Search

Background: Intermittent Pringle maneuver (PM) is widely performed to reduce blood loss during hepatectomy; however, its impact on clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of PM on PHLF and explore whether PM provides additional value for predicting PHLF. Methods: Consecutive patients, who underwent hepatectomy without biliary and/or vascular reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 in a single institution, were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome was PHLF grades B/C as defined by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model of variables significantly associated with PHLF was established. The model's predictive ability was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Among 597 patients, PHLF occurred in 42 (7.0%). PM was applied in 421 patients (70.5%) and was associated with the development of PHLF (PM vs. no-PM: 9.7 vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001). After the propensity score matching, patients with PM experienced significantly increased rates of PHLF (P = 0.010). Rem-ALPlat index (including future liver remnant, preoperative albumin level, and platelet count; P < 0.001), the number of PMs (P = 0.032), and blood loss (P = 0.007) were identified as significant predictors of PHLF. The model's AUROC combined with the intraoperative variables was higher than that of the preoperative model alone (0.877 vs. 0.789, P = 0.004). Conclusions: PM was involved in the occurrence of clinically relevant PHLF. Further, intraoperative factors including PM may provide additional value to predict PHLF and may facilitate early post-hepatectomy intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In laparoscopic anatomic liver resection, an increasingly common procedure, the hepatic vein-guided approach is widely used although the hepatic vein tributaries can be a major source of bleeding in the event of inadvertent injury. This report describes the anatomy of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) including its tributaries based on reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images and provides anatomic data to enable safe middle hepatic vein-guided liver resection. Methods: Following simulation modeling of the hepatic vasculatures, reconstructed MHV data was pooled from 35 healthy liver donors. Yields of the MHV tributaries were analyzed to enable MHV-guided liver resection. Results: A total of 252 tributaries were identified in the 35 donors. The MHV yielded fewer tributaries from its anterior and posterior aspects than from its right-side and left-side aspects (40 [15.9%], 13 [5.2%], 93 [36.9%], and 106 [42.1%], respectively). The MHV tributaries from the anterior and posterior aspects were smaller in diameter than those from the right-side and left-side aspects (median, 3.0, 2.0, 4.8, and 4.0 mm, respectively). Discussion: Our simulation revealed that MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect poses a lower risk of injury to the MHV tributaries compared to dissection from either lateral aspect. In addition, MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect allows for safer identification and isolation of the thick MHV tributaries originating from the lateral aspects. Ideally, the anterior or posterior aspect of the MHV should be accessed and exposed before the lateral aspects are dissected to minimize the risk of MHV tributary injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have suggested that laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, this issue remains controversial since the data may have been attributable to an imbalance in patients' background. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 290 hepatectomies for HCC undertaken between 2011 and 2019. Liver resection difficulty was based on the 3 levels of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification. Resection ratio was calculated using computed tomography volumetry. Patient characteristics were compared between the LLR and OLR groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to adjust the imbalance between the cohorts, and the incidence of postoperative complications was compared. Results: The difficulty and resection ratio were significantly lower in LLR (n = 112) than in OLR (n = 178) (difficulty grade I/II/III: 84/10/18 vs. 43/39/96, p < 0.001; resection ratio: 11.4 ± 12.7 vs. 22.7 ± 17.2%, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade III or more) was lower in LLR (2.7% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001), which was mainly attributable to fewer incidences of ascites and pleural effusion. PSM generated 68 well-matched patients in each group. The lower incidence of postoperative complications in LLR was also maintained in the PSM cohort (2.9% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.017). On multivariate analysis, LLR was the independent predictor of postoperative complications (OR 0.184, 95% CI 0.051–0.672, p = 0.010). Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach reduces the incidence of postoperative complications in liver resection for HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although decreased antithrombin-III (AT-III) is a risk factor for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis, the association between postoperative PVT and postoperative AT-III levels is unknown in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative PVT was assessed on CT at days 6–9 after hepatectomy. One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching was used to match the baseline characteristics. Results: Of the 295 patients included in this analysis, 19 patients (6.4%) were diagnosed with postoperative PVT. The AT-III level on postoperative day (POD) 3 predicted postoperative PVT with a sensitivity/specificity of 74%/59% (AUC, 0.644; cut-off value, 60%; p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis revealed that AT-III levels ≤ 60% on POD3 (OR, 3.01; 95% CI 1.02–8.89; p = 0.046), cirrhosis (OR, 5.88; 95% CI 1.92–18.0; p = 0.002) and right-sided hepatectomy (OR, 4.16; 95% CI 1.45–11.9; p = 0.0079) were significant risk factors for postoperative PVT. After PS matching, 56 patients with and without AT-III supplementation were analyzed. The two groups had a similar incidence of PVT (p = 0.489). Conclusions: Patients with AT-III levels ≤ 60% on POD3 should be carefully followed up regarding postoperative PVT. Our results did not support the efficacy of routine AT-III supplementation for the prophylaxis of postoperative PVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The bare area was reportedly formed by direct adhesion between the liver and diaphragm, meaning that the bare area lacked serosal components. This study aimed to analyze the structure of the bare area by an integrated study of surgical and laparoscopic images and pathological studies and describe surgical procedures focusing on the multilayered structure. Methods: Several surgical specimens of hepatectomy were analyzed histologically to evaluate the macroscopic structure of the bare area. Laparoscopic images and cadaver anatomy of the bare area were also examined. Results: The multilayered structure of the bare area comprised the liver, sub-serosal connective tissue, liver serosa, parietal peritoneum, retroperitoneal connective tissue, epimysium of the diaphragm, and diaphragm, in order from the liver to the diaphragm. The liver serosa and the parietal peritoneum fused with each other. This multilayered structure of the bare area is observed almost constantly. There are two layers in the dissection of the bare area in surgical procedures, an outer layer of the fused peritoneum (near the diaphragm) and an inner layer of the fused peritoneum (near the liver). Laparoscopic images enabled us to recognize the multilayered structure of the bare area. Conclusions: Histopathological findings showed the bare area to be a multilayered structure. In cases where tumors are located underneath the bare area, it could be important to dissect the bare area, with careful attention to its multilayered structure. Surgical dissection of the bare area in the outer layer of the fused peritoneum could allow a sufficient safety margin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preoperative simulation of liver resection to visualize the intraoperative cutting process, including liver deformation, may help surgeons to more accurately implement hepatectomy. We developed a novel simulation software called Resection Process Map (RPM). The present study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of RPM as a tool for preoperative simulation and surgical education for liver surgery.Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients who underwent anatomical hepatic resection at our institute from February 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled in this study. The time needed to prepare RPM for each patient was recorded. The imaging similarity between the image provided by RPM and the intraoperative photograph was evaluated with the Dice similarity coefficient and locational displacement of the vessels of interest. The surgeons completed questionnaires. The educational effect was assessed by a survey administered to medical students who attended clinical clerkship at our department from October 2017 to December 2018.Results: The time required to prepare the dataset for RPM was 199 ± 20 s after completion of operative planning in SYNAPSE VINCENT. The Dice similarity coefficient for surface similarity was 0.85 ± 0.06, where 1.00 indicates perfect concordance. The mean positional displacement of the vessels of interest was 8.7 ± 6.7 mm. Medical students' application of RPM significantly improved their survey score (use vs. non-use of RPM, 6.5 vs, 4.6, respectively; p < 0.001).Conclusion: RPM allows for preoperative simulation of hepatectomy and might be helpful for many surgeons. RPM is also useful for education of medical students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prediction of early mortality after hepatectomies for hepatocellular carcinoma is essential to identify high‐risk patients and to decrease the operative mortality rate. Several post‐operative clinical risk scores were developed recently to predict mortality post‐hepatectomy; however, which one is the best remains undefined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the different post‐operative clinical risk scores in predicting early mortality after hepatectomies. Methods: A total of 240 patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma at our hospital between June 2011 and July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Post‐operative clinical risk scores including 50–50 criteria, peak bilirubin >7 mg/dL, model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD), risk assessment for early mortality and Hyder scores were evaluated for their performance in predicting early mortality after hepatic resection using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The 90‐day mortality rate after hepatic resection was around 2.5%. The 50–50 criteria and peak bilirubin >7 mg/dL were weak predictors of