Search

This paper explored whether there was a relationship between staffing and quality indicators in residential care for older people, in both rest homes and continuing care hospitals. A longitudinal survey of a sample of residential-care rest homes and continuing-care hospitals explored the relationship between direct-care staffing levels, skill mix and quality indicators. The study was conducted in r est homes (n=18) and continuing care hospitals (n=16) providing long-term care for people 65 years of age and over in the greater Auckland region in New Zealand. Participating rest homes and hospitals collected monthly data on direct-care staffing (registered nurses, enrolled nurses and support workers), quality indicators (falls, new fractures, pressure ulcers, weight loss, urinary tract infections, over nine medications a day, presence of indwelling catheters and use of daily restraints), over a six-month period. Logistic analysis revealed that in continuing care hospitals, as registered nurse/enrolled nurse time increased, there was a general trend of reduction in adverse events: falls, pressure ulcers, and daily restraint use. However , there were no significant associations between registered nurse/ enrolled nurse, or support worker staffing hours in rest homes in relation to the incidence of the five quality indicators: falls, weight loss, urinary tract infections, use of over nine medications, and the use of indwelling catheters. The study, utilising facility-level data, demonstrated a trend that increasing the combined time of registered and enrolled nurses to residents resulted in a decrease in adverse events in continuing-care hospitals. No other trends were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: in Auckland, New Zealand in 1988, 7.7% of those aged over 65 years lived in licenced residential aged care. Age-specific rates approximately doubled for each 5-year age group after the age of 65 years. Even with changes in policies and market forces since 1988, population increases are forecast to drive large growth in demand. This study shows previously unrecognised 20-year trends in rates of care in a geographically defined population.Methods: four cross-sectional surveys of all facilities (rest homes and hospitals) licenced for long-term care of older people were conducted in Auckland, New Zealand in 1988, 1993, 1998 and 2008. Facility staff completed survey forms for each resident. Numbers of licenced and occupied beds and trends in age-specific and age-standardised rates in residential aged care are reported.Results: over the 20-year period, Auckland's population aged over 65 years increased by 43% (from 91,000 to 130,000) but actual numbers in care reduced slightly. Among those aged over 65 years, the proportion living in care facilities reduced from 1 in 13 to 1 in 18. Age-standardised rates in rest-home level care reduced from 65 to 33 per thousand, and in hospital level care, from 29 to 23 per thousand. Had rates remained stable, over 13,200 people, 74% more than observed, would have been in care in 2008.Conclusion: growth predicted in the residential aged care sector is not yet evident. The introduction of standardised needs assessments before entry, increased availability of home-based services, and growth in retirement villages may have led to reduced utilisation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective To assess effect of a complex, multidisciplinary intervention aimed at reducing avoidable acute hospitalization of residents of residential aged care (RAC) facilities. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting RAC facilities with higher than expected hospitalizations in Auckland, New Zealand, were recruited and randomized to intervention or control. Participants A total of 1998 residents of 18 intervention facilities and 18 control facilities. Intervention A facility-based complex intervention of 9 months' duration. The intervention comprised gerontology nurse specialist (GNS)-led staff education, facility bench-marking, GNS resident review, and multidisciplinary (geriatrician, primary-care physician, pharmacist, GNS, and facility nurse) discussion of residents selected using standard criteria. Main outcome measures Primary end point was avoidable hospitalizations. Secondary end points were all acute admissions, mortality, and acute bed-days. Follow-up was for a total of 14 months. Results The intervention did not affect main study end points: number of acute avoidable hospital admissions (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.85–1.36; P = .59) or mortality (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.76–1.61; P = .62). Conclusions This multidisciplinary intervention, packaging selected case review, and staff education had no overall impact on acute hospital admissions or mortality. This may have considerable implications for resourcing in the acute and RAC sectors in the face of population aging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]