Search

Purpose: Inconsistent results of lipid-lowering medications (LLMs) on improved cancer survival need more investigations. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to the drug would be associated with a lower cancer-specific mortality in a homogeneous population who has ever used the drug. Methods: Utilising data from the Australian Cancer database, linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data and the National Death Index, we identified two separate cohorts of 4519 and 3083 women patients with newly diagnosed endometrial and lung cancer respectively between 2003 and 2013. Adherence to this drug was calculated by proportion of days covered. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were used to estimate the multivariable-adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of adherence to LLMs, statins, lipophilic and hydrophilic statins, and cancer-specific mortality. Results: Each 10% increase in 1-year adherence to LLMs reduced cancer-specific mortality among women with endometrial cancer (adjusted HR=0.93, 95% CI 0.90–0.96) or lung cancer (adjusted HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.97). The inverse associations remained unchanged in different subgroup analyses. The reductions in lung cancer mortality were not apparent for women who adhered to lipophilic statins albeit better endometrial cancer survival appeared in the lipophilic statin group and borderline statistical improvement in the hydrophilic statin group. Conclusions: Among LLM users, adherence to this drug is inversely associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality. Together with previous evidence, randomised controlled trials are called for to confirm whether LLMs could be considered as an adjuvant treatment to improve prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Metabolic abnormalities, individually or combined, might increase the risk of IBD. • Individuals with high genetic risk and poor metabolic status have a higher risk of IBD. • Maintaining ideal metabolic status can reduce IBD risk regardless of genetic stratums. Metabolic disorders exhibit strong inflammatory underpinnings and vice versa. This study aimed to investigate the association between metabolic health status, genetic predisposition, and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and to explore the potential benefits of maintaining ideal metabolic status for individuals with a predetermined genetic risk of IBD. This population-based prospective study included 385,820 unrelated European descent participants from the UK Biobank. Using multivariable Cox regression, we assessed the relationship of metabolic phenotypes with risk of IBD and its subtypes. We also developed a polygenic risk score to examine how metabolic health status interacted with genetic risk in relation to IBD risk. During the follow-up period of 4,328,895 person-years, 2,044 newly-diagnosed IBD cases were identified. Higher genetic risk and an increasing number of abnormal metabolic phenotypes were associated with elevated IBD risk (p-trend <0.001). Individuals with high genetic risk and poor metabolic health had a significantly higher risk of IBD (HR=4.56, 95 % CI=3.27–6.36) compared to those with low genetic risk and ideal metabolic health. These results remained consistent for IBD subtypes. Maintaining ideal metabolic status reduced IBD risk within each genetic risk category and jointly decreased subsequent risk by 40 % in high genetic risk individuals. Our study reveals a combined impact of poor metabolic health and genetic risk on IBD incidence. Those with low genetic risk and optimal metabolic health exhibit the lowest IBD risk, offering insights into potential management strategies for individuals at predefined genetic risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Equivocal results of association between metformin and cancer-specific survival need more investigation. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to the drug had a lower cancer-specific mortality in a homogeneous population (i.e. regular users).Methods: The Australian Cancer database was linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data and the National Death Index. Adherence to metformin was calculated by proportion of days covered. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of adherence to metformin and cancer-specific mortality.Results: Between 2003 and 2013, three separate cohorts of 6717, 3121, and 1854 female patients were identified with newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, or endometrial cancer. The 1-year adherence was similar at baseline in three cohorts, on average 75%. Each 10% increase in 1-year adherence to metformin reduced cancer-specific mortality among women with breast cancer (adjusted HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97), colorectal cancer (adjusted HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), or endometrial cancer (adjusted HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99). The inverse associations remained unchanged in most subgroup analyses.Conclusions: Among metformin users, adherence to this drug is inversely associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality. If confirmed, metformin could be considered as an adjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a growing emphasis on the importance of availability of specialist palliative care for people living with dementia. However, for people imminently dying with dementia, we still have little knowledge about their palliative care needs and utilization of different specialist services. To (i) assess palliative care needs and other clinical and social characteristics of people imminently dying with dementia on their last admission in the context of community and inpatient palliative care services before death; (ii) compare care needs between patients requiring community-based and inpatient services; (iii) determine how and whether such care needs affect utilization of different palliative care services. Observational study using data from the Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration. Specialist palliative care services across Australia registered in the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration. A total of 3361 people who required specialist palliative care principally for dementia (including Alzheimer's disease and other dementias), and whose death occurred between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Five validated clinical instruments were used to collect point-of-care outcomes on each individual's function (Resource Utilisation Groups - Activities of Daily Living & Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status), symptom distress (Symptoms Assessment Scale & Palliative Care Problem Severity Score) and other clinical characteristics (Palliative Care Phases). We fitted multivariate logistic regression models to examine the association between these clinical outcomes and utilization of different specialist palliative care services. The majority of people imminently dying with dementia had absent or mild levels of symptom distress but experienced high levels of functional decline and needed substantial assistance with basic tasks of daily living in their last days of life. Large disparities in symptoms distress and functional decline between inpatient and community groups were not observed although differences in assessment scores were often statistically significant. Poor functional outcomes (odds ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.24–2.52) and "non-stable" palliative care phases (odds ratio =24.51, 95% confidence interval: 12.03–49.96) were positively associated with use of inpatient versus community palliative care, whereas there was no clear association between the majority of symptoms and use of different care services. The majority of people imminently dying with dementia could potentially benefit from greater access to supportive services in the community. Development of a dementia-specific palliative care pathway is needed to promote needs-based palliative care delivery models. the majority of people imminently dying with dementia could potentially benefit from greater access to supportive services in community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to compare incidences of adverse events of special interest (AESI) and delirium in 3 cohorts: after COVID-19 vaccination, prepandemic, and SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test positive. This is a population-based cohort study using electronic medical records linked with vaccination records in Hong Kong. A total of 17,449 older people with dementia received at least 1 dose of CoronaVac (n = 14,719) or BNT162b2 (n = 2730) between February 23, 2021, and March 31, 2022. Moreover, 43,396 prepandemic and 3592 SARS-CoV-2 test positive patients were also included in this study. The incidences of AESI and delirium up to 28 days after vaccination in the vaccinated dementia cohort were compared with the prepandemic and SARS-CoV-2 test positive dementia cohorts by calculating incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Patients who received multiple doses were followed up separately for each dose, up to the third dose. We did not detect an increased risk of delirium and most AESI following vaccination compared to the prepandemic period and those tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. No AESI group nor delirium incidence exceeded 10 per 1000 person-days in vaccinated individuals. The findings provide evidence for the safe use of COVID-19 vaccines in older patients with dementia. In the short run, benefit appears to outweigh the harm due to vaccine; however, longer follow-up should be continued to identify remote adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]