Search

Study Design: Retrospective study.Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess the conformity of the radiological neck and shoulder balance parameters throughout a follow-up period of more than 2 years.Summary Of Background Data: Postoperative shoulder and neck imbalance are undesirable features among Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients who underwent Posterior Spinal Fusion. There are many clinical and radiological parameters used to assess this clinical outcome. However, we do not know whether these radiological parameters conform throughout the entire follow-up period.Methods: This was a retrospective study done in a single academic institution. Inclusion criteria were patients with scoliosis who underwent posterior instrumented spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation and attended all scheduled follow-ups for at least 24 months postoperatively. Radiological shoulder parameters were measured from both preoperative antero-posterior and postoperative antero-posterior radiographs. Lateral shoulder parameters were: Radiographic Shoulder Height, Clavicle Angle (Cla-A), Clavicle-Rib Intersection Difference, and Coracoid Height Difference. Medial shoulder and neck parameters were: T1 Tilt and Cervical Axis (CA).Results: The radiographs of 50 patients who had surgery done from November 2013 to November 2015 were analyzed. Mean age of this cohort was 16.3 ± 7.0 years. There were 38 (76%) female patients and 12 (24%) male patients. Mean final follow-up was 38.6 ± 5.8 months. When conformity assessment of the radiological parameter using the interclass coefficient correlation was done, we found that all parameters had significant correlation (P < 0.05). T1 tilt (0.78) had good reliability, CA (0.47), Clavicle-Rib Intersection Difference (0.43), and Coracoid Height Difference (0.40) had moderate reliability and Radiographic Shoulder Height (0.22) and Cla-A (0.13) had poor reliability.Conclusion: All the radiological shoulder and neck balance parameters studied were conformed and suitable to be used to assess the patient postoperatively. Amongst these radiological parameters, T1 tilt followed by CA recorded to be the most reliable parameters over time.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Prospective study.Objective: To evaluate the perioperative outcome of posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients comparing a single attending surgeon strategy (G1) versus a dual attending surgeon strategy (G2).Summary Of Background Data: The complication rate for surgical correction in AIS is significant. There are no prospective studies that investigate dual attending surgeon strategy for posterior spinal fusion in AIS.Methods: A total of 60 patients (30 patients in each arm) were recruited. The patients were comparable for age, gender, Lenke classification, major Cobb angle magnitude, and number of fusion levels. The anesthetic, surgical, and postoperative protocol was standardized. The outcome measures included the operative duration, blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin, need for transfusion, morphine usage, duration of hospital stay, intraoperative lactate levels, and pH. The timing of the operation at six critical stages of the operation was recorded.Results: The mean operative time for G2 was 173.6 ± 27.0 minutes versus 248.0 ± 49.9 minutes in G1 (P < 0.000). Mean blood loss in G2 was 0.92 ± 0.4 L and 1.25 ± 0.6 L in G1 (P < 0.05). None of the patients in G2 required any allogenic transfusion. Four patients in G1 (13.3%) required allogenic blood product transfusion. The day 2 postoperative hemoglobin levels in both groups were similar, but this was taken after blood product transfusion in G1. The amount of morphine usage was 20.4 ± 11.5 mg in G2 and 42.5 ± 24.0 mg in G1 (P < 0.000). G2 patients had a shorter hospital stay. One patient in G1 had superficial wound infection. G2 was faster than G1 during exposure, instrumentation, facetectomy, and bone grafting.Conclusion: The involvement of two attending surgeons significantly reduced operative time, blood loss, need for allogenic blood transfusion, patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirement and led to faster patient recovery during the perioperative period.Level Of Evidence: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.Objective: To compare side bending (SB) and fulcrum bending (FB) radiographs in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and effect of magnitude and AR curves on curve correctability.Summary Of Background Data: The prediction of correction using side bending flexibility (SBF) and fulcrum bending flexibility (FBF) in alternate level pedicle screw (PS) configuration and effect of curve magnitude and AR curves are not well understood.Methods: 100 AIS Lenke 1 and 2 were recruited. Curve magnitude was stratified to G1 (41°-60°), G2 (61°-80°), G3 (>80°). The main thoracic (MT) curves were subclassified to AR curves [Miyanji F, Pawelek JB, Van Valin SE, et al. Is the lumbar modifier useful in surgical decision making? Defining two distinct Lenke 1A curve patterns. Spine 2008;33:2545-51]. Preoperatively SBF and FBF were determined whereas postoperative parameters were correction rate (CR), fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI), and side bending correction index (SBCI). Correlation test were carried out between SBF, FBF versus CR for the cohort.Results: There were 38 (G1), 42 (G2), and 20 (G3) patients. 