Search

Background: Hepatic steatosis is common in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The effect of steatosis on anti-HCV therapy efficacy is unclear. Methods: We studied host and viral factors associated with steatosis and the effect of steatosis on treatment efficacy using the database of a large prospective trial in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3. Results: Out of 885 patients assessed for steatosis, a total of 614 patients or 69% had steatosis. Patients with genotype 3 were more likely to have steatosis than those with genotype 2 (79 vs. 59%, P<0.001). Using the logistic regression model, steatosis was associated with genotype 3 ( P<0.0001), older age ( P=0.0025), heavier weight ( P<0.0001), higher HCV RNA ( P<0.0001), and higher ALT levels ( P=0.015). By univariate analysis, steatosis was associated with lower sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with genotype 3, but not in patients with genotype 2. When all factors associated with steatosis and SVR were evaluated by logistic regression analysis; genotype, age, bodyweight, histological diagnosis, ALT quotient, baseline HCV RNA and treatment duration were associated with the probability of SVR, but gender, race and steatosis were not. Further analysis showed that steatosis remained a non-significant factor while baseline viral load was significantly associated with the probability of an SVR. Conclusions: Steatosis did not influence the efficacy of treatment in our study population. Baseline viral load is a confounding factor, particularly in patients infected with genotype 3 and once baseline viral load was accounted for, the association between steatosis and SVR was not relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: The natural history of chronic hepatitis C and treatment response are different between blacks and Caucasians, but little comparable data is available about Latinos. METHODS: A cross-sectional secondary analysis to investigate differences between 421 anti-HCV-positive, treatment-naïve, HCV-viremic Latinos and 2,510 Caucasians in 24 VA medical centers enrolled in a prospective study. RESULTS: Latinos were infected at a younger age and were less likely to have blood contact during combat, surgery, and needle stick injury, but were more frequently HIV coinfected (20.4% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001) and prior HAV infection (39.9% vs 26.4%, p= 0.0001). Latinos were more likely to be treatment candidates, but less likely to actually initiate treatment. Liver histology (123 Latinos, 743 Caucasians) showed no difference in fibrosis or fibrosis rate, but steatosis (54.7% vs 43.2%, p= 0.038) was more common in Latinos. Eighty-eight Latinos and 481 Caucasians were subsequently treated with interferon-ribavirin: body mass index (BMI), duration of infection, baseline tests, liver histology and genotype distribution were similar. Compared with Caucasians, Latinos discontinued treatment prematurely more often (39.8% vs 28.9%, p= 0.043) and tended to have lower sustained virological response (SVR) rates (14.8% vs 22.5%, p= 0.10). Multivariate analysis found Latino race and history of recent alcohol use to be associated with early treatment discontinuation, whereas genotype and viral load but not ethnicity to be associated with SVR. CONCLUSIONS: Latinos were infected younger, more frequently HIV coinfected, more likely to meet criteria for antiviral therapy yet less likely to initiate treatment and had a trend toward lower SVR rates than Caucasians, but not in severity of liver disease. Latino ethnicity was associated with early discontinuation but not as an independent predictor of SVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Many veterans may not be candidates for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment due to contraindications to therapy. The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of HCV-infected veterans who were eligible for interferon alfa and ribavirin therapy and to evaluate barriers to HCV treatment. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 4,084 veterans who were referred for HCV treatment over a 1-yr period at 24 Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. Treatment candidacy was assessed using standardized criteria and the opinion of the treating clinician. RESULTS: Overall, 32.2% (95% CI, 30.8–33.7%) were candidates for HCV treatment according to standardized criteria, whereas 40.7% (95% CI, 39.2–42.3%) were candidates in the opinion of the treating clinician. Multivariable analysis identified ongoing substance abuse (OR = 17.68; 95% CI, 12.24–25.53), comorbid medical disease (OR = 9.62; 95% CI, 6.85–13.50), psychiatric disease (OR = 9.45; 95% CI, 6.70–13.32), and advanced liver disease (OR = 8.43; 95% CI, 4.42–16.06) as the strongest predictors of not being a treatment candidate. Among patients who were considered treatment candidates, 76.2% (95% CI, 74.0–78.3%) agreed to be treated and multivariable analysis showed that persons ≥50 yr of age (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07–1.76) and those with >50 lifetime sexual partners (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08–1.93) were more likely to decline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of veteran patients are not suitable candidates for HCV treatment because of substance abuse, psychiatric disease, and comorbid medical disease, and many who are candidates decline therapy. Multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to overcome barriers to HCV therapy in this population. (Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1–8) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]