early mortality with low sensitivity (area under the ROC curve: 0.65, 0.66, respectively), whereas, Hyder, risk assessment for early mortality, and post‐operative MELD were good predictors of early mortality (area under the ROC curve: 0.89, 0.91 and 0.88, respectively). Moreover, MELD score on post‐operative day 3 was an independent risk factor for 90‐day mortality with an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.81, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Post‐operative clinical risk scores, especially MELD, were capable of predicting early mortality after liver resection and should be used to identify high‐risk patients and provide them with more intensive medical care. Prediction of early mortality after hepatectomies for hepatocellular carcinoma is essential to identify high‐risk patients and to decrease the operative mortality rate. Several post‐operative clinical risk scores were developed recently to predict mortality post‐hepatectomy, however, which one is the best remains undefined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the different post‐operative clinical risk scores in predicting early mortality after hepatectomies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Surgery for Child–Pugh B liver function is considered risky because of its high morbidity rate and the acceptable indication criteria for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for Child–Pugh B patients have not been identified. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the optimal introduction of LLR for Child–Pugh B patients based on our single‐institute experience. Methods: A total of 17 Child–Pugh B patients underwent LLR between 2005 and 2017. Their clinical outcomes were compared to those of LLR for Child–Pugh A patients (103 cases), conventional open liver resection for Child–Pugh B patients (19 cases), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for Child–Pugh B patients (20 cases) during the same period. Results: LLR for Child–Pugh B patients had a significantly higher conversion rate than LLR for Child–Pugh A patients (Child–Pugh A vs B: 3.9% vs 35.3%, P < 0.01). However, patients who successfully underwent laparoscopic resection (11 cases) had fewer postoperative ascites and shorter postoperative hospital stays compared to patients who underwent conventional open liver resection. In comparison to the RFA group, the LLR group more frequently had lesions in the left lateral segment (LLR vs RFA: 50.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.02) and exophytic tumor (21.4% vs 0%, P = 0.02) than did the RFA group. Also, compared to the RFA group, the LLR group had a lower local recurrence rate (0% vs 15%, P = 0.25) and a longer recurrence‐free survival (P = 0.049), but the overall survival was similar between the two groups. Conclusions: In the treatment of Child–Pugh B liver malignancy, the minimal invasiveness of LLR was revealed. Our results suggest that lesions in the left lateral segment and exophytic tumors are good indications for LLR for Child–Pugh B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is safe, feasible and associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative complications in the working age patients with malignant liver tumors. However, it is still unclear if the elderly patients with malignant liver tumors would also benefit from that approach as the younger patients. So, the aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for malignant liver tumors in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: Between March 2009 and July 2016, all elderly patients (≥70 years old) who underwent laparoscopic (n = 40) and open (n = 202) liver resection for malignant liver tumors were included. A one to one propensity score matching analysis was performed, based on 6 covariates, to decrease the selection bias. Results: There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic and open liver resection groups regarding the patient characteristics and tumor features. The operative time was comparable between both groups (Laparoscopic group 259 min vs Open group 308 min, p =.86), while patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection had lower intraoperative blood loss (30 ml vs 517 ml, p <.0001), shorter hospital stays (10 days vs 23 days, p <.0001), and less overall morbidity (15% vs 38%, p =.04). The one-, three-, and five-year survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was comparable between both groups (Laparoscopic group 96%, 74%, 47%, vs Open group 94%, 71%, 48%, p =.82), whereas The one-, three-, and five-year recurrence-free survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (88%, 60%, 60% vs 54%, 25%, 19%, p =.019). Conclusions: Laparoscopic approach for minor liver resection in elderly patients is safe and feasible with less blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, less postoperative complications and a better oncological outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: THUNDERBEAT (TB) is a novel device that uses both ultrasonic and advanced bipolar energies for hemostasis. Several recent human studies have proved the safety and efficacy of TB in different surgical procedures, but there have been no similar studies about its efficacy in hepatic parenchymal transection. