Search

This study was conducted to test a modular scalable vest–load distribution system (MSV-LDS) against the plate carrier system (PC) currently used by the United States Marine Corps. Ten Marines engaged in 1.6 km load carriage trials in seven experimental conditions in a laboratory study. Kinematic, kinetic, and spatiotemporal gait parameters, muscle activity (electromyography), heart rate, caloric expenditure, shooting reaction times, and subjective responses were recorded. There was lower mean trapezius recruitment for the PC compared with the MSV-LDS for all conditions, and muscle activity was similar to baseline for the MSV-LDS. Twenty-seven Marines carrying the highest load were evaluated in the field, which measured an increase in energy expenditure with MSV-LDS; however, back discomfort was reduced. The field evaluation showed significantly reduced estimated ground reaction force on flat-ground segments with the MSV-LDS, and the data suggest both systems were comparable with respect to mobility and energy cost. Practitioner summary: This study found that a novel load distribution system appears to redistribute load for improved comfort as well as reduce estimated ground reaction force when engaged in hiking activities. Further, hiking with a load distribution system enables more neutral walking posture. Implications of load differences in loads carried are examined. Abbreviations: AGRF: anterior-posterior ground reaction forces; CAREN: Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment; GRF: ground reaction forces; HR: heart rate; ML-GRF: mediolateral ground reaction forces; MOLLE: Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment; MSV-LDS: modular scalable vest–load distribution system; NHRC: Naval Health Research Center; PC: plate carrier; PPE: personal protective equipment; RPE: rating of perceived exertion; SAPI: small arms protective insert; sEMG: surface electromyography; USMC: United States Marine Corps; VGRF: Ground reaction forces in the vertical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Musculoskeletal injuries of the lumbar spine occur frequently among military service members and are associated with heavy backpack loads. Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation facilitate biomechanical evaluation to compare different backpack designs. We developed a backpack attachment model that can be tuned to represent various load distributions between the torso and pelvis. We generated walking simulations to estimate muscle and joint contact forces of unloaded walking and while carrying 38 kg using shoulder-borne backpacks and hip belt-assisted backpacks for six U.S. Marines. Three-dimensional peak and average lumbar (L4-L5) and hip joint contact forces over the stance phase were compared between each load condition. Axial L4-L5 and axial and anterior hip joint contact forces were greater during both backpack conditions compared to the unloaded condition. Joint contact forces were similar between backpack conditions. Future studies incorporating additional participants, walking conditions, and backpack load distributions are suggested for further model development and backpack design evaluation. • A backpack load sharing model facilitates evaluation of musculoskeletal injury. • 50% load transfer from torso to pelvis did not reduce lumbar joint contact forces. • Amount of carried load affects joint contact forces more than backpack design. • Pelvis/torso loading ratio has an important influence on joint contact forces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Musculoskeletal injuries of the lumbar spine occur frequently among military service members and are associated with heavy backpack loads. Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation facilitate biomechanical evaluation to compare different backpack designs. We developed a backpack attachment model that can be tuned to represent various load distributions between the torso and pelvis. We generated walking simulations to estimate muscle and joint contact forces of unloaded walking and while carrying 38 kg using shoulder-borne backpacks and hip belt-assisted backpacks for six U.S. Marines. Three-dimensional peak and average lumbar (L4-L5) and hip joint contact forces over the stance phase were compared between each load condition. Axial L4-L5 and axial and anterior hip joint contact forces were greater during both backpack conditions compared to the unloaded condition. Joint contact forces were similar between backpack conditions. Future studies incorporating additional participants, walking conditions, and backpack load distributions are suggested for further model development and backpack design evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hip muscle weakness is associated with low back and leg injuries. In addition, hiking with heavy loads is linked to high incidence of overuse injuries. Walking with heavy loads on slopes alters hip biomechanics compared to unloaded walking, but individual muscle mechanical work in these challenging conditions is unknown. Using movement simulations, we quantified hip muscle concentric and eccentric work during walking on 0° and ±10° slopes with, and without 40% bodyweight added loads, and with and without a hip belt. For gluteus maximus, psoas, iliacus, gluteus medius, and biceps femoris long head, both concentric and eccentric work were greatest during uphill walking. For rectus femoris and semimembranosus, concentric work was greatest during uphill and eccentric work was greatest during downhill walking. Loaded walking had greater concentric and eccentric work from rectus femoris, biceps femoris long head, and gluteus maximus. Psoas concentric work was greatest while carrying loads regardless of hip belt usage, but eccentric work was only greater than unloaded walking when using a hip belt. Loaded and uphill walking had high concentric work from gluteus maximus, and high eccentric work from gluteus medius and biceps femoris long head. Carrying heavy loads uphill may lead to excessive hip muscle fatigue and heightened injury risk. Effects of the greater eccentric work from hip flexors when wearing a hip belt on lumbar spine forces and pelvic stability should be investigated. Military and other occupational groups who carry heavy backpacks with hip belts should maintain eccentric strength of hip flexors and hamstrings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The independent effects of sloped walking or carrying a heavy backpack on posture and torso muscle activations have been reported. While the combined effects of sloped walking and backpack loads are known to be physically demanding, how back and abdominal muscles adapt to walking on slopes with heavy load is unclear. This study quantified three-dimensional pelvis and torso kinematics and muscle activity from longissimus, iliocostalis, rectus abdominis, and external oblique during walking on 0° and ± 10° degree slopes with and without backpack loads using two different backpack configurations (hip-belt assisted and shoulder-borne). Iliocostalis activity was greater during downhill and uphill compared to level walking, but longissimus was only greater during uphill. Rectus abdominis activity was greater during downhill and uphill compared to level, while external oblique activity decreased as slopes progressed from down to up. Longissimus, but not iliocostalis, activity was reduced during both backpack configurations compared to walking with no pack. Hip-belt assisted load carriage required less rectus abdominis activity compared to using shoulder-borne only backpacks; however, external oblique was not influenced by backpack condition. Our results revealed different responses between iliocostalis and longissimus, and between rectus abdominis and external obliques, suggesting different motor control strategies between anatomical planes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]