Search

The induction of tyrosine aminotransferase by a variety of steroids was studied in cells from a hepatoma tissue culture (HTC). We have defined a class of steroids that induce TAT synthesis to a higher level than optimal inducers described earlier; these are called supra-inducers. When TAT induction is compared with the binding of the steroids to the cytoplasmic receptor or to their binding in the whole cell, a good correlation between binding in vivo of the hormone and its induction capacity can be established, whereas such a correlation was not systematically observed in vitro. A very short exposure of HTC cells to either dexamethasone or corticosterone is sufficient to induce TAT. When the inducer is removed from the culture medium a few minutes after its administration, the intracellular hormone concentration decreases very rapidly but TAT will be synthesized at its maximal rate. Thus the hormones behave as a starting signal for the optimal synthesis of the enzyme, and their presence in the culture medium is not necessary throughout the entire induction period.

Hepatoma tissue culture cells, grown in the presence of D-galactosamine and 6-azauridine, demonstrate a strong reduction of the intracellular UTP pool that can be replenished by formation of UTP from uridine and FUTP from 5-fluorouridine within 2 h. Concomitantly with the UTP deficiency, a decrease of dexamethasone-induced tyrosine aminotransferase activity occurs. 5-Fluorouridine, as compared to uridine, is even more efficient in restoring the activity of tyrosine aminotransferase. Treatment of the cells with D-galactosamine alone results in a minor lowering of UTP that is not followed by the inhibition of the enzyme induction. However, the administration of D-galactosamine, simultaneously or at any time up to 5 h before or after dexamethasone, leads to a 1.5- to 2-fold higher induction (superinduction) which appears 24 h later.

Sodium butyrate in a 5 mM concentration prevents the induction of tyrosine aminotransferase in hepatoma culture cells, without affecting the basal level of the enzyme. This effect is reversible immediately after the removal of butyrate, or after a lag, if butyrate was present for more than 2 h. Neither the amount of cellular RNA nor the rate of total RNA synthesis were affected by sodium butyrate. Furthermore, butyrate does not inhibit protein synthesis: [35S]methionine incorporation into proteins, measured in a reticulocyte lysate system, shows no significant difference between the translation capacity of the RNAs from butyrate-treated cells and from dexamethasone-induced or uninduced cells. Nevertheless, when tyrosine aminotransferase was isolated from the translation products by its specific antiserum and analyzed by gel electrophoresis, we observed that the amount of the enzyme synthetized in the presence of RNAs from dexamethasone/butyrate-treated cells was strongly diminished relative to that synthesized in the presence of RNA from dexamethasone-induced cells. These experiments indicate that the treatment of the cells with butyrate decreases the activity of the specific messenger RNA for tyrosine aminotransferase to a level close to the basal level.

The effects of several antagonists of glucocorticoid action on a line of hepatoma cells (HTC strain) have been studied in order to determine their mechanisms of action. The induction of tyrosine aminotransferase by dexamethasone can be partially or totally inhibited if an antagonist is added simultaneously with dexamethasone or some time later. Antagonists, even if they have as much affinity for the cytoplasmic receptor as dexamethasone, must be administered at a 100-fold excess as compared to dexamethasone. Their receptor binding kinetics are not identical to those of inducer steroids: moreover there is no correlation between relative binding affinities and anti-inducing capacities. A short contact between the cells and the antagonist is sufficient to obtain a full antagonistic effect, but the antagonist is inactive if administered and removed from the cells before induction. An interpretation if suggested, considering these results which do not find a satisfactory explanation in the classical theory of receptor action.