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the TB device in laparoscopic liver resection. Methods: This retrospective study compared TB and ultrasonic Harmonic devices in 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection from 2010 to 2016 in our institution. To reduce the selection bias, the two groups were matched in a 1‐to‐2 ratio on the basis of propensity scores. Results: There were no differences in the preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups. The extent of liver resection was comparable between the groups. Although the Harmonic group's intraoperative blood loss and operative time were less than that of the TB group, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.08, P = 0.32, respectively). Postoperative complications, mortality within 90 days, and hospital stay were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: TB is as safe and effective for parenchymal transection in laparoscopic hepatectomy as ultrasonic devices, but it is not a superior alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We have reported preoperative low skeletal muscularity as an independent risk factor for poor outcomes after liver transplantation, resection of hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer and extrahepatic biliary malignancies. However, the impacts of visceral adiposity and muscularity on outcomes after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) have not been fully investigated.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients undergoing primary liver resection for CLM between 2005 and 2014. Using preoperative computed tomography at the third lumbar vertebra level, skeletal muscle and abdominal adipose tissue were evaluated by skeletal muscle index (SMI), intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR), respectively. Impacts of preoperative SMI, IMAC and VSR on outcomes after liver resection for CLM were investigated.Results: Low SMI and high VSR were not significantly associated with poor overall or recurrence-free survivals (P = 0.324 and P = 0.106, P = 0.964 and P = 0.738, respectively). Overall survival rate tended to be lower in patients with high IMAC than in patients with normal IMAC (P = 0.054). Recurrence-free survival rate did not differ significantly between high and normal IMAC (P = 0.721). Multivariate analysis showed that low SMI, high IMAC and high VSR were not significant risk factors for death or recurrence after liver resection for CLM.Conclusion: Neither preoperative visceral adiposity nor low muscularity were poor prognostic factors in patients undergoing liver resection for CLM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Prophylactic abdominal drainage is performed routinely after liver resection in many centers. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and validity of liver resection without abdominal drainage and to clarify whether routine abdominal drainage after liver resection is necessary. Methods: Patients who underwent elective liver resection without bilio-enteric anastomosis between July, 2006 and June, 2012 were divided into two groups, based on whether surgery was performed before or after, we adopted the no-drain strategy. The 'former group' comprised 256 patients operated on between July, 2006 and June, 2009 and the 'latter group' comprised 218 patients operated between July, 2009 and June, 2012. We compared the postoperative complications, percutaneous drainage, and postoperative hospital stay between the groups, retrospectively. Results: There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative bleeding, intraabdominal infection, or bile leakage between the groups. Drain insertion after liver resection did not reduce the rate of percutaneous drainage. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the latter group. Conclusion: Routine abdominal drainage is unnecessary after liver resection without bilio-enteric anastomosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been widely performed throughout the world. Although prospective registry studies to clarify the safety of LLR have been feasible, no prior multicenter prospective study has addressed this issue. We have conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to reveal the current status of LLR in Japan. Methods From April 2015 to March 2016, candidates for LLR were preoperatively enrolled at 12 institutions. The primary end-point was surgical safety, which was evaluated based on surgical factors and on short-term and midterm outcomes. Results A total of 102 patients were enrolled. Planned laparoscopic procedures included 96 pure laparoscopies, 1 hand-assisted laparoscopy, and 5 hybrid techniques. Non-anatomical partial resection or left lateral sectionectomy were performed in almost all cases. The median duration of surgery was 221 min. The median blood loss was 80.5 mL. Conversion was required for four patients (3.9%). The 90-day postoperative morbidities with grades more severe than II in the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed in six patients (5.9%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 9.5 days. No cases involved reoperation or mortality. Conclusion Minor resection of LLR has been performed safely. To ensure the safe dissemination of LLR, including for major resection, a larger multicenter prospective study is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with tumor thrombus in the major portal vein has been extremely poor. We investigated the outcome of hepatic resection in HCC with major portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 52 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC with tumor thrombi in the first branch or trunk of the portal vein. Factors related to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: The median DFS and OS times were 8.9 and 27.6 months for the whole cohort, respectively. Multiple tumors (hazard ratio 2.12; 95% CI 1.11-4.33; p = 0.023), positive surgical margins (hazard ratio 2.45; 95% CI 1.19-4.81; p = 0.016), and non-adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC; hazard ratio 2.07; 95% CI 1.11-3.90; p = 0.023) were independent risk factors for DFS. Non-adjuvant HAIC (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% CI 1.01-3.37; p = 0.047) was an independent risk factor for OS. Conclusions: Macroscopically curative resection seems to be of benefit to HCC patients with PVTT, even with tumor thrombi in the first branch or trunk of the portal vein. Adjuvant postoperative HAIC might improve DFS and OS in such patients. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Letter to the editor: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case controlled study with propensity score matching. Tahir, Perin, and Balasubramanian for their comments on our recent publication titled "Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Controlled Study with Propensity Score Matching" [[1]]. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Obesity has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes than those for normal weight. Data on the short-term results of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in patients with obesity are scarce. Furthermore, the long-term outcomes of LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) have not been adequately assessed. The aims of this study were to analyze the outcomes of obese patients undergoing LLR and to compare these to the outcomes of obese patients undergoing OLR. Methods: Data regarding the short-term results from 13 obese patients who underwent laparoscopic non-anatomical liver resection were retrospectively compared with the data from 69 obese patients who underwent open non-anatomical liver resection between 2002 and 2012. The long-term results of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were also compared. Results: A total of 82 patients who underwent non-anatomical liver resection in our institution were included. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative patient characteristics. The intraoperative blood loss in the laparoscopic group was significantly less than that in the open group. There were no significant differences in the postoperative complications or postoperative mortality. The postoperative hospital stay of the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that of the open group. Conclusions: LLR in obese patients results in decreased intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stays compared with OLR. When performed in selected patients, LLR may be a safe and feasible option for obese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatectomy often developed an intrahepatic recurrence, even though it was a curative one. The relationship between surgery-induced liver damage and the recurrence of HCC has not been described. This study evaluated whether posthepatectomy liver failure, as defined by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery, affected the recurrence of HCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 488 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2012 at Kyoto University Hospital. Early posthepatectomy liver failure (EPLF) was defined as liver failure occurring between postoperative days 5 and 10. The patients were divided into an EPLF group and a non-EPLF group. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between these groups. The influences of host-related, surgery-related, and tumor-related factors on patient outcomes were evaluated using multivariate analyses. Results: The EPLF group and the non-EPLF group contained 153 and 335 patients, respectively. The probability of DFS was significantly increased in the non-EPLF group (median: 574 days) compared to the EPLF group (median: 348 days) (hazard ratio, HR [95 % confidence interval, CI] 1.61 [1.29-2.00]). The multivariate analysis revealed that EPLF was an independent factor for DFS (HR [95 % CI] 1.43 [1.13-1.81]), besides the factors previously described, including fibrosis (1.32 [1.05-1.67]), stage (1.85 [1.34-2.51]), tumor differentiation (1.46 [1.11-1.89]), and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (1.39 [1.10-1.74]). Conclusions: EPLF was associated with postoperative HCC recurrence. The prevention of EPLF might improve the prognosis of patients with HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) satisfying the Milan criteria (single tumor ≤5 cm or 2 or 3 tumors ≤3 cm), orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is an effective treatment. Nevertheless, it remains controversial whether OLT is the best treatment strategy for patients with resectable HCC. Methods: This study included 293 HCC patients (both with and without cirrhosis) oncologically satisfying the Milan criteria who underwent primary and curative liver resection between 1990 and 2003. Results: There were 127 noncirrhotic, 129 Child-Pugh A cirrhotic, and 37 Child-Pugh B cirrhotic patients. Five-year survival rates in each population were 81%, 54%, and 28%, respectively. Coexisting cirrhosis, Child-Pugh classification, α-fetoprotein value, tumor burden, and vascular invasion by the tumor were identified as significant prognostic factors. Among these factors, coexisting cirrhosis was the most crucial variable by multivariate analysis. During the initial 3 postoperative years, yearly tumor recurrence rate was 22% in cirrhotic patients and 15% in noncirrhotic patients. In cirrhotic patients, the recurrence rate did not decrease even after three years of tumor-free survival post-resection, whereas in noncirrhotic patients the recurrence rate decreased to 9%. Cirrhosis was associated with a higher probability of recurrence exceeding the Milan criteria. Conclusions: Hepatic resection offers an acceptable survival result for HCC patients fulfilling the Milan criteria. Coexisting cirrhosis is associated with higher mortality and recurrence rate, possibly due to multicentric carcinogenesis which limits the efficacy of hepatic resection. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the current evidence in the context of clinical prediction model for post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). A systematic search of the English literature for a period from December 2005 to September 2020 was conducted. Primary outcome was defined using the three common PHLF criteria (50-50 criteria, peak bilirubin>7 mg/dl criteria, and ≥ grade B PHLF criteria by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery). Studies that reported the value of area under receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC) for the occurrence of PHLF were included. Twenty eight of 1327 screened articles were eligible for inclusion. Eighteen studies developed the prediction models. The median AUC was found to be 0.79 (0.65–0.933). The parameters related to the amount of future liver remnant volume were most commonly identified as significant predictors for PHLF in statistical analysis (24 studies) and were most frequently incorporated in the prediction models (18 studies). The parameters associated with portal hypertension were significant for predicting PHLF in 16 studies and were adopted in the prediction models in 14 studies. Parameters related to future liver remnant volume and portal hypertension seem to be facilitating in predicting PHLF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This paper introduces a new design and application for direct volume manipulation for visualizing the intraoperative liver resection process. So far, interactive volume deformation and resection have been independently handled due to the difficulty of representing elastic behavior of volumetric objects. Our framework models global shape editing and discontinuous local deformation by merging proxy geometry encoding and displacement mapping. A local-frame-based elastic model is presented to allow stable editing of the liver shape including bending and twisting while preserving the volume. Several tests using clinical CT data have confirmed the developed software and interface can represent the intraoperative state of liver and produce local views of reference vascular structures, which provides a “road map of vessels” that are key features when approaching occluded tumors during surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Assessing portal vein (PV) hemodynamics is an essential part of liver disease management/liver surgery, yet the optimal methods of assessing intrahepatic PV flow have not yet been established. This study investigated the usefulness of 7-Tesla MRI with hemodynamic analysis for detecting small flow changes within narrow intrahepatic PV branches. Flow data in the main PV was obtained by two methods, two-dimensional cine phase contrast-MRI (2D cine PC-MRI) and three-dimensional non-cine phase contrast-MRI (3D PC-MRI). Hemodynamic parameters, such as flow volume rate, flow velocity, and wall shear stress in intrahepatic PV branches were calculated before and after a meal challenge using 3D PC-MRI and hemodynamic analysis. The hemodynamic parameters obtained using 3D PC-MRI and 2D cine PC-MRI were similar. All intrahepatic PV branches were clearly depicted in eight planes, and significant changes in flow volume rate were seen in three planes. Average and maximum velocities, cross-sectional area, and wall shear stress were similar between before and after a meal challenge in all planes. 7-Tesla 3D PC-MRI combined with hemodynamic analysis is a promising tool for assessing intrahepatic PV flow and enables future studies in small animals to investigate PV hemodynamics associated with liver disease/postoperative liver recovery. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) play central roles to treat early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, ≤3 cm, 1–3 nodules, and no macrovascular involvement), although data are lacking regarding whether LLR or RFA is preferable. This study aimed to compare outcomes of both treatments for small HCCs. Treatment outcomes of small HCCs were compared between all the minor LLRs performed between 2005 and 2016 and RFAs performed between 2011 and 2016 at Kyoto University. A total of 85 and 136 patients underwent LLR and RFA, respectively. Patients that underwent LLR had higher incidence of blood transfusions, complications, and longer hospital stay. Overall and disease-specific survival rates were similar between LLR and RFA; however, recurrence-free (49.2% vs. 22.1% at 3-year) and local recurrence-free survival rates (94.9% vs. 63.6% at 3-year) were higher after LLR. Multivariate analyses identified that multiple nodules and 65-year-old and above are predictors of disease-specific survival, and that RFA is a predictor of recurrence and local recurrence. RFA is less invasive, although both LLR and RFA are safe and effective. LLR provides better local control with superior recurrence-free and local-recurrence free survival. These results help optimize treatment selection based on patient-specific factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]