34% were AR curves. SBF for G1, G2, and G3 were 61.3 ± 14.4, 59.2 ± 16.2 and 43.1 ± 13.1% (P = 0.000) whereas FBF for G1, G2, and G3 were 71.1 ± 16.5, 58.3 ± 18.1 and 52.7 ± 17.1% (P = 0.000). The CR was G1 (74.5 ± 11.5%), G2 (69.2 ± 12.7%), and G3 (70.2 ± 8.6%). FBCI was 1.11 ± 0.3 (G1), 1.28 ± 0.4 (G2) and 1.48 ± 0.6 for G3. SBCI was 1.26 ± 0.2 (G1), 1.50 ± 0.5 (G2), and 1.72 ± 0.4 for G3. There was strong correlation for SBF and FBF versus CR for G1 and G2. For G3, a very strong correlation was established between SBF (r = 0.846, r = 0.716) and FBF versus CR (r = 0.700, r = 0.540). AR curves demonstrated higher SBF and FBF.Conclusion: CR remains almost constant in G1, G2, and G3. SBCI and FBCI increase significantly in G1, G2, and G3. Correlation between SBF and FBF and CR was strong for G1, G2, and very strong for G3. AR curves showed better correctability with SB and FB films. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Prospective propensity score-matched study.Objective: To compare the outcomes of minimal invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional open surgery for spinal metastasis patients.Summary Of Background Data: There is lack of knowledge on whether MIS is comparable to conventional open surgery in treating spinal metastasis.Methods: Patients with spinal metastasis requiring surgery from January 2008 to December 2010 in two spine centers were recruited. The demographic, preoperative, operative, perioperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Thirty MIS patients were matched with 30 open surgery patients using propensity score matching technique with a match tolerance of 0.02 based on the covariate age, tumor type, Tokuhashi score, and Tomita score.Results: Both groups had significant improvements in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Karnofsky scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and neurological status postoperatively. However, the difference comparing the MIS and open surgery group was not statistically significant. MIS group had significantly longer instrumented segments (5.5 ± 3.1) compared with open group (3.8 ± 1.7). Open group had significantly longer decompressed segment (1.8 ± 0.8) than MIS group (1.0 ± 1.0). Open group had significantly more blood loss (2062.1 ± 1148.0 mL) compared with MIS group (1156.0 ± 572.3 mL). More patients in the open group (76.7%) needed blood transfusions (with higher average units of blood transfused) compared with MIS group (40.0%). Fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in MIS group (116.1 ± 63.3 s) compared with open group (69.9 ± 42.6 s). Open group required longer hospitalization (21.1 ± 10.8 days) compared with MIS group (11.0 ± 5.0 days).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MIS resulted in comparable outcome to open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis but has the advantage of less blood loss, blood transfusions, and shorter hospital stay.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective, nonrandomized study.Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of periodic intraoperative text messages (SMS) in reducing parental anxiety level during posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.Summary Of Background Data: No studies have reported the use of intraoperative SMS to reduce level of anxiety in parents of patients who are undergoing AIS corrective surgery.Methods: Parents of 50 AIS patients were studied at two centers. Group 1 did not receive any SMS whereas those in Group 2 received periodic SMS. Parents' anxiety were assessed using a validated Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A) and the anxiety component of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Score (HADS). The assessment was carried out at five different periods: (P1) 6 hours before the surgery; (P2) at separation in the operation theatre; (P3) 1 hour after commencement of surgery; (P4) immediately after completion of surgery; (P5) 1 day postsurgery.Results: A total of 96 parents (47 fathers, 49 mothers) were involved in this study. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics and education level. The mean VAS for Group 1 peaked at P2 and the HADS scores peaked at P3. The anxiety level of Group 1 remained high at P2, P3, and P4. There was a steady decline in parental anxiety in Group 2 from P1 to P5. There were significantly lower mean VAS score and HADS score for both father and mother in Group 2 during P3 and P4. The mean HADS scores for parents in Group 1 at P2 and P3 were higher than 8, which indicate abnormal anxiety.Conclusion: The anxiety levels of parents receiving the SMS were significantly lower than parents who did not receive any messages. Thus, intraoperative SMS is an effective intervention to decrease parental anxiety of AIS patients undergoing PSF surgery.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]