Search

Background: The clinical equivalence of plasma treated to reduce pathogen transmission and untreated plasma has not been extensively studied. A clinical trial was conducted in liver transplant recipients to compare the efficacy of three plasmas., Study Design and Methods: A randomized, equivalence, blinded trial was performed in four French liver transplantation centers. The three studied (fresh-frozen) plasmas were quarantine (Q-FFP), methylene blue (MB-FFP), and solvent/detergent (S/D-FFP) plasmas. The primary outcome was the volume of plasma transfused during transplantation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, hemostasis variables corrections, and adverse events., Results: One-hundred patients were randomly assigned in the MB-FFP, 96 in the S/D-FFP, and 97 in the Q-FFP groups, respectively. The median volumes of plasma transfused were 2254, 1905, and 1798 mL with MB-FFP, S/D-FFP, and Q-FFP, respectively. The three plasmas were not equivalent. MB-FFP was not equivalent to the two other plasmas, but S/D-FFP and Q-FFP were equivalent. The median numbers of transfused plasma units were 10, 10, and 8 units with MB-FFP, S/D-FFP, and Q-FFP, respectively. Adjustment on bleeding risk factors diminished the difference between groups: the excess plasma volume transfused with MB-FFP compared to Q-FFP was reduced from 24% to 14%. Blood loss and coagulation factors corrections were not significantly different between the three arms., Conclusion: Compared to both Q-FFP and S/D-FFP, use of MB-FFP was associated with a moderate increase in volume transfused, partly explained by a difference in unit volume and bleeding risk factors. Q-FFP was associated with fewer units transfused than either S/D-FFP or MB-FFP., (© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.)

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibodies and their follow-up in a series of 64 orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Indications for transplantation were cirrhosis in 28 cases, primary biliary cirrhosis in 6 cases, liver cancer in 11 cases, fulminant hepatitis in 2 cases, and alveolar echinococcosis in 17 cases. The prevalence of serum antibodies to hepatitis C virus was assessed by an ELISA test (Ortho-Diagnostic-Systems). Sera were tested before liver transplantation and every two months after. Twenty-nine patients seronegative before transplantation remained negative. Four patients seropositive before liver transplantation remained seropositive. Twenty-eight patients seropositive before transplantation, became seronegative after, and 3 patients seronegative before transplantation became seropositive after. The prevalence of seroconversion was 9.3 percent. The prevalence of seropositive patients after transplantation was 11 percent. The high number of seropositive patients before transplantation (50 percent) could be explained by false positive results. Seropositivity before transplantation appeared to be related to hypergammaglobulinemia (p less than 0.001). This hypothesis was confirmed a posteriori by a concomitant disappearance of both seropositivity and hypergammaglobulinemia after transplantation in 62 percent of patients.