Search

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to provide a novel schematized and comprehensive classification of causes and severity grading system for lumbosacral stenosis., Materials and Methods: The MRI system proposed consisted of a severity grading scale for central and lateral (recess and foramen) stenosis, together with a schematized indication of the main causes of the disease (disc, arthritis, epidural lipomatosis, and their combinations). The system was applied to a cohort of patients from a single Institution in the last 2-years. Two radiologists evaluated all the MRIs to determine intra- and inter-observer reliability according to Cohen Kappa (K c , for non-ordered categorical variables) and weighted Kappa (K w , for ordered variables). Two orthopaedic surgeons clinically evaluated all patients and provided a schematic grading system with a central and lateral stenosis clinical score (CS-CS and LS-CS). Associations between ordinals were tested with chi-square test and measured with the Goodman and Kruskal's gamma index (Gi, with 95% confidence interval [95% CI]). Lastly, the most used previous MRI systems were applied, and their performances were compared to the new system proposed., Results: One hundred and twelve patients were included (55 females-mean age 63.3 ± 10.7 years). An almost perfect intra-observer agreement for the assessment of central stenosis, foramen stenosis, and lateral recess stenosis was found (K w  = 0.929, 0.928, and 0.924, respectively). The inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for central stenosis and foramen stenosis and substantial for lateral recess stenosis (K w  = 0.863, 0.834, and 0.633, respectively). Whatever the aetiologies involved in central and lateral stenosis, the intra-observer agreement was perfect (all K c  = 1), whereas the inter-observer agreements were almost perfect for arthritis (K c  = 0.838) and lipomatosis (K c  = 0.955) and substantial for disc (K c  = 0.691) regarding central stenosis. The inter-observer agreement for the causes of lateral stenosis was lower and variable, ranging from perfect (lipomatosis) to fair (disc, K c  = 0.224). The grading system revealed a strong association with CS-CS for both readers, with GI = 0.671 (95% CI 0.535-0.807) and 0.603 (95% CI = 0.457-0.749), respectively. The association with MRI grading and LS-CS was moderate for foraminal stenosis and for the concomitant presence of foraminal and lateral recess stenosis, with Gi = 0.337 (95% CI 0.121-0.554) and Gi = 0.299 (95% CI 0.098-0.500), respectively. A weak association was found between lateral recess grading alone and LS-CS with Gi = 0.102 (95% CI 0.193-0.397). The new grading systems showed higher Gi for associations with clinical symptoms, compared with previous ones, both for CS-CS and LS-CS., Conclusions: A standardized visual grading system for lumbar spinal stenosis that takes into account all of the major contributing factors-including disc, arthritis, and lipomatosis, for the central canal, lateral recess, and neural foramina could be a useful and practical tool for defining the stenosis, lowering inter-observer variability, and directing the various treatment options., (© 2023. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the rate with which radiologists reported spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) when interpreting lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination., Materials and Methods: A total of 450 lumbosacral MRI examinations obtained in 450 patients were included (199 men, 251 women; mean age, 56.7 ± 13.5 [SD] years; age range: 18-91 years).  Three senior radiologists assessed and classified independently SEL on MRI according to the Borré grading system (Grade 1 to Grade 3). Depiction of SEL on MRI reports (i. e., reporting rate) and association with patients' symptoms were verified., Results: SEL was found in 75/450 patients (prevalence = 16.7%), and classified as grade-1 (mild) in 49/75 (65.3%) patients, grade-2 (moderate) in 24/75 (32%), and grade-3 (severe) in 2/75 (2.7%). SEL was diagnosed on MRI report in 6/75 (8%) patients. SEL prevalence based on MRI reports was 1.3% (6/450), significantly lower than its actual prevalence based on MRI examinations (P < 0.0001). The reporting rate was 0% in grade-1 (0/19), 10.2% in grade-2 (5/49) and 50.0% in grade-3 (1/2), and variable on the radiologist subspecialty (10.0% among musculoskeletal radiologists, 11.1% among neuroradiologists, and 3.7% among generalists). SEL was considered as the only cause of symptoms in 7/75 patients (9.3%) and a concurrent cause in 9/75 (12%)., Conclusion: SEL reporting rate is extremely low, leading to an important underestimation of disease prevalence. SEL diagnosis and grading should be refined to improve reports quality and subsequently patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or personal relationships that could be viewed as influencing the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Spinal epidural lipomatosis is defined by an excessive amount of epidural fat in the spinal canal, usually in the lumbosacral tract: a well-known cause of lumbar pain and spinal stenosis with a possible wide range of neurological symptoms. Recent research data reveal that, nowadays, obesity has become the main cause of spinal epidural lipomatosis. Moreover, this condition was recently recognized as a previously unknown manifestation of metabolic syndrome. Radiological studies (CT and MRI) are the only tools that are able to diagnose the disease non-invasively. Indeed, radiologists play a key role in disease recognition, with subsequent possible implications on patients' systemic health assessments. Despite its clinical importance, the condition is still underreported and neglected. The current literature review summarizes all the main etiologies of spinal epidural lipomatosis, particularly regarding its linkage with metabolic syndrome. An overview of disease characteristics from diagnosis to treatment strategies is also provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]