Search

Non-selective beta-blockers are the mainstay of medical therapy for portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5-inhibitors) reduce portal pressure in the acute setting by > 10% which may suggest a long-term beneficial effect. Currently, there is no available data on long-term treatment of portal hypertension with PDE-5-inhibitors. This case of a patient with liver cirrhosis secondary to autoimmune liver disease with episodes of bleeding from esophageal varices is the first documented case in which a treatment with a PDE-5-inhibitor for eight years was monitored. In the acute setting, the PDE-5-inhibitor Vardenafil lowered portal pressure by 13%. The portal blood flow increased by 28% based on Doppler sonography and by 16% using MRI technique. As maintenance medication the PDE-5-inhibitor Tadalafil was used for eight consecutive years with comparable effects on portal pressure and portal blood flow. There were no recurrence of bleeding and no formation of new varices. Influencing the NO-pathway by the use of PDE-5 inhibitors may have long-term beneficial effects in compensated cirrhosis., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the authors declared a conflict of interest.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of spleen volume, blood flow, and an index incorporating multiple measures to predict cirrhosis-associated hypersplenism., Materials and Methods: A total of 39 patients (14 women and 25 men; mean [± SD] age, 52 ± 10 years) with cirrhosis and sequelae of portal hypertension underwent 4D flow MRI and anatomic 3-T MRI performed before and after contrast administration. Unenhanced 4D flow MRI was used to assess abdominal hemodynamics, and splenic volumes were measured on T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo MRI. Relationships among demographic characteristics, blood component counts, splenic volume, arterial flow, venous flow, and the percentage of shunted portal flow were assessed in 29 consecutive patients (i.e., the derivation group), to develop a splenic flow index. This index was assessed along with splenic volume and blood flow alone in 10 additional consecutive patients (i.e., the validation group) via ROC curve analysis, to identify platelet counts of less than 50 × 10 3 cells/μL, leukocyte counts of less than 3.0 × 10 3 cells/μL, or both., Results: In the derivation cohort (platelet count, 129 ± 76 × 10 3 cells/μL), splenic volume, arterial flow, venous flow, and the percentage of shunted portal flow were inversely correlated with platelet counts (ρ = -0.68, -0.68, -0.56, and -0.36, respectively; p < 0.05). Adding splenic volume to arterial flow and the product of venous flow and the percentage of shunted portal flow indexed to the body surface area yielded superior correlations with platelet counts, leukocyte counts, and the degree of severity of hypersplenism (ρ = -0.75, -0.48, and -0.75, respectively; p ≤ 0.001) and predicted severe hypersplenism (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%) in the validation cohort (platelet count, 93 ± 71 × 10 3 cells/μL)., Conclusion: A splenic flow index that incorporates both splenic volume and blood flow is a better indicator of hypersplenism than is splenic volume alone.

Since its introduction in the 1970's, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a standard imaging modality. With its broad and standardized application, it is firmly established in the clinical routine and an essential element in cardiovascular and abdominal imaging. In addition to sonography and computer tomography, MRI is a valuable tool for diagnosing cardiovascular and abdominal diseases, for determining disease severity, and for assessing therapeutic success. MRI techniques have improved over the last few decades, revealing not just morphologic information, but functional information about perfusion, diffusion and hemodynamics as well. Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI, a time-resolved phase contrast-MRI with three-dimensional (3D) anatomic coverage and velocity encoding along all three flow directions has been used to comprehensively assess complex cardiovascular hemodynamics in multiple regions of the body. The technique enables visualization of 3D blood flow patterns and retrospective quantification of blood flow parameters in a region of interest. Over the last few years, 4D flow MRI has been increasingly performed in the abdominal region. By applying different acceleration techniques, taking 4D flow MRI measurements has dropped to a reasonable scanning time of 8 to 12 min. These new developments have encouraged a growing number of patient studies in the literature validating the technique's potential for enhanced evaluation of blood flow parameters within the liver's complex vascular system. The purpose of this review article is to broaden our understanding of 4D flow MRI for the assessment of liver hemodynamics by providing insights into acquisition, data analysis, visualization and quantification. Furthermore, in this article we highlight its development, focussing on the clinical application of the technique.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of time-resolved flow-sensitive four-dimensional (4D) MRI for the visualization and quantification of splanchnic arterial and portal venous hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis and in controls., Materials and Methods: We applied flow-sensitive 4D MRI to evaluate arterial and portal venous three-dimensional blood flow in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (n=5) and in healthy controls (n=10) using 3T MRI (spatial resolution=1.7×2.1×2.4 mm, temporal resolution=62.4 ms). The qualitative flow was analyzed using three-dimensional streamlines and time-resolved particle traces. Retrospective flow was quantified in nine predefined anatomic regions evaluating maximum and mean velocities, the flow volume, the vessel lumen area, pulsatility indices, and resistance indices. Doppler ultrasound (US) was our reference standard., Results: Flow-sensitive 4D MRI visualized liver hemodynamics successfully in 91% of patients and 96% of volunteers with limitations for the patients' extrahepatic vessels (one case of splenic and superior mesenteric veins each) and intrahepatic portal vein branches (in five vessels). Healthy control individuals revealed reduced velocities and larger vessel areas in MRI than in Doppler US. We found no significant differences in the flow volume, pulsatility indices, and resistance indices on comparing MRI with US. Regional flow quantification within the splanchnic system of healthy volunteers and liver cirrhosis patients revealed an increase in the inflow (up to 65%), but a decrease in the patients' outflow (up to 37%)., Conclusion: Flow-sensitive 4D MRI is feasible for profound evaluation of arterial and portal venous hemodynamics in liver cirrhosis patients, providing additional information on the pathophysiology of the altered splanchnic system.

