1. Between-Visit Reproducibility of Shear Wave Viscoelastography in Volunteers and Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
- Author
-
Yazdani L, Selladurai S, Rafati I, Bhatt M, Montagnon E, Chayer B, Olivié D, Giard JM, Sebastiani G, Nguyen BN, Cloutier G, and Tang A
- Subjects
- Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Male, Prospective Studies, Adult, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Aged, Young Adult, Elastic Modulus, Elasticity Imaging Techniques methods, Fatty Liver diagnostic imaging, Fatty Liver complications, Liver diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objective: To assess the reproducibility of six ultrasound (US)-determined shear wave (SW) viscoelastography parameters for assessment of mechanical properties of the liver in volunteers and patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)., Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, institutional review board-approved study included 10 volunteers and 20 patients with MASLD or MASH who underwent liver US elastography twice, at least 2 weeks apart. SW speed (SWS), Young's modulus (E), shear modulus (G), SW attenuation (SWA), SW dispersion (SWD), and viscosity were computed from radiofrequency data recorded on a research US scanner. Linear mixed models were used to consider the sonographer on duty as a confounder. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), and Bland-Altman analyses., Results: The sonographer performing the exam had no impact on viscoelastic parameters (P > .05). ICCs of SWS, E, G, SWA, SWD, and viscosity were, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.79-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); CVs were 11.9, 23.3, 24.2, 10.1, 29.0, and 32.2%; RDCs were 33.0, 64.5, 66.9, 27.7, 80.3, and 89.2%, and Bland-Altman mean biases and 95% limits of agreement were -0.05 (-0.45, 0.35) m/s, -0.61 (-5.33, 4.10) kPa, -0.25 (-2.06, 1.56) kPa, -0.01 (-0.27, 0.26) Np/m/Hz, -0.09 (-7.09, 6.91) m/s/kHz, and -0.33 (-2.60, 1.94) Pa/s, between the two visits., Conclusion: US-determined viscoelastography parameters can be measured with high reproducibility and consistency between two visits 2 weeks apart on the same ultrasound machine., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF