Search

Abstract: Recent technological advances enable us to collect huge amounts of data from multiple sources. Jointly analyzing such multi-relational data from different sources, i.e., data fusion (also called multi-block, multi-view or multi-set data analysis), often enhances knowledge discovery. For instance, in metabolomics, biological fluids are measured using a variety of analytical techniques such as Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Data measured using different analytical methods may be complementary and their fusion may help in the identification of chemicals related to certain diseases. Data fusion has proved useful in many fields including social network analysis, collaborative filtering, neuroscience and bioinformatics. In this paper, unlike many studies demonstrating the success of data fusion, we explore the limitations as well as the advantages of data fusion. We formulate data fusion as a coupled matrix and tensor factorization (CMTF) problem, which jointly factorizes multiple data sets in the form of higher-order tensors and matrices by extracting a common latent structure from the shared mode. Using numerical experiments on simulated and real data sets, we assess the performance of coupled analysis compared to the analysis of a single data set in terms of missing data estimation and demonstrate cases where coupled analysis outperforms analysis of a single data set and vice versa. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In metabolomics studies, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) provides comprehensive information on biological samples. However, extraction of few relevant metabolites from this large and complex data is cumbersome. To resolve this issue, we have employed sparse principal component analysis (SPCA) to capture the underlying patterns and select relevant metabolites from LC-MS plasma profiles. The study involves a small pilot cohort with 270 subjects where each subject's time since last meal (TSLM) has been recorded prior to plasma sampling. Our results have demonstrated that both PCA and SPCA can capture the TSLM patterns. Nevertheless, SPCA provides more easily interpretable loadings in terms of selection of relevant metabolites, which are identified as amino acids and lyso-lipids. This study demonstrates the utility of SPCA as a pattern recognition and variable selection tool in metabolomics. Furthermore, amino acids and lyso-lipids are determined as dominating compounds in response to TSLM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]