Search

CA extern Lifestyle interventions can have a positive impact on quality of life and psychological parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). In this randomized controlled trial, 145 participants with MetS (62.8% women; 59.7 +/- 9.3 years) were randomized to (1) 5-day fasting followed by 10 weeks of lifestyle modification (F + LM; modified DASH diet, exercise, mindfulness; n = 73) or (2) 10 weeks of lifestyle modification only (LM; n = 72). Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 1, 12, and 24, and included quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, SF-36), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, CPSS), mood (Profile of Mood States, POMS), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE), mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS), and self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale, SCS). At week 1, POMS depression and fatigue scores were significantly lower in F + LM compared to LM. At week 12, most self-report outcomes improved in both groups-only POMS vigor was significantly higher in F + LM than in LM. Most of the beneficial effects within the groups persisted at week 24. Fasting can induce mood-modulating effects in the short term. LM induced several positive effects on quality of life and psychological parameters in patients with MetS.

Background: Lifestyle interventions, such as fasting, diet, and exercise, are increasingly used as a treatment option for patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). This study assesses the efficacy and safety of fasting followed by lifestyle modification in patients with MS compared to lifestyle modification only. Methods: Single-blind, multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial in two German tertiary referral hospitals in metropolitan areas. Interventions: (a) 5-day fasting followed by 10 weeks of lifestyle modification (modified DASH diet, exercise, mindfulness; n = 73); (b) 10 weeks of lifestyle modification only (n = 72). Main outcomes and measures: Co-primary outcomes were ambulatory systolic blood pressure and the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index at week 12. Further outcomes included anthropometric, laboratory parameters, and the PROCAM score at weeks 1, 12, and 24. Results: A total of 145 patients with metabolic syndrome (62.8% women; 59.7 +/- 9.3 years) were included. No significant group differences occurred for the co-primary outcomes at week 12. However, compared to lifestyle modification only, fasting significantly reduced HOMA index (Delta = -0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.7, -0.1), diastolic blood pressure (Delta = -4.8; 95% CI = -5.5, -4.1), BMI (Delta = -1.7; 95% CI = -2.0, -1.4), weight (Delta = -1.7; 95% CI = -2.0, -1.4), waist circumference (Delta = -2.6; 95% CI = -5.0, -0.2), glucose (Delta = -10.3; 95% CI = -19.0, -1.6), insulin (Delta = -2.9; 95% CI = -5.3, -0.4), HbA1c (Delta = -0.2; 95% CI = -0.4, -0.05;), triglycerides (Delta = -48.9; 95% CI = -81.0, -16.9), IL-6 (Delta = -1.2; 95% CI = -2.5, -0.005), and the 10-year risk of acute coronary events (Delta = -4.9; 95% CI = -9.5, -0.4) after week 1. Fasting increased uric acid levels (Delta = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.1, 1.9) and slightly reduced eGRF (Delta = -11.9; 95% CI = -21.8, -2.0). Group differences at week 24 were found for weight (Delta = -2, 7; 95% CI = -4.8, -0.5), BMI (Delta = -1.0; 95% CI = -1.8, -0.3), glucose (Delta = -7.7; 95% CI = -13.5, -1.8), HDL (Delta = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.5, 8.8), and CRP (Delta = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.4). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: A beneficial effect at week 24 was found on weight; fasting also induced various positive short-term effects in patients with MS. Fasting can thus be considered a treatment for initializing lifestyle modification for this patient group; however, it remains to be investigated whether and how the multilayered effects of fasting can be maintained in the medium and longer term. CA extern