Search

Biomechanical testing protocols for ligaments can be extensive and span two or more days. During this time, a specimen may have to undergo more than one cycle of freezing and thawing. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of refreezing on the viscoelastic and tensile properties of ligaments. The femur-medial collateral ligament-tibia complexes (FMTC) from six pairs of rabbit knees were used for this study. Following sacrifice, one leg in each pair was assigned to the fresh group and the FMTC was immediately dissected and prepared for testing. The contralateral knees were fresh-frozen at -20 degrees C for 3 weeks, thawed, dissected and then refrozen for one additional week before being tested as the refrozen group. The cross-sectional area and shape of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) was measured using a laser micrometer system. Stress relaxation and cyclic stress-relaxation tests in uniaxial tension were performed followed by a load to failure test. When the viscoelastic behavior of the MCL was described by the quasi-linear viscoelastic (QLV) theory, no statistically significant differences could be detected for the five constants (A, B, C, tau1, and tau2) between the fresh and refrozen groups (p > or = 0.07) based on our sample size. In addition, the structural properties of the FMTCs and the mechanical properties of the MCLs were also found to be similar between the two groups (p > or = 0.68). These results suggest that careful refreezing of the specimens had little or no effect on the biomechanical properties measured.

Traumatic knee injuries frequently involve the disruption of multiple ligaments, such as a complete tear of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) together with a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) (Miyasaka, K., D. M. Daniel, M. L. Stone, and P. Hirshman. Am. J. Knee Surg. 4:3-8, 1991). Despite the high incidence, clinical management of this type of injury is still debated. Laboratory studies have shown that the ACL and MCL share the responsibility of stabilizing the knee, especially in response to valgus and other rotatory torques as well as anterior tibial loads (Inoue, M., E. McGurk-Burleson, J. M. Hollis, and S. L-Y. Woo. Am. J. Sports Med. 15:15-21, 1987; Kanamori, A., M. Sakane, J. Zeminski, T. W. Rudy, and S. L-Y. Woo. J. Ortho. Sci. 5:567-571, 2000; Ma, C. B., C. D. Papageogiou, R. E. Debski, and S. L. Woo. Acta Orthop. Scand. 71:387-393, 2000; Sakane, M., G. A. Livesay, R. J. Fox, T. W. Rudy, T. J. Runco, and S. L-Y. Woo. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 7:93-97, 1999). When one structure is deficient, the force in the other increases significantly to compensate. The injured ACL does not heal and requires surgical replacement by tissue grafts. On the other hand, after an isolated MCL tear or in a combined MCL and ACL injury, the MCL can heal spontaneously without surgical intervention and can function well in most cases. Nevertheless, the biomechanical and biochemical properties as well as the histomorphological appearance of the healing MCL are substantially different to those of normal tissue (Bray, R. C., D. J. Butterwick, M. R. Daschak, and J. V. Tyberg. J. Orthop. Res. 14:618-625, 1996; Loitz-Ramage, B. J., C. B. Frank, and N. G. Shrive. Clin. Orthop.:272-280, 1997; Weiss, J. A., S. L-Y. Woo, K. J. Ohland, S. Horibe, and P. O. Newton. J. Orthop. Res. 9:516-528, 1991). In an effort to improve the outcome of injuries to these and other ligaments, therapeutic strategies associated with improving biomechanical, biochemical, and histomorphological properties of ligaments have been investigated in recent years. These therapeutic strategies include growth factor stimulation (Conti, N. A., and L. E. Dahners. Presented at Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA; Deie, M., T. Marui, C. R. Allen, K. A. Hildebrand, H. I. Georgescu, et al. Mech. Ageing Dev. 97:121-130, 1997), cell therapy (Menetrey, J., C. Kasemkijwattana, C. S. Day, P. Bosch, F. H. Fu, et al. Tissue Eng. 5:435-442, 1999; Watanabe, N., S. L-Y. Woo, C. Papageorgiou, C. Celechovsky, and S. Takai. Microsc. Res. Tech. 58:39-44, 2002), as well as gene stherapy (Nakamura N., D. A. Hart, R. S. Boorman, Y. Kaneda, N. G. Shrive, et al. J. Orthop. Res. 18:517-523, 2000; Shimomura, T., F. Jia, C. Niyibizi, and S. L-Y. Woo. Connect. Tissue Res.:2003). The knowledge gained by studying these therapeutic strategies could potentially be applied to other ligaments and tendons. In this article, antisense gene therapy to alter gene expression by using antisense oligonucleotides will be examined as a possible solution.

Purpose: For severe forearm injuries such as an Essex-Lopresti fracture-dislocation, functional reconstruction necessitates repair of the interosseous ligament (IOL) to restore normal load sharing between the radius and ulna. Locating or tensioning such a reconstruction improperly can lead to abnormal load sharing and/or restriction of forearm rotation. The normal IOL strains should indicate the proper location of reconstruction grafts and the proper forearm rotation for tensioning the grafts. The objective of this study was to quantify the passive strain distribution of the IOL of the forearm with passive rotation of the forearm throughout the range of motion., Methods: The 3-dimensional motions of the radius with respect to the ulna were measured throughout forearm rotation in 10 cadaveric forearms by using an instrumented spatial linkage. From the bone motions and ligament insertion site geometry from dissection and computed tomographic scanning, insertion site motions were determined and used to calculate changes in ligament fiber lengths., Results: The measured strain distribution in the IOL was nonuniform and varied with forearm rotation. The overall magnitude of IOL strain was found to be greatest in supination and smallest in pronation. In supination the strains varied across fibers with strains being greatest in the distal fibers and lowest in the proximal fibers. Strains in neutral rotation were uniform across fibers. Although fibers were generally slack in pronation proximal fibers were less slack than distal fibers., Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that fiber strains in the IOL vary from proximal to distal and depend on forearm rotation. Our data suggest that to prevent restriction of forearm rotation all grafts should be tensioned in supination, where measured strains were generally highest. Our data also suggest that a 2-bundle IOL reconstruction may be necessary for proper load transfer between the radius and ulna in both supination and pronation.