Search

Objective: To investigate the effect of four different techniques used in the treatment of ureteral stones on patients' daily physical functioning (PF) and quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS)-with or without Double-J stenting (DJS)-and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) were divided into four groups: Group I: SWL ( n  = 29), Group II: URS ( n  = 43), Group III: URS +4.8F DJS ( n  = 39), Group IV: URS +6F DJS ( n  = 42), and Group V: Control ( n  = 30). Short Form-36 (SF-36) was administered to each participant both preoperatively and 14 days after operation. Based on the SF-36 results, the changes in patients' PF and QoL were evaluated. Results: Ureteral stone treatment was performed in 202 patients. Of these, 153 patients who underwent an effective SWL or URS procedure in the first attempt were included in the study. Success rates in the first session were 53.7% (29/54) and 83.8% (124/148) for SWL and URS, respectively ( p  < 0.001). All the four groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, stone size, preoperative PF, and QoL. However, although postoperative PF, role limitations due to physical health, and energy/fatigue scores were similar in Group I, III, and IV, they were significantly higher in Group II. No major complication associated with SWL or URS occurred in any patient. However, in Group 2, DJS was inserted in three (7.7%) patients in the early postoperative period (within the first 48 hours) due to renal colic attacks secondary to ureterovesical junction mucosal edema. Conclusion: URS without DJS seems to be the most advantageous technique in the treatment of ureteral stones in terms of daily PF and QoL. However, it should be noted that patients undergoing URS may require postoperative emergency stenting, although rarely.

Purpose: ESWL and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are the primary treatment modalities for kidney stones. Furthermore, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is first line treatment when ESWL fails. We assessed how previous ESWL affects the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy., Materials and Methods: A total of 1,008 patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between 2002 and 2007, of whom 230 (22.8%) had a recent history of failed ESWL. Patient characteristics, operative findings, success and complication rates in patients with and without a history of ESWL were analyzed and compared., Results: In the post-ESWL group mean stone size was significantly lower and the mean +/- SD interval between the last ESWL session and percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 3.4 +/- 2.1 months (range 1 to 12). Mean operative time and fluoroscopic screening time were similar in the 2 groups (p >0.05). However, mean operative time per cm(2) stone and fluoroscopic screening time per cm(2) stone were significantly prolonged in the post-ESWL group (p <0.05). At a mean followup of 5.6 +/- 1.2 months (range 3 to 6) an overall success rate of 89% was achieved. Success and complication rates were comparable in the 2 groups., Conclusions: Although similar success and complication rates were achieved with percutaneous nephrolithotomy after failed ESWL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is usually more difficult with prolonged operative time and fluoroscopic screening time per cm(2) stone due to the tissue effects of ESWL and scattered stone fragments in the pelvicaliceal system.

Aim: Improvements in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy have almost eradicated the need for open surgery in ureteral stones. The aim of this study was to assess characteristics of patients who underwent open ureterolithotomy., Methods: During a 5-year period, a total of 654 patients with ureteral stones were treated. Initial management consisted of ureteroscopy in 524 patients, ESWL in 62 patients and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in 12 patients. Open surgery was performed in 56 patients. Stone location, size and success rates were retrospectively analyzed., Results: Ureteroscopy resulted in successful stone removal in 94%, 98% and 98.5% of proximal, mid and distal ureteral stones, respectively. A total of 14 patients with ureteroscopy failure were referred for open surgery. ESWL treatment resulted in success in 55 patients (88%), and those with ESWL failure were referred for either ureteroscopy (n = 3) or open surgery (n = 4). Open surgery was performed in a total of 56 patients, 38 of whom had been referred from other centers. Stone location was proximal ureter in 25 (44.6%) patients (stone size: 2-12 cm(2)), mid ureter in five (8.9%) patients (stone size: 2-6 cm(2)) and distal ureter in 26 (46.4%) patients (stone size: 4-9 cm(2)). A history of previous unsuccessful endourological procedure was observed in 33 (58%) of 56 patients. Children under age 16 (range 1-15 years) comprised 17.8% of patients undergoing open surgery., Conclusion: Open surgery, which is nowadays being replaced with laparoscopic techniques, is generally indicated for failed endourological procedures (58%), particularly in centers that do not have flexible ureteroscopy or laser lithotriptor, and in patients with larger stones (>3 cm). Children (17.8%) are also candidates for open surgery, if specifically designed endourological equipment is not available.

Objectives: Management of ureteral stones in children represents a challenging problem. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed our experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in 192 children with ureteric stones., Methods: Between 1990 and 2003, 192 children (