8 results on '"Benzoni E"'
Search Results
2. Superiority of transplantation versus resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Author
-
Baccarani U, Isola M, Adani GL, Benzoni E, Avellini C, Lorenzin D, Bresadola F, Uzzau A, Risaliti A, Beltrami AP, Soldano F, De Anna D, and Bresadola V
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular mortality, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms mortality, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Survival Analysis, Survivors, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery, Liver Neoplasms surgery, Liver Transplantation mortality, Liver Transplantation statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
The best therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still debated. Hepatic resection (HR) is the treatment of choice for single HCC in Child A patients, whereas liver transplantation (LT) is usually reserved for Child B and C patients with single or multiple nodules. The aim of this study was to compare HR and LT for HCC within the Milan criteria on an intention-to-treat basis. Forty-eight patients were treated by LT and 38 by HR. The median time on the waiting list for transplantation was 118 days. The estimated overall survival was significantly higher (P = 0.005) in the LT group than in the HR one. The estimated freedom from recurrence was also significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for LT patients than for HR ones. Indeed, the probability of HCC recurrence after resection was higher than after transplantation achieving 31% and 76% for HR and 2% and 2% for LT at 3 and 5 years after surgery. Multivariate analysis confirmed that transplantation was superior to resection in terms of patient's survival and risk of HCC recurrence. We conclude that LT is superior to HR for small HCC in cirrhotic patients assuming that LT should be performed within 6-10 months after listing to reduce the dropouts for reasons of tumor progression.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Surgery in hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases.
- Author
-
Favero A, Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Rossit L, Bresadola F, De Anna D, and Uzzau A
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Liver Neoplasms secondary, Liver Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Extrahepatic disease (EHD) has been considered a contraindication to hepatectomy. Over the last few years, some series reported interesting 5-year survival rates after resection with hepatic colorectal metastases and EHD free margins. Between August 1989 and October 2005, 116 patients underwent liver resection for colorectal metastases at Surgical Department of the University of Udine, Italy. Among these, we reviewed the data of 5 patients affected by EHD. In 3 patients there were also an anastomotic recurrence of the primary tumor, in 3 patients diaphragm was infiltrated by contiguous liver metastases. We performed in all the patients minor liver resections. We have associated the radiofrequence ablation of a lesion not surgically resectable with liver resection in one case. The surgical procedure was always considered as curative. We observed no case of operative mortality. The mean survival of the entire cohort is 23.2 months (range 4-42 months). Our study, even if based upon a limited number of patients, supports the thesis that extrahepatic disease in patients affected by colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases should not be considered as an absolute contraindication to liver resection especially for the cases in with local radical cure exeresis is achievable.
- Published
- 2007
4. Superiority of transplantation versus resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Author
-
Baccarani U, Benzoni E, Adani GL, Avellini C, Lorenzin D, Sainz-Barriga M, Bresadola V, Uzzau A, Risaliti A, Beltrami CA, and Bresadola F
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Hepatitis B complications, Hepatitis B surgery, Hepatitis C complications, Hepatitis C surgery, Humans, Liver Transplantation mortality, Male, Middle Aged, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Survival Analysis, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery, Liver Neoplasms surgery, Liver Transplantation statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
The best therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still debated. Hepatic resection (HR) is the treatment of choice for single HCC in Child A patients, whereas liver transplantation (OLT) is usually reserved for Child B and C patients with multiple nodules. The aim of this study was to compare HR and OLT for HCC within the Milan criteria on an intention-to-treat basis. Forty-eight patients were treated by OLT and 38 by HR. Three- and 5-year patient survival rates were significantly higher (P = .0057) in the OLT group (79% and 74%) than after HR (61% and 26%). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rate was better (P = .0005) for OLT (74% and 74%) versus HR (41% and 11%). The probability of HCC recurrences after resection was greater (P = .0002) than after transplantation, achieving 31% and 76% for HR and 2% and 2% for OLT at 3 and 5 years after surgery. The median waiting list time was 118 days; two patients dropped out for HCC progression. We concluded that OLT is superior to HR for small HCC in cirrhotic patients assuming that OLT can be performed within 6 to 10 months after listing to reduce dropouts due to tumor progression.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with improved prognosis. The role of clinical, pathological and surgical related factors.
- Author
-
Benzoni E, Lorenzin D, Favero A, Adani G, Baccarani U, Molaro R, Zompicchiatti A, Saccomano E, Avellini C, Bresadola F, and Uzzau A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antigens, Neoplasm analysis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular blood, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular complications, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular diagnostic imaging, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular mortality, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Liver Cirrhosis complications, Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic complications, Liver Failure mortality, Liver Neoplasms blood, Liver Neoplasms complications, Liver Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Liver Neoplasms mortality, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications mortality, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Ultrasonography, Interventional, alpha-Fetoproteins analysis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery, Hepatectomy methods, Liver Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Aims and Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (Hcc) is the third most common cause of cancer death. The aim of this study is to examine the factors associated with improved prognosis in Hcc after liver resection., Patients and Methods: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections. All patients enrolled in the study were followed-up three times during the first year after resection and twice the next years., Results: In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, temporary liver impairment function, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Overall survival resulted to be influenced by etiology (P = 0.03), underlying liver disease, in particular Child A vs BC (P = 0.04), Endmondson-Steiner grading (P = 0.01), the absence of a capsule (P = 0.004), the presence of more than one lesion (P = 0.02), lesion's size over 5 cm (P = 0.04), Pringle maneuver length over than 20 minutes (P = 0.03), an amount of resected liver volume lesser than 50% of total liver volume (P = 0.03), and the relapse of Hcc (P= 0.01)., Conclusions: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma should be both the most radical to obtain the best outcome and to reduce the recurrence's rate, and the most suitable according to the patient's condition, lesion's characteristics and underlying liver disease: because of the large number of factors affecting the outcome of Hcc, unfortunately, we are still far from an agreement upon a group of criteria useful to select the best candidates for liver resection.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Liver resective surgery: a multivariate analysis of postoperative outcome and complication.
- Author
-
Benzoni E, Cojutti A, Lorenzin D, Adani GL, Baccarani U, Favero A, Zompicchiati A, Bresadola F, and Uzzau A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery, Female, Hemoperitoneum epidemiology, Humans, Liver physiopathology, Liver Function Tests, Liver Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Liver Neoplasms physiopathology, Liver Neoplasms secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Hepatectomy adverse effects, Hepatectomy methods, Liver Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Introduction: Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complications after surgical resection could be high. In this study, we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the ground of data derived from a single center surgical population., Materials and Methods: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc and 153 consecutive patients with liver metastasis (derived from either colorectal cancer or noncolorectal cancer) at our department. We performed 22 major hepatectomy, 20 left hepatectomy, 14 trisegmentectomy, 77 bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy, 74 segmentectomy, and 80 wedge resection., Results: In-hospital mortality rate was 4.5%, about 7% in Hcc cases and 2.6% in liver metastasis. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites (10%), temporary impairment liver function (19%), biliary fistula (6%), hepatic abscess (25%), hemoperitoneum (10%), and pleural effusion (30%) sometimes combined each other. Some variables, associated with the technical aspects of surgical procedure, are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length of more than 20 minutes (p=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure [major hepatectomy (p=0.02), left hepatectomy (p=0.04), trisegmentectomy (p=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (p=0.04)]; and the request of an amount of blood transfusion of more than 600 cc (p=0.04). Also, both liver dysfunction, in particular Child A vs B and C (p=0.01), and histopathological grading (p=0.01) are associated with a high rate of postsurgical complication in Hcc cases., Conclusion: We make the following recommendations: every liver resection should be planned after intraoperative ultrasonography, anatomical surgical procedure should be preferred instead of wedge resection, and modern devices should be used, like Argon Beam and Ligasure dissector, to reduce the incidence of both intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and biliary leakage.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Liver resection for HCC: analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications.
- Author
-
Benzoni E, Molaro R, Cedolini C, Favero A, Cojutti A, Lorenzin D, Intini S, Adani GL, Baccarani U, Bresadola F, and Uzzacu A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Blood Loss, Surgical statistics & numerical data, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular mortality, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular physiopathology, Female, Hepatectomy methods, Humans, Liver Neoplasms mortality, Liver Neoplasms physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery, Hepatectomy adverse effects, Liver Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background/aims: Hepatic resection is widely accepted as the best treatment for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in those patients affected by cirrhosis after a sharp selection. Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complication after surgical resection could be high. Herein we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors on the grounds of data derived from a single center surgical population., Methodology: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for HCC on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections., Results: In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, hepatic insufficiency, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Intraoperative mortality resulted to be influenced by the amount of resected liver volume (p < 0.05), and the rising of complication (p = 0.006). Some technical aspects of surgical procedure are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length (p = 0.02), the amount of resected liver volume (p = 0.03) and the request of blood transfusion (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Complications that arise during the postoperative period, although treatable, delay patient's recovery and resumption of liver function; the evaluation of causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity during the planning of surgical treatment should play the same role as other factors weighted in the selection of patients eligible for liver resection.
- Published
- 2007
8. Resective surgery for liver tumor: a multivariate analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications.
- Author
-
Benzoni E, Lorenzin D, Baccarani U, Adani GL, Favero A, Cojutti A, Bresadola F, and Uzzau A
- Subjects
- Abscess etiology, Adult, Aged, Biliary Tract pathology, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Female, Hemoperitoneum etiology, Humans, Liver physiology, Liver surgery, Liver Neoplasms secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Pleural Effusion etiology, Postoperative Complications mortality, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery, Liver Neoplasms surgery, Postoperative Complications etiology
- Abstract
Background: In spite of accurate selection of patients eligible for resection, and although advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have greatly contributed to reducing the rate of perioperative deaths, stress must be placed on reducing the postoperative complication rates reported to be still as high as 50%. This study was designed to analyze the causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the grounds of data derived from a single-center surgical population., Methods: From September 1989 to March 2005, 287 consecutive patients, affected either with HCC or liver metastasis, had liver resection at our department. Among the HCC series we recorded 98 patients (73.2%) in Child-Pugh class A, 32 (23.8%) in class B and 4 in class C (3%). In 104 colorectal metastases, 71% were due to colon cancer, 25% rectal, 3% sigmoid, and 1% anorectal. In 49 non-colorectal metastases, 22.4% were derived from breast cancer, 63.2% gastrointestinal tumors (excluding colon) and 14.4% other cancers. We performed 80 wedge resections, 77 bisegmentectomies and/or left lobectomies, 74 segmentectomies, 22 major hepatectomies, 20 left hepatectomies, and 14 trisegmentectomies., Results: The in-hospital mortality rate in this series was 4.5%, and the morbidity rate was 47.7%, because of pleural effusion (30%), hepatic abscess (25%), hepatic insufficiency (19%), ascites (10%), hemoperitoneum (10%), or biliary fistula (6%). The variables associated with the technical aspects of the surgical procedure that were responsible for the complications were: a Pringle maneuver length more than 20 minutes (P=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure, including major hepatectomy (P=0.02), left hepatectomy (P=0.04), trisegmentectomy (P=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (P=0.04); and a blood transfusion of more than 600 ml (P=0.04)., Conclusion: The evaluation of causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity during the planning of surgical treatment should play the same role as other factors weighed in the selection of patients eligible for liver resection.
- Published
- 2006
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.