Purpose: To compare time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with three-directional velocity encoding (flow-sensitive four-dimensional [4D] MR imaging), with Doppler ultrasonography (US) as standard of reference, for investigating alterations in 3D portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with healthy age-matched control subjects and healthy young volunteers., Material & Methods: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics was assessed, employing flow-sensitive 4D MR imaging with a 3-T MR system (spatial resolution, approximately 2 mm(3); temporal resolution, approximately 45 msec) in 20 patients with hepatic cirrhosis, 20 healthy age-matched control subjects, and 21 healthy young volunteers. Flow characteristics were analyzed by using 3D streamlines and time-resolved particle traces. Quantitative analyses were performed by retrospectively evaluating regional peak and mean velocities, flow volume, and vessel area. Doppler US was used as standard of reference. Independent-sample t tests or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were applied for comparing each subject group. Paired-sample t tests or Wilcoxon tests were applied when comparing MR imaging and US., Results: Three-dimensional visualization of portal venous hemodynamics was successful, with complete visualization of the vessels in 18 patients and 35 volunteers, with limitations in the left intrahepatic branches (87%, reader A; 89%, reader B). A moderate but significant correlation was observed between 4D MR imaging and Doppler US in nearly all maximum and mean velocities, flow volumes, and vessel areas (r = 0.24-0.64, P = .001-.044). With MR imaging, significant underestimation was observed of intrahepatic flow velocities and flow volumes, except vessel area, which Doppler US represented as even lower (P < .001 to P = .045). Six patients had collateralization with reopened umbilical vein, while one had flow reversal in the superior mesenteric vein visible at MR imaging only., Conclusion: Flow-sensitive 4D MR imaging may constitute a promising, alternative technique to Doppler US for evaluating hemodynamics in the portal venous system of patients with liver cirrhosis and may be a means of assessing pathologic changes in flow characteristics., (© RSNA, 2012.)

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of time-resolved flow-sensitive MRI for the three-dimensional (3D) visualization and quantification of normal and pathological portal venous (PV) hemodynamics., Materials and Methods: Portal venous hemodynamics were evaluated in 18 healthy volunteers and 5 patients with liver cirrhosis. ECG- and adaptive respiratory navigator gated flow-sensitive 4D MRI (time-resolved 3D MRI with three-directional velocity encoding) was performed on a 3 Tesla MR system (TRIO, Siemens, Germany). Qualitative flow analysis was achieved using 3D streamlines and time-resolved particle traces originating from seven emitter planes precisely placed at anatomical landmarks in the PV system. Quantitative analysis included retrospective extraction of regional peak and mean velocities and vessel area. Results were compared with standard 2D flow-sensitive MRI and to the reference standard Doppler ultrasound., Results: Qualitative flow analysis was successfully used in the entire PV system. Venous hemodynamics in all major branches in 17 of 18 volunteers and 3 of 5 patients were reliably depicted with good interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.62). Quantitative analysis revealed no significant differences and moderate agreement for peak velocities between 3D MR and 2D MRI (r = 0.46) and Doppler ultrasound (US) (r = 0.35) and for mean velocities between 3D and 2D MRI (r = 0.41). The PV area was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in 3D and 2D MRI compared with US., Conclusion: We successfully applied 3D MR velocity mapping in the PV system, providing a detailed qualitative and quantitative analysis of normal and pathological hemodynamics., (2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)