). FiO2 requirements were significantly different between time-points (1) and (3) (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences between Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) Z-Scores, time to peak velocity: right ventricular ejection time (TPV:RVET), and ventilator changes. Conclusions: Although we found a statistically significant reduction of PAH between time-point (1) and (3), future trials are needed to further guide clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prophylactic indomethacin reduces the risk of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) but does not reduce death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Some investigators have suggested that prophylactic indomethacin may have a greater treatment effect on severe IVH among infants at high risk for severe IVH. Objective: To determine whether the relative treatment effects of prophylactic indomethacin on severe IVH and the composite outcome of death or NDI vary based on the risk of severe IVH. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP). We generated a model to predict the risk for severe IVH based on gestational age, birth weight, antenatal steroids, delivery mode, outborn status, sex, and 5-min Apgar score, and we divided the TIPP participants into risk quartiles. We used logistic regression to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of severe IVH and death or NDI based on indomethacin treatment for each quartile. Results: The relative treatment effects of prophylactic indomethacin on severe IVH did not vary based on the predicted risk of severe IVH: quartile 1: aOR 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-2.37); quartile 2: aOR 0.61 (95% CI 0.27-1.42); quartile 3: aOR 0.63 (95% CI 0.31-1.31); quartile 4: aOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.32-1.05). The relative treatment effect of prophylactic indomethacin on death or NDI did not vary significantly between quartiles. Conclusions: These findings do not support selective prophylactic indomethacin treatment to improve long-term outcomes of ELBW infants at high risk for severe IVH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]